Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 14, 2026
Accepted
June 3, 2026
Published
June 4, 2026
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) fundamentally transformed the new technology era, particularly in the field of military and law enforcement. Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS) that can identify, select, and attack targets without human intervention present serious challenges regarding the right to life under IHRL. This research analysis deployment of LAWS in non-combat situations like law enforcement, border control, and counter terrorism. The current research utilizes a doctoral research method based on the Human Rights and Technology theoretical framework to analyze the international instruments such as ICCPR, UDHR, and General Comment No. 36 of the Human Rights Committee. The research finding indicates deployment of LAWS without human meaningful control violates the fundamental principles for the protection of the right to life, including the necessity principle, the proportionality principle, and accountability. LAWS is used in some countries in non-combat situations like the US, South Korea, and Israel, which have revealed that the current international framework is not able to regulate and hold responsible against unlawful killings. Therefore, violation of human dignity and an accountability gap are the consequences of delegating life and death decisions to machines without human judgment. To conclude, to regulate, monitor, human meaningful control, accountability, and protection of the right to life in the era of digital transformation, the ratification of a binding international treaty is urgently required.

Keywords

Right to life Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems Accountability Artificial Intelligence

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Omida Kazimi, Sefriani Sefriani, Arezo Tolo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Kazimi, O., Sefriani, S., & Tolo, A. (2026). Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and the Right to Life in Non-Combat Contexts. Lex Renaissance, 10(2), 498–520. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol10.iss2.art10
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. -, Sefriani, and Nur Gemilang Mahardhika. “The Legality of Military Involvement in Law Enforcement Operations Against Criminal Armed Groups in Indonesia’s Papua Province.” Asia-Pacific Social Science Review 23, no. 4 (December 2023): 28–41 37. https://doi.org/10.59588/2350-8329.1515.

  2. Akkuş, Berkant. “AUTONOMOUS WEAPON SYSTEMS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW.” Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi 11, no. 2 (November 2022): 333–66 p 352. https://doi.org/10.28956/gbd.1078155.

  3. Ali, Asif, and Subramanian Ramamurthy. “Humanity at the Crossroads: Human Rights Challenges in the Age of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems.” International Journal of Legal Information 53, no. 1 (March 2025): 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/jli.2025.11.

  4. Amnesty International. Autonomous Weapons Systems: Five Key Human Rights Issues for Consideration. ACT 30/1401/2015. London: Amnesty International Publications, 2015. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ACT3014012015ENGLISH.pdf.

  5. ———. Submission to the UN Secretary-General Re: Res 78/241 — Autonomous Weapons Systems in Law Enforcement. IOR 40/7981/2024. London, United Kingdom: Amnesty International, 2024. https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/IOR4079812024ENGLISH.pdf.

  6. Aponte García, Carlos Alberto, Hermes Emilio Martínez Barrios, Alexander Romero-Sánchez, María Stephania Aponte García, and María del Pilar García Valdés. “Governance and Regulation of Autonomous Weapons and Cybersecurity (2016–2024): The Influence of States, International Organizations, and Civil Society on International Humanitarian Law.” Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice 17, no. 1 (February 2025): 550–62 551. https://crlsj.com/index.php/journal/article/view/537.

  7. Asaro, Peter. “On Banning Autonomous Weapon Systems: Human Rights, Automation, and the Dehumanization of Lethal Decision-Making.” International Review of the Red Cross 94, no. 886 (June 2012): 687–709 689. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383112000768.

  8. Australian Human Rights Commission. Human Rights and Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems: Submission to the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee. Sydney, Australia: Australian Human Rights Commission, 2023. https://humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/human_rights_and_lethal_autonomous_weapons__0.pdf.

  9. Australian Human Rights Commission: Submission to the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee. Human Rights and Lethal  Autonomous Weapons Systems. Sydney, Australia: Australian Human Rights Commission, n.d. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/advisorycommittee/techmilitarydomain/submissions/1-nhri-australian-hrc.pdf.

  10. Bajgar, Ondrej, and Jan Horenovsky. “Negative Human Rights as a Basis for Long-Term AI Safety and Regulation.” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 76 (April 2023): 1043–75. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.14020.

  11. Bhatt, Dr. Gargi. “Recognising Human Rights Concerns in Military AI: Stabilizing the Authority and Legal Ethics.” JSS Journal for Legal Studies and Research Special Issue (2025): 20–39 30. https://jsslawcollege.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/02.-Recognising-Human-Rights-Concerns-in-Military-AI-Stabilizing-the-Authority-and-Legal-Ethics-1_compressed.pdf.

  12. Blanchard, Alexander. “Autonomous Force beyond Armed Conflict.” Minds and Machines, 2023, 2. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4340209.

  13. Bode, Ingvild, and Hendrik Huelss. “Autonomous Weapons Systems and Changing Norms in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 44, no. 3 (July 2018): 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210517000614.

  14. Brehm, Maya. Autonomous Weapon Systems under International Law: Academy Briefing No. 8. Academy Briefing. Geneva, Switzerland: Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, 2017. https://www.geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-files/docman-files/Publications/Academy%20Briefings/Autonomous%20Weapon%20Systems%20under%20International%20Law_Academy%20Briefing%20No%208.pdf.

  15. Casey-Maslen, Stuart, and Christof Heyns. The Right to Life Under International Law: An Interpretative Manual. Cambridge University Press, 2021. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=f_w7EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=The+Right+to+Life+under+International+Law+An+Interpretative+Manual&ots=CuobwWKb9u&sig=4oHEl8tTVcPJuFEAbXdzsfp2BCM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.

  16. CENTER/AUP, GUNASEKARA-ROCKWELL, ERNEST A. CIV USAF AETC LEMAY. “Laws on LAWS: Regulating the Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems.” Air University (AU), September 21, 2023. https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/JIPA/Display/Article/3533453/laws-on-laws-regulating-the-lethal-autonomous-weapon-systems/.

  17. Chengeta, Thompson. “Accountability Gap, Autonomous Weapon Systems and Modes of Responsibility in International Law.” SSRN Electronic Journal 45, no. 1 (Fall) (2016): 1–51 2. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2755211.

  18. Coyne, Christopher J, and Yahya Alshamy. “Perverse Consequences of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems.” SSRN Electronic Journal, March 10, 2021, 14 12. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3767512.

  19. Deeks, Ashley, Noam Lubell, and Daragh Murray. “Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence, and the Use of Force by States.” Virginia Public Law & Legal Theory Research 10, no. 1 (2018): 1–26 16. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3285879.

  20. Docherty, Bonnie. The Need for and Elements of a New Treaty  on Fully Autonomous Weapons. Policy Report. Human Rights Watch and Harvard Law School International Human Rights Clinic (IHRC), 2020. https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/06/01/need-and-elements-new-treaty-fully-autonomous-weapons.

  21. E. Joh, Elizabeth. “Policing Police Robots.” UCLA Law Review 64 (November 2016). https://www.uclalawreview.org/policing-police-robots/.

  22. Ekelhof, Merel. “Moving Beyond Semantics on Autonomous Weapons: Meaningful Human Control in Operation.” Global Policy 10, no. 3 (September 2019): 343–48 343. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12665.

  23. Feenberg, Andrew. “Critical Theory of Technology.” Northeast China University, Shenyang, 2004. https://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/books/Critical_Theory_Technology.pdf.

  24. ———. “Questioning_Technology.” Routledge, 1999, 1–9 3. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296706069_Questioning_Technology#fullTextFileContent.

  25. Finegan, Tom. The Right to Life in International Human Rights Law. No. 3464. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation, 2020. https://reproductiverights.org/right-life-international-human-rights-law/.

  26. Forti, Mirko. “Addressing Algorithmic Errors in Data-Driven Border Control Procedures.” German Law Journal 25, no. 4 (June 2024): 635–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2023.102.

  27. Hammond, Daniel N. “Autonomous Weapons and the Problem of State Accountability.” Chicago Journal of International Law 15, no. 2 (2015): 652–91 664. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol15/iss2/8/.

  28. HAR, JANIE. “San Francisco Will Allow Police to Deploy Robots That Kill.” AP News, November 30, 2022. https://apnews.com/article/police-san-francisco-government-and-politics-d26121d7f7afb070102932e6a0754aa5.

  29. Heyns, Christof. “Autonomous Weapons in Armed Conflict and the Right to a Dignified Life: An African Perspective.” South African Journal on Human Rights 33, no. 1 (January 2017): 46–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2017.1303903.

  30. ———. “Human Rights and the Use of Autonomous Weapons Systems (AWS) During Domestic Law Enforcement.” Human Rights Quarterly 38, no. 2 (2016): 350–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2016.0034.

  31. Human Rights Watch and Harvard Law School International Human Rights Clinic. Killer Robots and the Concept of Meaningful Human Control. Memorandum. New York: Human Rights Watch and Harvard Law School IHRC, 2016. https://www.hrw.org/node/288610/printable/print.

  32. Human Rights Watch; International Human Rights Clinic, Harvard Law School. A Hazard to Human Rights: Autonomous Weapons Systems and Digital Decision-Making. United States: Human Rights Watch, 2025. https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/media_2025/04/arms0425%20web.pdf.

  33. ———. A Hazard to Human Rights Autonomous Weapons Systems and Digital Decision-Making. New York, United States: Human Rights Watch, 2025. https://www.hrw.org/report/2025/04/28/hazard-human-rights/autonomous-weapons-systems-and-digital-decision-making.

  34. “ICRC Position on Autonomous Weapon Systems | ICRC.” May 12, 2021. https://www.icrc.org/en/document/icrc-position-autonomous-weapon-systems.

  35. International Committee of the Red Cross. ICRC Position on Autonomous Weapon Systems and the Element of Human Control. Position and background paper. Geneva: ICRC, 2021. https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/document_new/file_list/icrc_position_on_aws_and_background_paper.pdf.

  36. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). The Use of Force in Law Enforcement Operations. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 2022. https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/document/file_list/the_use_of_force_in_law_enforcement_operations.pdf.

  37. International Law Commission (ILC). Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts (2001). New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2005.

  38. Jackson, Josephine. “Mapping the Lethal Autonomous Weapons Debate: An Introduction.” Ethics & International Affairs 37, no. 3 (2023): 254–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679423000345.

  39. Leslie, David, Christopher Burr, Mhairi Aitken, Michael Katell, Morgan Briggs, and Cami Rincon. Human Rights, Democracy, and the Rule of Law Assurance Framework for AI Systems: A Proposal. Zenodo, 2022. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5981676.

  40. Lewis, John. “The Case for Regulating Fully Autonomous Weapons.” THE YALE LAW JOURNAL 124, no. 4 (2025): 1309–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43617052?seq=1.

  41. Mortensen, Erika Steinholt. “Autonomous Weapon Systems That Decide Whom to Kill.” Master’s thesis, UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, 2016.

  42. Niels, Petersen. “Life, Right to, International Protection.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, with Petersen Niels. Oxford University Press, June 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/e841.

  43. O’Connell, Mary Ellen. “Banning Autonomous Weapons: A Legal and Ethical Mandate.” Ethics & International Affairs 37, no. 3 (2023): 287–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679423000357.

  44. Pedreschi, Dino, Luca Pappalardo, Emanuele Ferragina, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Albert-Laszlo Barabasi, Frank Dignum, Virginia Dignum, et al. “Human-AI Coevolution.” Nature Machine Intelligence 5 (May 2024): 5. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.13723.

  45. Popa, Dumitru, and Georgiana Alina Ristea. “THE RIGHT TO LIFE IN THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW.” International Journal of Communication Research 11, no. 1 (2021): 12–19. https://www.ijcr.eu/articole/531_002%20Dumitru%20Popa.pdf.

  46. Rinaldi, Alberto, and Sue Anne Teo. “The Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Border and Migration Control and the Subtle Erosion of Human Rights.” International & Comparative Law Quarterly 74, no. 1 (January 2025): 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589325000090.

  47. Robbins, Scott. “The Many Meanings of Meaningful Human Control.” AI and Ethics 4, no. 4 (November 2024): 1377–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00320-6.

  48. Santoni De Sio, Filippo, and Jeroen Van Den Hoven. “Meaningful Human Control over Autonomous Systems: A Philosophical Account.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5 (February 2018): 15 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00015.

  49. Sharkey, Amanda. “Autonomous Weapons Systems, Killer Robots and Human Dignity.” Ethics and Information Technology 21, no. 2 (June 2019): 75–87 76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9494-0.

  50. Smith, Patrick Taylor. “Resolving Responsibility Gaps for Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems.” Frontiers in Big Data 5 (December 2022): 1–6 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2022.1038507.

  51. Solovyeva, Anzhelika, and Nik Hynek. “Going Beyond the ‘Killer Robots’ Debate: Six Dilemmas Autonomous Weapon Systems Raise.” Central European Journal of International and Security Studies 12, no. 3 (2018): 166–208. https://cejiss.org/going-beyond-the-killer-robots-debate-six-dilemmas-autonomous-weapon-systems-raise-0.

  52. Spagnolo, Andrea. “Human Rights Implications of Autonomous Weapon Systems in Domestic Law Enforcement: Sci-Fi Reflections on a Lo-Fi Reality.” QIL, Zoom-In 43 (2017): 33–58. https://www.qil-qdi.org/human-rights-implications-autonomous-weapon-systems-domestic-law-enforcement-sci-fi-reflections-lo-fi-reality/.

  53. Stuart Casey-Maslen. Use of Force in Law Enforcement and the Right to Life: The Role of the Human Rights Council. Academy In-Brief No. 6. Geneva: Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, 2016.

  54. Surber, Regina. Artificial Intelligence: Autonomous Technology (AT), Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS) and Peace Time Threats. Zurich: ICT4Peace Foundation, 2018. https://ethicsandtechnology.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/2018_RSurber_AI-AT-LAWS-Peace-Time-Threats_final.pdf.

  55. Verdiesen, Ilse, Filippo Santoni De Sio, and Virginia Dignum. “Accountability and Control Over Autonomous Weapon Systems: A Framework for Comprehensive Human Oversight.” Minds and Machines 31, no. 1 (March 2021): 137–63 138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09532-9.

  56. Wanebo, Thomas. “Remote Killing and the Fourth Amendment: Updating Constitutional Law to Address Expanded Police Lethality in the Robotic Age.” UCLA Law Review 65, no. 4 (2018): 976–1034.

  57. Winter, Elliot. “The Compatibility of the Use of Autonomous Weapons with the Principle of Precaution in the Law of Armed Conflict.” The Military Law and the Law of War Review 58, no. 2 (December 2020): 240–73. https://doi.org/10.4337/mllwr.2020.02.18.

  58. Wood, Nathan G. “The Problem with Killer Robots.” Journal of Military Ethics 19, no. 3 (2020): 220–40 14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2020.1849966.