Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 12, 2024
Accepted
February 6, 2026
Published
February 10, 2026
Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 83 Download : 56

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This research explains inconsistencies in research findings regarding the effect of online consumer reviews dimension (review timeliness, review quantity, review positive valence, review quality) and trust on purchase intentions, using a social influence theory approach.
Design/methodology/approach – The sample in this study was 213 respondents, who were generation Y and generation Z, who had read online reviews of cosmetic products.
Findings – The results reveal that online consumer reviews influence purchase intention primarily through the formation of consumer trust. Review quantity, review positive valence, and review quality have significant positive effects on trust and purchase intention, suggesting that consumers place greater importance on the credibility, positivity, and informativeness of review content when evaluating products online. Trust serves as an important mediating mechanism in transmitting the influence of review dimensions on purchase intention. Review timeliness does not exhibit a significant direct or indirect effect, suggesting that consumers usually rely more on the content and quality of reviews than on their recency when forming purchase intention.
Research limitations/implications – This study has several limitations. The sample was dominated by Generation Z respondents, which may limit the generalizability of the findings across generations. The focus on cosmetic products also restricts the applicability of the results to other product categories. In addition, this study only examined four dimensions of online reviews and one mediating variable, namely trust. Future research is recommended to further explore the relationship between review timeliness and trust, as well as to include additional variables such as perceived credibility and consumer engagement.
Practical implications – The managerial implication in this research is that online reseller should be able to encourage consumers to give positive reviews of their market offerings, because online consumer reviews can have an impact on increasing company sales.
Originality/value – This study contributes to examine the social influence theory approachlinked to the dimensions of online reviews. It specifically focuses on generations Y and Z because these generations dominate the internet population and are more familiar with e-commerce than earlier generations. The value provided in this paper is that it is able to provide insight for companies and researchers in order to improve product reputation and explore future research.

Keywords

Online Consumer Review purchase intention trust Gen Y Gen Z

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Ade Yuliana, Weni Novandari, Sri Murni Setyawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Yuliana, A., Novandari, W. ., & Setyawati, S. M. (2026). Investigating the effect of online consumer reviews on purchase intention among Gen Y and Z. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 30(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol30.iss1.art7
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Akhtar, N., Sun, J., Chen, J., & Akhtar, M. N. (2020). The role of attitude ambivalence in conflicting online hotel reviews. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 29(4), 471–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2019.1650684
  2. Aljukhadar, M., Trifts, V., & Senecal, S. (2017). Consumer self‐construal and trust as determinants of the reactance to a recommender advice. Psychology & Marketing, 34(7), 708–719. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21017
  3. Arora, D., Kumar Sharma, B., & Arora, L. (2018). Influence of Review Quality, Review Quantity and Review Credibility on Purchase Intention in the context of High Involvement Products Evaluated by a double-blind review system. European Journal of Applied Business Management, 4(4), 25–40.
  4. Bailey, J. E., & Pearson, S. W. (1983). Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction. Management Science, 29(5), 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.5.530
  5. Bataineh, A. Q. (2015). The impact of perceived e-WOM on purchase intention: The mediating role of corporate image. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 7(1), p126. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v7n1p126
  6. Beneke, J., Mill, J., Naidoo, K., & Wickham, B. (2015). The impact of willingness to engage in negative electronic word-of-mouth on brand attitude: A study of airline passengers in south africa. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, Volume 09(Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.24052/JBRMR/194
  7. Bhattacherjee, A., & Sanford, C. (2006). Influence Processes for Information Technology Acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model1. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 805–825. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148755
  8. Bickart, B., & Schindler, R. M. (2001). Internet Forums as Influential. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), 31–40.
  9. Breazeale, M. (2009). FORUM - Word of Mouse—An Assessment of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Research. International Journal of Market Research, 51(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530905100307
  10. Chang, C.-C., & Chin, Y.-C. (2010). The impact of recommendation sources on online purchase intentions: The moderating effects of gender and perceived risk. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 4, 655-658.
  11. Chang, C.-W., & Chang, S.-H. (2023). The Impact of Digital Disruption: Influences of Digital Media and Social Networks on Forming Digital Natives’ Attitude. Sage Open, 13(3), 21582440231191741. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231191741
  12. Chen, C.-C., & Chang, Y.-C. (2018). What drives purchase intention on airbnb? Perspectives of consumer reviews, information quality, and media richness. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1512–1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.019
  13. Chen, C.-D., & Ku, E. C. S. (2021). Diversified online review websites as accelerators for online impulsive buying: The moderating effect of price dispersion. Journal of Internet Commerce, 20(1), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2020.1868227
  14. Chen, T., Samaranayake, P., Cen, X., Qi, M., & Lan, Y.-C. (2022). The impact of online reviews on consumers’ purchasing decisions: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 865702. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865702
  15. Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M. K. O., & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240810883290
  16. Cheung, Christy M.K., Lee, M. K. O., & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The impact of electronic word‐of‐mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240810883290
  17. Cheung, C. M. K., & Thadani, D. R. (2010). The effectiveness of electronic word-of-mouth communication. 23rd Bled eConference - eTrust: Implications for the Individual, Enterprises and Society, 329–345. https://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/the-effectiveness-of-electronic-word-of-mouth-communication-a-lit/
  18. Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345
  19. Choi, J., Lee, H. J., & Kim, Y. C. (2011). The Influence of Social Presence on Customer Intention to Reuse Online Recommender Systems: The Roles of Personalization and Product Type. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 16(1), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415160105
  20. Citrin, A. V., Washington State University, & Washington State University. College of Business & Economics. (2001). Information Quality Perceptions: The Role of Communication Media Characteristics. UMI. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=_5dMNQAACAAJ
  21. Click, K., & Schwartz, N. (2018). Trending Now: News Habits of Generation Z. SSRN Electronic Journal, (February 14, 2018). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3408021
  22. Conner, L. (2013). Audience engagement and the role of arts talk in the digital era. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023926
  23. Cox, C., Burgess, S., Sellitto, C., & Buultjens, J. (2009). The role of user-generated content in tourists’ travel planning behavior. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 18(8), 743–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368620903235753
  24. Dellarocas, C., Zhang, X. (Michael), & Awad, N. F. (2007). Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20087
  25. Dima, J., Sogen, M. M. B., Tallo, C. G., Ndun, R., & Taneo, R. E. (2025). The influence of social media on gen Z consumer behavior in E-commerce. JUPE : Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 10(2), 603. https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v10i2.8796
  26. Dimock, M. (2019, January 17). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
  27. Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. (2008). The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales—An empirical investigation of the movie industry. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2008.04.005
  28. Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2016). The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.003
  29. Fang, Y., Qureshi, I., Sun, H., McCole, P., Ramsey, E., & Lim, K. H. (2014). Trust, Satisfaction, and Online Repurchase Intention: The Moderating Role of Perceived Effectiveness of E-Commerce Institutional Mechanisms1. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.04
  30. Ferran, C., & Watts, S. (2008). Videoconferencing in the Field: A Heuristic Processing Model. Management Science, 54(9), 1565–1578. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0879
  31. Filieri, R., & McLeay, F. (2014). E-WOM and accommodation: An analysis of the factors that influence travelers’ adoption of information from online reviews. Journal of Travel Research, 53(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287513481274
  32. Floh, A., Koller, M., & Zauner, A. (2013). Taking a deeper look at online reviews: The asymmetric effect of valence intensity on shopping behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(5–6), 646–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2013.776620
  33. Floyd, K., Freling, R., Alhoqail, S., Cho, H. Y., & Freling, T. (2014). How online product reviews affect retail sales: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing, 90(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2014.04.004
  34. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  35. Fu, X., Zhang, B., Xie, Q., Xiao, L., & Che, Y. (2011). Impact of quantity and timeliness of EWOM information on consumer’s online purchase intention under C2C environment. Asian Journal of Business Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.110010
  36. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90.
  37. Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2004a). Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science, 23(4), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0071
  38. Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2004b). Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science, 23(4), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1040.0071
  39. Gopinath, S., Thomas, J. S., & Krishnamurthi, L. (2014). Investigating the relationship between the content of online word of mouth, advertising, and brand performance. Marketing Science, 33(2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2013.0820
  40. Gretzel, U., & Yoo, K. H. (2008). Use and impact of online travel reviews. In P. O’Connor, W. Höpken, & U. Gretzel (Eds.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2008 (pp. 35–46). Springer Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-77280-5_4
  41. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (Third edition). SAGE.
  42. Hajli, N. (2019). The impact of positive valence and negative valence on social commerce purchase intention. Information Technology & People, 33(2), 774–791. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2018-0099
  43. Hoehle, H., Scornavacca, E., & Huff, S. (2012). Three decades of research on consumer adoption and utilization of electronic banking channels: A literature analysis. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.04.010
  44. Huwaida, L. A., Yusuf, A., Satria, A. N., Darmawan, M. A., Ammar, M. F., Yanuar, M. W., Hidayanto, A. N., & Yaiprasert, C. (2024). Generation Z and indonesian social commerce: Unraveling key drivers of their shopping decisions. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(2), 100256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100256
  45. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(1–2), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019104520776
  46. Jiang, Z. (Jack), & Benbasat, I. (2007). The Effects of Presentation Formats and Task Complexity on Online Consumers’ Product Understanding1. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 475–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148804
  47. Jurafsky, D., Chahuneau, V., Routledge, B. R., & Smith, N. A. (2014). Narrative framing of consumer sentiment in online restaurant reviews. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i4.4944
  48. Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200106
  49. Kevin, A., Wahab, Z., & Shihab, M. S. (2020). The impact of online consumer reviews dimension on online purchase intentions in tokopedia. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 10(1), p9761. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.10.01.2020.p9761
  50. Kim, D., Ferrin, D., & Rao, R. (2003). Antecedents of Consumer Trust in B-to-C Electronic Commerce. 4–6. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220893427_Antecedents_of_Consumer_Trust_in_B-to-C_Electronic_Commerce
  51. Kim, S., & Park, H. (2013). Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance. International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.11.006
  52. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
  53. Lackermair, G., Kailer, D., & Kanmaz, K. (2013). Importance of online product reviews from a consumer’s perspective. Advances in Economics and Business, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.13189/aeb.2013.010101
  54. Ladhari, R., & Michaud, M. (2015). EWOM effects on hotel booking intentions, attitudes, trust, and website perceptions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 46, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.01.010
  55. Lantzy, S., & Anderson, D. (2020). Can consumers use online reviews to avoid unsuitable doctors? Evidence from RateMDs.com and the federation of state medical boards. Decision Sciences, 51(4), 962–984. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12398
  56. Lascu, D.-N., Bearden, W. O., & Rose, R. L. (1995). Norm extremity and interpersonal influences on consumer conformity. Journal of Business Research, 32(3), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)00046-H
  57. López, M., & Sicilia, M. (2014). eWOM as source of influence: The impact of participation in eWOM and perceived source trustworthiness on decision making. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 14(2), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2014.944288
  58. Lyu, M., & Huang, Q. (2024). Visual elements in advertising enhance odor perception and purchase intention: The role of mental imagery in multi-sensory marketing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 78, 103752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103752
  59. Matute Vallejo, J., Polo Redondo, Y., & Utrillas Acerete, A. (2015). Las características del boca-oído electrónico y su influencia en la intención de recompra online. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 24(2), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2015.03.002
  60. McCloskey, D. W. (2006). The importance of ease of use, usefulness, and trust to online consumers: An examination of the technology acceptance model with older customers. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 18(3), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2006070103
  61. McCrindle Research. (2022, July 6). Understanding Generation Alpha—McCrindle. https://mccrindle.com.au/article/topic/generation-alpha/generation-alpha-defined/
  62. Muda, M., Mohd, R., & Hassan, S. (2016). Online purchase behavior of generation Y in malaysia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30127-7
  63. Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on amazon.Com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721420
  64. Park, C., & Lee, T. M. (2009). Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.11.017
  65. Park, D.-H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The Effect of On-Line Consumer Reviews on Consumer Purchasing Intention: The Moderating Role of Involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415110405
  66. Park, S., & Nicolau, J. L. (2015). Asymmetric effects of online consumer reviews. Annals of Tourism Research, 50, 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2014.10.007
  67. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
  68. PWC. (2016). They say they want a revolution total retail 2016 (pp. 1–30). PWC. https://www.pwc.com/gr/en/publications/assets/total-retail-survey-2016.pdf
  69. Qiu, K., & Zhang, L. (2024). How online reviews affect purchase intention: A meta-analysis across contextual and cultural factors. Data and Information Management, 8(2), 100058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dim.2023.100058
  70. Racherla, P., Mandviwalla, M., & Connolly, D. J. (2012). Factors affecting consumers’ trust in online product reviews. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.385
  71. Ramadhan, M. A., Nugroho, I., & Wisnu, A. A. (2022). The impact of online reviews on online purchase intention in tokopedia (jakarta). Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 2(2), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v2i2.14077
  72. Ratchford, B. T., Talukdar, D., & Lee, M.-S. (2001). A model of consumer choice of the internet as an information source. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(3), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2001.11044217
  73. Sa’ait, N., Kanyan, A., & Nzrin, M. F. (n.d.). The effect of E-WOM on customer purchase intention. International Academic Research Journal of Social Science, 2(1), 73–80.
  74. Salim Khraim, H. (2011). The Influence of Brand Loyalty on Cosmetics Buying Behavior of UAE Female Consumers. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 3(2), p123. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v3n2p123
  75. Senecal, S., & Nantel, J. (2004). The influence of online product recommendations on consumers’ online choices. Journal of Retailing, 80(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.001
  76. Sheikh, Z., Yezheng, L., Islam, T., Hameed, Z., & Khan, I. U. (2019). Impact of social commerce constructs and social support on social commerce intentions. Information Technology & People, 32(1), 68–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2018-0195
  77. Sichtmann, C. (2007). An analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in a corporate brand. European Journal of Marketing, 41(9/10), 999–1015. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710773318
  78. Sparks, B. A., & Browning, V. (2011). The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1310–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.12.011
  79. Stvilia, B., Michael B. Twidale, Les Gasser, & Linda C. Smith. (2005). (pp. 101–113). World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. https://ideas.repec.org/h/wsi/wschap/9789812701527_0009.html
  80. Tata, S. V., Prashar, S., & Gupta, S. (2020). An examination of the role of review valence and review source in varying consumption contexts on purchase decision. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.003
  81. Tran, L. T. T. (2020). Online reviews and purchase intention: A cosmopolitanism perspective. Tourism Management Perspectives, 35, 100722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100722
  82. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  83. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  84. Wahyuarini, T., Sofiana, E., & Novieyana, S. (2022). The effect of online review on consumer’s attitude and purchase intention towards automotive products. Inovbiz: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis, 10(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.35314/inovbiz.v10i2.2425
  85. Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0042
  86. Xie, K. L., So, K. K. F., & Wang, W. (2017). Joint effects of management responses and online reviews on hotel financial performance: A data-analytics approach. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 62, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.12.004
  87. Yeap, J. A. L., Ignatius, J., & Ramayah, T. (2014). Determining consumers’ most preferred eWOM platform for movie reviews: A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.034
  88. Yuan, J., & Xu, W. (2024). Research on the impact of online review features on hotel customers’ purchase intention. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 17(3), 521–526. https://doi.org/10.54097/3knj5810
  89. Zhao, X. (Roy), Wang, L., Guo, X., & Law, R. (2015). The influence of online reviews to online hotel booking intentions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(6), 1343–1364. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2013-0542
  90. Zhu, L., Li, H., Wang, F.-K., He, W., & Tian, Z. (2020). How online reviews affect purchase intention: A new model based on the stimulus-organism-response. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(4), 463–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-11-2019-0308