Article Sidebar

Understanding intentions to donate to Islamic charities online A systematic review of theories, methods, and determinants
Submitted
June 25, 2025
Accepted
September 12, 2025
Published
October 30, 2025
Download
PDF Review Reports Originality Report
Statistic
Read Counter : 29 Download : 18

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction
The rapid development of digital technology has transformed Islamic philanthropic practices by enabling zakat, waqf, infaq, and sadaqah to be delivered through online platforms, mobile applications, and financial technology systems. This transformation has expanded access and efficiency while introducing new behavioral, technological, and institutional dynamics that shape how Muslims engage in charitable giving. As online Islamic donations increasingly contribute to broader agendas of Islamic social finance and sustainable development, understanding the determinants of donors’ intentions in digital environments has become an important area of scholarly inquiry. However, existing studies remain fragmented, vary in theoretical and methodological approaches, and lack an integrated synthesis focused specifically on Islamic online donation intentions.
Objectives
This study aims to systematically review and synthesize the academic literature on intentions to donate to Islamic charities through online channels. It seeks to map the current state of research, identify dominant themes and theoretical frameworks, examine methodological trends, highlight key determinants of donation intention, and reveal gaps related to underexplored factors, contexts, and populations.
Method
The study employs a systematic literature review using a structured and transparent approach based on the PSALSAR framework. Peer-reviewed journal articles were identified through comprehensive searches of Scopus and Web of Science databases using predefined keywords related to intention, online contexts, and Islamic donation instruments. A rigorous screening and appraisal process resulted in a final sample of 23 eligible studies, which were analyzed and synthesized to extract patterns in theories, methods, variables, and empirical findings.
Results
The review shows that research on Islamic online donation intention is dominated by quantitative studies using Structural Equation Modeling and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, the Technology Acceptance Model, and the Theory of Planned Behavior are the most frequently applied frameworks. Trust, religiosity, and technology acceptance consistently emerge as central determinants of online Islamic donation intention, particularly in studies on zakat and cash waqf. The literature also reveals a strong geographic concentration in a limited number of countries.
Implications
The findings underscore the importance of trust-building, religious motivation, and user-friendly digital systems for enhancing online Islamic donations. They also point to the need for broader theoretical perspectives, diversified methods, and expanded geographic coverage.
Originality/Novelty
This study contributes by offering a focused and comprehensive synthesis of research on Islamic online donation intentions, strengthening cumulative knowledge and providing a clear agenda for future research in digital Islamic philanthropy.

Keywords

Islamic online donation Islamic social finance religiosity systematic literature review technology acceptance trust zakat

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Rakhmawati Rakhmawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Rakhmawati, R. (2025). Understanding intentions to donate to Islamic charities online: A systematic review of theories, methods, and determinants. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(2), 1929–1966. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss2.art25
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abdul-Rahman, A., Mohd Nor, S., & Yaacob, S. E. (2023). Technological Integration within Zakat Institutions: A Comprehensive Review and Prospective Research Directions. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 24, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.24.2023.268

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.24.2023.268

  2. Adinugraha, H. H., Shulthoni, M., & Sain, Z. H. (2024). Transformation of cash waqf management in Indonesia: Insights into the development of digitalization. Review of Islamic Social Finance and Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol3.iss1.art4

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol3.iss1.art4

  3. Aji, H. M., Albari, A., Muthohar, M., Sumadi, S., Sigit, M., Muslichah, I., & Hidayat, A. (2021). Investigating the determinants of online infaq intention during the COVID-19 pandemic: An insight from Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-05-2020-0136

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-05-2020-0136

  4. Aji, H. M., & Muslichah, I. (2023). Online cross-religion donation during COVID-19: Mediating role of empathy and trust. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(6), 1531–1550. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2021-0316

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2021-0316

  5. Akhter, A., Javed, M. Y., & Akhter, J. (2025). Research trends in the field of Islamic social finance: A bibliometric analysis from 1914 to 2022. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 41(2), 455–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-03-2023-0044

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-03-2023-0044

  6. Al-Daihani, M., Che Abdullah, A. S., & Madun, A. (2024). Donors’ intentions to use crowdfunding-based waqf model in Kuwait: Application of unified theory on acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(10), 2461–2480. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2023-0022

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2023-0022

  7. Alharbey, M., & Van Hemmen, S. (2021). Investor intention in equity crowdfunding. Does trust matter? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14020053

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14020053

  8. Ali, S., & Jadidah, A. N. (2024). Peran teknologi dalam optimalisasi pengumpulan dan distribusi zakat dan wakaf [The role of technology in optimizing the collection and distribution of zakat and waqf]. El-Faqih : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Hukum Islam, 10(2), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.58401/faqih.v10i2.1495

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.58401/faqih.v10i2.1495

  9. Aligarh, F., Falikhatun, F., & Nugroho, A. (2023). Zakat, infaq and shadaqah (ZIS) digitalization: A case study using technology organization environment framework. EL DINAR: Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan Syariah, 11(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.18860/ed.v11i1.18916

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ed.v11i1.18916

  10. Alimusa, L. O., Sukmana, R., Ratnasari, R. T., Machfud, S., & Latif, S. D. H. (2025). Determinants of online cash waqf behavioural intentions for micro enterprises financing: The case of Indonesian Muslim youth. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 16(6), 1623–1649. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-06-2023-0166

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-06-2023-0166

  11. Almomani, M. A.-A., AbuAlhoul, M. A., Alqudah, M. T. S., & Al-Khalidi, I. K. S. (2024). Exploring digital waqf management: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Religion, 5(12), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.61707/ax7vd794

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.61707/ax7vd794

  12. Amin, H. (2022). An analysis of online sadaqah acceptance among university graduates in Malaysia. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 15(6), 1019–1034. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-01-2019-0020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-01-2019-0020

  13. Amin, H., Abdul‐Rahman, A., Ramayah, T., Supinah, R., & Mohd‐Aris, M. (2014). Determinants of online waqf acceptance: An empirical investigation. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 60(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2014.tb00429.x

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2014.tb00429.x

  14. Andriansyah, Y. (2024). Factors motivating muslims to pay zakat: A narrative review based on the Scopus database. Journal of Contemporary Applied Islamic Philanthropy, 2(2), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.62265/jcaip.v2i2.82

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62265/jcaip.v2i2.82

  15. Anjaswati, N., & Berakon, I. (2022). Utaut dan kepuasan berzakat melalui fintech: Peran religiositas sebagai variabel moderasi [Utaut and satisfaction with zakat through fintech: The role of religiosity as a moderating variable]. REVENUE: Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Islam, 3(2), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.24042/revenue.v3i2.13689

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/revenue.v3i2.13689

  16. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

  17. Astuti, W., & Prijanto, B. (2021). Faktor yang memengaruhi minat muzaki dalam membayar zakat melalui KitaBisa.com: Pendekatan technology acceptance model dan theory of planned behavior [Factors influencing muzaki’s interest in paying zakat through KitaBisa.com: Technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior approaches]. Al-Muzara’ah, 9(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.29244/jam.9.1.21-44

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jam.9.1.21-44

  18. Asyari, A., Hoque, M. E., Susanto, P., Begum, H., Awaluddin, A., Marwan, M., & Mamun, A. A. (2024). Online cash waqf behavioral intention: The role of knowledge of cash waqf and trust. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(11), 2864–2890. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-07-2023-0224

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-07-2023-0224

  19. Azarian, M., Yu, H., Shiferaw, A. T., & Stevik, T. K. (2023). Do we perform systematic literature review right? A scientific mapping and methodological assessment. Logistics, 7(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics7040089

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics7040089

  20. Bin-Nashwan, S. A. (2022). Toward diffusion of e-Zakat initiatives amid the COVID-19 crisis and beyond. Foresight, 24(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-08-2020-0082

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-08-2020-0082

  21. Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Ismaiel, A. E. A., Muneeza, A., & Isa, M. Y. (2023). Adoption of ZakaTech in the time of COVID-19: Cross-country and gender differences. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(11), 2949–2979. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2021-0278

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2021-0278

  22. Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Shah, M. H., Abdul-Jabbar, H., & Al-Ttaffi, L. H. A. (2023). Social-related factors in integrated UTAUT model for ZakaTech acceptance during the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(8), 1383–1403. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-02-2022-0038

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-02-2022-0038

  23. Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in IS. Journal of Information Technology, 30(2), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.26

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.26

  24. Bonang, D., Ismail, S., & Raditya Sukmana. (2024). Empowering the future of cash waqf through digitalisation: An insight into the philanthropic intention of the Indonesian Muslim community. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 16(S1), 94–117. https://doi.org/10.55188/ijif.v16iS1.586

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.55188/ijif.v16iS1.586

  25. Borst, I., Moser, C., & Ferguson, J. (2018). From friendfunding to crowdfunding: Relevance of relationships, social media, and platform activities to crowdfunding performance. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1396–1414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817694599

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817694599

  26. Cheah, J.-H., Amaro, S., & Roldán, J. L. (2023). Multigroup analysis of more than two groups in PLS-SEM: A review, illustration, and recommendations. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113539

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113539

  27. Chell, K., Mortimer, G., Masser, B. M., & Russell-Bennett, R. (2023). An identity-based model explaining online donor appreciation. Australasian Marketing Journal, 31(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/18393349211027670

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/18393349211027670

  28. Chen, Y., Dai, R., Yao, J., & Li, Y. (2019). Donate time or money? The determinants of donation intention in online crowdfunding. Sustainability, 11(16), 4269. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164269

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164269

  29. Chetioui, Y., Satt, H., Lebdaoui, H., Baijou, M., Dassouli, S., & Katona, S. (2023). Antecedents of giving charitable donations (Sadaqah) during the COVID-19 pandemic: Does Islamic religiosity matter? Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(5), 1169–1187. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2021-0296

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2021-0296

  30. Danila, R., Mat Saat, R., & Ku Bahador, K. M. (2024). Trust and religiosity: Tntegrating technological acceptance factors into the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model for zakat online payment systems. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 53(2), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.53.2.199214

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.53.2.199214

  31. Dirie, K. A., Alam, Md. M., & Maamor, S. (2024). Islamic social finance for achieving sustainable development goals: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 40(4), 676–698. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-12-2022-0317

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-12-2022-0317

  32. Echchakoui, S. (2020). Why and how to merge Scopus and Web of Science during bibliometric analysis: The case of sales force literature from 1912 to 2019. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 8(3), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00081-9

  33. Faturohman, T., Hassandi, I., & Yulianti, Y. (2020). User acceptance of online waqf applications: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 6(3), 503–530. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v6i3.1117

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v6i3.1117

  34. Febriandika, N. R., Rosyadi, I., & Raihanita. (2023). An empirical study on the Muslims’ intention to use digital waqf innovation. Journal of System and Management Sciences, 13(6), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2023.0608

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.33168/JSMS.2023.0608

  35. Ghofar, A., Fawwaz, M., Prestianawati, S. A., Mubarak, M. F., Manzilati, A., & Imamia, T. L. (2024). Young muslim generation’s preferences for using digital platforms for Zakat payments: A cross-country study of Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development, 8(6), 3249. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i6.3249

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i6.3249

  36. Hamzah, M. Z., Rahim, H., Abdul Rasool, M. S., Abdul Khir, M. F., & Zakaria, N. B. (2023). Ease and usefulness of zakat e-payment: The mediating role of attitude towards intention. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 8(3), 408–428. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss3pp408-428

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol8iss3pp408-428

  37. Hasbulah, M. H., Shuib, M. S., Asni, F., Ahmad, K. A., Hashom, H., Mustafa, W. A., & Syamsuri. (2024). Implementation of technology in cash waqf: A structured literature review. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 54(2), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.54.2.89103

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.54.2.89103

  38. Hassan, M. K., Irsyan, N. M., & Muneeza, A. (2023). The potential of waqf-blended finance using crowdfunding in Indonesia. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 24. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.24.2023.271

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.24.2023.271

  39. Hatimah, H., Sukoharsono, E. G., Djamhuri, A., & Adib, N. (2024). Exploring waqf management transformation: Opportunities and challenges (Case study in Ismuhu Yahya Foundation Pontianak). Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4712

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4712

  40. Ibrahim, M. (2024). Islam in the digital infrastructure: The rise of Islamic cyber practices in Northern Nigeria. Religion, State and Society, 52(2–3), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2024.2353956

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2024.2353956

  41. Ismail, M., Ismail, S., Mohamad, M. S., Suyurno, S. S., & Hashim, F. (2023). A conceptual framework of cash waqf awareness in Malaysia using theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i1/16245

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i1/16245

  42. Jiao, H., Qian, L., Liu, T., & Ma, L. (2021). Why do people support online crowdfunding charities? A case study from China. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 582508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.582508

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.582508

  43. Kamal, S., Safarida, N., & Kassim, E. S. (2024). Investigating the role of fiqh zakat knowledge in moderating the behaviour of the Acehnese to pay zakat digitally. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(11), 3048–3083. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-02-2023-0055

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-02-2023-0055

  44. Kamarudin, M. K., Mohamad Norzilan, N. I., Mustaffa, F. N. A., Khidzir, M., Alma’amun, S., Nor Muhamad, N. H., Abu-Hussin, M. F., Noor Zainan, N. I., Abdullah, A. H., & Samat-Darawi, A. B. (2023). Why do donors donate? A study on donation-based crowdfunding in Malaysia. Sustainability, 15(5), 4301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054301

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054301

  45. Kang, M., Gao, Y., Wang, T., & Zheng, H. (2016). Understanding the determinants of funders’ investment intentions on crowdfunding platforms: A trust-based perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(8), 1800–1819. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0312

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0312

  46. Kasmon, B., Ibrahim, S. S., Daud, D., Raja Hisham, R. R. I., & Dian Wisika Prajanti, S. (2025). FinTech application in Islamic social finance in Asia region: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 41(1), 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-07-2023-0155

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-07-2023-0155

  47. Kasri, R. A., & Chaerunnisa, S. R. (2022). The role of knowledge, trust, and religiosity in explaining the online cash waqf amongst Muslim Millennials. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(6), 1334–1350. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2020-0101

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2020-0101

  48. Kasri, R. A., & Indriani, E. (2022). Empathy or perceived credibility? An empirical study of Muslim donating behaviour through online charitable crowdfunding in Indonesia. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 15(5), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-09-2020-0468

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-09-2020-0468

  49. Kasri, R. A., & Sosianti, M. W. (2023). Determinants of the intention to pay zakat online: The case of Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 9(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v9i2.1664

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v9i2.1664

  50. Kasri, R. A., & Yuniar, A. M. (2021). Determinants of digital zakat payments: Lessons from Indonesian experience. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(3), 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2020-0258

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2020-0258

  51. Kuen, L., Westmattelmann, D., Bruckes, M., & Schewe, G. (2023). Who earns trust in online environments? A meta-analysis of trust in technology and trust in provider for technology acceptance. Electronic Markets, 33(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00672-1

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00672-1

  52. Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2024). How to combine and clean bibliometric data and use bibliometric tools synergistically: Guidelines using metaverse research. Journal of Business Research, 182, 114760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114760

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114760

  53. Magno, F., Cassia, F., & Ringle, C. M. (2024). A brief review of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) use in quality management studies. The TQM Journal, 36(5), 1242–1251. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2022-0197

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2022-0197

  54. Masrizal, M., Sukmana, R., Trianto, B., & Zaimsyah, A. M. (2023). Determinant factor of crowdfunders’ behavior in using crowdfunding waqf model in Indonesia: Two competing models. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(7), 1793–1816. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2021-0246

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2021-0246

  55. Mauludin, M. R., & Herianingrum, S. (2022). Pengaruh digital zakat terhadap penghimpunan zakat dan kinerja lembaga amil zakat [The impact of digital zakat on zakat collection and the performance of zakat institutions]. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori Dan Terapan, 9(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.20473/vol9iss20221pp47-58

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/vol9iss20221pp47-58

  56. Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777

  57. Mohd Thas Thaker, M. A., Mohd Thas Thaker, H., & Allah Pitchay, A. (2018). Modeling crowdfunders’ behavioral intention to adopt the crowdfunding-waqf model (CWM) in Malaysia: The theory of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 11(2), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-06-2017-0157

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-06-2017-0157

  58. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

  59. Mondal, S., Das, S., & Vrana, V. G. (2024). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in achieving a net zero carbon economy in emerging economies: A combination of PLS-SEM and fsQCA approaches to digital inclusion and climate resilience. Sustainability, 16(23), 10299. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310299

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310299

  60. Moysidou, K., & Hausberg, J. P. (2020). In crowdfunding we trust: A trust-building model in lending crowdfunding. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(3), 511–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1661682

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1661682

  61. Muflih, M. (2023). Muzakki ’s adoption of mobile service: Integrating the roles of technology acceptance model (TAM), perceived trust and religiosity. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2021-0273

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2021-0273

  62. Munandar, S. A., & Fahrurrozi, F. (2024). Transformation of Islamic philanthropy by the Idrisiyyah Tariqa in the digital era. Al-Qalam, 30(2), 212. https://doi.org/10.31969/alq.v30i2.1530

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.31969/alq.v30i2.1530

  63. Muryanto, Y. T., Kharisma, D. B., & Nugraheni, A. S. C. (2022). Prospects and challenges of Islamic fintech in Indonesia: A legal viewpoint. International Journal of Law and Management, 64(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-07-2021-0162

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-07-2021-0162

  64. Mutmainah, L., Berakon, I., & Yusfiarto, R. (2024). Does financial technology improve intention to pay zakat during national economic recovery? A multi-group analysis. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(6), 1583–1607. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2022-0268

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-09-2022-0268

  65. Ninglasari, S. Y. (2021). Determinants of online zakat intention amongst Muslim Millennials: An integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business, 6(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.22515/shirkah.v6i2.387

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22515/shirkah.v6i2.387

  66. Niswah, F. M., Mutmainah, L., & Legowati, D. A. (2019). Muslim Millennial’s intention of donating for charity using fintech platform. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 5(3), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v5i3.1080

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v5i3.1080

  67. Oktavendi, T. W., & Mu’ammal, I. (2022). Acceptance model for predicting adoption of Zakat, Infaq, and Sodaqoh (ZIS) digital payments in Generation Z. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(4), 684–700. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2021-0267

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2021-0267

  68. Osman, A. F., & Muhammed, M. O. (2017). Measuring a cash waqf giving behavior among Muslim donor in Malaysia: A theory of planned behavior approach using structural equation modelling. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research, 14(2), 39–63. https://jmifr.usim.edu.my/index.php/jmifr/article/view/19

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0045779

  69. Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), O1–O16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695

  70. Purbasari, L. T., Ratnasari, R. T., & Ab Rahman, A. (2023). Digital wallet adoption for repeat infaq payment: Integrating religiosity – intention model. Jurnal Syariah, 30(1), 34–75. https://doi.org/10.22452/syariah.vol30no1.2

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22452/syariah.vol30no1.2

  71. Purwanto, P., Sulthon, M., & Wafirah, M. (2021). Behavior intention to use online zakat: Application of technology acceptance model with development. ZISWAF: Jurnal Zakat Dan Wakaf, 8(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.21043/ziswaf.v8i1.10457

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/ziswaf.v8i1.10457

  72. Qomar, M. N., Ratnasari, R. T., Hasyim, F., Hidayati, & Putra, T. W. (2024). Trust, waqf literacy and cash waqf intention in Islamic boarding schools: A theory of planned behavior. Al-Uqud : Journal of Islamic Economics, 8(1), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.26740/aluqud.v8n1.p109-123

  73. Rahim, H., Muhd Irpan, H., Zakaria, N. B., Abdul Khir, M. F., & Ahammad, S. F. (2024). Perceived usefulness and attitude toward intention and acceptance of e-payment zakat. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 9(1), 320–344. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol9iss1pp320-344

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol9iss1pp320-344

  74. Rahmayanti, P. L. D., Rahyuda, I. K., Ekawati, N. W., & Setiawan, P. Y. (2024). Intention to donate on online charitable crowdfunding: Systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Economics, Business, & Accountancy Ventura, 26(3), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v26i3.4221

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v26i3.4221

  75. Ramadhan, A. R., Rosyalqin Azri, S., & Ridha, M. R. (2023). Strategies and innovations in the management of ZISWAF funds through digital platforms for sustainable community development. Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic Philantrophy, 1, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.24090/icip.v1i1.305

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/icip.v1i1.305

  76. Robaina-Calderín, L., Martín-Santana, J. D., & Melián-Alzola, L. (2023). Prosocial customer in the public sector: A PLS-SEM analysis applied to blood donation (active donors). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 86, 101507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101507

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101507

  77. Ryandono, M. N. H., Kusuma, A., Maryani, A., & Wijayanti, I. (2022). Factors influence online donation during COVID-19 pandemic. Al-Uqud : Journal of Islamic Economics, 6(1), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.26740/aluqud.v6n1.p66-83

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/aluqud.v6n1.p66-83

  78. Sauer, P. C., & Seuring, S. (2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: A guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions. Review of Managerial Science, 17(5), 1899–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3

  79. Saunders-Smits, G. N., & Leandro Cruz, M. (2020). Towards a typology in literature studies & reviews in engineering education research. Zenodo. Engaging Engineering Education. SEFI 48th Annual Conference (SEFI 2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14653887

  80. Saxton, G. D., & Wang, L. (2014). The social network effect: The determinants of giving through social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 850–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013485159

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013485159

  81. Sharma, M., Joshi, S., Luthra, S., & Kumar, A. (2024). Impact of digital assistant attributes on Millennials’ purchasing intentions: A multi-group analysis using PLS-SEM, Artificial Neural Network and fsQCA. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(3), 943–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10339-5

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10339-5

  82. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

  83. Soomro, Y. A. (2019). Understanding the adoption of SADAD e-payments: UTAUT combined with religiosity as moderator. International Journal of E-Business Research, 15(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEBR.2019010104

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEBR.2019010104

  84. Tang, L., & Jiang, J. (2024). Enhancing the Combined-TAM-TPB model with trust in the sharing economy context: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 442, 141168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141168

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141168

  85. Testa, S., Atawna, T., Baldi, G., & Cincotti, S. (2022). The innovation potential of Islamic crowdfunding platforms in contributing to sustainable development. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(6), 1008–1035. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2021-0547

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2021-0547

  86. Tilahun, M., Berhan, E., & Tesfaye, G. (2023). Determinants of consumers’ purchase intention on digital business model platform: Evidence from Ethiopia using partial least square structural equation model (PLS-SEM) technique. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00323-x

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00323-x

  87. Triantoro, D. A., Wahyuni, T., & Purna, F. P. (2021). Digital philanthropy: The practice of giving among middle to upper-class Muslim in Indonesia and soft capitalism. QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies), 9(2), 315–350. https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v9i2.7814

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/qijis.v9i2.7814

  88. Tumewang, Y. K., Annisa, I. T., & Fakhrunnas, F. (2021). How islamic social funds support sustainable development goals during COVID outbreak? The role of religiosity, trust, and perceived behavioral control. Share: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Islam, 10(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.22373/share.v10i1.9302

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22373/share.v10i1.9302

  89. Ulfahadi, R. (2023). Islamic philanthropy on social media in youth volunteering movements. Dialog, 46(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.47655/dialog.v46i2.737

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47655/dialog.v46i2.737

  90. Usman, H., Mulia, D., Chairy, C., & Widowati, N. (2022). Integrating trust, religiosity and image into technology acceptance model: The case of the Islamic philanthropy in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(2), 381–409. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2020-0020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2020-0020

  91. Van Teunenbroek, C., Bekkers, R., & Beersma, B. (2021). They ought to do it too: Understanding effects of social information on donation behavior and mood. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 18(2), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-020-00270-3

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-020-00270-3

  92. Wan Ismail, W. M. B., Abd Samad, K. B., & Ibrahim, S. N. H. B. (2023). Application of technology usage and perception of performance of cash waqf in theory of planned behaviour: Analysing intention to contribute cash waqf among Muslims in Malaysia. Information Management and Business Review, 15(3(I)), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v15i3(I).3557

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v15i3(I).3557

  93. Wibowo, D., & Bakri, M. H. (2024). Understanding islamic financial technology adoptin in Indonesia: The integration of UTAUT, ES-Qual, and religiosity. Journal of Accounting and Finance Management, 5(3), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.38035/jafm.v5i3.580

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/jafm.v5i3.580

  94. Widiastuti, T., Mawardi, I., Samer Ali, A.-S., Atiya, N., Rani, L. N., Robani, A. B., & Al Mustofa, M. U. (2025). Determinant factors for online cash waqf intention among Muslim Millennial Generation. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 16(1), 258–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-12-2023-0408

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-12-2023-0408

  95. Ye, Y., Jiang, P., & Zhang, W. (2022). The neural and psychological processes of peer-influenced online donation decision: An event-related potential study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 899233. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899233

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899233

  96. Zakariyah, H., Salaudeen, A. O., Othman, A. H. A., & Rosman, R. (2022). Enhancing waqf management through FinTech in Malaysia: A conceptual framework on the technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research, 10(2), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.24191/jeeir.v10i2.17953

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/jeeir.v10i2.17953

  97. Zikrinawati, K., Isrounnastiti, F., & Aiyuda, N. (2023). Keputusan donasi online ditinjau dari pengaruh trust dan persepsi risiko [Online donation decisions reviewed from the perspective of trust and risk perception]. JIVA: Journal of Behaviour and Mental Health, 4(1), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.30984/jiva.v4i1.2533

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.30984/jiva.v4i1.2533

  98. Zyphur, M. J., Bonner, C. V., & Tay, L. (2023). Structural equation modeling in organizational research: The state of our science and some proposals for its future. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 495–517. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041621-031401

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041621-031401

The challenges of literacy, inclusion, and public trust in the digital Islamic banking ecosystem: An urban context study in Indonesia

Hurriah Ali Hasan, Abd Rahim Razaq, Hafizah Besar Sa'aid
Abstract View : 154
Download :162
10.20885/jielariba.vol12.iss1.art7
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

The dynamics of mosque fund management in Old Order Indonesia

Rizqi Anfanni Fahmi, Amelia Fauzia, Abdur Razzaq
Abstract View : 137
Download :149
10.20885/jielariba.vol12.iss1.art4
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

Trends in Islamic entrepreneurship research: A perspective on developing the independence of Islamic boarding school students in Indonesia

Erly Juliyani
Abstract View : 132
Download :66
10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss2.art27
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

Modeling the mediating role of trust in halal cosmetics: Evidence from MS Glow consumers in Palopo City‎

Linda A. Ali, Ahmad Syarief Iskandar, Ishak Ishak
Abstract View : 443
Download :192
10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss2.art13
PDF Review Reports Originality Report

The impact of zakat, infak, and sedekah funds, life expectancy, and average length of schooling on poverty mediated by economic growth in Indonesia

Nufasilul Ayati, Siswanto Siswanto, Khusnudin Khusnudin
Abstract View : 690
Download :314
10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss2.art14
PDF Review Reports Originality Report