Main Article Content

Abstract

After the destroying of World Trade Center USA on September 11 2001, America is focusing his international political policy on war on terrorism which was further followed by preemptive action and unilateralism toward countries considered a terrorist. One of them is Irak. Certainly the policy will hamper the realization of good world governance under the United Nations Program. Attacking Irak in 2003 is a real proof of the USA hegemony in the world as the Super Power, especially concerning about Saddam Husein’s process of judicature which is hold by Iraqi Special Tribunal and the Iraqi Special Tribunal is under the US intervention. Teoritically the session process of Saddam who was accused executing genocide toward Kurdi tribe should be hold by International Criminal Court (ICC) under the United Nations. It is not the competency of Iraqi Special Tribunal. The session Process of Saddam judicature is considered invalid and breaking out the principals of international law. This case will hamper the maintenance of international law supremacy. The maintenance of international law is one of the requirements of good world governance. However, the reality is showing that international politic under USA hegemony, and this will always hamper the realization of good world governance.

Article Details

How to Cite
Millah, F. T. (2007). PERADILAN SADDAM HUSSEIN: HEGEMONI AMERIKA DAN TRAGEDI GOOD WORLD GOVERNANCE. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 7(1), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol7.iss1.art9

References

  1. Anom, Andari Karina. 2006. “Dari Nuremberg sampai Bagdadâ€. Majalah Tempo Edisi 13-19 November.
  2. Atmasasmita, Romli. 1998. Kapita Selekta: Hukum Pidana Internasional. Bandung: Putra A Bardin.
  3. Bremer, L. Paul dikutip http://www.cpairaq.org/ regulations/ 20030516_CPAREG_1_The_Coalition_Provisional_Authority_pdf.
  4. Bush, Goerge W., “Freedom at war with Fearâ€, dikutip dari: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010920-8.html
  5. Cipto, Bambang. 2003. Politik dan Pemerintahan Amerika. Yogyakarta: Lingkaran.
  6. Coalition Provisional Authority Order Number 48: Delegation of Authority Regarding an Iraqi Tribunalâ€,CPA/ORD/9 Dec 2003/48 (2003) (IST Statute), IST Department of State, Quarterly Update to Congress: Section 2207 Report on Iraq Relief and Reconstruction (Januari 2004).
  7. Djunaedi, Eddy. 1998. “Mengapa AS Tidak Setuju dengan Statuta ICC?â€,Varia Peradilan, Majalah Hukum Tahun XVI No. 184.
  8. G. John Ikenberry. 2004. “Illusions of Empire: Defining the New American Orderâ€, dalam Foreign Affairs, Vol. 83, No. 2, March/April 2004.
  9. Garis Besar Pemerintahan Amerika Serikat. 2000. Office of International Information Programs, United States Department of State.
  10. Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War of August 12 1949", The Geneva Conventions of August 12 1949, ICRC, Geneva.
  11. http://www.globalpolicy.org/intljustice/tribunals/iraq/2005/1019fairness.htm diakses 14 Juli 2007, pukul 16:11 WIB.
  12. http://www.ranesi.nl /arsipaktua/timurtengah/irak/tribunal_irak.html diakses 12 Juli 2007, pukul 20:35 WIB.
  13. http://www.suaramerdeka.com/ harian/0406/21/opi2.htm.
  14. Katzenstein, Peter J., 2005. “Conclusion: National Security in a Changing Worldâ€, dalam Peter J. Katzenstein (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norm and Identity in World Politics, dalam Suzie Sudarman, “Norma-norma, Identitas, dan Politik Luar Negeri AS Periode ke-2 Bushâ€. Jurnal Studi Amerika, Vol. X No. 2, Juli-Desember, Pusat Kajian Wilayah Amerika Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta
  15. Kehoe, Greg. 2005. “A Slow Search for Justice in Iraqâ€. Legal Times, 24 January; Department of State, Quarterly Update to Congress: Section 2207 Report on Iraq Relief and Reconstruction
  16. Kompas, Kamis, 18 Desember 2003. “Arah Pengadilan Saddam: Sentuhan AS, tetapi Dikemas atas Nama Irakâ€, dalam http://www.kompas.com/kompascetak/0312/18/sorotan/753159.htm
  17. Konvensi Genewa III mengenai Perlakuan terhadap Tawanan Perang, Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War of August 12 1949 “, The Geneva Conventions of August 12 1949, Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross
  18. Konvensi IV Den Haag. 1907. Mengenai Hukum dan Kebiassan Perang di Darat yang judul lengkapnya adalah Convention Respecting to the Laws and Customs of War on Land merupakan penyempurnaan dari Konvensi II Den Haag (1899) mengenai Hukum dan Kebiasaan Perang di Darat, dalam Arlina Permanasari et.al. (1999), Pengantar Hukum Humaniter, International Committee of the Red Cross, Jakarta
  19. Kuncahyono, Trias. 2005. Bulan Sabit di Atas Baghdad. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas
  20. Lake, David A., and Patrick M. Morgan. 1992. Regional Order Building Security in a New World. United States of America: Pensylvania State University Press
  21. Millah, Vol V, No. 2, 2005.Yogyakarta: Magister Studi Islam UII
  22. President of the United States. 2002. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America The Former Iraqi Government on Trial, A Human Right Watch Briefing Paper, http://hrw.org/backgrounder/mena/iraq1005/iraq1005.pdf
  23. The World Book Multimedia Encyclopedia © 2005 World Book, Inc. 233 North Michigan Avenue Suite 2000 Chicago, Illinois 60601
  24. Widjajanto, Andi. 2007. “Komplikasi Hukum Tertangkapnya Saddam Husseinâ€, dikutip melalui http://www.kompas.com/ kompas-cetak/0312/17/Jendela/744944.htm.