Main Article Content
Abstract
Court decisions releasing the accused both in the cases of corruption and those of illegal logging could be influenced by juridical factor, for example the regulation on the criteria for decisions releasing the accused. This regulation would be a guide for judges. Besides, court decisions releasing the accused could also be influenced by non-juridical factor, such as return fee payment. The implication of such decisions on human rights is that the conducts of corruption and illegal logging tend to decrease and destruct the economic life, safety, peace, and welfare of people. The ideal judge decisions should be combination of normative, philosophical, and sociological considerations. These could be done by highly integrated, professional, progressive and knowledgeable judges who believe in God. Keywords: Court Decisions, Corrup-tion, Human Rights, Illegal logging, Release
Article Details
License
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
How to Cite
Muhammad, R. (2012). Refleksi Putusan Bebas Kasus Korupsi dan Illegal Logging dalam Perspektif Hak-hak Azasi Manusia. Unisia, 30(64). https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol30.iss64.art3
