Article Sidebar

Evaluating the effectiveness of social assistance programs for poverty reduction: Evidence from Baramamase Village, Indonesia
Submitted
June 15, 2025
Accepted
August 6, 2025
Published
August 25, 2025
Download
PDF Originality Report
Statistic
Read Counter : 342 Download : 147

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction
Indonesia continues to face the challenge of multidimensional poverty despite multiple government initiatives. Social assistance programs such as food aid, conditional cash transfers, health insurance subsidies, and direct village fund transfers have been implemented nationwide. However, concerns about mistargeting, weak management, and limited long-term impact persist. This study examines the implementation and effectiveness of social assistance in Baramamase Village to understand how these programs contribute to welfare improvement at the local level.
Objectives
The study aims to evaluate whether the design and implementation of social assistance programs in the village achieve their intended goals, to identify the factors that influence their effectiveness, and to assess the extent to which they improve household welfare beyond short-term relief.
Method
A qualitative descriptive method was employed using observation, interviews with program implementers and beneficiaries, and documentation. Data were analyzed using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) framework to capture institutional settings, resources, implementation mechanisms, and welfare outcomes. NVivo software was used to organize and analyze interview data.
Results
The findings reveal that program effectiveness depends heavily on local governance, accurate data, and active community participation. Health insurance subsidies show the most consistent positive impact on welfare protection and sustainability, while conditional cash transfers improve education and health outcomes for children. Food aid contributes to short-term consumption but offers limited long-term benefits, and village fund cash transfers are valued by recipients but face distributional challenges. Beneficiaries report immediate relief and satisfaction, yet also express concerns about adequacy and continuity.
Implications
The results suggest that social assistance plays a vital role in protecting poor households from shocks and ensuring access to basic needs. Nevertheless, its transformative effect on long-term welfare is constrained without complementary empowerment strategies. Policy improvements are needed in data accuracy, transparency, inter-institutional coordination, and the integration of skill-building and livelihood support to reduce dependency.
Originality/Novelty
This study provides a localized and comprehensive assessment of social assistance effectiveness using the CIPP evaluation framework. By highlighting the interplay between management quality, data integrity, and beneficiary participation, it contributes to policy discourse on how to transform social assistance from temporary relief into a sustainable path toward welfare enhancement.

Keywords

CIPP evaluation community participation data accuracy poverty alleviation social assistance social policy welfare impact

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Fauziah Jewed, Muh. Ruslan Abdullah, Ishak Ishak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Jewed, F., Abdullah, M. R. ., & Ishak, I. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of social assistance programs for poverty reduction: Evidence from Baramamase Village, Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(2), 1079–1114. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss2.art16
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Agustanta, N., Anggalini, T. D., Septiningrum, L., & Dewanti, P. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of social assistance programs to alleviating poverty in Indonesia. KnE Social Sciences, IAPA 2023 Annual International Conference, 511–521. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i7.15526

  2. Akhter, S., & Chauhan, V. S. (2024). Social mobility and youth aspirations: An analysis of the conditional convergence of aspirations in India. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 37(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2024/v37i41313

  3. Alix-Garcia, J., McIntosh, C., Sims, K. R. E., & Welch, J. R. (2013). The ecological footprint of poverty alleviation: Evidence from Mexico’s Oportunidades program. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00349

  4. Arham, M. A., Humalanggi, M., Tantawi, R., & Kusuma, C. A. (2024). Can fiscal transfers effectively reduce poverty in the Gorontalo Province? Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah, 11(6), 449–464. https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v11i6.28489

  5. Balaji, K., & Zama R., A. (2024). Empowering the underserved: The role of microfinance in poverty alleviation and economic empowerment. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6(6), 31232. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.31232

  6. Bodur, N. C., Tuysuz, C., & Ugulu, I. (2022). Qualitative evaluation of the science curriculum applied in science and art centers (SACs) for gifted students in turkey within the framework of the CIPP approach. Journal of Advanced Academics, 33(4), 604–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X221119535

  7. Botha, N., Coutts, J., Turner, J. A., White, T., & Williams, T. (2017). Evaluating for learning and accountability in system innovation: Incorporating reflexivity in a logical framework. Outlook on Agriculture, 46(2), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727017707406

  8. Breuer, E., Lee, L., De Silva, M., & Lund, C. (2016). Using theory of change to design and evaluate public health interventions: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 11(1), Article Number 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0422-6

  9. Casamitjana, N., Vahedi, M., Davoren, S., Kavoura, E., Tallada, J., Yamaka, S., & Launois, P. (2022). Benefits and barriers in a clinical research competency development scheme for low- and middle-income countries. Global Health Action, 15(1), 2035504. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2035504

  10. Churchill, S. A., & Nuhu, A. S. (2016). What has failed: Microfinance or evaluation methods? Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 6(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1176424

  11. Cicatiello, L., De Simone, E., & Gaeta, G. L. (2018). Cross-country heterogeneity in government transparency and citizens’ political efficacy: A multilevel empirical analysis. Administration & Society, 50(4), 595–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716666356

  12. Cortés, F., Banegas, I., & Solís, P. (2007). Pobres con Oportunidades: México 2002-2005 [Poor with Oportunidades: Mexico 2002-2005]. Estudios Sociológicos, 25(73), 3–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40421071

  13. Crossen-White, H. L., Hemingway, A., Ladkin, A., Jones, A., Burke, A., & Timmermans, O. (2022). An international qualitative feasibility study to explore the process of using social innovation (co-production) strategies with older people: The SAIL project. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 23(3), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAOA-02-2022-0012

  14. Dartanto, T., Moeis, F., Can, C., Ratih, S., Nurhasana, R., Satrya, A., & Thabrany, H. (2021). Good intentions, unintended outcomes: Impact of social assistance on tobacco consumption in Indonesia. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 19(April), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/132966

  15. De Marchis, E. H., Hessler, D., Fichtenberg, C., Fleegler, E. W., Huebschmann, A. G., Clark, C. R., Cohen, A. J., Byhoff, E., Ommerborn, M. J., Adler, N., & Gottlieb, L. M. (2020). Assessment of social risk factors and interest in receiving health care–based social assistance among adult patients and adult caregivers of pediatric patients. JAMA Network Open, 3(10), e2021201. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21201

  16. De Silva, M. J., Breuer, E., Lee, L., Asher, L., Chowdhary, N., Lund, C., & Patel, V. (2014). Theory of Change: A theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council’s framework for complex interventions. Trials, 15(1), 267. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-267

  17. DeLacey, E., Tann, C., Smythe, T., Groce, N., Quiring, M., Allen, E., Gombo, M., Demasu-ay, M., Ochirbat, B., & Kerac, M. (2022). Learning from the implementation of the child nutrition program: A mixed methods evaluation of process. Children, 9(12), 1965. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9121965

  18. Dhaktode, N., & Kumar, A. (2020). Social accountability in MGNREGA: Institutionalised social audit in United Andhra Pradesh of India. International Journal of Governance and Public Policy Analysis, 2(1), 122–157. http://journals.sjp.ac.lk/index.php/ijgppa/article/view/4802

  19. Diaz, J. (2025). Assessing the economic impact of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) in the Philippines: A systematic review. Journal of Applied Management and Business, 6(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.37802/jamb.v6i1.1030

  20. Do Vale, H. F. (2021). How to become innovative: The trajectory of social assistance programs in Brazil. Latin American Policy, 12(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12205

  21. Duha, S. (2025). Genesis of the human capital theory: From classical foundations to the challenges of the digital era. Economics and Management, 2, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.32782/2312-7872.2.2025.3

  22. Elliott, K. C., & Resnik, D. B. (2019). Making open science work for science and society. Environmental Health Perspectives, 127(7), 075002. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4808

  23. Essama-Nssah, B. (2004). Empowerment and poverty-focused evaluation. Development Southern Africa, 21(3), 509–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/0376835042000265469

  24. Frediani, A. A. (2010). Sen’s Capability Approach as a framework to the practice of development. Development in Practice, 20(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520903564181

  25. Frongillo, E. A., Escobar‐DeMarco, J., & Bose, S. (2025). Assessment of four essential features of the alive & thrive initiative to improve maternal, infant, young child, and adolescent nutrition. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 21(2), e13800. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13800

  26. Gaarder, M. M., Glassman, A., & Todd, J. E. (2010). Conditional cash transfers and health: Unpacking the causal chain. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 2(1), 6–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439341003646188

  27. Gennetian, L. A., Shafir, E., Aber, J. L., & De Hoop, J. (2021). Behavioral insights into cash transfers to families with children. Behavioral Science & Policy, 7(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/237946152100700107

  28. Haass, O., & Guzman, G. (2020). Understanding project evaluation – A review and reconceptualization. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(3), 573–599. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2018-0217

  29. Habibi, A., Utami, P., Muzammil, R., & Nasor, M. (2023). The policy role of Bank Syariah Indonesia for MSMEs sector in community economic empowerment. Jurnal Kewirausahaan Dan Bisnis, 28(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkb.v28i1.67178

  30. Habibullah, H. (2019, October). Public perceptions of social assistance in Indonesia. International Conference on Advances Social Science and Community Development (ICASSCD-2019). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7246435

  31. Haliim, W., Ferdiansyah, F., & Sari, A. Y. E. S. (2024). Power relations between program keluarga harapan (PKH) facilitators and beneficiary families (KPM) (Study on PKH implementation in Malang Regency). International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 7(2), 998–1009. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V7-i2-13

  32. Halim, K. C. P., Sukmara, M. B., Nasrullah, M. R., & Choirunnisa, S. A. (2023). Juridical review regarding cases of corruption in social assistance funds during the COVID-19 pandemic. QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(1), 718–722. https://doi.org/10.57235/qistina.v2i1.473

  33. Handa, S., Otchere, F., Sirma, P., & the Evaluation Study Team. (2022). More evidence on the impact of government social protection in sub‐Saharan Africa: Ghana, Malawi, and Zimbabwe. Development Policy Review, 40(3), e12576. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12576

  34. Hartono, H., Daraba, D., Nurdin, I., & Achmad, M. (2023). Implementation of social assistance policy for communities affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in DKI Jakarta Province. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 13(1), 457–464. https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v13i1.50458

  35. Hodson, E., Vainio, T., Sayún, M. N., Tomitsch, M., Jones, A., Jalonen, M., Börütecene, A., Hasan, M. T., Paraschivoiu, I., Wolff, A., Yavo-Ayalon, S., Yli-Kauhaluoma, S., & Young, G. W. (2023). Evaluating social impact of smart city technologies and services: Methods, challenges, future directions. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 7(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7030033

  36. Islam, Md. A., & Bhuiyan, Md. A.-F. (2023). Social media adoption in the public sector of Bangladesh: Progress and efficiency. Information Polity, 28(3), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-239011

  37. Jacobson, T. L. (2016). Amartya Sen’s Capabilities Approach and communication for development and social change. Journal of Communication, 66(5), 789–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12252

  38. Jara, H. X., & Palacio Ludeña, M. G. (2024). Rethinking social assistance amid the COVID‐19 pandemic: Guaranteeing the right to income security in Ecuador. Journal of International Development, 36(3), 1738–1764. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3878

  39. Kamakaula, Y. (2024). Cultural perspectives on climate change adaptation in agriculture an ethnoecological study. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(4), 743–748. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v2i04.787

  40. Kapoor, A., Mehta, A. H., Arobelidze, S., & Foshee, C. M. (2024). A decision-oriented approach to evaluating a leadership curriculum in fellowship. ATS Scholar, 5(1), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2023-0003OC

  41. Khairi, A., Jalinus, N., Ambyar, A., & Waskito, W. (2023). Evaluation of the implementation of independent learning-independent campus (MBKM) curriculum by using the CIPP evaluation model. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Multikulturalisme, 5(2), 543–559. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v5i2.3168

  42. Kiss, L., Fotheringhame, D., & Quinlan-Davidson, M. (2022). Latin American young NEETs: Brazil as a case study for systemic risks of youth social exclusion. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(10), 1386–1410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.1965107

  43. Lagarde, M., Haines, A., & Palmer, N. (2009). The impact of conditional cash transfers on health outcomes and use of health services in low and middle income countries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008137

  44. Langi, C. R., Zulfikar, A. L., Maulana, I., Widayati, N., & Yudaruddin, R. (2023). The impact of social aid on poverty during the COVID-19 pandemic: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Public and Municipal Finance, 12(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.12(2).2023.09

  45. Lengkong, F. D. J., Ruru, J. M., & Londa, V. Y. (2023). Implementation of the entrepreneurship capability improvement program in the tourism sector in Manado City. Journal La Bisecoman, 3(6), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallabisecoman.v3i6.857

  46. Lenhardt, A., Diwakar, V., Tumusiime, E., Simbaya, J., & Moonga, A. M. (2024). A behavioural livelihoods approach to address psychosocial constraints to empowerment. International Journal of Social Welfare, 33(2), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12610

  47. Leroy, J. L., García-Guerra, A., García, R., Dominguez, C., Rivera, J., & Neufeld, L. M. (2008). The Oportunidades program increases the linear growth of children enrolled at young ages in urban Mexico. The Journal of Nutrition, 138(4), 793–798. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/138.4.793

  48. Mackenzie, M., & Blamey, A. (2005). The practice and the theory: Lessons from the application of a theories of change approach. Evaluation, 11(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389005055538

  49. Mahadi, R. (2024). Cash transfer program in Olilan Village, Walea Islands Sub-District, Tojo Una-Una District. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v4i1.1746

  50. Maxwell, N. (2022). Using programme theory to identify the key elements of the Frontline programme. Social Work Education, 41(5), 926–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2021.1903415

  51. McGonagle, K. A., Schoeni, R. F., Sastry, N., & Freedman, V. A. (2012). The panel study of income dynamics: Overview, recent innovations, and potential for life course research. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 3(2), 268–284. https://doi.org/10.14301/llcs.v3i2.188

  52. Munandar, Y. (2021). Income inequality and noncash food assistance program in Central Java Province. Eko-Regional: Jurnal Pengembangan Ekonomi Wilayah, 16(2), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.erjpe.2021.16.2.1805

  53. Muryanto, Y. T., Kharisma, D. B., & Nugraheni, A. S. C. (2022). Prospects and challenges of Islamic fintech in Indonesia: A legal viewpoint. International Journal of Law and Management, 64(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-07-2021-0162

  54. Mustaqim, I. Z., Puspasari, H. M., Utami, A. T., Syalevi, R., & Ruldeviyani, Y. (2024). Assessing public satisfaction of public service application using supervised machine learning. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI), 13(2), 1608–1618. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v13.i2.pp1608-1618

  55. Nandini, A. P., & Latif, A. D. (2024). Human capital theory as a foundation for investment among the young generation. Fundamental and Applied Management Journal, 2(2), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.61220/famj.v2i2.2248

  56. Ncube, T., & Murray, U. (2024). Reflections on government‐led social assistance programmes under Zimbabwe’s National Social Protection Policy Framework: A social contract lens. International Social Security Review, 77(3), 59–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12367

  57. Neves, J. A., Vasconcelos, F. D. A. G. D., Machado, M. L., Recine, E., Garcia, G. S., & Medeiros, M. A. T. D. (2022). The Brazilian cash transfer program (Bolsa Família): A tool for reducing inequalities and achieving social rights in Brazil. Global Public Health, 17(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1850828

  58. Paitoonpong, S., Abe, S., & Puopongsakorn, N. (2008). The meaning of “social safety nets.” Journal of Asian Economics, 19(5), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2008.09.011

  59. Pavão, N. (2016). Conditional cash transfer programs and electoral accountability: Evidence from Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 58(2), 74–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2016.00311.x

  60. Purnomo, H., Samidjo, G. S., Azhar, Muh., Nurjannah, A., Prawoto, N., Tahir, H., & Agustina, N. Q. (2023). Counseling management assistance through social spirituality values to overcome anxiety and increase learning motivation of Indonesian school students in the Hague. Proceeding International Conference of Community Service, 1(2), 655–660. https://doi.org/10.18196/iccs.v1i2.117

  61. Qiu, M., Jessani, N., & Bennett, S. (2018). Identifying health policy and systems research priorities for the sustainable development goals: Social protection for health. International Journal for Equity in Health, 17(1), 155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0868-z

  62. Rahmaddian, R. (2024). The effect of social entrepreneurship, government support on local economic performance in Indonesia, and the impact of local initiatives mediated by intellectual capital. West Science Business and Management, 2(1), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsbm.v2i01.748

  63. Rahmadian, M. F., & Badriyah, N. (2025). The influence of fintech companies cashback methods on student consumption behavior (A study on Economics students at Brawijaya University). Journal of Development Economic and Social Studies, 4(1), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.21776/jdess.2025.04.1.15

  64. Ranganathan, M., & Lagarde, M. (2012). Promoting healthy behaviours and improving health outcomes in low and middle income countries: A review of the impact of conditional cash transfer programmes. Preventive Medicine, 55, S95–S105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.11.015

  65. Rassanjani, S., Novialdi, R., Saribulan, N., & Dahlawi, D. (2023). Overcoming the threat of poverty and social welfare amid the COVID-19 pandemic through sustainable funding sources. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah, 10(6), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v10i6.18017

  66. Rasyid, M., Kristina, A., Wantara, P., & Jumali, M. A. (2023). Household participations and sustainable development programs: Social impact of government assistance in Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(6), 1725–1732. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180608

  67. Ravallion, M., van de Walle, D., & Gautam, M. (1995). Testing a social safety net. Journal of Public Economics, 57(2), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(94)01446-U

  68. Rizal, Y., & Siskawati, E. (2022). The role of social media in improving the transparency of village fund management. Entrepreneurship and Small Business Research, 1(2), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.55980/esber.v1i2.25

  69. Rollins, L., Lawrence, T. Z., Akintobi, T. H., Hopkins, J., Banerjee, A., & De La Rosa, M. (2019). A participatory evaluation framework for the implementation of a transdisciplinary center for health disparities research. Ethnicity & Disease, 29(Supp2), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.29.S2.385

  70. Roshan, S., & Rahman, F. (2025). Education and social mobility: A pathway to economic and social empowerment. Global Social Sciences Review, 10(1), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2025(X-I).11

  71. Ruiz, J., Baner, N., Anderson, H. L., Chadehumbe, M., & Khalek, N. (2023). A virtual pilot of a multispecialty group mentoring program for underrepresented in medicine (URiM) trainees and faculty. Journal of the National Hispanic Medical Association, 1(2), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.59867/nhma0206

  72. Rusliadi, R., & Aina, A. N. (2024). Social welfare policy and cross-sectoral participation: For resilience overcoming stunting in Indonesia. Government & Resilience, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.62503/gr.v2i1.10

  73. Saad-Filho, A. (2015). Social policy for neoliberalism: The Bolsa Família programme in Brazil. Development and Change, 46(6), 1227–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12199

  74. Santarsiero, F. (2023). Developing a strategic planning model for developing, monitoring and evaluating digital transformation initiatives: A soft system approach. Measuring Business Excellence, 27(3), 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-02-2023-0023

  75. Sari, S. N., Rahmawati, D. L., Alfajri, R., Friyatmi, F., & Susanti, D. (2024). Evaluation of the pre-service teacher professional education using CIPP model. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Ekonomi (JIPE), 14(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.24036/011286400

  76. Scott, V. C., Chagnon, E., & Wandersman, A. (2024). The technical assistance (TA) effectiveness logic model: A tool for systematically planning, delivering, and evaluating TA. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 47(4), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787241285561

  77. Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. North-Holland ; Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co.

  78. Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

  79. Shields, B. P., Moore, S. A., & Eagles, P. F. J. (2016). Indicators for assessing good governance of protected areas: Insights from park managers in Western Australia. PARKS, 22(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.PARKS-22-1BPS.en

  80. Simangunsong, H., & Sihotang, D. (2023). The impact of economic conditions on social assistance programs and poverty alleviation. Law and Economics, 17(2), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.35335/laweco.v17i2.2

  81. Simanjuntak, P. N., Yanti S., B. S., Simangunsong, M., & Berlianti, B. (2024). Ketimpangan distribusi Kartu Indonesia Pintar: Sebuah kajian terhadap akses dan implementasi di Indonesia [Inequality in the distribution of the Indonesia Smart Card: A review of access and implementation in Indonesia]. AHKAM, 3(4), 803–812. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v3i4.4251

  82. Siong, T. S. (2022). Improving academic supervision through program evaluation using the CIPP model at private high school in Bogor City. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 2(7), 1220–1236. https://doi.org/10.36418/edv.v2i8.500

  83. Soares, F. V. (2011). Brazil’s Bolsa Família: A review. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(21), 55–60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23017226

  84. Soares, F. V., Ribas, R. P., & Osório, R. G. (2010). Evaluating the impact of Brazil’s Bolsa Família: Cash transfer programs in comparative perspective. Latin American Research Review, 45(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0023879100009390

  85. Solihati, G. P., Suhardiyanto, H., Hakim, D. B., & Irawan, T. (2023). Integrating good corporate governance, islamic corporate social responsibility, zakat, syariah governance, and syariah compliance: Exploring their interconnected impact on the financial health of Islamic commercial banks. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(3), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.61100/adman.v1i3.94

  86. Sopha, S., & Nanni, A. (2019). The CIPP Model: Applications in language program evaluation. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 16(4), 1360–1367. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.4.19.1360

  87. Souza, E. L. D., Ferreira, V. L. D. R., Waldman, E. A., & Sato, A. P. S. (2022). Effect of a conditional cash transfer programme on infant up-to-date and timely vaccination. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 76(7), 685–693. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2021-217964

  88. Sutanto, W., Sakaguchi, M., Amrullah, E. R., Rusyiana, A., & Ishida, A. (2020). Accurate targeting in the Indonesian RASKIN program. International Journal of Social Economics, 47(11), 1363–1379. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-03-2020-0124

  89. Tach, L., & Edin, K. (2017). The social safety net after welfare reform: Recent developments and consequences for household dynamics. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1), 541–561. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053300

  90. Tamsah, H., & Nurung, J. (2024). Social and economic interventions to alleviate poverty in Makassar City: An approach using human capital theory and Kurt Lewin’s change model. Jurnal  Manajemen Bisnis, 11(1), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.33096/jmb.v11i1.845

  91. Taufik, T., Khairunnisa, K., & Amirulkamar, S. (2025). Bantuan sosial menjadi ketergantungan: Evaluasi dampak program keluarga harapan di Kabupaten Pidie Jaya [Social assistance becomes a dependency: An impact evaluation of the family hope program in Pidie Jaya District]. PANDITA: Interdisciplinary Journal of Public Affairs, 8(2), 686–700. https://doi.org/10.61332/ijpa.v8i2.366

  92. Toosi, M., Modarres, M., Amini, M., & Geranmayeh, M. (2021). Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model in medical education: A systematic review. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10(1), 199. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1115_20

  93. Tristanto, A., Yunilisiah, Y., & Bangsu, T. (2022). Community response to change of social assistance scheme family hope program during the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Bina Praja, 14(2), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.361-372

  94. Ulrichs, M., & Roelen, K. (2012). Equal opportunities for all?– A critical analysis of Mexico’s Oportunidades. IDS Working Papers, 2012(413), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00413.x

  95. Van Den Boogaard, V., Santoro, F., & Walker, M. (2023). Social protection, community participation and state‐citizen relations: Evidence from a cash transfer program in south‐central Somalia. Social Policy & Administration, 57(7), 1181–1198. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12973

  96. Van Epp, M., & Garside, B. (2019). Towards an evidence base on the value of social learning‐oriented approaches in the context of climate change and food security. Environmental Policy and Governance, 29(2), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1835

  97. Vargas‐Faulbaum, L., Velasco, J. J., & Cruz‐Martínez, G. (2025). Beyond emergency measures: Assessing preexisting social policy and labor program expansion in Latin America during COVID‐19. Latin American Policy, 16(2), e70015. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.70015

  98. Vij, N. (2011). Collaborative governance: Analysing social audits in MGNREGA in India. IDS Bulletin, 42(6), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2011.00269.x

  99. Wahyuni, P., & Wulandari, R. (2024). Zakat and poverty alleviation in Muslim countries: A Biblioshiny application. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 10(1), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol10.iss1.art12

  100. Walker, M. (2005). Amartya Sen’s capability approach and education. Educational Action Research, 13(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790500200279

  101. Wedayanthi, L. M. D., Pradnyana, P. B., & Adiwijaya, P. A. (2024). The implementation of CIPP as evaluation model on teaching assistance in SD Bali Bilingual School as the practice of Kurikulum Merdeka. EduHumaniora | Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 16(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v16i1.59591

  102. Yona, L., & Nadan, Y. (2021). Mind the gap: Parental and professional perceptions of ‘risk’ for children living in poverty. Child & Family Social Work, 26(4), 582–591. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12840

  103. Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product evaluation model (CIPP) as a comprehensive framework to guide the planning, implementation, and assessment of service-learning programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57–84. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ej957107

A qualitative case study on productive zakat and pentahelix-based empowerment: Insights from BAZNAS Malang Regency

Minarni Minarni, Slamet Slamet, Misbahul Munir
Abstract View : 505
Download :361
10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss1.art17
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

The role of zakat in Islamic macroeconomics: A fiscal instrument for stability during global economic crises‎

Siti Walida Mustamin, Abdillah S. Abdillah S., Fakhruddin Mansyur, Muhammad Ridwan, Ulil Amri,...
Abstract View : 613
Download :197
10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss1.art10
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

Zakat and poverty alleviation in Muslim countries: A Biblioshiny application

Putri Wahyuni, Ries Wulandari
Abstract View : 1440
Download :616
10.20885/jielariba.vol10.iss1.art12
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

The role of LAZISMU in eradicating poverty in D.I. Yogyakarta

Ahmad Danu Syaputra
Abstract View : 542
Download :314
10.20885/jielariba.vol2.iss2.art4
PDF