Isi Artikel Utama

Abstrak

This study aims to examine the perceptions of K–12 science teachers regarding the integration of Mobile Augmented Reality (mAR) as a pedagogical tool in Biology education. Specifically, it investigates current mAR usage, its perceived impact on student learning, and the challenges teachers face in its implementation. Using a mixed-method research design, data were collected from 34 teachers through surveys and interviews. Results reveal that only 44.1% of respondents have used mAR in their lessons primarily coming from private schools, while 55.9% have not, primarily due to limited access to devices, unstable internet, and insufficient training. Teachers who employed mAR reported improved student engagement, enhanced visualization of complex concepts, and increased motivation and collaboration. mAR was most used during the engagement and exploration phases, particularly in anatomy and cell biology lessons. Despite challenges in curriculum alignment, technical support, and classroom management, most teachers acknowledge the potential of mAR to enrich Biology education. The study highlights the need for improved infrastructure, targeted professional development, and curriculum-aligned AR content to support wider adoption.

Kata Kunci

Augmented Reality Mobile Augmented Reality Biology Education K-12 teachers

Rincian Artikel

Cara Mengutip
Maulion, R. J., & Prudente, M. (2025). Perceptions of K-12 teachers on Mobile Augmented Reality in Biology Education: A Descriptive Action Research. IJCER (International Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 9(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijcer.vol9.iss2.art5

Referensi

  1. Statista, “AR/VR-Worldwide,” Statista Outlook, [Online].
  2. Available: https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/ar-vr/worldwide. (Accessed: Apr. 10, 2025).
  3. HolonIQ, “2022 Global Education Outlook,” HolonIQ Notes, 2 Februari 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.holoniq.com/notes/2022-global-education-outlook. (Accessed: Apr. 10, 2025).
  4. M. Akçayır and G. Akçayır, “Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: a systematic review of the literature,” Educational Research Review, vol. 20, pp. 1-11, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
  5. M. Dunleavy and C. Dede, "Augmented reality teaching and learning," in Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, Springer, 2014, pp. 735–745, https://doi.org/110.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_59
  6. OECD, PISA 2018 Results (Volume III): What School Life Means for Students’ Lives, Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2020. https://doi.org/110.1787/acd78851-en.
  7. T. Ciloglu and A. B. Ustun, "The Effects of Mobile AR-Based Biology Learning Experience On Students’ Motivation, Self-Efficacy, And Attitudes In Online Learning," J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 32, pp. 309–337, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10030-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10030-7
  8. M. E. C. Santos, A. Chen, T. Taketomi, G. Yamamoto, J. Miyazaki, and H. Kato, "Augmented Reality Learning Experiences: Survey Of Prototype Design And Evaluation," IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., vol. 7, pp. 38–56, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2013.37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2013.37
  9. T. I. Permana, H. Husamah, M. I. Nurhamdani, A. Zaskia, A. Savitri, and D. A. Salsabila, “Augmented Reality In Biology Education: A Systematic Literature Review,” Res. Dev. Educ. (RaDEn), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 630-652, June 11, 2024. https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i1.32636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i1.32636
  10. M. B. Ibáñez and C. Delgado-Kloos, "Augmented Reality For STEM Learning: A Systematic Review," Comput. Educ., vol. 123, pp. 109–123, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002
  11. H.-K. Wu, S. W.-Y. Lee, H.-Y. Chang, and Y.-W. Liang, "Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education," Comput. Educ., vol. 62, pp. 41–49, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
  12. T.-Y. Liu and Y.-L. Chu, "Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation," Comput. Educ., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 630–643, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.023.
  13. I. Radu, "Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and cross-media analysis," Pers. Ubiquitous Comput., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1533–1543, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y
  14. T. P. Caudell and D. W. Mizell, "Augmented reality: An application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes," in Proc. 25th Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., 1992, pp. 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1992.183317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1992.183317
  15. R. T. Azuma, "A survey of augmented reality," Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 355–385, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
  16. R. Azuma, Y. Baillot, R. Behringer, S. Feiner, S. Julier and B. MacIntyre, "Recent advances in augmented reality," in IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 34-47, Nov.-Dec. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.963459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/38.963459
  17. J. H. Shuhaiber, "Augmented reality in surgery," Arch. Surg., vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 170–174, Feb. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.2.170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.2.170
  18. R. Wojciechowski and J. Cellary, "Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in AR-based environment," Comput. Educ., vol. 68, pp. 570–585, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014
  19. H. Altinpulluk, "Advantages and challenges associated with AR applications in science education: A literature review," J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 10–20, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9806-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9806-3
  20. A. Gillet, M. Sanner, D. Stoffler, D. Goodsell, and A. Olson, "Augmented Reality with Tangible Auto-Fabricated Models For Molecular Biology Applications," in Visualization 2004 (Proceedings), Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2004, pp. 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1109/VISUAL.2004.7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/VISUAL.2004.7
  21. S. S. Jamali, M. F. Shiratuddin, K. W. Wong, and C. L. Oskam, "Utilising Mobile-Augmented Reality For Learning Human Anatomy," Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 197, pp. 659–668, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.054
  22. Y.-H. Wang, "Integrating Games, E-Books And AR Techniques To Support Project-Based Science Learning," Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 53–67, Jul. 2020, [online], Available on: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26926426.
  23. J. Tondeur, J. Van Braak, P. A. Ertmer, and A. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, "Understanding The Relationship Between Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs And Technology Use In Education: A Systematic Review Of Qualitative Evidence," Educ. Technol. Res. Develop., vol. 65, pp. 555–575, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2
  24. K. F. Hew and T. Brush, "Integrating Technology Into K–12 Teaching And Learning: Current Knowledge Gaps And Recommendations For Future Research," Educ. Technol. Res. Develop., vol. 55, pp. 223–252, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
  25. J. Piedade and E. Batista, “Teachers’ Perceptions of Augmented Reality In Education: Between Pedagogical Potential And Technological Readiness,” Educ. Sci, vol. 15, no. 8, Art. no. 1076, Aug. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081076
  26. E. Schmidthaler, B. Anđic, M. Schmollmüller, B. Sabitzer, and Z. Lavicza, “Mobile Augmented Reality In Biological Education: Perceptions Of Austrian Secondary School Teachers,” J. Effi. Responsib. Educ. Sci., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 113-127, 2023. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2023.160203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2023.160203
  27. L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education, 6th ed., London, U.K.: Routledge, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203224342
  28. D. L. Morgan, "Exploring the use of artificial intelligence for qualitative data analysis: The case of ChatGPT," Int. J. Qualitative Methods, vol. 22, pp. 1–11, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231211248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231211248
  29. M. Meriyati, M. Nitin, S. Bradford, and V. Wiliyanti, "The impact of applying augmented reality technology in learning on student learning experiences," J. Emerg. Technol. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 215–228, Jun. 2024. https://doi.org/ 10.70177/jete.v2i2.1067. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70177/jete.v2i2.1067
  30. I. Ansori, F. Arianto, and K. Khotimah, "The Effectiveness of Augmented Reality On Students' Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) In Geography," Edunesia: J. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 448–464, Apr. 2025. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v6i1.1083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v6i1.1083
  31. M. A. Sattar, M. U. Maqbool, F. Zakir, and Mustaeen Billah, “Enhancing Student Engagement Through Augmented Reality In Secondary Biology Education,” Front. Educ., vol. 10, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1628004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1628004
  32. S. C. Olim and V. Nisi, "Augmented Reality Towards Facilitating Abstract Concepts Learning," in Entertainment Computing – ICEC 2020 (N. J. Nunes, L. Ma, M. Wang, N. Correia, and Z. Pan, Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12523. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65736-9_17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65736-9_17
  33. L. S. Nowell, J. M. Norris, D. E. White, and N. J. Moules, "Thematic Analysis: Striving To Meet The Trustworthiness Criteria," Int. J. Qualitative Methods, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  34. T.-Y. Liu and Y.-L. Chu, "Using Ubiquitous Games In An English Listening And Speaking Course: Impact On Learning Outcomes And Motivation," Comput. Educ., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 630–643, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.023
  35. S. Subran and S. N. D. Mahmud, "Augmented Reality (AR) Technology In Biology And Life Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR)," Int. J. Acad. Res. Prog. Educ. Develop., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 768–792, Jan. 2024. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i1/20455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i1/20455
  36. F. Khairiyah, M. Ramdan, and H. Suharyati, "Application Of Augmented Reality-Based Learning Technology To Information Processing And Memory In Vocational High Schools: A Literature Review," Int. J. Sustainable Develop. Future Soc., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 54–61, Dec. 2024. https://doi.org/10.62157/ijsdfs.v2i2.72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62157/ijsdfs.v2i2.72
  37. M. Perifanou, A. A. Economides, and S. A. Nikou, “Teachers’ Views On Integrating Augmented Reality In Education: Needs, Opportunities, Challenges And Recommendations,” Future Internet, vol. 15, no. 1, Art. no. 20, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15010020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15010020
  38. M. Z. Iqbal, E. Mangina, and A. G. Campbell, "Current Challenges And Future Research Directions In Augmented Reality For Education," Multimodal Technol. Interact., vol. 6, no. 9, p. 75, Aug. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6090075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6090075
  39. Y. Indarta, A. Ambiyar, F. Fadhillah, A. D. Samala, A. R. Riyanda, F. Ranuharja, F. T. Ayasrah and A. Torres-Toukoumidis, "Transforming Vocational Education Through Augmented Reality: A Systematic Review Of Current Trends, Challenges, And Future Opportunities," Data and Metadata, vol. 4, p. 1-13, 2025. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025578
  40. N. Mau-Duc, P. Ngoc-Son, and T. Hoai-Minh, "Factors Influencing Teachers’ Adoption Of Augmented Reality In High School Chemistry Education," J. Technol. Sci. Educ., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 346–363, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.3310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.3310
  41. H.-P. Hsu, Y. H. Cheah, and J. E. Hughes, "A Case Study Of A Secondary Biology Teacher’s Pedagogical Reasoning And Action With Augmented Reality Technology," Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 11, Art. no. 1080, Oct. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111080