Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 9, 2025
Accepted
September 23, 2025
Published
September 24, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 62 Download : 60

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the standards and provisions of fuqaha and muhaddisun in the use of daif hadith as a legal basis, as well as its application in the fatwa of the DSN-MUI with a focus on the sulh hadith and its implementation in the fatwa on Musyarakah Sharia Current Account Financing. This study highlights the lack of clear criteria and transparency in the use of daif hadith in the DSN-MUI fatwa which impacts the credibility and legal force of the fatwa . The purpose of the study is to describe the standards for the use of daif hadith according to the views of hadith and fiqh scholars, while also evaluating its application in the practice of DSN-MUI fatwas. The method used is normative legal research with textual and content analysis, including takhrij sanad and matan hadith as well as comparison with other valid evidence and established fiqh rules. The results of the study indicate differences of opinion between fuqaha and muhaddisun regarding the criteria and use of daif hadith as evidence. In the DSN-MUI fatwa , the frequently used hadith sulh has a weak sanad due to problematic narrators, but the text remains relevant and in accordance with sharia principles that encourage peaceful dispute resolution. In the fatwa on Sharia Musyarakah Current Account Financing, the implementation of the hadith sulh and other hadiths , some of which are weak, indicates the need for increased methodological accuracy and transparency in the inclusion of hadith status to maintain the credibility and accountability of fatwas , especially in facing the dynamic needs of contemporary sharia.

Keywords

DSN-MUI Fatwa Weak Hadith Sulh Hadith Islamic Jurisprudence Scholars Hadith Scholars

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Khodijah Nur Tsalis, Abdul Mujib, Yusril Bariki, Abdul Illah Tohir

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Tsalis, K. N., Mujib, A., Bariki, Y., & Tohir, A. I. (2025). Perspektif Ulama Hadis Dan Fikih Terhadap Hadis Dhaif: Analisis Hadis Dhaif Dalam Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 32(3), 530–555. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss3.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abduroman, Dede. “Legitimasi Akad Mudharabah Dan Musyarakah Dalam Al-Quran Dan Hadits.” Ecopreneur: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam 2, no. 2 (2021): 248–62.

  2. Ad-Daruquthni. Sunan Ad-Daruquthni. Beirut: Muassasah ar Risalah, 2003.

  3. Adam, Faisal, Husni Ahmadi, and Tajul Arifin. “Penolakan Parsial Kritikus Terhadap Rawi Shaduq: Telaah Kritis Atas Ar-Rabi Bin Anas.” Universium: Jurnal Keislaman Dan Keindonesiaan 2, no. 4 (2024): 431–46.

  4. Adz-Dzahabi. Tadzkiroh AL Huffadz. Beirut: Dar Al Kutub Al Ilmiyah, 1998.

  5. Afandi, Rizki Restu, and Aziz Arifin. “Metodologi Al-Jarh Wa Ta’dil: Sejarah Dan Signifikansinya Di Era Kontemporer.” Al-Mu’tabar 4, no. 2 (2024): 59–74.

  6. Al-Bukhori. Shohih Al Bukhori. Damaskus: Dar Ibnu Kastir, 2002.

  7. Al-Haitami. Fath Al-Mubin. Jeddah: Dar al Minhaj, 2020.

  8. Al-Khudair, ‘Abd al-Kariim. Al-Hadis Al-Dhaif Wa Hukm Al-Ihtijaj Bihi. Riyadh: Maktabah Dar Minhaj, 2020.

  9. Al-Mizzi. Tahdzib Al Kamal Fi Asma’ Al Rijal. Beirut: Muassasah Ar Risalah, 2000.

  10. Al-Qayyim, Ibn. I’lam Al-Muwaqqi’in ’An Rabb Al-’Alamiin. Beirut: Dar Al Kutub Al Ilmiyah, 2020.

  11. Al-Syaukany. Nailul Authar. Kairo: Idarah Muniriyah, 1988.

  12. Al-Tirmidzi. Sunan Al Tirmidzi. Kairo: Dar Al Ta’shil, 2016.

  13. Aliyah, Alfiina Rohmatil. “Peran Fatwa DSN MUI Terhadap Operasional Dan Aktivitas Bisnis Pada Lembaga Keuangan Syari’ah (LKS)).” Irsyaduna: Jurnal Studi Kemahasiswaaan 3, no. 2 (2023): 189–204.

  14. Alwi Shobri, and Pais Ainul Yaqin. “Ulama Hadis Dan Orientalis: Analisis Historis Tentang Asal Usul Hadis.” Al-Hasyimi - Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 1, no. 1 (2024): 31–44.

  15. Alwi, Zulfahmi, Rahman, Zikri Darussamin, Darusman, and Ali Akbar. “Yusuf Al-Qardhawi’s Methodological Reformulation of Hadith Thought and Its Influence on the Development of Hadith Science: An Analysis in the Book of Kaifa Nata’amal Ma’a Al-Sunnah Al-Nabawiyyah.” International Journal of Islamic Thought and Humanities 2, no. 1 (2023): 88–106.

  16. Anas, Mohamad. “Al-Hakim Al-Naisabury Dan Al-Mustadrak ‘Ala Al-Sahihain.” KACA (Karunia Cahaya Allah): Jurnal Dialogis Ilmu Ushuluddin 8, no. 1 (2018): 1–10.

  17. Arif, Nik Muhammad, and Mohamad Tedy Rahardi. “Peran DSN-MUI Dalam Penegakan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia.” TERAJU: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 5, no. 01 (2023): 59–67.

  18. Aziz, Abdul, and Husain Attorah. “Imam Ahmad ’ s Doctrine about Al-Hadith Al- Ḍa’īf,” 2023, 21–36.

  19. Daud, Abu. Sunan Abi Daud. Beirut: Dar Ibnu Hazm, 1997.

  20. Din, Muhammad Masyhud, and Muhammad Ya’qub. “Hasan Shahih Fi Jami’ Al Tirmidzi.” Deoband: Darul Ulum, 2016.

  21. Dr. Jamal Zarabozo. “Fatwaa-Making and the Use of Weak Hadith.” In Principles of Giving Religious Rulings (Fatwaa). Houston, 2018.

  22. Fauziyyah, Wafa, and Hilda Yessy Diah Pernanda. “Penggunaan Hadis Dha’īf Yang Kontroversial: Studi Tentang Pemikiran Dan Praktik Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani Dalam Bulūgh Al-Marām.” Jurnal Living Hadis 9, no. 2 (2024): 211–30.

  23. Fian, Khafifatul, and Munawir Munawir. “Komparasi Kehujjahan Hadits Dha’if Perspektif Imam Abu Hanifah Dan Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal.” Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman 11, no. 1 (2023): 27–39.

  24. Gümüş, Fatih. “The Effect of Ibn Al-Ṣalāḥ on the Development of the Term of Ḥasan Ḥadīth.” Cumhuriyet Ilahiyat Dergisi 25, no. 3 (December 15, 2021): 1231–52.

  25. Hanbal, Ahmad bin. Musnad Ahmad Bin Hanbal. Beirut: Muassasah Ar Risalah, 1999.

  26. Hariani, Pipit Putri. Mengenal Dasar-Dasar Perbankan. Vol. 1. UMSU press, 2022.

  27. Hibban, Ibnu. Shohih Ibnu Hibban. Beirut: Dar Ibnu Hazm, 2012.

  28. Hidayat, Roni. “Studi Hadis Rujukan Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional (DSN) Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) Tentang Produk Perbankan Syariah,” 2021.

  29. Huswat, Nurhikmah, Muhammad Shiddiq Abdillah, and Riska Riska. “Aktualisasi Kaidah Al-Ḥājah Tunazzalu Manzilah Al-Ḍarūrah Pada Akad Istiṣnā’Paralel.” AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Bahasa Arab 3, no. 4 (2024): 673–93.

  30. Ibnu Hajar. Taqrib At Tahzib. Yordania: Bait Al Afkar, 2000.

  31. Jamil, Muhammad, Engkos Kosasih, and Muhammad Al Mighwar. “Critical Analysis of Various Works of the Kutubus Sittah Book: A Review of the Reliability, Consistency, and Relevance of the Hadiths.” Al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies 8, no. 2 (2025): 1712–21.

  32. Jauzy, Ibnu. Al-Dhu’afa Wa Al-Matrukin. Beirut: Dar Al Kutub Al Ilmiyah, 1986.

  33. Jundi, M Fikri Al, and Abdul Malik Ibrohim. “Ases Pertimbangan MUI Dalam Pemberian Fatwa Dalam Qaul Dhaif.” Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Sosial Keagamaan 2, no. 3 (2025): 463–70.

  34. Khoiron, Muhammad Zidni, and Jamaludin Achmad Kholik. “Konsep Maqasid Syariah Pada Akad-Akad Bagi Hasil.” Nahdatul Iqtishadiyah: Jurnal Perbankan Syariah 4, no. 1 (2024): 23–27.

  35. Kusuma Putra, Rengga, and Ummi Kalsum. “Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Non Litigasi.” Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains 7, no. 6 (2024): 2200–2206.

  36. Ma’mur, Jamal. “Peran Fatwa MUI Dalam Berbangsa Dan Bernegara (Talfiq Manhaji Sebagai Metodologi Penetapan Fatwa MUI).” Wahana Akademika 5, no. 2 (2018): 42–53.

  37. Majah, Ibnu. Al Sunan Ibnu Majah. Kairo: Dar Al Ta’shil, 2014.

  38. Malik, Imam. Al Muwaththa’. Dubai: Majmu’ah al Furqan, 2003.

  39. Masudi, Ahmad Thoyib. “Hadits Shahih, Hasan, Dan Dhaif Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam: Sebuah Perbandingan Kualitatif.” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam 21, no. 2 (2023): 268–79.

  40. Munandar, Aris. “Kontekstualisasi Fikih Muāmalāt Māliyyah (Studi Atas Fatwa DSN-MUI Dengan Standar Transaksi AAOIFI Untuk Transaksi Murabahah, Mudarabah Dan Musyarakah.” UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2020.

  41. Muslim, Imam. Shohih Muslim. Riyadh: Bait Al Afkar Al Dauliyah, 1998.

  42. Nafiah, Jihan Nahda, Isabel Zalita Putri, and Miftahul Ubaidilah. “Damai Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Wan Prestasi (Kajian Hadis Tentang Damai Pada Fatwa DSN MUI No. 08/DSN-MUI/IV/2000).” El-Sunnah: Jurnal Kajian Hadis Dan Integrasi Ilmu 5, no. 1 (2024): 59–71.

  43. Naisabury, Al Hakim Al. Al Mustadrak ’Ala Al Shohihaini. Beirut: Dar Al Kutub Al Ilmiyah, 1990.

  44. Rahayu, Rani, and M Zidny Nafi’Hasbi. “Teori Dan Konsep Akad Musyarakah Dan Penerapannya Dalam Perbankan Syariah.” Jurnal Keislaman 5, no. 2 (2022): 176–85.

  45. Rahmawati, Fina Sabrina, and Muhamad Fatoni. “Tinjauan Historis Pembagian Hadis Beserta Macam-Macam Hadis.” DIRAYAH: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis 4, no. 1 (2023): 36–49.

  46. Rajab, H. “Hadis-Hadis Dalam Fatwa MUI.” UIN Alauddin 1, no. 1 (2021): 15–28.

  47. Robbani, Hamdan, and Ely Masnawati. “Problems of Practicing Weak Hadith in Fiqh Law: Normative Review of Weak Hadith in Fiqh Law.” Journal of Islamic Education Studies 1, no. 2 (2025): 16–26.

  48. Sakinah, Nailus, Muhammad Miftahul Ikhsan, Nana Herdiana, and Iwan Setiawan. “Musharakah Contract Implementation in the Financing of Shariah Newspaper Accounts: Hybrid Contract Dalam Pembiayaan Rekening Koran Syariah (PRKS).” Zona Law And Public Administration Indonesia 2, no. 1 (2024): 271–76.

  49. Sati, Ali. “Hadis Palsu Dan Hukum Meriwayatkannya.” Jurnal El-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Pranata Sosial 4, no. 1 (2018): 1–15.

  50. Shodiq, Maidah Habib. “Studi Penukilan Hadis Dalam Kitab Hujjah Allah Al-Balighah Karya Syah Waliyullah Ad-Dihlawi.” UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA, 2024.

  51. Syasya, Nur. “The Significance Of Sulh In The Syariah Court.” YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam 11, no. 1 (June 5, 2020): 141.

  52. Tahmid, Khairuddin, and Muhammad Zaki. “The Implementation of DSN-MUI Fatwa in Handling of Sharia Economic Problems (A Case at Bandar Lampung People’s Credit Bank [BPRS]).” Al-’Adalah 16, no. 2 (2019): 263–86.

  53. Thabarani, Al. Al Mu’jam Al Kabiir. Kairo: Maktabah Ibnu Taimiyah, 2012.

  54. WJ, Wan Kamal Nadzif. “Ruling On Practicing Weak Hadith According To Mutaqaddimin And Muta’akhkhirin Hadith Scholars.” European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 2019.

  55. Yafi’i, Abd al Fattah al. “Hukm Al ’Amal Bi Al Hadis Al Dhaif ’Inda Al Muhaddisin Wa an Fuqaha.” An Nur, 2015.

  56. Zulkefli, Nurul Syeilla Syazhween, Nurazzah Abdul Rahman, and Mazidah Puteh. “A Survey: Framework of an Information Retrieval for Malay Translated Hadith Document.” In MATEC Web of Conferences, 135:73. EDP Sciences, 2017.