Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 22, 2020
Accepted
September 29, 2020
Published
November 17, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 223 Download : 1944

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the legal implications for notaries who provide notary services beyond their authority, in which case the notary is an extension of the state, and in the case of a notary's accountability, it is the primary issue considering the deed they make is a strong written evidence. Hence, the first problem arises is the legal implications and accountability of the notary for their position in carrying out matters beyond their authority. Second, what is the Regional Supervisory Council (MPD)'s view of notaries who carry out matters beyond their authority. The results conclude that first, if a notary has committed a violation, they will receive civil and administrative sanctions in the form of compensation, temporary dismissal from their position or disrespectful dismissal. Second, the implementation of supervision and coaching that has been carried out by the Notary Supervisory Council must prioritize communication between the Central Supervisory Council (MPP), the Provincial Supervisory Council (MPW), the Regional Supervisory Council (MPD) to the Notary themselves is very important to avoid miscommunication and to create good synergy in the implementation of supervision carried out by the Supervisory Council.

Keywords

Authorities implications Notary Supervisory Council

Article Details

Author Biography

Dondy Permana Putra, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Pascasarjana Hukum
How to Cite
Putra, D. P. (2020). Implikasi Hukum Terhadap Notaris Yang Memberikan Jasa Kenotariatan Di Luar Kewenangannya. Lex Renaissance, 5(1), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss1.art11
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Achmad, Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2010.
  3. Adjie, Habib, Hukum Notaris Indonesia Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, Reflika Aditama, Bandung, 2008.
  4. Ali, H. Zainuddin, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2010.
  5. Dewi, Santia dan R.M. Fauwas Diradja, Paduan teori dan Praktik Notaris, PustakaYusticia, Yogyakarta, 2011.
  6. Pramudya, Kelik dan Ananto Widiatmoko, Pedoman Etika Profesi Aparat Hukum, Pustaka Yusticia, Yogyakarta, 2010.
  7. Soekanto, Soerjono, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta, 1986.
  8. Sunggono, Bambang, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2003.
  9. Syamsuddin, M., Operasionalisasi Penelitian Hukum, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2007.
  10. Makalah
  11. Sutrisno, “Tanggapan Terhadap Undang-undang No.30 Tahun 2004tentangJabatan Notaris”, Bahan Kuliah pada Kuliah Etika Profesi Notaris Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 2007.
  12. Majalah
  13. Hadi, Mudofir, “Pembatalan Isi Akta Notaris Dengan Putusan Hakim”, Varia Peradilan, No. 72, 1991.
  14. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
  15. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (Burgerlijk Wetboek).
  16. Undang-UndangNomor 30 Tahun 2004Tentang Jabatan Notaris, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia No. 117Tahun 2004, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia No. 4432.