Bilah Samping Artikel

Telah diserahkan
November 28, 2024
Diterima
June 23, 2025
Diterbitkan
June 30, 2025
Unduh
PDF (English)
Statistik
Baca Penghitung : 695 Unduh : 945

Isi Artikel Utama

Abstrak

This research aims to examine the relationship between law, norms, and ethics within the societal context, as well as the role of normative legal theory from the perspective of Neo Kantian thinkers, focusing on ontological, epistemological, and axiological aspects. The importance of this study lies in understanding how normative legal theory serves not only as a positive system but also meets moral standards. The research uses a normative legal approach with historical and comparative methods, incorporating a qualitative analysis of the thoughts of several Neo Kantian thinkers, allowing for the identification of strengths and weaknesses in their perspectives. The study relies on secondary legal materials, such as legal journals, and employs literature review techniques to gather data. The findings reveal that the connection between law, norms, and ethics is essential in establishing a fair and harmonious social order. Justice should be a central principle in legal reasoning, not only based on the application of laws but also incorporating social, political, economic, and cultural elements. The exploration of normative legal theory from the Neo Kantian viewpoint provides valuable insights into the relationship between legal norms and moral principles, emphasizing the significance of rationality and individual autonomy in legal enforcement. This perspective fosters legal reforms that are more responsive to societal needs and aspirations. In conclusion, this research highlights the role of normative legal theory in the Neo Kantian tradition, which stresses rationality and individual autonomy, and advocates for legal reforms that better address contemporary societal challenges.

Kata Kunci

Gustav Radbruch Hans Kelsen Normative Law Neo Kantian Rudolf Stemmler

Rincian Artikel

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Annisa Meidaniasari

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:


a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Cara Mengutip
Meidaniasari, A. (2025). Teori Hukum Normatif Dalam Perspektif Aliran Pemikiran Neo Kantian. Lex Renaissance, 10(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol10.iss1.art1
Unduh Sitasi
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Referensi

  1. Ab. Halim, Mustafa ‘Afifi, and Shabrina Zata Amni. “Legal System in the Perspectives of H.L.A Hart and Lawrence M. Friedman.” Peradaban Journal of Law and Society 2, no. 1 (2023): 51–61. https://doi.org/10.59001/pjls.v2i1.83.

  2. Abdullah Ahmad, Mukhtarzain. “Dualisme Kebijakan Terkait Organisasi Advokat Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 101/Ppu-Vii/2009 Dan Surat Ketua Mahkamah Agung No. 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015.” As-Syar i:Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga 6 No. 1 6, no. 18 (2024): 22–33. https://doi.org/10.47476/assyari.v6i1.345.

  3. Academia.edu. “Ayat-Ayat Tentang Keadilan Kejujuran Moral.” Accessed November 3, 2024. https://www.academia.edu/40998409/AYAT_AYAT_TENTANG_KEADILAN_KEJUJURAN_MORAL.

  4. Aroma Elmina Martha, Agus Triyanta, and Bayu Mogana Putra. “Theft Punishment in Islamic Law and Indonesian Criminal Law: Initiative for Harmonization From the Perspective of Sharur’S Boundary Theory.” Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law 12, no. 2 (2024): 436–46. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol12no2.663.

  5. Barus, Zulfadli. “Analisis Filosofis Tentang Peta Konseptual Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Penelitian Hukum Sosiologis.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 13, no. 2 (2013): 307–18.

  6. Bello, Petrus CKL. “Hubungan Hukum Dan Moralitas Menurut H.L.a Hart.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 44, no. 3 (2014): 373. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol44.no3.27.

  7. Darumurti, Krishna Djaya. “Karakter Ilmu Hukum: Pendekatan Fungsional Dalam Kaitan Dengan Pendidikan Hukum.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 2 (2017): 191. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2017.v1.i2.p191-212.

  8. Effendi, Erdianto, Edwin Capri Purba. “Tinjuan Yuridis Pengaturan Aborsi Berdasarkan Undang-Uandang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan.” Riau University 151 (2015): 10–17.

  9. Fadillah, Ranti, Gina Nabila, Dina Fazriah, and Imas Yuliana Nurasri. “Semangat Dan Kontribusi Hans Kelsen Dalam Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum.” Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat 2, no. 01 (2024): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.11111/dassollen.xxxxxxx.

  10. Firdaus, E I, P C Stalista, and ... “Analisis Kasus Penganiayaan Mario Dandy Terhadap David Ozora Dikaitkan Dengan Teori Filsafat Tujuan Hukum Gustav Radbruch:(Studi Putusan: 297/Pid. B/2023 ….” … Hukum Dan Masyarakat, no. 2023 (2024): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.11111/dassollen.xxxxxxx.

  11. Fitriani, Nike. “Pengaruh The Pure Theory of Law Dalam Perkembangan Hukum Positivisme Di Indonesia.” Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat 2, no. 01 (2024): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.11111/dassollen.xxxxxxx.

  12. Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus, Leslie Green. The Concept of Law. Oxford University Press, 2012.

  13. Hukum, Penegakan, and Perspektif Paradigma. “DOKTRINA : Journal of Law” 6, no. April (2023): 82–103.

  14. Journal, Law, Pembentukan Metode, Penelitian Hukum, and Hukum Kontemporer. “KHAIRUN” 8, no. 1 (2024): 17–29.

  15. Jusuf, Muhamad Baharuddin, and Adara Khalfani Mazin. “Penerapan Teori Hans Kelsen Sebagai Bentuk Upaya Tertib Hukum Di Indonesia.” Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat 2, no. 1 (2023): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.11111/dassollen.xxxxxxx.

  16. Kelsen, Hukum Hans, Sejarah Artikel, Kata Kunci, Legalitas Praktek, Perkawinan Dibawah, Tangan Sistem Hukum, Justicia Islamica, and Zudan Arif Fakrulloh. “325 | P a g E” 3 (2024): 325–33.

  17. Khasyi, Muchammad Akmal, Dudik Djaja Sidarta, Noenik Soekorini Al. “KARAKTERISTIK PENYELESAIAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DANA DESA MELALUI RESTORATIVE JUSTICE.” COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum (e-ISSN: 2776-1916) 4 15, no. 1 (2024): 37–48.

  18. Kurnia, Titon Slamet. “Hukum Dan Keadilan: Isu Bagian Hulu Dan Hilir.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 1 (2016): 17. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2016.v10.i1.p17-32.

  19. Mappatunru, Andi Munafri D. “The Pure Theory of Law & Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pembentukan Hukum Indonesia.” Indonesia Journal of Criminal Law 2, no. 2 (2020): 132–52.

  20. Mukhlishin, Sarip. “Keadilan Dan Kepastian Hukum : Menyoal Konsep Keadilan Hukum Hans.” Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 11, no. keadilan (2020): 58–59.

  21. Nahak, Alfonsus. “Problematika Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Perspektif Hukum Gustav Radbruch.” Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Humaniora 2, no. 3 (2023): 11659–74. https://publisherqu.com/index.php/pediaqu/article/view/386.

  22. Nope, Bill. The Paradigm of Science According to Thomas Kuhn and Prophetic Jurisprudence. Prophetic Law Review, 6(2), (2024): 201–218. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol6.iss2.art3

  23. Nurfaqih, Irfani. “Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, Dan Lex Posterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, Dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran Dan Argumentasi Hukum.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 16, no. 3 (2020): 305–25.

  24. Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.

  25. Pitasari, Raden Roro Atika, and Adis Imam Munandar. “Penolakan Ruu Omnibus Law Di Kalangan Buruh : SEBUAH ANALISIS INTELIJEN.” Jurnal Litbang Polri 23, no. 3 (2020): 27–36.

  26. Prianto, Wahyu, Fakultas Hukum, Nahdlatul Ulama, Sulawesi Tenggara, Jl Mayor, Jenderal Katamso, Kec Baruga, and Kota Kendari. “Analisis Hierarki Perundang-Undangan Berdasarkan Teori Norma Hukum Oleh Hans Kelsen Dan Hans  Nawiasky.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan 2, no. 1 (2024): 8–19. https://jurnal.unusultra.ac.id/index.php/jisdik.

  27. Projustice. “Kumpulan Teori Hukum Menurut Para Ahli.” Accessed November 3, 2024. https://projustice.id/kumpulan-teori-hukum-menurut-para-ahli/.

  28. Rahardjo, Satjipto. Teori Hukum Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang Dan Generasi. Jakarta: Genta Publishing, 2010.

  29. Rahmi Febriani, Nur, Dhoni Martien, and Yurisa Martanti. “Kepastian Hukum Perubahan Status Perseroan Terbatas Menjadi Perseroan Terbatas Penanaman Modal Asing Akibat Wanprestasi.” Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia 2, no. 10 (2023): 3022–47. https://doi.org/10.58344/jmi.v2i10.578.

  30. Ranal Hadar. “Pemikiran Hukum Radbruch (Radbruch 1878-1949): Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum, Dan Kegunaan (Kebermanfaatan) Dalam Praktik Bisnis Di Indonesia.” Accessed November 3, 2024. https://www.kompasiana.com/ranalhadar/645affb44addee14c4021713/pemikiran-hukum-radbruch-radbruch-1878-1949-keadilan-kepastian-hukum-dan-kegunaan-kebermanfaatan-dalam-praktik-bisnis-di-indonesia?lgn_method=google.

  31. Rangkuti, Andi Rendra. “Efektivitas Penertiban Dan Pendayagunaan Tanah Terlantar Di Kota Batam.” Journal of Law and Policy Transformation 1, no. 2 (2016): 131–67.

  32. Samekto, FX. Adji. “Normativitas Keilmuan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Aliran Pemikiran Neo-Kantian.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.44.1.2015.11-17.

  33. Saputra, Angga Rahmat. “SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA ( ANALISIS MATERI MUATAN BATAS USIA ANAK DALAM UNDANG UNDANG )” 18, no. 24 (2017): 48–66.

  34. Setiawan, Adam, and Rezky Robiatul Aisyiah Ismail. “Paradigma Positivisme Hukum John Austin Di Era Posmodernisme.” Arena Hukum 16, no. 3 (2023): 485–508. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01603.3.

  35. Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning, and Ade Adhari. “Positivisme Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Ilmu Dan Penegakan Hukum Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi (Analisa Putusan Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016).” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 1 (2020): 104. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1715.

  36. Suhenriko, Muhammad. “Implementasi Teori Hierarki Hans Kelsen Terhadap Perumusan Kebijakan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisipin 1, no. 2 (2023): 64–71.

  37. Syuhada, Muhammad. “‘Tinjauan Aspek Hukum Pidana Ekonomi, Administratif Dan Pendekatan Restoratif Pada Kasus Pt. Bank Lippo. Tbk.’” Jurnal Impresi Indonesia 2, no. 6 (2023): 505–17. https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v2i6.2864.

  38. Talita Prapta Putri, Nur, and Ananda Aulia. “Penerapan Teori Positivisme Hans Kelsen Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat 2, no. 1 (2024): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.11111/dassollen.xxxxxxx.

  39. Wardiono, Kelik. Pure Theory of Law – Hans Kelsen: Sebuah Eksplanasi Dari Perspektif Basis Epistemologi. Pengembangan Epistemologi Ilmu Hukum, 2015. https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/bitstream/handle/11617/.../5.Kelik Wardiono.pdf...