Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 27, 2023
Accepted
July 9, 2024
Published
August 12, 2024
Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 178 Download : 110

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to examine the effect of board characteristics on CEO compensation. The board characteristics examined in this study include board independence and gender diversity consisting of woman on board and independent woman board on CEO compensation.
Design/methodology/approach – The population in this study is a company belonging to the Jakara Islamic Index (JII) at the Indonesian Stock Exchange for the period 2012 - 2016. The sample in this research was determined by purposive sampling method with a total sample of 75 annual reports.
Findings – The results show that independent board gender diversity consisting of female boards and independent female boards has no effect on CEO compensation.
Research limitations/implications – The sample of this study is a company with shares included in the Jakarta Islamic Index on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) with an observation period of 2012-2016. Hypothesis testing in this study using multiple linear regression analysis.
Practical implications – Boards to oversee and control the actions of opportunists manager, and define the most important decisions of companies, one of which compensation for the CEO, so that corporate objectives can be achieved. With the larger board size will increase oversight function of the board to act opportunistically manager so control oversight of CEO compensation more stringent design and can be defined more precisely.
Originality/value – Research on the role of women in board composition is gaining attention, but not much has been explored in a country with a strong patriarchal culture like Indonesia.

Keywords

Board independence gender diversity woman on board woman independent board CEO compensation

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Khodijah Ishak, Arumega Zarefar

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Author Biography

Arumega Zarefar, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia

-

How to Cite
Ishak, K., & Zarefar, A. (2024). The impact of board characteristics on executive compensation: evidence from Jakarta Islamic Index Company. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 28(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol28.iss2.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdullah, S. N. (2006). Directors’ remuneration, firm’s performance and corporate governance in Malaysia among distressed companies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 6(2), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700610655169
  2. Adam, M., Safitri, R., & Wahyudi, T. (2018). Effect of company size, liquidity and operational efficiency on bank profitability with problem credit risk as a moderating variable at commercial banks that are listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan Dan Pembangunan Daerah, 6(3), 331–344. https://mail.online-journal.unja.ac.id/JES/article/view/5894
  3. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
  4. Al-Absy, M. S. M., Ismail, K. N. I. K., & Chandren, S. (2019). Corporate governance mechanisms, whistle-blowing policy and real earnings management. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(6), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n6p265
  5. Al-Shammari, H. A. (2021). The Moderating Effects of Corporate Governance on the Relationship between CEO Pay and Risk Taking. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 1–24. https://www.abacademies.org/abstract/the-moderating-effects-of-corporate-governance-on-the-relationship-between-ceo-pay-and-risk-taking-10587.html
  6. Alfawareh, F. S., Che Johari, E. E., & Ooi, C.-A. (2023). Governance mechanisms, firm performance and CEO compensation: evidence from Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-01-2023-0062
  7. Anton, S. G. (2016). The impact of leverage on firm growth. empirical evidence from romanian listed firms. Review of Economic and Business Studies (REBS), 18, 147–158. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1239897
  8. Awuor, M. M. (2012). The relationship between director remuneration and performance of firms listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange [University of Nairobi]. http://erepository.uonbi.ac.ke/handle/11295/9123
  9. Bachmann, R. L., Bedford, A., Ghannam, S., & Yang, J. S. (2023). A shock to CEOs’ external environment: terrorist attacks and CEO pay. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 77, 101935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.101935
  10. Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2006). Pay without Performance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2006.19873407
  11. Benkraiem, R., Hamrouni, A., Lakhal, F., & Toumi, N. (2017). Board independence, gender diversity and CEO compensation. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(5), 845–860. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2017-0027
  12. Bonner, S. E., & Sprinkle, G. B. (2002). The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(4), 303–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00052-6
  13. Bouaziz, D., Salhi, B., & Jarboui, A. (2020). CEO characteristics and earnings management: empirical evidence from France. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 18(1), 77–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-01-2019-0008
  14. Bouteska, A., & Mefteh-Wali, S. (2021). The determinants of CEO compensation: new insights from United States. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(4), 663–686. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-08-2020-0176
  15. Chen, C.-W., Lin, J. S. B., & Yi, B. (2008). CEO duality and firm performance - an endogenous issue. Corporate Ownership & Control, 6(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv6i1p6
  16. Chircop, J., Fabrizi, M., Ipino, E., & Parbonetti, A. (2018). Does social capital constrain firms’ tax avoidance? Social Responsibility Journal, 14(3), 542–565. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2017-0157
  17. Chong, C., Leong, A., National University of Singapore (NUS), NUS Business School, The Centre for Governance Institutions and Organisations (CGIO), & BoardAgender. (2012). Statutory boards lead the way in boardroom gender diversity. https://boardagender.org/profiles/boardagender-nus-news-release-statutory-boards-lead-the-way-in-boardroom-gender-diversity/
  18. Chong, L. L., Ong, H. B., & Tan, S. H. (2018). Corporate risk-taking and performance in Malaysia: the effect of board composition, political connections and sustainability practices. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 18(4), 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2017-0095
  19. Conyon, M. J. (2006). Executive Compensation and Incentives. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2006.19873408
  20. Conyon, M. J., & Peck, S. I. (1998). Board Control, Remuneration Committees, and Top Management Compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.5465/257099
  21. Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance1The financial support of Nomura Securities and Ernst & Young LLP is gratefully acknowledged. We appreciate the able research assistance of Dan Nunn. We acknowledge the helpfu. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00058-0
  22. Dah, M. A., Jizi, M. I., & Kebbe, R. (2020). CEO gender and managerial entrenchment. Research in International Business and Finance, 54, 101237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101237
  23. Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2003). Women in the boardroom: a business imperative. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/jbs.2003.28824eaf.002
  24. Darmadi, S. (2011). Board diversity and firm performance: The Indonesian evidence. Corporate Ownership & Control, 8(2–4), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i2c4p4
  25. Das, A., & Dey, S. (2016). Role of corporate governance on firm performance: a study on large Indian corporations after implementation of Companies’ Act 2013. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 5(1–2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-016-0061-7
  26. Drobetz, W., Pensa, P., & Wanzenried, G. (2007). Firm Characteristics, Economic Conditions and Capital Structure Adjustments. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.924179
  27. Effendi, M. A. (2016). The Power of Good Corporate Governance: Teori dan Implementasi (2nd ed.). Salemba Empat.
  28. Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1086/260866
  29. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
  30. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. (1996). Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. West Publishing Company.
  31. Florackis, C., Kostakis, A., & Ozkan, A. (2009). Managerial ownership and performance. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1350–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.12.001
  32. Gracelia, S., & Tjaraka, H. (2020). Managerial Ownership Moderates the Effect of Executive Risk Preference and Gender Diversity on Tax Avoidance. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 10(Oct), 484–495. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2020.10.Oct(39)
  33. Guizani, M., & Ajmi, A. N. (2021). Board gender diversity and the timing of CEO stock option awards. Management Research, 19(2), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-09-2020-1092
  34. Han, X., Wang, J., & Cheng, H. (2021). The effect of corporate tax avoidance on salary distribution——Empirical evidence from publicly listed companies in China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 78, 101917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101917
  35. Harakeh, M., El-Gammal, W., & Matar, G. (2019). Female directors, earnings management, and CEO incentive compensation: UK evidence. Research in International Business and Finance, 50, 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.05.001
  36. Haron, H., & Akhtaruddin, M. (2013). Determinants of Directors’ Remuneration in Malaysian Public Listed Companies. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 6(2), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686220130202
  37. Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and Racial Minorities in the Boardroom: How Do Directors Differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800603
  38. Ibrahim, A. H., & Hanefah, M. M. (2016). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility in Jordan. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 14(2), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-06-2015-0065
  39. Indonesia’s Code of Good Corporate Governance, 30 (2006). https://www.ecgi.global/sites/default/files/codes/documents/indonesia_cg_2006_en.pdf
  40. Issa, A., Zaid, M. A. A., Hanaysha, J. R., & Gull, A. A. (2022). An examination of board diversity and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from banking sector in the Arabian Gulf countries. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 30(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-07-2021-0137
  41. Jackson, S. E., & Alvarez, E. B. (1992). Working through diversity as a strategic imperative. In Diversity in the workplace: Human resources initiatives. (pp. 13–29). The Guilford Press.
  42. Jensen, M. C. (1993). The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x
  43. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (2019). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Cost and Ownership Stucture. In Corporate Governance: Values, Ethics and Leadership (p. 56). Q North-Holland Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315191157
  44. Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1990). Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225–264. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937665
  45. Juliawaty, R., & Astuti, C. D. (2019). TATA KELOLA, KOMPENSASI CEO, KARAKTERISTIK CEO, ACCOUNTING IRREGULARITIES DAN TAX AGGRESSIVENESS. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 6(2), 285–300. https://e-journal.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/jat/article/view/5451
  46. Kaihatu, T. S. (2006). GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DAN PENERAPANNYA DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 8(1), 1–9. https://jurnalmanajemen.petra.ac.id/index.php/man/article/view/16505
  47. Kalia, A., & Gill, S. (2023). Corporate governance and risk management: a systematic review and synthesis for future research. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 20(3), 409–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-07-2022-0151
  48. Kasmir. (2017). Analisis Laporan Keuangan (1st ed.). Raja Grafindo Persada.
  49. Kasum, A. S., Etudaiye-Muthar, Oyebola, F., & Abdulraheem, A. (2011). Agency problem in corporate governance in the Nigerian banking industry: a review. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Oyebola_Etudaiye-Muhtar/publication/215585788_Agency_Problem_in_Corporate_Governance_in_the_Nigerian_Banking_Industry_A_Review/links/094b0a1dc37f4e5e7553ffec/Agency-Problem-in-Corporate-Governance-in-the-Nigerian-Banki
  50. Kerin, P. (2003). Executive Compensation: Getting the Mix Right. Australian Economic Review, 36(3), 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.00292
  51. Khan, W. A., & Vieito, J. P. (2013). Ceo gender and firm performance. Journal of Economics and Business, 67, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2013.01.003
  52. Komari, N., & Faisal. (2007). Analisis Hubungan Struktur Corporate Governance dan Kompensasi Eksekutif. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 5(2), 213–224.
  53. Kompas.com. (2013). Prestasi Bagus, Bankir Raup Bonus. Kompas.Com. https://money.kompas.com/read/2013/04/04/14485932/Prestasi.Bagus..Bankir.Raup.Bonus
  54. Liputan6. (2005). Gaji Gubernur BI Rp 156 Juta. Liputan6. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/114886/gaji-gubernur-bi-rp-156-juta
  55. Lucas-Pérez, M. E., Mínguez-Vera, A., Baixauli-Soler, J. S., Martín-Ugedo, J. F., & Sánchez-Marín, G. (2015). Women on the Board and Managers’ Pay: Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2148-1
  56. Mak, Y. T., & Li, Y. (2001). Determinants of corporate ownership and board structure: evidence from Singapore. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00021-9
  57. Miao, M., Khan, M. I., Ghauri, S. P., & Zaman, S. I. (2023). The effect of corporate governance on firm performance: perspectives from an emerging market. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2023.2277275
  58. Nickerson, C., Schwarz, N., Diener, E., & The Gallup Organization. (2007). Financial aspirations, financial success, and overall life satisfaction: Who? and how? Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(4), 467–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9026-1
  59. Oktaviani, I. (2018). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kompensasi CEO pada Perusahaan Sektor Non Keuangan Terdaftar dalam Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2012-2016 [Universitas Surabaya]. https://repository.ubaya.ac.id/34057/
  60. Probohudono, A. N., Perwitasari, D., & Putra, R. P. (2016). Faktor-Faktor yang memengaruhi remunerasi direksi: studi komparasi perusahaan di Australia, Singapura, Indonesia, dan Malaysia. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 13(1), 52–69. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jaki/vol13/iss1/3/
  61. Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., Bel-Oms, I., & Olcina-Sempere, G. (2017). Is board gender diversity a driver of CEO compensation?: Examining the leadership style of institutional women directors. Asian Women, 33(4), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.14431/aw.2017.12.33.4.55
  62. Rehman, S. U., & Hamdan, Y. H. (2023). CEO Greed, Corporate Governance, and CSR Performance: Asian Evidence. Administrative Sciences, 13(5), 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13050124
  63. Salem, W. F., Metawe, S. A., Youssef, A. A., & Mohamed, M. B. (2019). Boards of Directors’ Characteristics and Firm Value: A Comparative Study between Egypt and USA. Open Access Library Journal, 6, e5323. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105323
  64. Sánchez-Marín, G., Baixauli-Soler, J. S., & Lucas-Pérez, M. E. (2010). When much is not better? Top management compensation, board structure, and performance in Spanish firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(15), 2778–2797. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2010.528660
  65. Sands, K. (2014). CEO Compensation: A Position Paper (Johnson & Wales University ScholarsArchive@JWU - MBA Student Scholarship). https://scholarsarchive.jwu.edu/mba_student/30/
  66. Schiehll, E., & Bellavance, F. (2009). Boards of Directors, CEO Ownership, and the Use of Non-Financial Performance Measures in the CEO Bonus Plan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00723.x
  67. Sessa, V. I., & Jackson, S. E. (1995). Diversity in Decision-Making Teams: All Differences are Not Created Equal. In M. M. Chemers, S. Oskamp, & M. A. Costanzo (Eds.), Diversity in Organizations: New Perspectives for a Changing Workplace. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243405
  68. Setiawanta, Y., & Septiani, W. (2017). Struktur, kinerja keuangan dan nilai perusahaan (Studi empiris industri perbangkan tahun 2007-2014 di Bursa Efek Indonesia). Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.33633/jpeb.v2i1.2232
  69. Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance?A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569–593. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400610702160
  70. SWAOnline. (2013). Siapa berani bayar mahal eksekutif hebat (SWA Edisi 20/2013). SWAOnline. https://swa.co.id/read/68601/siapa-berani-bayar-mahal-eksekutif-hebat-swa-edisi-202013
  71. Ullah, F., Jiang, P., Shahab, Y., Li, H.-X., & Xu, L. (2020). Block ownership and CEO compensation: does board gender diversity matter? Applied Economics, 52(6), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1659490
  72. Vidyatmoko, D., Sanim, B., Siregar, H., & Didu, M. S. (2009). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kompensasi eksekutif dan hubungannya dengan kinerja perusahaan: kasus bumn perkebunaN. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis (JMA), 6(2), 74–90. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jmagr/article/view/3306
  73. Yoon, N. (2024). How Much Does Nonprofit Board Governance Matter? Role of Interlocking Directorates, Executive Power, and Women on Boards in Executive Compensation. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X231221505
  74. Zolotoy, L., O’Sullivan, D., Martin, G. P., & Wiseman, R. M. (2021). Stakeholder Agency Relationships: CEO Stock Options and Corporate Tax Avoidance. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 782–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12623