Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The theory of reverse piercing the corporate veil is used by the United States Court to settle disputes between shareholders who use limited liability companies to save their assets in order to avoid suing individual shareholder-creditors. In the future, Indonesia needs to assess the potential application of the theory of reverse piercing the corporate veil in the country through a transplantation mechanism. This research will analyze first, the potential application of the theory of reverse piercing the corporate veil in Indonesia according to the legal transplantation theory and second the method of applying the theory of reverse piercing the corporate veil in Indonesia. This study uses the normative legal research method. The conclusion of this research is firstly, based on the legal transplant theory popularized by Watson, the theory of reverse piercing the corporate veil has the potential to be transplanted in Indonesia. The transplant is based on the existence of legal equality between the United States and Indonesia with limited liability company law. Secondly, the method of implementing reverse piercing in Indonesia adopts the same method as the United States of America, which is reversing the parameters that exist in piercing the corporate veil.
Keywords
Article Details
References
- Buku
- Ali, Chidir, Badan Hukum, Alumni, Bandung, 1987.
- Hartono, Sunaryati, Penelitian Hukum di Indonesia Pada Akhir Abad Ke-20, Alumni, Bandung, 2006.
- JH, Farrar, Company Law, 3rd ed, Butterworths, London, 1991.
- Sulistiowati, Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pada Perusahaan Grup di Indonesia, Erlangga, Jakarta, 2013.
- Watson, Alan, Legal Transplants, 2d ed., University of Georgia Press, 1993.
- Yani, Ahmad, Perseroan Terbatas (Seri Hukum Bisnis), Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 2003
- Jurnal
- Allen, Nicholas, “Reverse Piercing of the Corporate Veil: A Straightforward Path to Justice”, New York Business Law Journal Vol.16 No.1, New York State Bar Association, New York, 2012.
- Butarbutar, Elisabeth Nurhaini, “Pembuktian Terhadap Perbuatan Debitur Yang Merugikan Kreditur Dalam Tuntutanactio Pauliana Kajian Putusan Nomor 07/Pdt.Sus-Actio Pauliana/2015/PN.Niaga.Mdn”. Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 12 No. 2 Agustus 2019.
- Gaertner, Michael J., “Reverse Piercing the Corporate Veil: Should Corporation Owners Have It Both Ways?”, 30 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 667, 1989, William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository, Virginia, 1989.
- Hart, Karen L and Anneke Cronje, “Leggo My Alter Ego! What You Need to Know About Piercing the Corporate Veil”, NACM Credit Congress, Florida, 2014.
- Kang, Michael S. “Shareholder Voting as Veto,” Indiana Law Journal Vol. 88:1299, 2013, Indiana University, Bloomington.
- Millon, David K. “Piercing the Corporate Veil, Financial Responsibility, and the Limits of Limited Liability”, 56 Emory L. J. 1305, Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons, Washington, 2007.
- Velasco, Julian, “The Fundamental Rights of the Shareholder,” University of California Davis Law Review, Vol. 40:407, University of California Davis, California, 2006.
- Undang-Undang
- Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas; Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4756
- Putusan Pengadilan
- Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta Nomor 587/Pdt/2004/PT.DKI
- Artikel Internet
- G.W. Paton dalam Anom Surya Putra, BUM Desa sebagai Badan Hukum Publik, http://www.anomsuryaputra.id/2017/07/bum-desa-sebagai-badan-hukum-publik.html, diakses tanggal 25 Januari 2018.
References
Buku
Ali, Chidir, Badan Hukum, Alumni, Bandung, 1987.
Hartono, Sunaryati, Penelitian Hukum di Indonesia Pada Akhir Abad Ke-20, Alumni, Bandung, 2006.
JH, Farrar, Company Law, 3rd ed, Butterworths, London, 1991.
Sulistiowati, Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pada Perusahaan Grup di Indonesia, Erlangga, Jakarta, 2013.
Watson, Alan, Legal Transplants, 2d ed., University of Georgia Press, 1993.
Yani, Ahmad, Perseroan Terbatas (Seri Hukum Bisnis), Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 2003
Jurnal
Allen, Nicholas, “Reverse Piercing of the Corporate Veil: A Straightforward Path to Justice”, New York Business Law Journal Vol.16 No.1, New York State Bar Association, New York, 2012.
Butarbutar, Elisabeth Nurhaini, “Pembuktian Terhadap Perbuatan Debitur Yang Merugikan Kreditur Dalam Tuntutanactio Pauliana Kajian Putusan Nomor 07/Pdt.Sus-Actio Pauliana/2015/PN.Niaga.Mdn”. Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 12 No. 2 Agustus 2019.
Gaertner, Michael J., “Reverse Piercing the Corporate Veil: Should Corporation Owners Have It Both Ways?”, 30 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 667, 1989, William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository, Virginia, 1989.
Hart, Karen L and Anneke Cronje, “Leggo My Alter Ego! What You Need to Know About Piercing the Corporate Veil”, NACM Credit Congress, Florida, 2014.
Kang, Michael S. “Shareholder Voting as Veto,” Indiana Law Journal Vol. 88:1299, 2013, Indiana University, Bloomington.
Millon, David K. “Piercing the Corporate Veil, Financial Responsibility, and the Limits of Limited Liability”, 56 Emory L. J. 1305, Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons, Washington, 2007.
Velasco, Julian, “The Fundamental Rights of the Shareholder,” University of California Davis Law Review, Vol. 40:407, University of California Davis, California, 2006.
Undang-Undang
Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas; Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4756
Putusan Pengadilan
Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta Nomor 587/Pdt/2004/PT.DKI
Artikel Internet
G.W. Paton dalam Anom Surya Putra, BUM Desa sebagai Badan Hukum Publik, http://www.anomsuryaputra.id/2017/07/bum-desa-sebagai-badan-hukum-publik.html, diakses tanggal 25 Januari 2018.