Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 20, 2025
Accepted
July 25, 2025
Published
September 20, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 184 Download : 120

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article investigates the crisis of public trust in Indonesia’s Constitutional Court, triggered by a series of controversial decisions that suggest the practice of abusive judicial review. It focuses on three pivotal rulings, Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023, that collectively reveal a pattern of judicial behavior aligned with executive interests, undermining judicial independence and constitutional integrity. Utilizing a normative legal research method with statute, conceptual, and analytical approaches, the study critically examines how judicial overreach, ethical breaches, and procedural irregularities have contributed to institutional decay. The findings indicated that the Constitutional Court has shifted from its role as a counter-majoritarian institution to a political instrument, eroding legal certainty and democratic accountability. The involvement of justices in conflicts of interest, particularly in election-related cases, has intensified public skepticism and revealed systemic weaknesses in judicial appointment and oversight mechanisms. This paper argued that such decisions constitute a form of “abusive judicial review” that threatens Indonesia’s constitutional democracy. To restore judicial legitimacy, structural reforms are imperative, emphasizing transparent judicial recruitment, permanent ethical oversight bodies, and stronger civil society engagement. The article concluded that without substantial reform, the erosion of public trust may further delegitimize the Court as a guardian of the Constitution.

Keywords

Abusive Judicial Review Constitutional Court Judicial Integrity Legal Reform Public Trust

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Fathi, Aisyah Ajeng Putri Riyanto, Nanik Prasetyoningsih, Muhammad Nur Rifqi Amirullah

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Fathi, M., Riyanto, A. A. P., Prasetyoningsih, N., & Amirullah, M. N. R. (2025). From Guardians to Threats? Abusive Judicial Review and Public Distrust. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 32(2), 505–527. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss2.art10
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Agnes Rita Sulistyawaty. “Citra MK Berada Di Titik Terendah Sejak 2015.” https://www.kompas.id/baca/video/2023/12/19/citra-mk-berada-di-titik-terendah-sejak-2015, 2023.

  2. Astuti, Ngudi, and Dewi Setyarini. “The Advancement of Gibran in Political Contestation as Vice President of the 2024 Election in the Perspective of Political Ethics of the Indonesian Nation.” Journal of Social Science (JoSS) 3, no. 1 (2024): 1174–95. https://doi.org/10.57185/joss.v3i1.273.

  3. Bedner, Adriaan, and Ward Berenschot. “Legal Mobilisation and Civil Society.” In Routledge Handbook of Civil and Uncivil Society in Southeast Asia, 81–98. London: Routledge, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367422080-6.

  4. Bin-Armia, Muhammad Syauqi, Muhammad Siddiq Armia, Fadhal Faruq Rifqy, Huwaida Tengku-Armia, and Cut Reni Mustika. “From Constitutional Court to Court of Cartel: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Other Countries.” PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah (PJKIHdS) 9, no. 2 (2024): 457–79. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i2.437.

  5. Butt, Simon, and Prayekti Murharjanti. “What Constitutes Compliance? Legislative Responses to Constitutional Court Decisions in Indonesia.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 20, no. 1 (2022): 428–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac014.

  6. Daniels, Gilda R. “Democracy’s Distrust: The Supreme Court’s Anti-Voter Decisions as a Threat to Democracy.” The Yale Law Journal 134 (2025): 1062–98. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/forum/democracys-distrust-the-supreme-courts-anti-voter-decisions-as-a-threat-to-democracy.

  7. Darusman, Yoyon Mulyana, Elmer Micu Soriano, and Bhanu Prakash Nunna. “Strengthening Judicial Commission Authority in Indonesia Judicial Power Institutions, Link to Trias Politica Theory.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 24, no. 1 (April 22, 2024): 73. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2024.24.1.3987.

  8. Dewi, Rozana Sukma, Avien Zakaria, and Aghnia Safana Ilmi. “Ethical Supervision of Judges to Improve the Integrity of the Constitutional Court.” Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law 1, no. 3 (2024): 221–45. https://doi.org/10.71239/jicl.v1i3.29.

  9. Dixon, Rosalind. Responsive Judicial Review. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192865779.001.0001.

  10. Dixon, Rosalind, and David Landau. Abusive Constitutional Borrowing. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192893765.001.0001.

  11. Doyle, Oran, and Rachael Walsh. “Constitutional Amendment and Public Will Formation: Deliberative Mini-Publics as a Tool for Consensus Democracy.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 20, no. 1 (2022): 398–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac013.

  12. Fauzan, Muhammad, Dewi Iriani, Arief Budiono, Mahesa Rannie, and Elsa Sintya Marvinda. “The Age Limit for Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates in Constitutional Court: An Implication of Ethical Sanctions for Judges.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 24, no. 3 (13 December, 2024): 334–53. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2024.24.3.4116.

  13. Ginsburg, Tom, and Aziz Z. Huq. “How to Save a Constitutional Democracy.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16, no. 4 (31 December, 2018): 1352–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy107.

  14. Idul Rishan. “The Politicizing of Judicial Independence: Cases and Controversy in Indonesian Constitutional Court’s.” South East Asian Journal of Advanced Law and Governance (SEAJ ALGOV) 1, no. 2 (26 November, 2024): 31–48. https://doi.org/10.22146/seajalgov.v1i2.15535.

  15. Ip. Eric C. “The Democratic Foundations of Judicial Review under Authoritarianism: Theory and Evidence from Hong Kong.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 12, no. 2 (1 April, 2014): 330–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mou026.

  16. Juanda, and Nina Zainab. “Delinquency of Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 on Age Limit Requirements for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidature.” Siber International Journal of Advanced Law (SIJAL) 2, no. 2 (2024): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.38035/sijal.v2i2.124.

  17. Kurniawan, M Beni. “Filling the Position of Constitutional Court Judge and Its Correlation With the Independence of Judges (Comparative Study of Some Countries).” JURNAL CITA HUKUM 6, no. 2 (December 5, 2018): 253–76. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v6i2.4739.

  18. Landau, David. “Courts Are Not Enough: Independent Accountability Institutions and the Protection of Democracy in the United States.” SSRN Scholarly Paper, 2025, 1–83. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5165178.

  19. Levendusky, Matthew, Shawn Patterson, Michele Margolis, Josh Pasek, Kenneth Winneg, and Kathleen H. Jamieson. “Has the Supreme Court Become Just Another Political Branch? Public Perceptions of Court Approval and Legitimacy in a Post-Dobbs World.” Science Advances 10, no. 10 (8 March, 2024). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk9590.

  20. Lewis, Melea, and Philip Stenning. “Considering the Glenister Judgment: Independence Requirements for Anti-Corruption Institutions.” South African Crime Quarterly, no. 39 (8 March, 2016). https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2012/v0i39a847.

  21. Muhammad, Fikri, and Daruaji Kusuma. “Legal Review of Corruption Crimes Committed By Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court.” Law Journal Borobudur International 1, no. 1 (2024): 1–15. http://lawjournalborobudurinternational.com/index.php/LJBI/article/view/17.

  22. Mochtar, Zainal Arifin, Yance Arizona, Faiz Rahman, Umar Mubdi, Garuda Era Ruhpinesthi, and Mochamad Adli Wafi. “From Meaningful to Meaningless Participation: The Tragedy of Indonesia’s Omnibus Law on Job Creation.” Jurnal Media Hukum 31, no. 2 (2024): 351–70. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v31i2.23557.

  23. Nursetiawan, Eko, Riris Ardhanariswari, Muhammad Fauzan, and Enny Dwi Cahyani. “Questioning the Independence of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and Judicial Restraint.” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Law, Governance, and Social Justice (ICoLGaS 2023) 805 (2023): 570–81. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-164-7_52.

  24. Oktavia, Enika Maya, Mely Noviyanti, and Dalpin Safari. “Potret Abusive Judicial Review Di Masa Pemerintahan Presiden Joko Widodo.” Jurnal Legislatif 7, no. 2 (2024): 131–51. https://doi.org/10.20956/jl.v7i2.35506. 

  25. Pavone, Tommaso, and Øyvind Stiansen. “The Shadow Effect of Courts: Judicial Review and the Politics of Preemptive Reform.” American Political Science Review 116, no. 1 (2022): 322–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000873.

  26. Prasetyo, Yogi, Alfalachu Indiantoro, and Aries Isnandar. “Ethical Criticism of Constitutional Court Decision Number.90/PUU-XXI/2023 Concerning Minimum Age Limits for Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates.” Constitutionale 5, no. 1 (6 September, 2024): 53–66. https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v5i1.3431.

  27. Pujayanti, Luh Putu Vera Astri, Zainun Zakya Nugrahayu, Erman I Rahim, Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, and Chami Yassine. “Indonesia’s Constitutional Court: Bastion of Law Enforcement and Protector of Human Rights in The Reform Era.” Jurnal Pamator: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo 17, no. 1 (2024): 35–49. https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v17i1.24128.

  28. Resopijani, A, and Yohanes Baptista Neonbeni. “Ethical Violation by the Chairman of the Constitutional Court against Indonesian Law and Democracy.” Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Business Studies 1, no. 3 (2024): 335–432. https://doi.org/10.35912/jomabs.v1i3.2147.

  29. Rochmawanto, Munif, Suisno, and Zainal Hamdan Sakuroikan. “Age Limit For Presidential and Vice Presidential Candidates in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023; A Legal Approach.” Journal Independent 12, no. 2 (2024): 188–99. https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v13i2.328.

  30. Saragih, Geofani Milthree, Mirza Nasution, and Dan Eka N A M Sihombing. “Judicial Review by the Constitutional Court: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint in the Perspective of Judicial Freedom; [Judicial Review oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman].” Jurnal Konstitusi 22, no. 1 (2025): 39 – 65. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2213.

  31. Shah, Dian A H. “Dismantling Democratic Change in Asia: Modalities and Weapons of Choice.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 22, no. 4 (29 December, 2024): 997–1030. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moae088.

  32. Sulastri, Dewi, Firdaus Arifin, Anthon F Susanto, Uu Nurul Huda, and Mohd Zakhiri Nor. “Institutional Integrity and Challenges in the Indonesian Constitutional Court Institution.” Jurnal Media Hukum 32, no. 1 (2025): 40–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v32i1.24100.

  33. Waldron, Jeremy. “The Crisis of Judicial Review.” SSRN Scholarly Paper, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4763558.

  34. Wiratraman, Herlambang P. “Constitutional Struggles and the Court in Indonesia’s Turn to Authoritarian Politics.” Federal Law Review 50, no. 3 (2022): 314–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205X221107404.

  35. Yanuarto, Totok, Pika Sari, Bayu Dwi Anggono, and Fanny Tanuwijaya. “Legal Certainty in the Decisions of the Honorary Council of the Constitutional Court: A Case Study of Chairman Anwar Usman’s Ruling.” Mimbar Keadilan 17, no. 2 (10 July, 2024): 154–63. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v17i2.11012.

  36. Yuliana, Adelia, Adzra Ardelia Tuasalamony, Al Fath, Alizcia Dora Parhusip, Anggie Febriani, and Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar. “Analisis Tingkat Kepercayaan Publik terhadap Mahkamah Konstitusi Pasca Putusan Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023.” Jurnal Hukum Statuta 3, no. 2 (2024): 74–91. https://doi.org/10.35586/jhs.v3i2.9095.

  37. Zaman, Nurus, Paul Atagamen Aidonojie, Muwaffiq Jufri, and Raphael D Jackson-Ortiz. “Questioning the Constitutional Court Decision Regarding the Age Limit of Presidential and Vice-Presidential Candidates.” PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah (PJKIHdS) 9, no. 2 (2024): 540–60. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v9i1.299.