Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction
Zakat plays a fundamental role in promoting economic justice and social welfare in Muslim communities. Muhammadiyah, as one of the largest Islamic organizations in Indonesia, actively manages zakat through its philanthropic institution. Despite this, zakat compliance remains uneven, prompting the need to understand what drives individuals' intentions to pay zakat within religious organizations.
Objectives
This study aims to analyze the behavioral intentions to pay zakat among members of the Muhammadiyah organization. It specifically examines how attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control influence the intention to pay zakat, using the Theory of Planned Behavior as the guiding framework.
Method
A quantitative approach was employed with a structured online questionnaire distributed to 200 members of Muhammadiyah. The data collected were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling with the Partial Least Squares method to assess the relationships between the three behavioral constructs and zakat intention.
Results
The findings reveal that perceived behavioral control and subjective norms significantly influence the intention to pay zakat among Muhammadiyah members. Perceived behavioral control emerged as the strongest predictor, indicating that the ability and convenience to pay zakat play a critical role. Subjective norms also had a notable positive impact, suggesting that social expectations and religious community influence enhance zakat intention. Contrary to common assumptions, attitude did not have a significant effect on behavioral intention in this context. The model explained 49 percent of the variance in zakat intention, demonstrating a moderate level of predictive power.
Implications
These results suggest that increasing zakat compliance in Islamic organizations such as Muhammadiyah requires strategies that enhance accessibility and social reinforcement. Strengthening the influence of religious leaders, promoting collective obligations, and improving ease of payment through institutional services can foster a stronger intention to fulfill zakat.
Originality/Novelty
This study contributes to the literature by applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to a specific religious organizational context. It provides new insights by highlighting that perceived control and normative influence are more decisive than individual attitudes in shaping zakat behavior among committed Muslim communities. This research offers a valuable reference for designing effective zakat campaigns and improving philanthropic engagement in Islamic institutions.

Keywords

attitude intention to pay zakat mass Islamic organization Muhammadiyah theory of planned behavior subjective norm zakat management

Article Details

How to Cite
Syaputra, A. D., Ardiansyah, M., & Sa’adah, N. (2025). Exploring zakat payment intentions using the Theory of Planned Behavior among members of Muhammadiyah in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(1), 597–616. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss1.art23

References

  1. Ahmed, H. (2004). Role of zakah and awqaf in poverty alleviation. Islamic Development Bank Institute. https://isdbinstitute.org/product/role-of-zakah-and-awqaf-in-poverty-alleviation/

  2. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action Control (pp. 11–39). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  4. Alzahrani, H. (2020). A comparison of three models in multivariate binary longitudinal data analysis: Application to FDCS study. OALib, 7(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106030

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106030
  5. Andam, A. C., & Osman, A. Z. (2019). Determinants of intention to give zakat on employment income: Experience from Marawi City, Philippines. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 10(4), 528–545. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2016-0097

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2016-0097
  6. Andriansyah, Y. (2024). Factors motivating muslims to pay zakat: A narrative review based on the Scopus database. Journal of Contemporary Applied Islamic Philanthropy, 2(2), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.62265/jcaip.v2i2.82

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62265/jcaip.v2i2.82
  7. Annahl, M. A. F., Al Anshory, A. C., & Aulia, M. (2021). Why do muzaki pay zakat through institutions? The theory of planned behaviour application. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 7(Special Issue 1), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v7i0.1313

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v7i0.1313
  8. Azman, F. M. N., & Bidin, Z. (2015). Factors influencing zakat compliance behavior on saving. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 5(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.18533/ijbsr.v5i1.688

  9. Beylik, U., Cirakli, U., Cetin, M., Ecevit, E., & Senol, O. (2022). The relationship between health expenditure indicators and economic growth in OECD countries: A Driscoll-Kraay approach. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1050550. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1050550

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1050550
  10. Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Abdul-Jabbar, H., & Aziz, S. A. (2021). Does trust in zakat institution enhance entrepreneurs’ zakat compliance? Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(5), 768–790. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2020-0282

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2020-0282
  11. Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Abdul-Jabbar, H., Dziegielewski, S. F., & Aziz, S. A. (2021). Moderating effect of perceived behavioral control on Islamic tax (zakah) compliance behavior among businessmen in Yemen. Journal of Social Service Research, 47(2), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2020.1767260

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2020.1767260
  12. Bonang, D., Baihaqi, M., & Pusparini, M. D. (2023). Determinants of zakat compliance among business owners in Indonesia. Share: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Islam, 12(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.22373/share.v12i2.16917

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22373/share.v12i2.16917
  13. Cahyani, U. E., Sari, D. P., & Afandi, A. (2022). Determinant of behavioral intention to use digital zakat payment: The moderating role of knowledge of zakat. Ziswaf: Jurnal Zakat Dan Wakaf, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21043/ziswaf.v9i1.13330

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/ziswaf.v9i1.13330
  14. Carter, S. R. (2016). Using confirmatory factor analysis to manage discriminant validity issues in social pharmacy research. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 38(3), 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0302-9

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-016-0302-9
  15. Cheah, J.-H., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Ramayah, T., & Ting, H. (2018). Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM: On using single-item versus multi-item measures in redundancy analyses. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(11), 3192–3210. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2017-0649

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2017-0649
  16. Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y
  17. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  18. Choiriyah, E. A. N., Kafi, A., Hikmah, I. F., & Indrawan, I. W. (2020). Zakat and poverty alleviation in Indonesia: A panel analysis at provincial level. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 6(4), 811–832. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v6i4.1122

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v6i4.1122
  19. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

  20. Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900406

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900406
  21. Hadi, R., Shafrani, Y. S., Hilyatin, D. L., Riyadi, S., & Basrowi, B. (2024). Digital zakat management, transparency in zakat reporting, and the zakat payroll system toward zakat management accountability and its implications on zakat growth acceleration. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(1), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.8.025

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.8.025
  22. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
  23. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  24. Hakim, L., & Setyaningsih, A. I. (2022). Effectiveness of online zakat during the COVID-19 pandemic by amil zakat institutions in Boyolali, Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 8(2), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol8.iss2.art6

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol8.iss2.art6
  25. Hasyim, F., Awwal, M. A.-F., & Al Amin, N. H. (2020). ZISWAF digital payment as an effort to reach Millennials. Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 11(2), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.21580/economica.2020.11.2.5752

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21580/economica.2020.11.2.5752
  26. Heikal, M. & Falahuddin. (2014). The intention to pay zakat commercial: An application of revised theory of planned behavior. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 6(9), 727–734. https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v6i9.532

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22610/jebs.v6i9.532
  27. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  28. Hilkenmeier, F., Bohndick, C., Bohndick, T., & Hilkenmeier, J. (2020). Assessing distinctiveness in multidimensional instruments without access to raw data – A manifest Fornell-Larcker criterion. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 223. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00223

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00223
  29. Huda, N., Rini, N., Mardoni, Y., & Putra, P. (2012). The analysis of attitudes, subjective norms, and behavioral control on muzakki’s intention to pay zakah. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(22), 271–279. https://ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_22_Special_Issue_November_2012/24.pdf

  30. Ilieva, G., Yankova, T., Ruseva, M., Dzhabarova, Y., Zhekova, V., Klisarova-Belcheva, S., Mollova, T., & Dimitrov, A. (2024). Factors influencing user perception and adoption of E-government services. Administrative Sciences, 14(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14030054

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14030054
  31. Ilmi, M. N., & Maesaroh, I. (2024). Donor fund empowerment strategy in increasing donor trust: A case study on Lazismu Sidoarjo. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 10(2), 951–974. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol10.iss2.art18

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol10.iss2.art18
  32. Ilmi, N., Ridlwan, A. A., Fahrullah, A., Timur, Y. P., & Alam, Md. K. (2024). The impact of subjective norm and religiosity on zakat compliance of Muslim entrepreneurs: The mediating role of intention. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business, 9(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.22515/shirkah.v9i2.584

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22515/shirkah.v9i2.584
  33. Indarningsih, N. A., Ma’wa, M. A. F., & Waliyuddinsyah, Muh. N. (2023). Zakat, infaq, shadaqah, and waqf using financial technology: Millennial generation perspective. Review of Islamic Social Finance and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol2.iss1.art2

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol2.iss1.art2
  34. Irianti, M., & Al Jumroh, S. F. (2022). Generous philanthropy lAZISMU as a form of social solidarity for Muhammadiyah citizens in Sorong Regency. Istawa : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.24269/ijpi.v7i1.5244

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24269/ijpi.v7i1.5244
  35. Kamal, S., Berakon, I., Hamid, A., & Muttaqin, Z. (2024). How do muzakki pay professional zakat? (The qualitative inquiries using the Bloom model). Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(3), 866–885. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-02-2022-0046

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-02-2022-0046
  36. Kashif, M., & De Run, E. C. (2015). Money donations intentions among Muslim donors: An extended theory of planned behavior model. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 20(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1519

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1519
  37. Kasri, R. A., & Yuniar, A. M. (2021). Determinants of digital zakat payments: Lessons from Indonesian experience. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(3), 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2020-0258

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2020-0258
  38. Khan, A. A. (2012). Religious obligation or altruistic giving? Muslims and charitable donations. In M. Barnett & J. Stein (Eds.), Sacred aid: Faith and humanitarianism (pp. 90–114). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199916023.001.0001

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199916023.003.0004
  39. Knowles, S. R., Hyde, M. K., & White, K. M. (2012). Predictors of young people’s charitable intentions to donate money: An extended theory of planned behavior perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9), 2096–2110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00932.x

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00932.x
  40. Lahjouji, H., & Kahf, M. (2021). Poverty alleviation through potential zakat collection. International Journal of Islamic Economics, 3(2), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.32332/ijie.v3i2.3509

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.32332/ijie.v3i2.3509
  41. Lopes, J. M., Laurett, R., Ferreira, J. J., Silveira, P., Oliveira, J., & Farinha, L. (2023). Modeling the predictors of students’ entrepreneurial intentions: The case of a peripheral European region. Industry and Higher Education, 37(2), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222221117055

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222221117055
  42. Mat Daud, M. S., & Wahid, H. (2025). The influence of zakāt management institutions on zakāt compliance intention during the COVID-19 lockdown in Malaysia: A multilevel analysis. SAGE Open, 15(1), 21582440251324979. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251324979

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251324979
  43. Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Ramayah, T., Chuah, F., & Cheah, J.-H. (2017). A review of the methodological misconceptions and guidelines related to the application of structural equation modeling: A Malaysian scenario. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, i–xiii. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.1(1)01

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.1(1)01
  44. Mittelman, R., & Rojas-Méndez, J. (2018). Why Canadians give to charity: An extended theory of planned behaviour model. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 15(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-018-0197-3

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-018-0197-3
  45. Mohd Dzin, N. H., & Lay, Y. F. (2021). Validity and reliability of adapted self-efficacy scales in Malaysian context using PLS-SEM approach. Education Sciences, 11(11), 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110676

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110676
  46. Mutmainah, L., Berakon, I., & Yusfiarto, R. (2024). Does financial technology improve intention to pay zakat during national economic recovery? A multi-group analysis. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(6), 1583–1607. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2022-0268

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2022-0268
  47. Muzaffar, N. (2015). Developing an extended model of Theory of Planned behavior to explore green purchase behavior of Pakistani consumers. American Journal of Business and Management, 4(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.11634/216796061706654

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.11634/216796061504654
  48. Nuryahya, E., Mahri, A. J. W., & Nurasyiah, A. (2019). Influencing factors of muzaki use and receive zakat payment platform. International Conference of Zakat, 203–215. https://doi.org/10.37706/iconz.2019.176

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.37706/iconz.2019.176
  49. Nuryana, F. (2016). Pengaruh sikap, norma subjektif dan kontrol perilaku terhadap niat kepatuhan muzakki pegawai negeri sipil (PNS) dalam membayar zakat profesi pada badan amil zakat (BAZ) Kabupaten Sumenep [The influence of attitudes, subjective norms and behavioral control on compliance intentions of civil servant muzakki (PNS) in paying professional zakat at the amil zakat agency (BAZ) Sumenep Regency]. NUANSA: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial Dan Keagamaan Islam, 13(2), 383–416. https://doi.org/10.19105/nuansa.v13i2.1105

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.19105/nuansa.v13i2.1105
  50. Oktavendi, T. W., & Mu’ammal, I. (2022). Acceptance model for predicting adoption of zakat, infaq, and sodaqoh (ZIS) digital payments in Generation Z. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(4), 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2021-0267

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2021-0267
  51. Pacherie, E., & Haggard, P. (2010). What are intentions? In W. Sinnott-Armstrong & L. Nadel (Eds.), Conscious will and responsibility: A tribute to Benjamin Libet (pp. 70–84). Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/2344/chapter/142507193

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195381641.003.0008
  52. Radomir, L., & Moisescu, O. I. (2019). Discriminant validity of the customer-based corporate reputation scale: Some causes for concern. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(4), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-11-2018-2115

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-11-2018-2115
  53. Rakhmawati, R., & Rizky, A. W. (2023). The intention of university students to donate at zakat institution through digital payment. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 9(1), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol9.iss1.art12

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol9.iss1.art12
  54. Rocha, L. F. D. D., Hernandez, J. A. E., & Falcone, E. M. D. O. (2021). Latent structure evidence of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales—Short Form. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 38, e190103. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202138e190103

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202138e190103
  55. Rokhman, W. (2022). Determinants of zakat paying intentions: Evidences from SMEs’ workers in Central Java, Indonesia. Ziswaf: Jurnal Zakat Dan Wakaf, 9(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.21043/ziswaf.v9i2.19933

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/ziswaf.v9i2.19933
  56. Rönkkö, M., & Cho, E. (2022). An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968614

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968614
  57. Saad, R. A. J., & Farouk, A. U. (2019). A comprehensive review of barriers to a functional Zakat system in Nigeria: What needs to be done? International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 35(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-06-2018-0090

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-06-2018-0090
  58. Saad, R. A. J., Farouk, A. U., & Abdul Kadir, D. (2020). Business zakat compliance behavioral intention in a developing country. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(2), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-03-2018-0036

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-03-2018-0036
  59. Saad, R. A. J., & Haniffa, R. (2014). Determinants of zakah (Islamic tax) compliance behavior. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 5(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2012-0068

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2012-0068
  60. Saad, R. A. J., Wahab, M. S. A., & Samsudin, Mohd. A. M. (2016). Factors influencing business zakah compliance behavior among Moslem businessmen in Malaysia: A research model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 654–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.047

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.047
  61. Sadallah, M., Abdul-Jabbar, H., & Aziz, S. A. (2023). Promoting zakat compliance among business owners in Algeria: The mediation effect of compliance intention. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(6), 1603–1620. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-11-2021-0366

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-11-2021-0366
  62. Sadallah, M., Abdul-Jabbar, H., Bin-Nashwan, S. A., & Abdul Aziz, S. A. (2023). Alms tax (ZAKAT) compliance intention among entrepreneurs from a social cognitive perspective: The moderating role of knowledge. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(8), 1133–1151. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-04-2022-0104

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-04-2022-0104
  63. Saeri, A. K., Ogilvie, C., La Macchia, S. T., Smith, J. R., & Louis, W. R. (2014). Predicting Facebook users’ online privacy protection: Risk, trust, norm focus theory, and the theory of planned behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 154(4), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.914881

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.914881
  64. Santoso, S., Cahyono, Y., Wafirotin, K. Z., & Ayutika, R. D. N. (2022). An analysis of muzakis behavior in paying zakat mal and factors influencing it: The perspective of the theory of planned behavior. JIFA (Journal of Islamic Finance and Accounting), 4(2), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.22515/jifa.v4i2.4912

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22515/jifa.v4i2.4912
  65. Sapingi, R., Ahmad, N., & Mohamad, M. (2011). A study on zakah of employment income: Factors that influence academics’ intention to pay zakah. 2nd International Conference on Business and Economic Research (2nd ICBER 2011) Proceeding, 2492–2507. https://baitalzakat.com/files/english-files/baitalzakat.com-E100024.pdf

  66. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  67. Setianingsih, H. E., Irsyad, M., & Velayati, A. A. (2022). Exploring the predictors of zakat compliance in the community of farmers. JIFA (Journal of Islamic Finance and Accounting), 5(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.22515/jifa.v5i1.5295

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22515/jifa.v5i1.5295
  68. Shiu, E., Pervan, S. J., Bove, L. L., & Beatty, S. E. (2011). Reflections on discriminant validity: Reexamining the Bove et al. (2009) findings. Journal of Business Research, 64(5), 497–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.04.004

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.04.004
  69. Sutrisno, & Haron, R. (2022). Zakat contribution model in entrepreneurship empowerment of zakat institutions: Case study of LAZISMU Pusat. Nusantara Islamic Economic Journal, 1(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.34001/nuiej.v1i2.251

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.34001/nuiej.v1i2.251
  70. Taiwo, O. A., Bin Mohsin, R., Hassan, S. A., & Mahmud, N. (2023). Validation of driver behavior questionnaire on Nigerian truck drivers: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 50(1), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.50.1.13

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.50.1.13
  71. Utami, A. R., . H., & Yuliati, L. N. (2021). Behavior of paying zakat through zakat institutions. International Journal of Research and Review, 8(12), 260–269. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20211232

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20211232
  72. van der Linden, S. (2011). Charitable intent: A moral or social construct? A revised theory of planned behavior model. Current Psychology, 30(4), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-011-9122-1

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-011-9122-1
  73. Voorhees, C. M., Brady, M. K., Calantone, R., & Ramirez, E. (2016). Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0455-4
  74. Wang, L., Zhang, Q., Ding, Y.-Y., & Wong, P. P. W. (2023). The effect of social and personal norm on intention to patronize green hotels: Extension of theory of planned behavior. Journal of China Tourism Research, 19(2), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2022.2070567

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2022.2070567
  75. Yusfiarto, R., Setiawan, A., & Nugraha, S. S. (2020). Literacy and intention to pay zakat. International Journal of Zakat, 5(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.37706/ijaz.v5i1.221

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.37706/ijaz.v5i1.221
  76. Zhang, D., Zhang, Y., & Lou, S. (2024). What determines consumers’ purchasing behavioral intention on social commerce platforms: Introducing consumer credit to TPB. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(5), 13353–13373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04210-z

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04210-z

Public’s Understanding and Zakat Management on Agricultural Zakat

Nia Zulinda, Rahma Yulisa Kalbarini, Muhammad Mursalin
Abstract View : 456
Download :496