Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 22, 2020
Accepted
September 29, 2020
Published
November 17, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 248 Download : 685

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to compare the Law on Notary Office in Indonesia (UUJN) with the Law on Notary Office in Japan (Koshoninho) in the case that the Notary finds deaf people/communities as their clients, with the first problem formulation, what are the differences between UUJN and Koshoninho in providing translators for deaf applicants? Second, how do notaries in Indonesia implement UUJN when they find deaf applicants as their clients ? This is a normative juridical research in which interviewing the informants become additional information in this study. The results of the research conclude that, first, the differences in the provision of translators for deaf Notaries on UUJN and Koshoninho are in the condition of applicants, the use of translator phrases, and recognition of deaf people/communities, second, the implementation of a Notary in Indonesia when they find deaf people as clients is by using the services of a sign language interpreter.

Keywords

Deaf interpreter notary

Article Details

Author Biography

Muhammad Reza Hastomo Aji, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Pascasarjana Hukum
How to Cite
Hastomo Aji, M. R. (2020). Studi Komparatif Penyediaan Penerjemah Terhadap Penghadap Notaris Tuli Di Indonesia Dan Jepang. Lex Renaissance, 5(1), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol5.iss1.art13
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Adjie, Habib, Hukum Notaris Indonesia Tafsir Telematik terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 20004 tentang Jabatan Notaris, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2008.
  3. Anand, Ghansham, Karakteristik Jabatan Notaris di Indonesia, Kencana, Surabaya, 2018.
  4. Fatahna, Muchlis dan Joo Purwanto, Notaris Bicara Soal Kenegaraan, Watampone Press, Jakarta, 2003.
  5. Fuady, Munir, Perbandingan Ilmu Hukum, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2007.
  6. World Health Organization, World Report on Disability, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2011.
  7. Makalah
  8. Budiono, Herlien, “Notaris dan Kode Etiknya”, Makalah pada Upgrading dan Refreshing Course Nasional Ikatan Notaris Indonesia, Medan, 2007.
  9. Thaw, Deborah M., “The Notary Public and its Impact in 21st Century”, Makalah dalam presentasi di NACO/NACRC Annual Conference, 2000.
  10. Internet
  11. Karwelo, Erlina Saktiani, “Prospek Pembacaan dan Penandatangan Akta Notaris Melalui Video Conference”,http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index. php/hukum/article/view/721/70, diakses tanggal 20 September 2019.
  12. “Menakertrans: Buka Kesempatan Kerja yang Luas untuk Penyandang Cacat”,https://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/umum/12/12/09/merigb-menakertrans-buka-kesempatan-kerja-luas-bagi-penyandang-cacat/, diakses tanggal 4 Juli 2019.
  13. “Undang-UndangHukum Notaris Jepang”, http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?ft=1&re=2&dn=1&x=0&y=0&co=01&ia=03&ja=04&ky=notary&page=18, diakses tanggal 2 Juli 2019.
  14. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
  15. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
  16. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Indonesia.
  17. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas.
  18. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.