Main Article Content
Abstract
Various government’s policies implemented through Precedential Decrees (Keppres), Precidential Instruction (Inpres), and Precedential Regulation (Perpres), since the New Order up to the Reformation Order, have brought about the increase of the social welfare among fishermen, especially through the schemes such as Undeveloped Regions Precedential Instruction (IDT) and Social Security Network (JPS). However, those schemes seem to be an ad-hoc solution which does not relate functionally to the Act on Social Welfare (UU Kesejahteraan Sosial) and the Act on Fishery Profit Sharing (UU Bagi Hasil Perikanan). Consequently, the availability of a sustainable program on social welfare cannot be achieved since the function of a presidential policy different from the function of an act.
Article Details
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
How to Cite
Djauhari, D. (2009). Politik Hukum Negara Kesejahteraan Indonesia (Studi Tentang Kebijakan Regulasi dan Institusionalisasi Gagasan Kesejahteraan Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Nelayan di Jawa Tengah). Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol14.iss4.art1