Main Article Content

Abstract

Entrusted absent has been done among student, not exception for student in The Faculty of Mathematic and Faculty of Natural Science University Islam Indonesia (FMIPA UII). The Presence of student which prove with absent is important component. FMIPA UII have rule for minimum attendance, about 75%. The attendance determine the student can do the semester exam. Absent is important, in addition to be test requirement, the lecturer use it for component to give a mark. Entrusted absent is form of academic fraud which will effect student’s personality and the impact on their behaviour in workplace later. This Research have aim to know factors that influence academic cheating (Entrusted absent) on student in Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences. Deskriptif crosstabs analysis, and regression logistic analysis are used for data analysis method. After a research, and data analysis was done, factors which influence entrusted absent for students are gender variable, student opinion in assess entrusted absent. Male student and some student who have opinion about entrust absent is fine, have more probabilities to do entrusted absent. This research can be used for base to improve student behaviour in order to make them realized that entrusted absent make bad impact for student behaviour.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rafita, Y. (2013). ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI KECURANGAN AKADEMIK (TITIP ABSEN) PADA MAHASISWA S1 FAKULTAS MATEMATIKA DAN ILMU PENGETAHUAN ALAM UNIVERSITAS ISLAM INDONESIA. Khazanah: Jurnal Mahasiswa, 5(2), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.20885/khazanah.vol5.iss2.art3

References

  1. Aksara Kanungo & Mendoca (1992) Compensation: Effective Rewards Management. Toronto and Vancouver: Butterworth.
  2. Anonim.2011 . Academic Cheating (Kecurangan Akademik ) http://makkita.wordpress.com/2011/03/24/academic-cheating-kecuranganakademik/ [ diakses 23 Desember 2012].
  3. Bagus, Ida Putu Widiarta & I Gusti Ngurah Wardana. ‘Analisis Pemilihan Moda Dengan Regresi Logistik Pada Rencana Koridor Trayek Trans Sarbagita’, Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil Vol. 15, No. 2, Juli 2011
  4. Chakim, M. L. 2012. Faktor-faktor Penyebab Ketidakjujuran Mahasiswa .http://lutfi hakim.blogspot.com /2012/04/faktor-faktor-penyebab-ketidakjujuran.html [ diakses tanggal 15 Desember 2012]
  5. Gibson, Ivancevich & Donnelly (terjemahan) (1996). Organisasi. Edisi kedelapan, Jakarta : Binarupa.
  6. Gustraprasaja. 2011. Kehadiran Mahasiswa di Kelas Kebutuhan atau Kewajiban. http://gustraprasaja.wordpress.com/2011/08/13/kehadiran-mahasiswa-di-kelas-kebutuhan-atau-kewajiban/ [ diakses tanggal 17 desember 2012 jam 21:00 ]
  7. Irawati, I. 2008. Budaya menyontek di kalangan pelajar. Http://kabarindonesia.com/berita.php [diakses 22 Desember 2012].
  8. Mendenhall, W. & Terry Sincich. 2012. Regression Analysis. United States: Pearson Education, Inc.
  9. Nazir. 2005. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
  10. Novitasari. I. 2004. ‘ Sindikasi Jual-Beli Kunci Jawaban Ujian Nasional 2010 ( Studi Kasus Jaringan Jual-Beli Kunci Jawaban Ujian Nasional 2010 di Kota X )’, Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia Vol. 7 No. II Oktober 2011 : 267 – 286
  11. Nugraha, J. 2012. Modul Analisis Data Kategorik. Yogyakarta : Fakultas Matematika dan Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Islam Indonesia.
  12. Riski, S.A. 2009. Hubungan prokrastinasi akademis dan kecurangan akademis pada mahasiswa fakultas psikologi universitas sumatera utara. Skripsi Tidak Diterbitkan. Universitas Sumatera Utara.
  13. Studenta .2008. Melanggar Dianggap Wajar, 80 Persen Mahasiswa Lakukan Titip Absen. http://studentajurnalbogor.blogspot.com/2008/11/melanggar-dianggap-wajar-80-persen.html [ diakses tanggal 21 Desember 2012 ]
  14. Suhartini dan Romy .G. 2004. ‘Analisis Motivasi Kehadiran Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Islam Indonesia ( Pendekatan Teori Pengharapan) ’, Jurnal Siasat Bisnis No. 9 Vol. 1 Juni 2004
  15. www.statistika-unhalu.org/downlot.php?file=Regresi_Logistik.pdf [diakses tanggal 27 Desember 2012]