Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 24, 2025
Accepted
July 1, 2025
Published
October 25, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 66 Download : 114

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of Self-Determination Theory (SDT) as a construct to help pre-service teachers mitigate chemistry anxiety as they build resilience in the subject. The study was framed within the three key sub-constructs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness under SDT as a theoretical lens.  The study employed sequential mixed methods research approaches and sampled pre-service teachers from two South African universities, one university being in the urban area and the second university in the rural area. Whole-class interventions were employed in each institution where the researchers incorporated a resilience toolkit over a semester. Questionnaires and interviews were the main instruments used to collect data. The data was analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. The study found that pre-service teachers generally experienced anxiety in chemistry, and that female pre-service teachers displayed statistically significant anxiety scores compared to males (p = 0.018); whereas the location of the university had no statistically significant influence on anxiety scores (p = 0.896). The study further found that the interventions improved emotional regulation, competence, and intrinsic motivation while fostering supportive peer networks.  The study recommends integrating resilience-building strategies into science teacher training programs to equip pre-service teachers with skills to manage science anxiety effectively.

Keywords

Self-Determination Theory Chemistry anxiety Reslience-Building Strategies Pre-service Teachers Autonomy and Competence

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Sakyiwaa Boateng, Brighton Mudadigwa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the simultaneously licenced under A Creative Commons Attribution (CC-By-SA) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the worsk's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Boateng, S., & Mudadigwa, B. (2025). Enhancing Pre-Service Teachers’ Resilience to Overcome Chemistry Anxiety: Self-Determination Theory Approach. IJCER (International Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 9(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijcer.vol9.iss2.art2
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. R. F. Krueger and K. E. Markon, "The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology," Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 477-501, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732
  2. J. V. Mallow, "Science anxiety: Research and action," in Handbook of college Science Teaching, National Science Teachers Association, Arlington, V.A.: Mintzes, 2006, pp. 3-14.
  3. E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, "Self-determination theory," in Handbook of theories of social psychology, Thousand Oaks, CA.: Van Lange, Kruglanski and Higgins, 2012, vol. 1, no. 20, pp. 416-436, doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21
  4. R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, "Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions," Contemp. Educ. Psychol, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 54-67, 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  5. S. Henschel, “Antecedents of science anxiety in elementary school,” The J. Educ. Res., vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 263-77, May 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1922989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2021.1922989
  6. K. Utha, B. H. Subba, B.B. Mongar, N. Hopwood, and K. Pressick-Kilborn, “Secondary school students’ perceptions and experiences of learning science and mathematics: The case of Bhutan,” Asia Pac. J. Educ. Vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 350-67, Apr 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1901652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1901652
  7. M. S. Griggs, S. E. Rimm-Kaufman, E. G. Merritt, and C. L. Patton, “The Responsive Classroom approach and fifth-grade students’ math and science anxiety and self-efficacy,” Sch. Psychol. Q., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 360, Dec 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000026
  8. A. M. Megreya, D. Szűcs, and A. A. Moustafa, “The Abbreviated Science Anxiety Scale: Psychometric properties, gender differences and associations with test anxiety, general anxiety and science achievement,” Plos one, vol. 16. No. 2, Feb 2021, e0245200, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245200
  9. S. Boateng, B. Mudadigwa, and S. Johnston-Wilder, “Examining gendered patterns in mathematics and science anxiety levels among physical science pre-service teachers,” EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Tech. Ed., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1-15, Jan 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15800
  10. A. Mallow, and D. Cameronkelly, “Unraveling the layers of cultural competence: Exploring the meaning of meta-cultural competence in the therapeutic community,"J. Ethn. Subst. Abuse, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 63-74, Sep 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1300/J233v05n03_04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J233v05n03_04
  11. L. F. Goes, and C. Fernandez, “Evidence of the development of pedagogical content knowledge of chemistry teachers about redox reactions in the context of a professional development program,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1159, Nov. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111159
  12. J. Hsu, and G. R. Goldsmith, “Instructor strategies to alleviate stress and anxiety among college and university stem students”, CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 20 es1 1-13 Feb 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-08-0189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-08-0189
  13. B. Jukins, “Building a Bridge to Understanding: Utilizing Professional Development to Enhance Teacher Self-Efficacy and Knowledge of Student Stress and Anxiety,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Educ., Arizona State University, Arizona, United State of America, Dec 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2611704627?pqorigsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses
  14. J. Villegas-Puyod, S. Sharma, S. Ajah, M. Chaisanrit, and B. Skuldee, “The Role of Teacher Support, Classmate Support, and Self-efficacy in Reducing Speaking Anxiety among University Students Using English as a Foreign Language,” Hum. Behav. Dev. Soc., vol. 21, no. 3 pp. 58-59, May 2020. [Online]. Available: https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/hbds/article/view/240111
  15. R. Wheeldon, “Improving preservice chemistry teachers’ content knowledge through intervention activities,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1238-61, Jun 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1333655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1333655
  16. T. K. F. Chiu, “Using self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student STEM interest and identity development,” Instr Sci., vol. 52 pp. 89–107, Jul 2024, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09642-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09642-8
  17. D. Elford, S. Lancaster, and G. A. Jones, “Fostering motivation toward chemistry through augmented reality educational escape activities. a self-determination theory approach,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 3406-3417, Sept 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00428
  18. I. Puspita, T. P. . Nidiah, and J. A. M. . Contreras, “The Influence of Self Efficacy, Social Support and Coping Stress on Academic Resilience in Students of the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Jambi”, ELEMENT, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 36–56, Aug. 2024.4, doi: https://doi.org/10.22437/element.v2i1.36666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/element.v2i1.36666
  19. J. Reeve, “Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit,” The Elementary School Journal. vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 225-36, Jan 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/501484 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/501484
  20. E. L. Deci, A. H. Olafsen, and R. M. Ryan, “Self-determination theory in work organisations: The state of a science,” Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., vol. 4. No. 1, pp. 19-43, Mar 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
  21. L. Partanen, “How student-centred teaching in quantum chemistry affects students’ experiences of learning and motivation—a self-determination theory perspective,” Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 79-94, Jul 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00036D. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00036D
  22. M. Gagné, and E. L. Deci, “Self‐determination theory and work motivation,” J. Organ. behav., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 331-62, Jun 2005, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
  23. A. Bach, and G. Hagenauer, “Joy, anger, and anxiety during the teaching practicum: how are these emotions related to dimensions of pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy?” Zf Bildungsforsch , vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 295-311 Aug 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s35834-022-00343-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s35834-022-00343-9
  24. B. Senler, “Pre-service science teachers’ self-efficacy: The role of attitude, anxiety and locus of control,” Australian J. Educ., vol. 60. No. 1, pp. 26-41, Apr 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944116629807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944116629807
  25. H. A. Efe, and R Efe, “Swiss and Turkish Pre-Service Science Teachers' Anxiety Levels for Educational Technology,” J. Educ. Train. Stud., vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 185-95, Jul 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i7.1492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i7.1492
  26. H. A. Efe, R. Efe, and S. Yücel, “A Comparison of Swiss and Turkish Pre-Service Science Teachers' Attitudes, Anxiety and Self-Efficacy Regarding Educational Technology,” Univers. J. Educ. Res., vol. 4. no. 7, pp. 1583-94, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040711
  27. T. Demirci, and E. Akgün, “An Analysis on the Cognitive Structure and Opinions of Pre-Service Science Teachers on the Concept of Micro Teaching,” Shanlax Int. J. Educ., vol. 11. no. 4, pp. 1-4, Sept 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v11i4.6116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v11i4.6116
  28. X. Li, X. Guan, J. Wang, Y, Zhang, M. Ma, T.Pu, M. C. Jobe, and M. Z. Ahmed, “The effect of pre-service teachers’ family adaptation on anxiety: A moderated mediating effect,” Sustainability. vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 10796, Jul 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410796
  29. H. A. Nugroho, “Pre-service EFL teachers’ self-efficacy, their English proficiency and their preparedness for teaching practicum program,” Premise: J. Engl. Educ. Appl. Linguist., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1-1, Nov 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v6i2.997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v6i2.997
  30. N. Mersin, and Ş Danişman, “The impact of instruction on Web 2.0 tools on pre-service mathematics teachers' self-efficacy beliefs and their activity development experiences,” Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 18655-76, Oct 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i10.3069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v14i10.3069
  31. T. Kearns, “Applying self-determination theory (SDT) in an emancipatory study with anxious adolescents to investigate any changes in anxiety and well-being,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Educ. Child Psychol. Univ. of East London, East London, South Africa, Apr 2017. [Online]. Available: https://repository.uel.ac.uk/download/b81970e229569466b87664949fa27358b5f6da520ff695ccae748c1b4dd3c5e1/2810911/Tiffany%2520Kearns.pdf.
  32. E. Novak, I. Soyturk, and S. L. Navy, “Development of the science teaching anxiety scale for preservice elementary teachers: A Rasch analysis,” Sci. Educ., vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 739-64, May 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21707
  33. W. Chen, S. B. Baharom, and S. B. Yassin, “Does Flipped Classroom Approach Impact on Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety of First-year Chinese Urban-rural Pre-service Teachers?” World J. Engl. Lang., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 430, Sept 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n7p430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n7p430
  34. R. Banerjee, and S. Halder, “Amotivation and influence of teacher support dimensions: A self-determination theory approach,” Heliyon. vol. 7, no. 7, Jul 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07410
  35. S. Chan, S. Maneewan, and R. Koul, “Teacher educators’ teaching styles: relation with learning motivation and academic engagement in pre-service teachers,” Teach. High. Educ. Vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 2044-65, Nov 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1947226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1947226
  36. R. M. Eddy, “Chemophobia in the college classroom: Extent, sources, and student characteristics,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 514, Apr 2000, doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed077p514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed077p514
  37. P. M. Ghimire, “Chemistry Anxiety Among Bachelor-Level Students in Science Education”, Ganeshman Darpan, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 72–78, Aug. 2023., https://doi.org/10.3126/gd.v8i1.57333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/gd.v8i1.57333
  38. B. Caymaz, and A. Aydın, “An investigation of secondary school students’ anxiety and motivation levels towards science course in terms of some variables, ”Int. J. Psychol. Educ. Stud., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 13-27, Jul 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.3.189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.3.189
  39. E. Özbugutu, “An Investigation into Anxiety about the Science Lesson through a Mixed Model,” J. Educ. Learn., vol. 10. no. 1, pp. 104-17, Jul 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n1p104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v10n1p104
  40. S. D. Fia, C. Fosu-Ayarkwah, and T. Obuobi-Ayim, “Causes, effects and management of science anxiety among senior high school students in Old Tafo Municipality of Ghana,” Open J. Psychol. vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 46-57, Aug 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31586/ojp.2022.384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31586/ojp.2022.384
  41. A. E. Foley, J. B. Herts, F. Borgonovi, S. Guerriero, S. C. Levine, and S. L. Beilock, “The math anxiety-performance link: A global phenomenon,” Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 52-8, Feb 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416672463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416672463
  42. S. C. Nwafor, J. A. Eke, and F. N. Ibe, “Correlation between test anxiety and students’ chemistry achievement,” J. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 3 no. 1, pp. 31-40. Apr 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v3i1.93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v3i1.93
  43. S. Amaliyah, S. Suryaningsih, and L. Yunita, “Gender Differences in the Relationship Between Anxiety, Self-Efficacy and Students Learning Outcomes on Chemistry Subject,” EDUSAINS, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 8-14, Jun 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v13i1.12991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v13i1.12991
  44. D. Rozgonjuk, K. Täht, R. Soobard, M. Teppo, and M. Rannikmäe, “The S in STEM: gender differences in science anxiety and its relations with science test performance-related variables,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 45, Sept 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00504-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00504-4
  45. M. Dickson, M. McMinn, and H. Kadbey, “Science anxiety levels in Emirati student teachers,” Learn. Teach. High. Educ. Gulf Perspectives. vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 16-29, Jun 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.18538/lthe.v14.n1.250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18538/lthe.v14.n1.250
  46. D. Oludipe, and J. O. Awokoy, “Effect of cooperative learning teaching strategy on the reduction of students’ anxiety for learning chemistry,” J. Turkish Sci Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 30-6, Mar 2010. [Online], Available: https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/501.
  47. M. Siddique, M. S. Ali, N. Nasir, T. H. Awan, and A. Siddique, “Resilience and self-efficacy: A correlational study of 10th-grade chemistry students in Pakistan,” Multicult. Educ., vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 210-22, Jan 2021, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5498287
  48. M, Bascopé, and K. Reiss, “Place-based STEM education for sustainability: A path towards socio-ecological resilience,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 15, pp. 8414, Jul 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158414
  49. S. Johnston-Wilder, S. Pardoe, H. Almehrz, B. Evans, J. Marsh, and S. Richards, “Developing Teaching for Mathematical Resilience in Further Education,” in Proc. 9th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI 2016), Seville, Spain, Nov. 14–16, 2016, pp. 3019–3028, doi: https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2016.1652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2016.1652
  50. S. Johnston-Wilder, and C. Lee, “Developing Mathematical Resilience. BERA Annu Conf University of Warwick, vol. 4, no. 2 pp 1–11, Sept 2010.
  51. N. E. Betz, “Prevalence, distribution, and correlates of math anxiety in college students,” J. Couns. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 441, Sept 1978, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.25.5.441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.25.5.441
  52. V. Braun, and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77-101, Jan 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  53. R. Meléndez, R. Giraldo, and V. Leiva, “Sign, Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests for functional data: An approach based on random projections,” Mathematics. vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 44, Dec 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/math9010044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math9010044
  54. Z. Ahmad, T. K. Nguyen, A. Rai, and J. M. Kim, “Industrial fluid pipeline leak detection and localisation based on a multiscale Mann-Whitney test and acoustic emission event tracking,” Mech. Syst. Signal Pr. vol. 189. pp. 110067, Apr 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.110067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.110067
  55. S. Ledger, “Resilience building for pre-service teachers: BRiTE, micro-teaching and augmented reality/simulation (BRiTE-AR),” Cultiv. Teach. Resil. pp. 245, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5963-1_15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5963-1_15