Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction
Loan shark predation traps financially vulnerable households in recurring debt, weakens family welfare, and undermines community stability. Conventional interventions often provide temporary debt relief without addressing the economic, legal, psychological, and spiritual conditions that cause victims to return to predatory lending. Productive zakat offers a potential instrument for social rehabilitation when combined with community trust, legal protection, and sustainable economic empowerment.
Objectives
This study examines the collaborative roles of the National Zakat Agency of Cianjur, pesantren, and the Cianjur Social Service Agency in rehabilitating loan shark victims through zakat-based programs. It analyzes the division of institutional responsibilities, implementation mechanisms, synergistic interactions, program outcomes, and challenges affecting long-term sustainability.
Method
The study employed an emergent qualitative multiple-case design in Cugenang, Cipanas, Pacet, and Cikalong Kulon, Cianjur Regency, Indonesia. Data were collected over six months through semi-structured interviews, longitudinal field observations, and document analysis. The initial participants comprised twenty-four representatives of the National Zakat Agency, pesantren leaders and administrators, social-service personnel, and beneficiary household heads. Data were analyzed through abductive thematic analysis, constant comparison, maximum-variation sampling, and deviant-case analysis.
Results
The findings reveal a four-stage rehabilitation process consisting of victim identification and verification, core intervention, mentoring and monitoring, and sustainability support. The National Zakat Agency provided productive zakat capital and Sharia financial education. Pesantren facilitated victim identification, religious counseling, spiritual commitment, and community trust. The Social Service Agency delivered legal mediation, administrative assistance, and access to social protection. Debt mediation succeeded in more than eighty percent of cases, while all beneficiaries-initiated microenterprises using productive assets. Participants also reported reduced anxiety, restored dignity, and stronger social belonging. However, approximately thirty percent of businesses stagnated after twelve to eighteen months.
Implications
Sustainable rehabilitation requires formal coordination, advanced business mentoring, long-term monitoring, and institutional mechanisms that reduce dependence on individual local leaders.
Originality/Novelty
This study introduces a community-embedded tripartite model that integrates productive zakat, religious authority, and government social protection. It expands zakat from consumptive assistance into a transformative instrument for debt liberation, economic independence, spiritual recovery, and social justice.

Keywords

collaborative governance debt bondage Islamic social finance loan shark victim rehabilitation multi-stakeholder collaboration productive zakat social rehabilitation

Article Details

How to Cite
Hadiyanto, R., Pusvisasari, L. ., & Athoillah, M. A. . (2026). Liberating loan shark victims: The collaborative role of BAZNAS, Pesantren, and Cianjur Social Services in zakat-based rehabilitation. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 12(2), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol12.iss2.art9

References

  1. Adinugraha, H. H., Shulhoni, M., & Achmad, D. (2023). Islamic social finance in indonesia: Opportunities, challenges, and its role in empowering society. Review of Islamic Social Finance and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol2.iss1.art4

  2. Aisyah, S. N., & Muiz, A. (2022). Restructuring Islamic social finance ecosystem on standardization of waqf in Indonesia: Platform digitized. Talaa : Journal of Islamic Finance, 2(2), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.54045/talaa.v2i2.697

  3. Akhter, A., Javed, M. Y., & Akhter, J. (2025). Research trends in the field of Islamic social finance: A bibliometric analysis from 1914 to 2022. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 41(2), 455–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-03-2023-0044

  4. Ariani, N., Yuyetta, E. N. A., & Hardiningsih, P. (2020). The support of sharia rural banks financing on national financial inclusion. International Journal of Islamic Business  and Economics (IJIBEC), 4(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.28918/ijibec.v4i1.1980

  5. Ayub, M., Khan, K., Khan, M., & Ismail, M. (2025). Management and governance of awqāf as social finance institutions. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-01-2025-0013

  6. Badrudin, B., Komariah, A., & Kurniady, D. A. (2021). The implementation of pesantren financing based on agribusiness social entrepreneurs. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 9(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v9i1.504

  7. Biermann, F., Stevens, C., Bernstein, S., Gupta, A., Kabiri, N., Kanie, N., Levy, M., Nilsson, M., Pintér, L., Scobie, M., & Young, O. R. (2014). Integrating governance into the Sustainable Development Goals (POST2015/UNU-IAS Policy Brief #3). United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability. https://www.sei.org/publications/integrating-governance-into-the-sustainable-development-goals/

  8. Bisel, R. S., Kavya, P., & Tracy, S. J. (2020). Positive deviance case selection as a method for organizational communication: A rationale, how-to, and illustration. Management Communication Quarterly, 34(2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318919897060

  9. Blanchet, T. (2024). The role of social innovation and cross-sector collaboration in addressing wicked problems. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 37(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2024.2326864

  10. Burton, A. L., Jonson, C. L., M. Petrich, D., & Miller, W. T. (2023). Nefarious and disconcerting motivations for choosing a correctional officer position: A deviant case analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50(10), 1506–1525. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231187415

  11. Dirie, K. A., Alam, Md. M., & Maamor, S. (2024). Islamic social finance for achieving sustainable development goals: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 40(4), 676–698. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-12-2022-0317

  12. Fatimah, S., Al Idrus, S., & Rahayu, Y. S. (2026). From mustahik to muzaki: An integrated entrepreneurial ecosystem model for productive zakat distribution. Al-Jadwa: Jurnal Studi Islam, 5(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.38073/aljadwa.4612

  13. Fauzi, M., Junaedi, & Mahmudin. (2023). Does micro waqf bank avoid loan sharks practice? Keeping on indigent productive business. International Economic and Finance Review, 2(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.56897/iefr.v2i1.23

  14. Fitriah, M. (2025). Institutional transformation of zakat towards a maqashid shariah-based distribution system and econophysics model: A critical conceptual study from an Islamic Economic perspective. Islamic Banking and Finance Review, 12(2), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.32350/ibfr.122.04

  15. Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory; Strategies for qualitative research: Nursing Research, 17(4), 364. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014

  16. Handayani, L., Widiastuti, T., Sukmana, R., Ainun, B., & Napitupulu, R. M. (2025). A new lens: Reframing performance measurement for Islamic social finance. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-12-2024-0519

  17. Harjawati, T., Sumiati, Aisjah, S., & Ratnawati, K. (2026). Integrated business strategies in islamic boarding school-based businesses: A qualitative phenomenological study on human resource management, cooperation, marketing, production, and finance. Cogent Business & Management, 13(1), 2607801. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2607801

  18. Hemerijck, A., Ronchi, S., & Plavgo, I. (2023). Social investment as a conceptual framework for analysing well-being returns and reforms in 21st century welfare states. Socio-Economic Review, 21(1), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwac035

  19. Högberg, L. (2024). Boundary spanning in cross-sector collaboration: Sensemaking and framing in a civil society public partnership beyond the crossroads. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 28(1), 60–77. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-200892

  20. Ibadi, N., & Hardi, E. A. (2022). Is human trafficking’s victim receive zakat as riqab?: Zakat distribution at East Java philanthropic organizations. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian  Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 22(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v22i1.1210

  21. Insani, N., Karimullah, S. S., & Sulastri. (2023). Islamic law challenges in addressing human trafficking and sexual exploitation. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 21(2), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi_v21i2_06

  22. Iskandar, A., Possumah, B. T., Aqbar, K., & Yunta, A. H. D. (2021). Islamic philanthropy and poverty reduction in Indonesia: The role of integrated Islamic social and commercial finance institutions. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 16(2), 274–301. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v16i2.5026

  23. Kamal, I. (2025). A revisit to the prohibition of interest-bearing loans, impact of the verses’ clarity and religious authorities’ interventions: A comparison between the three Abrahamic religions. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-10-2024-0323

  24. Karyanto, & Setiadi, I. (2025). Impact assessment of smartfarm program Laznas Indonesian Zakat Initiative (IZI) in improving the welfare of mustahik. Paradigma, 22(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33558/paradigma.v22i1.10666

  25. Khalidin, B., Musa, A., Fardesi, M., & Ulfia, N. (2024). Islamic economics towards the sustainability of economic development. International Journal of Social Science Humanity & Management Research, 3(11), 1505–1513. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijsshmr.2024.v3i11n16

  26. Kunhibava, S., Muneeza, A., Khalid, M. B., Mustapha, Z., & Sen, T. M. (2024). Islamic social finance from the Quran and Sunnah. In S. Kunhibava, A. Muneeza, M. B. Khalid, Z. Mustapha, & T. M. Sen (Eds.), Islamic Social Finance: Law and Practice in Malaysia (pp. 1–21). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1410-0_1

  27. Kuran, T. (2020). Zakat: Islam’s missed opportunity to limit predatory taxation. Public Choice, 182(3), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00663-x

  28. Kurniawati, E., Fauza, N., Faiza, N. A. R., & Waeno, M. (2025). Metamorphosis of productive zakat: Integrating zakat utilization and women empowerment for achieving sustainable development goals. Islam Realitas: Journal of Islamic and Social Studies, 11(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.30983/islam_realitas.v11i1.9486

  29. Kutsiyah, F., Kamaroellah, A., & Kulsum, U. (2026). Exploring social capital in pesantren communities: A pathway to poverty alleviation in the Tapal Kuda region of Indonesia. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 34(2), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1332/17598273Y2026D000000058

  30. Mahmudi, M., & Muhammad, D. W. (2022). Collaborative governance in the Jogja Berwakaf Movement. Justicia Islamica, 19(1), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v19i1.3759

  31. Mahomed, Z., & Saba, I. (2024). Sustainable development: Exploring the role of Islamic social finance in promoting sustainable development and social welfare. In E. Smolo & M. M. Raheem (Eds.), The future of Islamic finance: From Shari’ah law to fintech (pp. 103–120). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-906-120241007

  32. Makhrus, M., & Sulaeman, A. (2025). Centralized management of Islamic philanthropy at LAZISMU Banyumas: Enhancing welfare through community-based innovation in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(1), 573–596. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss1.art22

  33. Marques, L. M., & Battistella, L. R. (2025). Well-being as a core element of rehabilitation: Preventing mental health challenges in a global context. Global Health Journal, 9(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glohj.2025.02.004

  34. Mikail, S. A., Djafri, F., & Ahmad, M. (2024). Waqf and microfinance integration for enabling sustainable financial inclusion: Analysis of Shari’ah compliance. International Journal of Islamic Finance and Sustainable Development, 16(3), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.55188/ijifsd.v16i3.901

  35. Minarni, M., Slamet, S., & Munir, M. (2025). A qualitative case study on productive zakat and pentahelix-based empowerment: Insights from BAZNAS Malang regency. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(1), 429–454. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss1.art17

  36. Morse, J. M. (2015). Data Were Saturated. . . So What? Qualitative Health Research, 25(5), 587–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315576699

  37. Mubin, M. U., & Siddiq, A. (2022). Contextualization of mustaḥiq zakat at LAZNAS nurul hayat surabaya. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 193–208. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v16i2.6915

  38. Muqorobin, A., & Urrosyidin, M. S. (2023). The Contribution of Zakat, Infaq, Sadaqa, and Waqf (Ziswaf) Strategic Management in Developing the Prosperity of Ummah. Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 4(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.47700/jiefes.v4i1.5698

  39. Mustari, N., Razak, R., Junaedi, J., Fatmawati, F., Hawing, H., & Baharuddin, T. (2024). Multipartner governance and the urgency of poverty alleviation policy: Zakat fundraising management. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2361529. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2361529

  40. Napitupulu, R. M., Sukmana, R., & Rusydiana, A. S. (2024). Governance of Islamic social finance: Learnings from existing literature. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 17(3), 552–571. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-06-2023-0222

  41. Nazeri, A. N. N., & Shaharuddin, A. (2025). Islamic social finance reinvented: A conceptual paper on stretegic framework for socioeconomic development. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Research, 8(2 December), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.53840/ijiefer233

  42. Novriansyah, Y., Supriyati, S., & Darham, D. (2023). Model sinergitas antar lembaga dalam pengelolaan zakat bagi mustahiq pedagang kaki lima (PKL) [A synergy model between institutions in managing zakat for street vendors (PKL)]. Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman, 11(2), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.52431/tafaqquh.v11i2.2089

  43. Pouw, N., & Bender, K. (2022). The poverty reduction effect of social protection: The pros and cons of a multidisciplinary approach. The European Journal of Development Research, 34(5), 2204–2223. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-022-00505-5

  44. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 357. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

  45. Qutaiba, M., Owais, M., & Muharam, A. S. (2024). The current issue of reporting zakat in Indonesia: A critical analysis. Journal of Islamic Economic and Business Research, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.18196/jiebr.v4i1.227

  46. Ramli, A. F. A., Jaenudin, Yuniarti, V. S., Idfilandu, S., & Hidayat, A. A. (2025). Strategic interventions of zakat institution in empowering MSEs: The case of BAZNAS in Bone Regency. Milkiyah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 4(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.46870/milkiyah.v4i1.1527

  47. Rohim, A. N., & Yetty, F. (2025). Contribution of Islamic economy in achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Review of Islamic Social Finance and Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.20885/RISFE.vol4.iss1.art5

  48. Saadah, C., Salsabila, A. Z. A., & Khalimah, D. (2024). Productive zakat and women’s empowerment for inclusive economy: Sharia economic law and social fiqh in Indonesia. Mu’amalah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 3(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.32332/muamalah.v3i1.9248

  49. Sadabadi, A. A., & Rahimi Rad, Z. (2022). How can cross-sector partnership promote social innovation? Systemic Practice and Action Research, 35(4), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-021-09581-w

  50. Saifullah, M., & Mubarok, F. K. (2024). How the legal standing of amil zakat tiban? Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(2), e3133. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i2.3133

  51. Samsi, S., Martomo, Y. P., & Anafih, E. S. (2024). BAZNAS leadership commitment in harnessing zakat potential and strengthening the community economy. Society, 12(2), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v12i2.750

  52. Santoso, A. B., Nurhadi, A., & Jani, M. H. B. G. M. (2025). Empowering persons with disabilities through inclusive productive zakat models: Insights from Indonesian local cases. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat: Media Pemikiran Dan Dakwah Pembangunan, 9(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpm.2025.091-01

  53. Sarif, S., Ali, N. A., & Kamri, N. ‘Azzah. (2024). Zakat for generating sustainable income: An emerging mechanism of productive distribution. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2312598. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2312598

  54. Sawmar, A. A., & Mohammed, M. O. (2021). Enhancing zakat compliance through good governance: A conceptual framework. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 13(1), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-10-2018-0116

  55. Scoones, I., Stirling, A., Abrol, D., Atela, J., Charli-Joseph, L., Eakin, H., Ely, A., Olsson, P., Pereira, L., Priya, R., van Zwanenberg, P., & Yang, L. (2020). Transformations to sustainability: Combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, Advancing the Science of Actionable Knowledge for Sustainability, 42, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.12.004

  56. Small, M. L. (2009). `How many cases do I need?’: On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108099586

  57. Soesilo, N. I. (2021). Advocacy coalition framework of ultra micro loan policymaking in Indonesia. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business, 6(1), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.22515/shirkah.v6i1.412

  58. Subhan ZA, Moh. Ah., Wirasabda, M. A., Marpuah, S., & Ritonga, I. (2025). Enhancing economic empowerment through productive zakat: A case study of coastal communities Cak Kaji Program by BAZNAS, Indonesia. IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.54471/iqtishoduna.v14i1.2919

  59. Sulistyowati, S. (2019). Designing integrated zakat-waqf models for disaster management. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 4(2), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v4i2.1011

  60. Suraiya, N. (2022). Sharia financial management alternative sources in encouraging micro, small and medium enterprises expansion in Indonesia. El-Qish: Journal of Islamic Economics, 2(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.33830/elqish.v2i2.3604.2022

  61. Suryahadi, A., Al Izzati, R., & Suryadarma, D. (2020). Estimating the impact of COVID-19 on poverty in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 56(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2020.1779390

  62. Sutomo, S., Musnandar, A., Mahmoud Alzitawi, D. U. D., & Sutrisno, S. (2024). Religious-sociocultural networks and social capital enhancement in pesantren. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(1), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v10i1.19997

  63. Tenzing, J. D. (2020). Integrating social protection and climate change adaptation: A review. WIREs Climate Change, 11(2), e626. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.626

  64. Thaidi, H. A. A., Rahman, M. F. A., & Salleh, A. Z. (2023). Addressing challenges, unleashing potentials: Towards achieving impactful Islamic social finance. Ulum Islamiyyah, 35(02), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.33102/uij.vol35no02.554

  65. Uddin, M. N., & Hossain, S. (2025). Zakat-based ownership model for sustainable poverty alleviation in developing Muslim countries. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-12-2023-0425

  66. Vestergaard, A., Langevang, T., Morsing, M., & Murphy, L. (2021). Partnerships for development. Assessing the impact potential of cross-sector partnerships. World Development, 143, 105447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105447

  67. Vogel, R., Göbel, M., Grewe-Salfeld, M., Herbert, B., Matsuo, Y., & Weber, C. (2022). Cross-sector partnerships: Mapping the field and advancing an institutional approach. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(3), 394–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12283

  68. Wardiyanto, B., Hariani, N. J., & Soegiono, A. N. (n.d.). Faith-driven alternative social financing: Governing social provision through Islamic-based communities in Indonesia. Public Administration and Development. Retrieved https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pad.70075

  69. Yasmeen, K. (2026). Framework for Islamic social entrepreneurship. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 17(2), 445–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2023-0256

  70. Zauro, N. A., Saad, R. A. J., & Sawandi, N. (2020). Enhancing socio-economic justice and financial inclusion in Nigeria: The role of zakat, sadaqah and qardhul hassan. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(3), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-11-2016-0134