Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 19, 2025
Accepted
January 31, 2026
Published
July 15, 2026
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study maps the intellectual and conceptual development of technology acceptance research within the electric vehicle (EV) domain using a comprehensive bibliometric science-mapping approach. A total of 272 peer-reviewed Scopus-indexed articles published between 2011 and 2025 were systematically analyzed following the PSALSAR protocol and PICOC framing. Performance analysis and network-based mapping techniques including co-word, bibliographic coupling, co-citation, thematic mapping, and thematic evolution were applied using Biblioshiny and VOSviewer. The results demonstrate rapid publication growth, increasing international collaboration, and consolidation of behavioral acceptance frameworks as the dominant analytical foundation of the field. Technology acceptance model, theory of planned behavior, and UTAUT/UTAUT2 emerge as the central theoretical cores structuring EV adoption research, with recent thematic evolution shifting toward behavioral intention, sustainability orientation, and environmental concern. The study reconstructs conceptual architecture, identifies underexplored behavioral domains, and provides an integrated epistemic foundation for cumulative theory development in electric vehicle technology acceptance research.

Keywords

Technology acceptance Electric vehicles Bibliometric analysis Behavioral intention

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Igor Yotapditya, Ngatno Ngatno, Ari Pradhanawati, Reni Dewi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Yotapditya, I., Ngatno, N., Pradhanawati, A., & Dewi, R. (2026). Technology acceptance in electric mobility: A bibliometric review and research agenda. Asian Management and Business Review, 6(2), 290–311. https://doi.org/10.20885/AMBR.vol6.iss2.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ahmad, K., Huat, K. Y., Ismail, F., & Wei, C. S. (2024). Moving towards sustainable purchase behaviour: determinants of consumers’ acceptance of electric vehicles in Malaysia. Paper Asia, 40(4b), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.59953/paperasia.v40i4b.207
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  3. Ali, A., Mirzaei, N., Yousefi, H., & Hajinezhad, A. (2025). Comprehensive bibliometric analysis of electric vehicle research: Trends , emerging topics , and sustainability insights. Energy Strategy Reviews, 62: Article e101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101963
  4. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  5. Aria, M., Cuccurullo, C., D’aniello, L., Misuraca, M., & Spano, M. (2022). Thematic analysis as a new culturomic tool: The social media coverage on COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. Sustainability, 14(6), 3643. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063643
  6. Aria, M., Misuraca, M., & Spano, M. (2020). Mapping the evolution of social research and data science on 30 years of social indicators research. Social Indicators Research, 149, 803–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02281-3
  7. Augurio, A., Castaldi, L., Mazzoni, C., & Matarazzo, O. (2025). EV purchase intention in Italy, Germany, France, and Denmark: Comparative analysis after the approval of the 2035 ban. Journal of Cleaner Production, 486: Article e144212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144212
  8. Axsen, J., Orlebar, C., & Skippon, S. (2013). Social influence and consumer preference formation for pro-environmental technology: The case of a U.K. workplace electric-vehicle study. Ecological Economics, 95, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.08.009
  9. Bryła, P., Chatterjee, S., & Ciabiada-Bryła, B. (2023). Consumer adoption of electric vehicles: a systematic literature review. Energies, 16(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010205
  10. Çallı, L., & Çallı, B. A. (2024). Value-centric analysis of user adoption for sustainable urban micro-mobility transportation through shared e-scooter services. Sustainable Development, 32(6), 6408–6433. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3032
  11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  12. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  13. Degirmenci, K., & Breitner, M. H. (2017). Consumer purchase intentions for electric vehicles: Is green more important than price and range? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 51, 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.01.001
  14. Dixon, J., & Bell, K. (2020). Electric vehicles: Battery capacity, charger power, access to charging and the impacts on distribution networks. ETransportation, 4, 100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etran.2020.100059
  15. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  16. Duangekanong, S. (2023). Determining behavioral intention of logistic and distribution firms to use electric vehicles in Thailand. Journal of Distribution Science, 21(5), 31–41. https://doi.org/ 10.15722/jds.21.05.202305.31
  17. Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy, 48, 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009
  18. Featherman, M., Jia, S. J., Califf, C. B., & Hajli, N. (2021). The impact of new technologies on consumers beliefs: Reducing the perceived risks of electric vehicle adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169: Article e120847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120847
  19. Franke, T., & Krems, J. F. (2013). What drives range preferences in electric vehicle users? Transport Policy, 30, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.07.005
  20. Gulzari, A., Wang, Y., & Prybutok, V. (2022). A green experience with eco-friendly cars: A young consumer electric vehicle rental behavioral model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65: Article e102877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102877
  21. Graham-Rowe, E., Gardner, B., Abraham, C., Skippon, S., Dittmar, H., Hutchins, R., & Stannard, J. (2012). Mainstream consumers driving plug-in battery-electric and plug-in hybrid electric cars: A qualitative analysis of responses and evaluations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(1), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.008
  22. Hakam, D. F., & Jumayla, S. (2024). Electric vehicle adoption in Indonesia: Lesson learned from developed and developing countries. Sustainable Futures, 8: Article e100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100348
  23. Han, W., Shum, C., & Wan, G. (2025). Charging during the stay: the effects of EV chargers’ availability and pricing on consumer perceived utilitarian value and behavioral intentions. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 42(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2024.2427171
  24. Han, L., Wang, S., Zhao, D., & Li, J. (2017). The intention to adopt electric vehicles: Driven by functional and non-functional values. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 103, 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.033
  25. He, X., & Zhan, W. (2018). How to activate moral norm to adopt electric vehicles in China? An empirical study based on extended norm activation theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3546–3556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.088
  26. Helveston, J. P., Liu, Y., Feit, E. M., Fuchs, E., Klampfl, E., & Michalek, J. J. (2015). Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the U.S. and China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 73, 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.01.002
  27. Herrenkind, B., Brendel, A. B., Nastjuk, I., Greve, M., & Kolbe, L. M. (2019). Investigating end-user acceptance of autonomous electric buses to accelerate diffusion. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 74, 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.003
  28. Higueras-Castillo, E., Singh, V., Singh, V., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2024). Factors affecting adoption intention of electric vehicle: a cross-cultural study. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 29293–29329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03865-y
  29. Jain, N. K., Bhaskar, K., & Jain, S. (2022). What drives adoption intention of electric vehicles in India? An integrated UTAUT model with environmental concerns, perceived risk and government support. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 42: Article e100730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100730
  30. Jaiswal, D., Kaushal, V., Kant, R., & Kumar Singh, P. (2021). Consumer adoption intention for electric vehicles: Insights and evidence from Indian sustainable transportation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173: Article e121089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121089
  31. Jensen, A. F., Cherchi, E., & Mabit, S. L. (2013). On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.006
  32. Joghee, S., Kabiraj, S., Ramakrishnan, S., & Alzoubi, H. M. (2024). Consumer decision-making study regarding the SUV market in the Indian context. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(11), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i11/174628
  33. Karami, A., Allahviranloo, M., & Samadzad, M. (2025). The impacts of personality traits on the acceptance of shared e-scooters: Evidence from Tehran. Cities, 158: Article e105633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105633
  34. Keszey, T. (2020). Behavioural intention to use autonomous vehicles: Systematic review and empirical extension. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 119: Article e102732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102732
  35. Khurana, A., Kumar, V. V. R., & Sidhpuria, M. (2020). A Study on the Adoption of Electric Vehicles in India: The Mediating Role of Attitude. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 24(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262919875548
  36. Kim, M.-K., Oh, J., Park, J.-H., & Joo, C. (2018). Perceived value and adoption intention for electric vehicles in Korea: Moderating effects of environmental traits and government supports. Energy, 159, 799–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.064
  37. Kim, J., Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2014). Expanding scope of hybrid choice models allowing for mixture of social influences and latent attitudes: Application to intended purchase of electric cars. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 69, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.08.016
  38. Kumar, R. R., & Alok, K. (2020). Adoption of electric vehicle: A literature review and prospects for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, Article 119911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119911
  39. Kumar, V., Kaushik, A. K., Noravesh, F., Sindhwani, R., & Mathiyazhagan, K. (2025). Green drives: Understanding how environmental propensity, range and technological anxiety shape electric vehicle adoption intentions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 210: Article e123859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123859
  40. Lai, I. K. W., Liu, Y., Sun, X., Zhang, H., & Xu, W. (2015). Factors influencing the behavioural intention towards full electric vehicles: An empirical study in Macau. Sustainability, 7(9), 12564–12585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70912564
  41. Lashari, Z. A., Ko, J., & Jang, J. (2021). Consumers’ intention to purchase electric vehicles: influences of user attitude and perception. Sustainability, 13(12), 6778. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126778
  42. Lee, S. S., Kim, Y., & Roh, T. (2023). Pro-environmental behavior on electric vehicle use intention: Integrating value-belief-norm theory and theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 418: Article e138211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138211
  43. Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., & Geng, J. (2017). A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.076
  44. Liao, F., Molin, E., & van Wee, B. (2017). Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: a literature review. Transport Reviews, 37(3), 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1230794
  45. Lundberg, J., Fransson, A., Brommels, M., Skår, J., & Lundkvist, I. (2006). Is it better or just the same? Article identification strategies impact bibliometric assessments. Scientometrics, 66, 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0013-4
  46. Malik, M. A. I., Kalam, M. A., Ikram, A., Zeeshan, S., & Raza Zahidi, S. Q. (2025). Energy transition towards electric vehicle technology: Recent advancements. Energy Reports, 13, 2958–2996. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.02.029
  47. Marzi, G., Balzano, M., Caputo, A., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2025). Guidelines for Bibliometric-systematic literature reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 27(1), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12381
  48. Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7: Article e100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777
  49. Meyer, D., Kraus, L., Husemann, L., & Proff, H. (2025). Willingness of employees to accept bidirectional charging at the workplace. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 139: Article e104517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104517
  50. Mohamed, M., Higgins, C., Ferguson, M., & Kanaroglou, P. (2016). Identifying and characterizing potential electric vehicle adopters in Canada: A two-stage modelling approach. Transport Policy, 52, 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.006
  51. Moons, I., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2015). An extended decomposed theory of planned behaviour to predict the usage intention of the electric car: A multi-group comparison. Sustainability, 7(5), 6212–6245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7056212
  52. Orji, I. J. (2024). Adopting electric bus for improving efficiency in the local public transport sector: Analysis of facilitating conditions and their nonlinear relationships. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 180: Article e103967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2024.103967
  53. Pan, X., & Liao, F. (2025). On effects of behavioral intention on travel preferences for electric car-sharing services: Empirical insights from the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 109, 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.003
  54. Pandita, D., Bhatt, V., Kumar, V. V. R., Fatma, A., & Vapiwala, F. (2024). Electrifying the future: analysing the determinants of electric vehicle adoption. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 18(6), 1767–1786. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-06-2023-0004
  55. Prakhar, P., Jabeen, F., Jaiswal, R., Gupta, S., Piccardi, P., & Jose, S. (2025). Mapping the electric vehicle adoption scholarship for sustainability: an integrated theoretical framework and future research directions. Management of Environmental Quality, 36(1), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-04-2024-0153
  56. Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bengtsson, M. (2018). Consumer motivations for sustainable consumption: The interaction of gain, normative and hedonic motivations on electric vehicle adoption. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), 1272–1283. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2074
  57. Rong, L., Zhao, M., & Xu, M. (2025). How do self-transcendent values and institutional forces influence consumer intentions to purchase new energy vehicles under subsidy withdrawal? Evidence from China. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(3), 7843–7870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04224-7
  58. Samadzad, M., Nosratzadeh, H., Karami, H., & Karami, A. (2023). What are the factors affecting the adoption and use of electric scooter sharing systems from the end user’s perspective? Transport Policy, 136, 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.03.006
  59. Sang, Y.-N., & Bekhet, H. A. (2015). Modelling electric vehicle usage intentions: An empirical study in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.045
  60. Schmalfuß, F., Mühl, K., & Krems, J. F. (2017). Direct experience with battery electric vehicles (BEVs) matters when evaluating vehicle attributes, attitude and purchase intention. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46, 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.01.004
  61. Selvi, M. S., & Önem, Ş. (2025). Impact of variables in the UTAUT 2 model on the intention to use a fully electric car. Sustainability, 17(7), 3214. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073214
  62. Shafiei, E., Thorkelsson, H., Ásgeirsson, E. I., Davidsdottir, B., Raberto, M., & Stefansson, H. (2012). An agent-based modeling approach to predict the evolution of market share of electric vehicles: A case study from Iceland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(9), 1638–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.05.011
  63. Shi, H., Wang, S., & Zhao, D. (2017). Exploring urban resident’s vehicular PM2.5 reduction behavior intention: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.108
  64. Singh, S., Arora, M., Kaur, R., Rani, A., & Kathuria, P. (2025). Unpacking role of environmental awareness in the triad relationship of religious commitment, environmental values and intentions in Indian textile industry. Social Responsibility Journal, 21(4), 776–792. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-07-2024-0447
  65. Singh, V., Singh, H., Dhiman, B., Kumar, N., & Singh, T. (2023a). Analyzing bibliometric and thematic patterns in the transition to sustainable transportation: Uncovering the influences on electric vehicle adoption. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 50: Article e101033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2023.101033
  66. Singh, V., Singh, H., Dhiman, B., Kumar, N., & Singh, T. (2023b). Research in transportation business & management analyzing bibliometric and thematic patterns in the transition to sustainable transportation: Uncovering the influences on electric vehicle adoption. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 50: Article e101033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2023.101033
  67. Singh, V., Singh, V., & Vaibhav, S. (2020). A review and simple meta-analysis of factors influencing adoption of electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86: Article e102436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102436
  68. Sovacool, B. K. (2017). Experts, theories, and electric mobility transitions: Toward an integrated conceptual framework for the adoption of electric vehicles. Energy Research and Social Science, 27, 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.014
  69. Tahir, H., Erteza, H., El-ferik, S., Tayyab, M., & Khosravi, N. (2025). Electric vehicles and renewable energy for sustainable mobility : Insights from bibliometric , topic modeling , and societal impact analyses. Energy Strategy Reviews, 61: Article e101827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101827
  70. Tilly, N., Yigitcanlar, T., Degirmenci, K., & Paz, A. (2024). How sustainable is electric vehicle adoption? Insights from a PRISMA review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 117: Article e105950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105950
  71. Tu, J.-C., & Yang, C. (2019). Key factors influencing consumers’ purchase of electric vehicles. Sustainability, 11(14), 3863. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143863
  72. Tyagi, R., & Vishwakarma, S. (2022). Technology aspect of Electric Vehicles Initiative’s social sustainability. Technological Sustainability, 1(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/TECHS-09-2021-0005
  73. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
  74. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. y. ., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2002388
  75. Wang, N., Zhang, J., & Yu, X. (2024). Sustainability-driven technology road mapping: a strategic framework for sustainable development with moderation of ease of use. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, 14(4), 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISCM.2024.144422
  76. Wang, S., Wang, J., Li, J., Wang, J., & Liang, L. (2018). Policy implications for promoting the adoption of electric vehicles: Do consumer’s knowledge, perceived risk and financial incentive policy matter? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.014
  77. Will, C., & Schuller, A. (2016). Understanding user acceptance factors of electric vehicle smart charging. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 71, 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.07.006
  78. Wu, J., Liao, H., Wang, J.-W., & Chen, T. (2019). The role of environmental concern in the public acceptance of autonomous electric vehicles: A survey from China. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.029
  79. Yau, A. T. L., Ismail, H., & Kamaruddin, N. I. (2024). Eco-friendly drive: extending the theory of planned behaviours towards electric vehicle adoption. Paper Asia, 40(6b), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.59953/paperasia.v40i6b.265
  80. Yu, T., Zhang, Y., Teoh, A. P., Wang, A., & Wang, C. (2023). Factors influencing university students’ behavioral intention to use electric car-sharing services in Guangzhou, China. Sage Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231210551
  81. Zhang, F., Lv, H., Kuai, C., & Feng, T. (2025). The battery-swapping revolution: Exploring user preferences in electric micro-mobility sector. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 194: Article e104416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104416
  82. Zhang, X., & Chang, M. (2023). Applying the extended technology acceptance model to explore Taiwan’s Generation Z’s behavioral intentions toward using electric motorcycles. Sustainability, 15(4), 3787. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043787