Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This study aimed to determine the significant impact of marketing stimuli on perceived usefulness, the appreciably effect of social media interaction on content quality, and the remarkably influence of perceived usefulness and content quality on purchase intentions.
Design/methodology/approach – This is quantitative research, where quantitative data were obtained from the distribution of online questionnaires. The research sample was all participants of the "Book Writing Camp" up to Batch 21 (2023) who had published their books at PT. Litera Media Tama, totaling 162 people. A sophisticated PLS-SEM analysis was used to examine the data gathered.
Findings – The results showed that perceived usefulness and content quality on the publisher's social media greatly determine the author's choice. To increase perceived usefulness, publisher must strengthen marketing stimuli such as relative service innovation, service and price advantage, and promotional effort. Meanwhile, publisher must interact more with consumers on social media to improve content quality.
Research limitations – Limitations of this study are that the data collecting process was conducted online and only at one publisher. Therefore, the results obtained from this study may vary if applied to other publishers.
Practical implications – Publishers should optimize marketing stimuli to strengthen perceived usefulness and increase interaction with followers on social media to improve content quality. Therefore, publishers can effectively attract very motivated writers to publish their books with that publisher.
Originality/value – The originality of this work lies in the utilization of Planned Behaviour Theory inside a sophisticated conceptual framework that has yet to be employed in prior research. In addition, the framework tested on Indie publishers in developing countries, a practice that has yet to be explored.

Keywords

Purchase Intention Perceived Usefulness Marketing Stimuli Content Quality Social Media Interaction

Article Details

Author Biography

Vivien Amor Viloria, Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, Nueva Ecija, Philippines

Business Administration Department, College of Management and Business Technology

How to Cite
Anjaningrum, W. D., Rahayu, E. D. ., & Viloria, V. A. . (2026). Decisive factors for indie publishers to win authors’ hearts to publish their books. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 30(1), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol30.iss1.art8

References

  1. Abdelfattah, F., Salah, M., Dahleez, K., Darwazeh, R., & Al Halbusi, H. (2024). The future of competitive advantage in oman: Integrating green product innovation, AI, and intellectual capital in business strategies. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 8(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.02.001
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  3. Ariasih, M. P., Rahmantari, N. L. L., & Mahendra, G. S. (2023). Exploring the influence of visual content quality marketing on impulse buying in tiktok shop the mediating role of copywriting. Enrichment: Journal of Management, 13(2), 1143–1151. https://doi.org/10.35335/enrichment.v13i2.1448
  4. Brondino, G. (2023). Fragmentation of production, comparative advantage, and the heckscher-ohlin theory. Review of Political Economy, 35(3), 803–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2021.1977540
  5. Chasanah, H. F., & Saino, S. (2022). The effect digital content marketing and product quality on purchasing decisions through buying interest as intervening variable. Jurnal Mantik, 6(1), 551–559.
  6. Dabbous, A., & Barakat, K. A. (2020). Bridging the online offline gap: Assessing the impact of brands’ social network content quality on brand awareness and purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 101966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101966
  7. Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=hbx8NwAACAAJ
  8. Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168
  9. Ellitan, L., & Prayogo, C. (2022). Increasing online Purchase through Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Risk and Perceived Ease of Use. EKOMA: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi, 1(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.56799/ekoma.v1i2.463
  10. Georgantzis, N., & Brunner, C. B. (2016). Promotional Effort. In A. Marciano & G. B. Ramello (Eds.), Encyclopedia of law and economics (pp. 1–4). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_385-1
  11. Gutierrez, A., Punjaisri, K., Desai, B., Syed Alwi, S. F., O’Leary, S., Chaiyasoonthorn, W., & Chaveesuk, S. (2023). Retailers, don’t ignore me on social media! The importance of consumer-brand interactions in raising purchase intention—Privacy the achilles heel. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 72, 103272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103272
  12. Haq, M. D., Tseng, T.-H., Cheng, H.-L., & Chiu, C.-M. (2024). An empirical analysis of eWOM valence effects: Integrating stimulus-organism-response, trust transfer theory, and theory of planned behavior perspectives. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 81, 104026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104026
  13. Indrawati, Putri Yones, P. C., & Muthaiyah, S. (2023). eWOM via the TikTok application and its influence on the purchase intention of somethinc products. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.07.007
  14. Johanson, K., Rutherford, L., & Reddan, B. (2023). Beyond the “good story” and sales history: Where is the reader in the publishing process? Cultural Trends, 32(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2022.2045864
  15. Kaur, M. (2024). Digital Narratives: Exploring Literature in the Age of Technology. American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (ARJHSS), 10(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.21694/2378-7031.24001
  16. Krisprimandoyo, D. A. (2024). Reputation and risk management in promotional activities in relation to the brand identity of IQOS. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 23(2), 185. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i2.4311
  17. Leonhardt, J. M., Pezzuti, T., & Namkoong, J.-E. (2020). We’re not so different: Collectivism increases perceived homophily, trust, and seeking user-generated product information. Journal of Business Research, 112, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.017
  18. Liao, S., Yu, L., Kruger, J.-L., & Reichle, E. D. (2024). Dynamic reading in a digital age: New insights on cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.08.002
  19. Onofrei, G., Filieri, R., & Kennedy, L. (2022). Social media interactions, purchase intention, and behavioural engagement: The mediating role of source and content factors. Journal of Business Research, 142(May 2021), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.031
  20. Oyman, M., Bal, D., & Ozer, S. (2022). Extending the technology acceptance model to explain how perceived augmented reality affects consumers’ perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107127
  21. Pamuji, E., Ida, R., & Mustain. (2022). Print media innovation in the digital era: Disruptive challenges or opportunities? Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 6(3), 785–804. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v6i3.5311
  22. Pillai, S. G., Kim, W. G., Haldorai, K., & Kim, H.-S. (2022). Online food delivery services and consumers’ purchase intention: Integration of theory of planned behavior, theory of perceived risk, and the elaboration likelihood model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 105, 103275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103275
  23. Pratista, N. D., & Marsasi, E. G. (2024). Effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use for driving purchase intention. Jurnal Ekonomi, 28(3), 488–509. https://doi.org/10.24912/je.v28i3.1940
  24. Rahayu, E. D., & Lestari, J. D. (2023). Data Target dan Peserta "Book Writing Camp PT. Litera Media Tama. Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia.
  25. Rehman, S. U., Gulzar, R., & Aslam, W. (2022). Developing the Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC) through Social Media (SM): The Modern Marketing Communication Approach. Sage Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221099936
  26. Salani, J., & Tapfuma, M. M. (2025). Artificial intelligence transforming the publishing industry: A case of the book sector in africa. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 10, 1504415. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1504415
  27. Shanmugavel, N., & Micheal, M. (2022). Exploring the marketing related stimuli and personal innovativeness on the purchase intention of electric vehicles through Technology Acceptance Model. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 3(September 2021), 100029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100029
  28. Sinitsyn, M. (2022). Price leadership with promotions. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 82, 102838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2022.102838
  29. Spjeldnæs, K. (2022). Platformization and publishing: Changes in literary publishing. Publishing Research Quarterly, 38(4), 782–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-022-09912-2
  30. Tang, L., & Jiang, J. (2024). Enhancing the combined-TAM-TPB model with trust in the sharing economy context: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 442, 141168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141168
  31. Vazquez, E. E., Patel, C., Alvidrez, S., & Siliceo, L. (2023). Images, reviews, and purchase intention on social commerce: The role of mental imagery vividness, cognitive and affective social presence. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74, 103415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103415
  32. Wang, E. S.-T. (2022). Influences of Innovation Attributes on Value Perceptions and Usage Intentions of Mobile Payment | JECR. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 23(1), 45–58.
  33. Winarto, W. W. A. (2022). Determinastion of Service Innovation, Attitude, and Satisfaction in Adopt Use of Sharia Fintech. Global Financial Accounting Journal, 06(02), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.37253/gfa.v6i2.6802
  34. Wismiarsi, T., Pangaribuan, C. H., Prayitno, S. B., & Ainin, A. Q. (2024). The influences of content interactivity on purchase intention: An engagement mediation. Multidiciplinary Science Journal, 6(7), e2024094. https://10.31893/multiscience.2024094
  35. Wu, S.-H., & Ku, E. C. S. (2024). Aligning restaurants and artificial intelligence computing of food delivery service with product development. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 15(3), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-10-2023-0322
  36. Xiao, J., & Goulias, K. G. (2022a). Perceived usefulness and intentions to adopt autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 161, 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.05.007
  37. Xiao, J., & Goulias, K. G. (2022b). Perceived usefulness and intentions to adopt autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part A, 161(July 2021), 170–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.05.007
  38. Zhang, P., Chao, C.-W. (Fred), Chiong, R., Hasan, N., Aljaroodi, H. M., & Tian, F. (2023). Effects of in-store live stream on consumers’ offline purchase intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 72, 103262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103262
  39. Zhang, W., Zhang, W., & Daim, T. U. (2023). Investigating consumer purchase intention in online social media marketing: A case study of tiktok. Technology in Society, 74, 102289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102289
  40. Zhou, S., Rashid, Md. H. U., Mohd. Zobair, S. A., Sobhani, F. A., & Siddik, A. B. (2023). Does ESG Impact Firms’ Sustainability Performance? The Mediating Effect of Innovation Performance. Sustainability, 15(6), 5586. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065586
  41. Zulfikar, T., Yudha, F. M., & Kosasih, K. (2023). Marketing digital and social media improve content quality and implicate the performance of ayobandung.com. JHSS (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies), 7(2), 706. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v7i2.9379