Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 18, 2022
Accepted
September 9, 2022
Published
December 19, 2022
Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2808 Download : 2998

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – The paper aims to clarify the unclear relationship between management accounting information systems and SME business performance by having intellectual capital as mediating variable. This will expand the domain of management accounting information usage from SME’s perspective.


Design/methodology/approach – The paper used a descriptive study using the close-ended questionnaire distributed to 428 SMEs in East Java Region. The data were complemented by statistical analysis using SMART PLS to test the mediation role of intellectual capital.


Findings – The paper provided empirical evidence that intellectual capital plays as a quasi mediating for management accounting information system and business performance relationship. This encouraged SME to optimize their IT usage to maximize the benefit of implementing MAIS.


Research limitations/implications – Since management accounting system needs for business varied, future study needs to consider the level of IT usage. Therefore, future researchers are encouraged to investigate how to set the usage level.


Practical implications – The paper included implications for the development of higher level of IT usage, such as management accounting information system to gain the benefits, that is increased business performance.


Originality value – This paper filled the gap in IT usage from SMEs’ perspective by expanding the role of intellectual capital on the relationship of management accounting information systems on business performance.

Keywords

Management accounting information system; Small Medium Enterprises; business performance, intellectual capital

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Hariyati, Dian Anita Nuswantara, Rendra Arief Hidayat, Insyirah Putikadea

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Author Biography

Dian Anita Nuswantara, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

Accounting Department

How to Cite
Hariyati, H., Nuswantara, D. A., Hidayat, R. A., & Putikadea, I. (2022). Management accounting information system and intellectual capital: a way to increase SME’s business performance. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 27(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol27.iss1.art5
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Adomako, S., Danso, A., & Ofori Damoah, J. (2016). The moderating influence of financial literacy on the relationship between access to finance and firm growth in Ghana. Venture Capital, 18(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2015.1079952
  2. Agostini, L., Nosella, A., & Filippini, R. (2017). Does intellectual capital allow improving innovation performance? A quantitative analysis in the SME context. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2), 400–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-05-2016-0056
  3. Al-Dalaien, M. A. A.-H., Alzubi, M. M., & Alheety, S. N. Y. (2020). The mediating role of Management Information System between Business Processes Management and Operational Excellence in Banks. International Journal Of All Research Writings, 2(12), 49–58.
  4. Al-Swidi, A., Faiz, G., & Gelaidan, H. (2019). Total quality management and the organisational performance: The mediating role of market orientation. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management, 9(4), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPIM.2019.105669
  5. Audretsch, D., Horst, R. Van Der, & Thurik, R. (2009). First Section of the Annual Report of EU SMEs. European Commission, 46.
  6. Basyar, C., & Khanifah, -. (2008). Pengaruh Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial, Dengan Desentralisasi Sebagai Variabel Moderat : (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di Kawasan Industri Pelabuhan Semarang). AKSES: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 3(6), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.31942/akses.v3i6.506
  7. Bayo-Moriones, A., Billón, M., & Lera-López, F. (2013). Perceived performance effects of ICT in manufacturing SMEs. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 113(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571311289700/FULL/XML
  8. Beal, R. M. (2000). Competing Effectively: Environmental Scanning, Competitive Strategy, and Organizational Performance in Small Manufacturing Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 38, 27–47.
  9. Berry, A., Rodriguez, E., & Sandee, H. (2001). Small and Medium Enterprise Dynamics in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 37(3), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910152669181
  10. Bromwich, M. (1990). The case for strategic management accounting: The role of accounting information for strategy in competitive markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(90)90011-I
  11. Carter, S., & Jones-Evans, D. (2009). Enterprise and Small Business: Principles, Practice and Policy (2nd ed.). Strategic Direction, 25. https://doi.org/10.1108/sd.2009.05625eae.001
  12. Chairoel, L., & Riski, T. R. (2018). Internal and External Factor Influence ICT Adoption: A Case of Indonesian SMEs. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 20(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.20.1.38-44
  13. Chenhall, R. H., & Morris, D. (1986). The impact of structure, environment, and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. Accounting Review, 16–35.
  14. Chowdhury, L. A. M., Rana, T., Akter, M., & Hoque, M. (2018). Impact of intellectual capital on financial performance: evidence from the Bangladeshi textile sector. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 14(4), 429–454. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-11-2017-0109
  15. Chua, A. (2002). The influence of social interaction on knowledge creation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(4), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930210448297
  16. Damanpour, F. (2017). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators. Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/256406, 34(3), 555–590. https://doi.org/10.5465/256406
  17. de Castro, G. M., & Sápez, P. L. (2008). Intellectual capital in high-tech firms: The case of Spain. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930810845786
  18. Feher, A., & Towell, E. (1997). Business use of the Internet. Internet Research, 7(3), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662249710171832/FULL/PDF
  19. García‐Muiña, F. E., & Pelechano‐Barahona, E. (2008). The complexity of technological capital and legal protection mechanisms. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930810845821
  20. Gerloff, E. A., Muir, N. K., & Bodensteiner, W. D. (1991). Three Components of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty: An Exploratory Analysis of the Effects of Aggregation. Journal of Management, 17(4), 749–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700408
  21. Ghozali, I. (2013). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 21 up date PLS regresi (Edisi ke-7). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  22. Giannopoulos, G., Holt, A., Khansalar, E., & Cleanthous, S. (2013). The Use of the Balanced Scorecard in Small Companies. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(14), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n14p1
  23. Gloet, M., & Terziovski, M. (2004). Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(5), 402–409. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380410540390/FULL/PDF
  24. Grover, V., Fiedler, K., & Teng, J. (1997). Empirical Evidence on Swanson’s Tri-Core Model of Information Systems Innovation. Https://Doi.Org/10.1287/Isre.8.3.273, 8(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1287/ISRE.8.3.273
  25. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2017). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective (7th Editio). Pearson New International Edition.
  26. Handoko, F., Smith, A., & Burvill, C. (2014). The role of government, universities, and businesses in advancing technology for SMEs’ innovativeness. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 12(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2014.900968
  27. Hariyati, H., & Tjahjadi, B. (2017). Peran Mediasi Kinerja Proses Internal Atas Hubungan Strategi Inovasi Dengan Kinerja Keuangan. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 1(2), 164. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2017.v1.i2.2015
  28. Hariyati, & Tjahjadi, B. (2018). Contingent factors affecting the financial performance of manufacturing companies: The case of East Java, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 11(1), 121–150. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol11no1.5
  29. Harrison, S., & Sullivan, P. H. (2000). Profiting from intellectual capital:Learning from leading companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930010324124/FULL/PDF
  30. Huang, C. F., & Hsueh, S. L. (2007). A study on the relationship between intellectual capital and business performance in the engineering consulting industry: A path analysis. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 13(4), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/13923730.2007.9636446
  31. Ismail, M. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the performance of telekom malaysia mazlan bin ismail universiti teknologi malaysia. PhD Thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Business & Advanced Technology Centre., 1–302.
  32. Jardon, C. M., & Martos, M. S. (2012). Intellectual capital as competitive advantage in emerging clusters in Latin America. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13(4), 462–481. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931211276098
  33. Johnston, M. A. (2016). Delegation and Organizational Structure in Small Businesses: Influences of Manager’s Attachment Patterns. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/1059601100251002, 25(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601100251002
  34. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part II. In Accounting Horizons (Vol. 15, Issue 2, pp. 147–160). https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2001.15.2.147
  35. Kelly, M., & Alam, M. (2008). Management Accounting and the Stakeholder Value Model. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 6(1), 75–86.
  36. Kettinger, W. J., & Teng, J. T. C. (1998). Aligning BPR to strategy: a framework for analysis. Long Range Planning, 31(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)00094-0
  37. Khalique, M., Bontis, N., Bin Shaari, J. A. N., Yaacob, M. R., & Ngah, R. (2018). Intellectual capital and organisational performance in Malaysian knowledge-intensive SMEs. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 15(1), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLIC.2018.088345
  38. Khalique, M., Bontis, N., Shaari, J. A. N. bin, & Isa, A. H. M. (2015). Intellectual capital in small and medium enterprises in Pakistan. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JIC-01-2014-0014
  39. Khalique, M., Shaari, J. A. N., & Hassan, A. (2011). Intellectual Capital and Its Major Components. International Journal of Current Research, 3(6), 343–347. https://doi.org/http://ssrn.com/abstract=1892844
  40. Kim, H., Park, S. Y., & Joh, W. IL. (2019). A Study on Technology Development Performance and Technology Commercialization Performance According to the Technology Development Capability of SMEs Focusing on a Comparative Analysis of Technology Business Groups. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2019, Vol. 5, Page 65, 5(3), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC5030065
  41. Ling, Y.-H. (n.d.). A Study on the Influence of Intellectual Capital and Intellectual Capital Complementarity on Global Initiatives. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 10, 154–162.
  42. Lita, R. P. (2018). SME’S Performance of Creative Industries Supporting Tourism in Indonesia: Market Orientation, Learning Orientation and Organizational Innovatiness as Determinants. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 22(1).
  43. Luis Hervas-Oliver, J., Boronat-Moll, C., & Sempere Ripoll, F. (2016). On Process Innovation Capabilities in SMEs: A Taxonomy of Process-Oriented Innovative SMEs: ••• Creative Industries View project Mature Industries Value Chain View project. Article in Journal of Small Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12293
  44. Luther, C. C. (2016). Pengaruh Penggunaan Informasi Akuntansi Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan ( Studi Pada Kentucky Fried Chicken Di Manado ) the Influence of Information Management Accounting Effect on the Company Performance ( Study in Kentucky Fried Chicken Manado ). Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 4(1), 504–513.
  45. Maksum, I. R., Rahayu, A. Y. S., & Kusumawardhani, D. (2020). A Social Enterprise Approach to Empowering Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(3), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6030050
  46. Malagueño, R., Lopez-Valeiras, E., & Gomez-Conde, J. (2018). Balanced scorecard in SMEs: effects on innovation and financial performance. Small Business Economics, 51(1), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9921-3
  47. Mardiana, I. W., & Hariyati. (2014). Pengaruh Modal Manusia, Modal Struktural, dan Modal Pelanggan Terhadap Kinerja Bisnis. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 2(2), 623–635.
  48. Marino, L. D., Lohrke, F. T., Hill, J. S., Weaver, K. M., & Tambunan, T. (2008). Environmental Shocks and SME Alliance Formation Intentions in an Emerging Economy: Evidence from the Asian Financial Crisis in Indonesia: Https://Doi.Org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00220.X, 32(1), 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-6520.2007.00220.X
  49. McDaniel, Carl, J., & Gates, R. (2010). Marketing Research with SPSS 8 ed (8th ed.). John Willey & Sons (ASIA) Pte.Ltd.
  50. Nani, D. A., & Safitri, V. A. D. (2021). Exploring the relationship between formal management control systems, organisational performance and innovation: The role of leadership characteristics. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 14(1), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.22452/ajba.vol14no1.8
  51. Ngo, Q. H. (2020). Effectiveness of Management Accounting System in Public Healthcare Sector: An Empirical Investigation in Vietnam. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 13(2), 147–180.
  52. Poon, S., & Swatman, P. M. C. (1997). Small business use of the Internet: Findings from Australian case studies. International Marketing Review, 14(5), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339710184343/FULL/PDF
  53. Raharja, S. J., Kostini, N., Muhyi, H. A., & Rivani. (2019). Utilisation analysis and increasing strategy: E-commerce use of SMEs in Bandung, Indonesia. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 12(3–4), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2019.101557
  54. Rahayu, R., & Day, J. (2015). Determinant Factors of E-commerce Adoption by SMEs in Developing Country: Evidence from Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.06.423
  55. Ritchi, H. (2018). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dalam Upaya Peningkatan Aksesibilitas UKM (DESA WISATA) kepada Pasar di Lokasi Wisata Pangandaran dan sekitarnya. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(1), 36–40.
  56. Singh, R., Charan, P., & Chattopadhyay, M. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and responsiveness: moderating effect of organization structures and environmental dynamism. DECISION, 46(4), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-019-00227-4
  57. Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463.
  58. Tovstiga, G., & Tulugurova, E. (2007). Intellectual capital practices and performance in Russian enterprises. Journal of Intellectual Capital.
  59. Ullah, B., Aziz, A., & Yousaf, M. H. (2015). IC in SMEs in Pakistan. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 15(11), 41–48.
  60. Venkatraman, N. (1994). IT-enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition. Sloan Management Review, 73–87.
  61. Veršič, S., Tominc, P., & Štrukelj, T. (2022). SME Top Management Perception of Environmental Uncertainty and Gender Differences during COVID-19. Sustainability, 14(6), 3593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063593
  62. Wang, W., & Chang, C. (2005). Intellectual capital and performance in causal models. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(2), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930510592816
  63. Yin, C., Salmador, M. P., Li, D., & Lloria, M. B. (2022). Green entrepreneurship and SME performance: the moderating effect of firm age. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(1), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00757-3
  64. Young, C.-S., Tsai, L.-C., & Lee, H.-W. (2007). Relationship between intellectual capital-oriented corporate performance management systems, intellectual capital and corporate performance: an exploratory study. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 4(4–5), 422–442.
  65. Yuldinawati, L., Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2018). Exploring the Internet Access of Indonesian SME Entrepreneurs. International Journal of Business, 23(3).
  66. Yusnita, M., & Wibawa, D. P. (2020). Menakar Peran Pemerintah Dan Akademisi Terhadap Pengembangan UMKM. Jurnal Penelitian IPTEKS, 5(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.32528/IPTEKS.V5I1.3020
  67. Zmud, R. W. (1984). An Examination of “Push-Pull” Theory Applied to Process Innovation in Knowledge Work. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1287/Mnsc.30.6.727, 30(6), 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1287/MNSC.30.6.727.