Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 20, 2020
Accepted
March 17, 2022
Published
April 30, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1202 Download : 2535

Main Article Content

Abstract

The boarding room is a private room for students, but it is constantly changing due to the development of communication technology. This research shows that the media have found a barrier between the public and the private. By using the spatial ethnography method, this study finds that media consumption in boarding rooms has an impact on the way the occupants condition the private space zone. Data was collected by observation and interviews. The discussion is carried out by conducting a dialogue with field findings with the study of bedroom culture, which is offered by Siân Lincoln. This concept assumes that when young people (red: students) consume media in private spaces, they are actually at the crossroads between public and private. The findings of this study reveal that the presence of media in boarding rooms can open communication portals, thus giving rise to various mediated activities. This has made the boarding room an integral space, as well as a center for student activities. The student, when consuming media, can arrive at the reality of the world between the physical and the virtual world. This opens up opportunities for activities and controls that were previously public to enter their boarding rooms. 

Keywords

boarding room new media private space student

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Wahyudi, R., & Nugroho, H. . (2022). Mengaburnya Ruang Publik dan Ruang Privat dalam Praktik Konsumsi Media Baru. Jurnal Komunikasi, 16(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol16.iss2.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. The University of Chicago Press.
  2. Baudrillard, J. (1988). Simulacra and Simulations. In Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings. Polity Press.
  3. Bennet, A., & Kahn-Harris, K. (2004). After Subculture: Critical Studies in Contemporary Youth Culture. In A. Bennet & K.-H. Keith (Eds.), After Subculture: Critical Studies in Contemporary Youth Culture. Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12019
  5. Couldry, N., & Mccarthy, A. (2004). MediaSpace: Place, scale, and culture in a media age. In N. Couldry & A. McCarthy (Eds.), MediaSpace: Place, Scale and Culture in a Media Age (pp. 1–303). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203010228
  6. Dhona, H. R. (2018). Komunikasi Geografi. Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(1), 1–16. https://journal.uii.ac.id/jurnal-komunikasi/article/view/11584
  7. Gieseking, J. J., Mangold, W., Katz, C., Low, S., & Saegert, S. (2014). “PUBLIC” AND “PRIVATE” (Editors’ Introduction and Suggestions for Further Reading). In The People Place, and Space Reader. Routledge.
  8. Gunawan, H., & Saputro, A. K. H. (2018). Pemanfataan Aplikasi Mobile Untuk Mempercepat Pencarian Tempat Indekos Berbasis Android. Jurnal Muara Sains, Teknologi, Kedokteran Dan Ilmu Kesehatan, 1(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmstkik.v1i2.1454
  9. Hayat, N. (2018). Hermeneutika : Jurnal Hermeneutika “Gambaran Perilaku Menyimpang Mahasiswa Indekost dan Upaya Pencegahannya.” Jurnal Hermeneutika, 4(1), 49–58.
  10. Hjarvard, S. (2008). The Mediatization of Society. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 102–131. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0181
  11. Irfan, M., Somantri, M., & Sinuraya, E. W. (2017). Perancangan Aplikasi Pencarian Indekos Menggunakan Location Based Service Pada Smartphone Berbasis Android. Transient: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro, 6(2), 260–266. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/transient/article/view/17091
  12. Lincoln, S. (2004). Teenage Girls ‘Bedrooms Culture’: Code Versus Zone. In A. Bennett & K.-H. Keith (Eds.), After Subculture: Critical Studies in Contemporary Youth Culture. Palgrave Macmillan.
  13. Lincoln, S. (2012). Youth culture and private space. In Youth Culture and Private Space. Palgrave Macmilan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137031082
  14. Livingstone, S. (2005). In defence of privacy: Mediating the public/private boundary at home. In Audiences and publics: When cultural engagement matthers for the public sphere (pp. 163–185). Intellect Books.
  15. Livingstone, S. (2007). From family television to bedroom culture: young people’s media at home. In E. Devereux (Ed.), Media Studies: key issues and debates (pp. 302–321). SAGE.
  16. Low, S. (1996). spatializing culture: the social production and social construction of public space in Costa Rica. American Ethnologist, 23(4), 861–879. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1996.23.4.02a00100
  17. Low, S. (2017). Spatializing culture: The ethnography of space and place. In Spatializing Culture: The Ethnography of Space and Place. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315671277
  18. Lubis, Y. (2019). Baranangsiang. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
  19. Madanipour, A. (2005). Pubic and Private Space of the City. Routledge.
  20. Mamikos. (2019). No Title. https://mamikos.com/kost/kost-jogja-murah
  21. McRobbie, A., & Garber, J. (1991). Girls and Subcultures. In Feminism and Youth Culture: From Jackie to Just Seventeen. Macmillan Education LTD.
  22. Nugraha, S. (2019). Keputusan Mahasiswa Memilih Tempat Indekos Di Mamuju : Focused Group Discussion Dengan Mahasiswa Jurusan Manajemen. 1(2).
  23. Nur, S. (2019). Perilaku Menyimpang Studi Kasus Perilaku Seks diluar Nikah Mahasiswa Kos-Kosan. Phinisi Integration Review, 2(1), 47–55.
  24. Parkinson, J. (2012). Democracy and Public Space: The Physical Sites of Democratic Performance. Oxford University Press.
  25. PDDIKTI. (2019). No Title. https://forlap.ristekdikti.go.id/mahasiswa/homerekap/NjY0MjYyOUYtRTA3Mi00RjAzLTgyQkUtREZFMzVGM0ZGQzRF/1
  26. PH, L., & Arisdiani, T. (2019). Hubungan Tingkat Ansietas dengan Status Gizi Mahasiswa Indekos. Community of Publishing in Nursing (COPING), 7(2), 103–110. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/coping/article/view/53719
  27. Praba, D. A. P. U., Adnyani, N. K. S., & Sudiatmaka, K. (2020). Ganesha law review. Ganesha Law Review, 2(2), 167–179.
  28. Prasdika, D., Auliyah, R., & Setiawan, A. R. (2018). Menguak Nilai Dan Makna Di Balik Praktik Penentuan Harga Sewa: Studi Fenomenologis Pada Pengusaha Kos-Kosan. InFestasi, 14(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.21107/infestasi.v14i1.4259
  29. Rahmawati, D., Yuniar, N., & Ismail, C. S. (2017). Analisis faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan perilaku seks pranikah mahasiswa kos-kosan di Kelurahan Lalolara tahun 2016. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Kesehatan Masyarakat, 2(5), 1–12. http://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JIMKESMAS/article/viewFile/1929/1361
  30. Rusman, A. D. P. (2018). Pola Makan Dan Kejadian Anemia Pada Mahasiswi Yang Tinggal Di Kos-Kosan. Jurnal Ilmiah Manusia Dan Kesehatan, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.31850/makes.v1i2.141
  31. Septiana, P., N, F. A., & W, C. S. (2018). Konsumsi Junk food dan Serat pada Remaja Putri Overweight dan Obesitas yang Indekos Junk food and Fiber Consumption among Overweight and Obese Young Women Living in Boarding House. Kedokteran Brawijaya, 30(1), 61–67.
  32. Thariq, M., & Anshori, A. (2017). Komunikasi adaptasi mahasiswa indekos. Jurnal Interaksi, 1(2), 156–173. http://journal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/interaksi/article/view/1201/1194
  33. Westin, A. (1967). Privacy and Freedom. IG Publishing.
  34. Wijoyo, S., & Maimunah, E. (2018). ISSN : 2302 – 9595 Volume 7 No 1 April 2018. 7(1), 50–74.