Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the independency of Independent State Institutions (LNI) in Indonesia with the perspective of the concept of Independent Regulatory Agencies (IRAs). In addition, it also analyzes the LNI model that is in line with the concept of IRAs. The number of Independent State Institutions (LNI) in Indonesia has relatively increased since the amendment of the 1945 Constitution. However, the need for institutions that are free from government interference is not accompanied by the formulation of standards and mature institutional design on the aspect of independence as the main characteristic of LNI. This study uses a normative method, with statutory and conceptual approaches. This study concludes that the independence of LNI in Indonesia tends to be non-uniformed. Some institutions meet the aspects of formal independence in the concept of IRAs, but some others still have aspects of regulation that are incomplete. The results of the study of de facto independence also concluded that there were interventions, politicization and resistance from various parties towards the presence and policy of LNI in Indonesia. The LNI model that is in line with the IRAs concept can be done by improving 3 aspects: first, minimizing the authority of the DPR in the selection of LNI leaders, second, providing independent authority, and third, emphasizing the non-partisan provisions in each institutional regulation of LNI.

Keywords

Independence independent regulatory agencies LNI

Article Details

Author Biography

Rizki Ramadani, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muslim Indonesia Makassar

Fakultas Hukum, Departemen Hukum Tata Negara dan Administrasi Negara
How to Cite
Ramadani, R. (2020). Lembaga Negara Independen Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Konsep Independent Regulatory Agencies. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 27(1), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss1.art9

References

  1. Buku
  2. Braun, Dietmar & Gillardi, Fabrizio (ed.), Delegation in Contemporary Democracies, Routledge, USA, 2006.
  3. Gillardi, Fabrizio, Delegation In The Regulatory State, Independent Regulatory Agencies In Western Europe, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, United Kingdom, 2008.
  4. Asshiddiqie, Jimly, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara, cetakan kelima, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2015.
  5. Verhoest, Koen, et. all, Autonomy and Control of State Agencies, Comparing State Agencies, Palgrave Macmillan, United Kingdom, 2010.
  6. Breger, Marshal J. & Edles, Gary J., Independent Agencies in United States: Law, Structure, and Politics, Oxford University Press, USA, 2015.
  7. F. Funk, William, & Seamon, Richard H., Admisnistrative Law: Examples and Explanations, Apen Law & Bussiness, Printed in the United States of America, New York, 2001.
  8. Meny, Yves& Knapp, Andrew, Government and Politic in Western Eruope: Britain, France, Italy, Germany, 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.
  9. Mochtar, Zainal Arifin, Lembaga Negara Independen: Dinamika Perkembangan dan Urgensi Penataannya Kembali Pasca-Amandemen Konstitusi, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2016.
  10. Jurnal
  11. Alamsyah, Giorgio C.S. & Huda, Uu Nurul, “Politik Hukum Pelembagaan Komisi-Komisi Negara Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Volume 2, No. 1, Maret 2013.
  12. Giraudi, Giorgio C.S., “Independent Regulatory Agencies in Italy and France, Building The Bridge between delegation and Europanization”, Swiss Political Science Review, Vol. 8.
  13. Tauda, Gunawan A., “Kedudukan Komisi Negara Independen dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia”, Jurnal Pranata Hukum, Vol. 6 No. 2, Juli 2011.
  14. Kharisma, Luh Gede Mega dan Ariana, I gede Putra,“Kedudukan Komnas HAM sebagai Lembaga Negara Independen Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia”, Jurnal Kertha Negara, Vol. 4, No. 5, Juli 2016.
  15. Ramadani, R., & Mamonto, M., “The Independency of the Corruption Eradication Commission of the Republic of Indonesia (KPK RI) in Indicators of Independent Regulatory Agencies (IRAs)”, Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, Vol. 1, Issue 2, Juli 2018.
  16. Martini, Rina, “Politisasi birokrasi di Indonesia”, POLITIKA Jurnal Ilmu Politik MIP, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2010.
  17. Devins, Neal & Lewis, David E., “Not-So Independent Agencies: Party Polarization and The Limits of Institutional Design”, Boston University Law Review, Vol. 88, 2008.
  18. Hasil Penelitian
  19. Copeland, Curtis W., “Economic Analysis and Independent Regulatory Agencies”, draft Report for the consideration of the administrative conference of United States, USA, 2013.
  20. John M. Ackerman, “Independent Accountability Agencies and Democracy: A New Separation of Powers?”, paper on Workshop on Comparative Administrative Law, yale University, May 8-9 2009.
  21. Disertasi
  22. Mochtar, Zainal A., Penataan Lembaga Negara Independen Setelah Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945”, disertasi pada Sekolah Pascasarjana Univeristas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, 2012.
  23. Koran, Majalah
  24. Rita, Susana, “Meninjau Ulang Seleksi Pejabat Publik”, Opini pada Harian Kompas, 15 Oktober 2015.
  25. Thatcher, M. “Independent regulatory agencies in Europe”, Risk and Regulation Magazine, Summer 2005, 2011, 117.
  26. Internet
  27. “Arogansi KPK Harus Dihentikan”, https://www.jpnn.com/news/arogansi-kpk-harus-dihentikan, diakses pada 10 maret 2019.
  28. “The Paperwork of Reduction Act of 1980”, diunduh dari laman https://www. law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/44/3502, diakses pada 25 Agustus 2016.
  29. “Pengamat Anggap Revisi UU Perlu Supaya KPK Tak 'Membabi Buta'”, https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20190915164859-12-430657/pengamat-anggap-revisi-uu-perlu-supaya-kpk-tak-membabi-buta, diakses pada 10 maret 2019.
  30. “Moeldoko: KPK Bisa Hambat Investasi”, https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/ 1251471/moeldoko-kpk-bisa-hambat-investasi, diakses pada 10 maret 2019.
  31. “Komnas HAM Butuh Penguatan Kewenangan”, http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt4f7d11402f7ae/komnas-ham-butuhpenguatan-kewenangan diakses tanggal 2 Agustus 2016.
  32. “Penyidik Independen KPK”, http://www.kemitraan.or.id/blog-partnership/penyidik-independen-kpk, diakses pada 24 Juni 2015.
  33. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
  34. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
  35. Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6409.
  36. Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 1999 tentang Bank Indonesia. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 66, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3843.
  37. Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 165, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3886.
  38. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2002 Nomor 137, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4250.
  39. Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2006 tentang Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2006 Nomor 85, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4654.
  40. Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2011 tentang Penyelenggara Pemilu. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 101, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5246.
  41. Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2011 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 tentang Komisi Yudisial. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 106, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5250.
  42. Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 111, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5253.
  43. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 17 Tahun 2011 tentang Komisi Kepolisian Nasional.
  44. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 18 Tahun 2011 tentang Komisi Kejaksaan.