Main Article Content

Abstract

The more fundamental decision for the States of the international community, however, was whether to make the concessions necessary to create an effective international
mechanism against the background of States insisting upon preserving the totality of their sovereign prerogatives, if such aview had held sway, no effective international criminal tribunal could have been created.

Keywords

fundamenta criminal tribunal could

Article Details

How to Cite
margoto, J. N. (2016). Revisiting the Balkan Crisis: AUn Question; The European Connection and the Us Solution. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 9(21), 159–187. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss21.art11

References

  1. AgeEknes. 'The United Nations' Predicament ill the Former Yugoslavia' in Thomas G Weiss (ed). The United Nationsand Civil Wars. (1995).
  2. Amy Lou King. "Bosnia-Herzegvina—Vance-Owen Agenda for A Peaceful Settle ment: Did the UN Do Too Little, Too
  3. Late7 To Support This Endeavour?" (1993) 23 Georgia Journalof Interna tional and Comparative Law.
  4. Bassiouni, MCherif & Peter Manikas. TheLaw of the International Criminal Tribunal ForThe Former Yugoslavia (1996) 40.
  5. Brzezinski, Zbigniew. "Bombs andBlather: The Strategy Deficit; Can Clinton Find America's Missing Foreign Policy?"
  6. Washington Post 17January 1993.
  7. ,Clark, Andrew. 'Yugoslavia: Fragile Cease-fire Holds in Croatia.' Australian Financial Re view. 10 October 1991.
  8. Simpson, Gerry. 'Didactic and Dissident Stories in War Crimes Trials.' 60 Alberta Law Review 801, (discussing thetrials of Eichmann, Demanjunk, Barbie, Polyukhovic, Preibke, Touvier andoth-. ers).