Article Sidebar

Submitted
February 17, 2026
Accepted
April 8, 2026
Published
April 30, 2026
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 104 Download : 51

Main Article Content

Abstract

To bridge the gap in visualization and interactivity found in traditional chemistry tools, this study developed an AR-powered comic using differentiated instruction to help students navigate the spatial complexities of molecular geometry while sharpening their critical thinking.The product was developed using the 4D model (Define, Design, Develop, Disseminate) and integrated visual storytelling, interactive 3D molecular visualisations, and an instructional song to support multimodal learning. Five experts validated the media and content, indicating high validity (media = 89.5%; content = 91%). Effectiveness was examined using a one-group pretest-posttest design with 30 Grade 11 students. Shapiro–Wilk results confirmed normal distributions for pretest and posttest scores (p = 0.278; p = 0.324). A paired-samples t-test showed a significant improvement in students’ critical thinking after the intervention (t(29) = -11.524, p < 0.001). Learning gains were moderate (n-gain = 0.40), with the strongest improvements in supposition and integration but inference and decision-making require further reinforcement through targeted scaffolding, such as the inclusion of guided inquiry prompts or interactive decision-making tasks within the AR interface that direct students to evaluate electron pair repulsions and conclude molecular properties based on their 3D observations. Overall, the AR differentiated comic is a promising medium for strengthening critical thinking in chemistry differentiated learning.

Keywords

Development Augmented Reality Comics differentiated learning critical thinking

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Nabila Prasetiyani, Sigit Priatmoko, Sudarmin, Edy Cahyono

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the simultaneously licenced under A Creative Commons Attribution (CC-By-SA) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the worsk's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Prasetiyani, N., Priatmoko, S., Sudarmin, & Cahyono, E. . (2026). Development of AR Comics for Differentiated Chemistry Learning: Catalyzing Students’ Critical Thinking. IJCER (International Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijcer.vol10.iss1.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. R. A. Rushiana, O. Sumarna, and S. Anwar, “Efforts to Develop Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Chemistry Learning: Systematic Literature Review,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1425–1435, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.2632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i3.2632
  2. A. R. Saavedra and V. Darleen Opfer, “Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching,” Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 8–13, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400203
  3. S. Antonova, T. Pletyago, and A. Ostapenko, “Fostering Critical Thinking Skills in European and Asian Higher Education Institutions,” Mier J. Educ. Stud. Trends Pract., pp. 138–150, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2020/v10/i2/1335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52634/mier/2020/v10/i2/1335
  4. L. S. L. Purba, “Analysis of Critical Thinking Ability Based on Student Gender Through The Implementation of Independent Curriculum in Chemistry Learning,” J. Pendidik. Kim., vol. 14, no. 3, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v14i3.40305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v14i3.40305
  5. S. Q. Wang, “A Case Study of Critical Thinking Education for Undergraduate Students in China,” Int. J. Technol. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijtee.390132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTEE.390132
  6. E. T. Ong, C. K. S. Singh, R. Wahid, and M. I. M. Saad, “Uncovering Pedagogical Gaps in a Chemistry Classroom: Implications for Teaching and Learning,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 12, no. 2, p. 979, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.23042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.23042
  7. E. Swanzy‐Impraim, J. E. Morris, G. W. Lummis, and A. Jones, “Exploring Creative Pedagogical Practices in Secondary Visual Arts Programmes in Ghana,” Curric. J., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 558–577, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.201
  8. C. A. Tomlinson, Differentiate Instruction. Alexandria: ASCD, 2017.
  9. A. A. Dalila, S. Rahmah, W. Liliawati, and I. Kaniawati, “Effect of Differentiated Learning in Problem Based Learning on Cognitive Learning Outcomes of High School Students,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2116–2122, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1839
  10. N. F. Saidin, “Enhancing students’ critical thinking and visualisation skills through mobile augmented reality,” Knowl. Manag. E-Learning An Int. J., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–41, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2024.16.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2024.16.001
  11. M. A. Karami and A. Shakurnia, “Critical Thinking Disposition in the Pharmacy Faculty Members of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Iran,” Educ. Res. Med. Sci., vol. 9, no. 2, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/erms.109691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/erms.109691
  12. M. Linkwitz and I. Eilks, “An Action Research Teacher’s Journey While Integrating Green Chemistry Into the High School Chemistry Curriculum,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 17, p. 10621, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710621
  13. M. Manning, “University Lecturers’ Lived Experiences of Teaching Critical Thinking in Australian University: A Hermeneutic Phenomenological Research,” High. Educ., vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 2057–2073, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01200-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01200-6
  14. C. A. Tomlinson, How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classrooms 3rd Edition. ASCD, 2017.
  15. A. T. Purnawanto, “Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi,” JURNAL PEDAGOGY, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 34–54, Apr. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.63889/pedagogy.v16i1.152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63889/pedagogy.v16i1.152
  16. M. A. Zakaria, M. F. Ahmad, and M. K. A. Rahman, “Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTs): Acting Method as Approach of Critical Pedagogy in Education Culture,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Progress. Educ. Dev., vol. 10, no. 2, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v10-i2/10132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i2/10132
  17. R. Setianingsih, M. Novita, and S. Patonah, “Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik pada Pembelajaran Kimia dalam Pokok Bahasan Laju Reaksi di SMA Negeri 1 Bantarbolang,” Media Penelit. Pendidik. J. Penelit. dalam Bid. Pendidik. dan Pengajaran, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 5–9, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.26877/mpp.v16i1.11806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/mpp.v16i1.11806
  18. D. A. Karnishyna, T. V Selivanova, P. P. Nechypurenko, Т. В. Старова, and С. О. Семеріков, “Enhancing High School Students’ Understanding of Molecular Geometry With Augmented Reality,” Sci. Educ. Q., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 25–40, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.55056/seq.818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55056/seq.818
  19. J. Levy, I. C. Chagunda, V. Iosub, D. C. Leitch, and J. S. McIndoe, “MoleculAR: An Augmented Reality Application for Understanding 3D Geometry,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 2533–2539, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01045
  20. N. Garg, A. Kaur, F. Ahmad, and R. Dutta, “Augmenting Education: The Transformative Power of AR, AI, and Emerging Technologies,” Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol., vol. 2025, no. 1, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/hbe2/5681184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/hbe2/5681184
  21. N. Suprapto, K. Nisa, I. Sya’roni, and A. S. Adam, “Scientific Mapping and Production Analysis of Digital Comic, Animation, and Digital Cartoon in Education,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03513-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03513-4
  22. S. D. S. Tikson, S. Samintang, F. Firdaus, A. K. Nisa, W. Wahda, and F. Mustafa, “The Reactualization of Sipakatau, Sipakalebbi, and Sipakainge’ Values Using La Galigo Comic With Augmented Reality,” Int. J. Elem. Educ., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 666–676, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i4.59779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i4.59779
  23. C. D. Kenneally and B. Bentley, “A Cognitive Load Approach to Molecular Geometries: Augmented Reality Technology and Visuospatial Abilities in Chemistry,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 9, p. 1036, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091036
  24. X. Guo, J. Wang, and C. Sheng, “The Development Path of College Physical Education Informationization Based on Modern Teaching Theory,” Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0476
  25. V. G. Zuin, I. Eilks, M. Elschami, and K. Kümmerer, “Education in Green Chemistry and in Sustainable Chemistry: Perspectives Towards Sustainability,” Green Chem., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1594–1608, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/d0gc03313h. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0GC03313H
  26. I. Ernawati, “Uji Kelayakan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Pada Mata Pelajaran Administrasi Server,” Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, Vocat. Educ.), vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 204–210, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/elinvo.v2i2.17315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/elinvo.v2i2.17315
  27. J. Creswell, Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2023.
  28. R. R. Hake, “Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses,” Am. J. Phys., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 64–74, 1999, doi: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
  29. I. Damopolii, F. F. Paiki, and J. H. Nunaki, “The Development of Comic Book as Marker of Augmented Reality to Raise Students’ Critical Thinking,” TEM J., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 348–355, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM111-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM111-44
  30. S. A. A. A. Falah, R. Fajr, and S. A. A. Sadat, “Effects of virtual and augmented reality in chemistry education: systematic literature review,” Int. J. Arts Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 221–239, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ijassjournal.com/2024/V7I1/414665417.pdf
  31. M. Ripsam and C. Nerdel, “Augmented reality for chemistry education to promote the use of chemical terminology in teacher training,” Front. Psychol., vol. 15, no. July, pp. 1–23, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1392529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1392529
  32. I. Atong, J. Sirait, and E. Oktavianty, “Pengembangan komik dilengkapi augmented reality dan game wordwall pada pokok bahasan tata surya di SMP,”JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) FKIP UM Metro, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 92–107, Mar. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v12i1.9308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v12i1.9308
  33. V. F. Ningrum, W. Sumarni, and E. Cahyono, “Development of Augmented Reality-Based Learning Media on Concept of Hydrocarbon to Improve Multi-Representation Ability,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. Ipa, vol. 7, no. SpecialIssue, pp. 256–265, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7ispecialissue.1038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v7iSpecialIssue.1038
  34. K. D. Ningrum, E. Utomo, A. Marini, and B. Setiawan, “Media Komik Elektronik Terintegrasi Augmented Reality dalam Pembelajaran Sistem Peredaran Darah Manusia di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1297–1310, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i1.2289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i1.2289
  35. Suryani, Media Pembelajaran Inovatif dan Pengembangannya. Remaja Rosdakarya, 2019.
  36. R. Ennis, “Critical Thinking: Reflection and Perspective Part II,” Inq. Crit. Think. Across Discip., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 5–19, 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews201126215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews201126215
  37. H. Haetami, “Effect of STEM-Based Differentiated Learning to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills: A Meta-Analysis Study,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 655–663, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.5084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.5084
  38. T. Demircioğlu, M. Karakuş, and S. Uçar, “Developing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Argumentation Abilities Through Augmented Reality–Based Argumentation Activities in Science Classes,” Sci. & Educ., 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00369-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00369-5
  39. Y. Lin and Z. Yu, “A meta-analysis of the effects of augmented reality technologies in interactive learning environments (2012–2022),” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1111–1131, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22628
  40. L. H. Thai and P. S. Nam, “Augmented reality as a tool to enhance the learning experience and outcomes of spatial geometry,” in Integrating Cultural and Educational Needs Into Foreign Educational Systems, T. Tran and T. Hoang, Eds. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2025, pp. 39–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8317-9.ch003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8317-9.ch003
  41. S. A. Elsayed and H. I. Al-Najrani, “Effectiveness of the Augmented Reality on Improving the Visual Thinking in Mathematics and Academic Motivation for Middle School Students,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11069
  42. N. A. S. Adnan and S. Osman, “Innovative Augmented Reality Integration for Enhanced Geometry Education: A Review of the Impact on Student Interest, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Achievement,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Progress. Educ. Dev., 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v13-i1/20782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i1/20782
  43. A. M. Baabdullah, A. A. Alsulaimani, A. Allamnakhrah, A. A. Alalwan, Y. K. Dwivedi, and N. P. Rana, “Usage of Augmented Reality (AR) and Development of E-Learning Outcomes: An Empirical Evaluation of Students’ E-Learning Experience,” Comput. & Educ., 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104383
  44. A. Kurniawan, J. Jumadi, H. Kuswanto, and N. I. Syar, “The 21st Century Education: A Systematic Literature Review of Transforming Learning Methods to Foster Critical Thinking Skills Through Augmented Reality in Science Learning,” J. Eduscience, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v11i3.6438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v11i3.6438