Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 1, 2020
Accepted
July 12, 2020
Published
August 25, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1462 Download : 3997

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to answer two problems: first, how is the concept of implementing a bargaining system in the criminal justice system in the United States? Second, what is the urgency of implementing the Plea Bargaining System in reforming the criminal justice system in Indonesia. The research method used is juridical normative with a conceptual approach and comparison method. This paper intends to provide legal problem solving for the accumulation of criminal cases in Indonesia, namely by implementing a plea bargaining system in reforming the criminal justice system in Indonesia. This study concludes that, first, In the United States, the plea bargaining mechanism is carried out at the arraignment and preliminary hearing stages. Second, the plea bargaining system in the United States is regulated in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure rule 11. The urgency of implementing a plea bargaining system in the criminal justice system in Indonesia can be seen from several considerations, namely philosophical, juridical, sociological, and political-legal considerations. The conclusions and recommendations of the authors are implementing a plea bargaining system in reforming the criminal justice system in Indonesia in order to realize an effective and efficient criminal justice.

Keywords

Legal problem solving plea bargaining cases

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Author Biography

Ruchoyah Ruchoyah, Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Brawijaya Malang

Hukum Acara Pidana
How to Cite
Ruchoyah, R. (2020). Urgensi Plea Bargaining System Dalam Pembaruan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia: Studi Perbandingan Plea Bargaining System Di Amerika Serikat. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 27(2), 388–409. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art9
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Atmasasmita, Romli, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer, Kencana, Jakarta, 2010.
  3. Kusumaadmadja, Mochtar, Konsep-konsep Hukum Dalam Pembangunan, Alumni, Bandung, 2002.
  4. MD., Muh. Mahfud, Politik Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2009.
  5. Najih, Muhammad, Politik Hukum Pidana: Konsepsi Pembaruan Hukum Pidana dalam Cita Negara Hukum, Setara Press, Malang, 2014.
  6. Tongat, Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Dalam Prespektif Pembaruan, UMM Press, Malang, 2010.
  7. Rahardjo, Satjipto, Negara Hukum yang Membahagiakan Rakyatnya, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta, 2008.
  8. Reksodiputro, Mardjono, Pembocor Rahasia/Wistle Blowers dan Penyadapan (Wiretapping, Electronic Interception) Dalam Menanggulangi Kejahatan Di Indonesia, Wacana Goverminyboard, Jakarta, 2016.
  9. Shidarta, Mochtar Kusumaatmadja dan Teori Hukum Pembangunan, Epistema Institute, Jakarta, 2012.
  10. Sundari, Perbandingan Hukum dan Fenomena Adopsi Hukum, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Yogyakarta, 2014.
  11. Jurnal
  12. Alschuler, Albert, “Plea Bargaining and its History”, Journal Articles Unniversity of Chicago Law School, Volume 79, Nomor 1, 1979.
  13. Igor dan Ivana, “Plea Bargaining: A Challenging Issue in the Law and Economics”, Faculty Of Law, 2010.
  14. Mulyadi, Lilik, “Menggagas Konsep dan Model Ideal Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Organized Crime di Indonesia Masa Mendatang”, Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Volume III, Nomor 2, 2014.
  15. Langbein, “Understanding the Short History of Plea Bargaining”, Yale Law Achool Legal Scholarship Repository, Rev, 261, 1979.
  16. Nixson dan Syafrudin Kalo, “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, USU Law Jurnal, Volume II, Nomor 2, 2013.
  17. Faiz, Mohammad, “Teori Keadilan John Rawls”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 6, Nomor 1, 2009.
  18. Muhammad, Rusli, “Pengaturan Whistle Blower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana”. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, Volume 22, Nomor 2, 2015.
  19. Sidhartha Mohapatra & Hailshree Saksena, “Plea Bargain : A Uniqie Remedy”. New York. http://indlaw.com, 2009.
  20. Son Haji dan Gunarto, “Implementasi Kewenangan Diskresi Kepolisian dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana di Polres Demak Jawa Tengah”, Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, Volume 13, Nomor 1, 2018.
  21. Welsh S. White, “A Proposal for Reform of the Plea Bargaining Process”, University of Pennyslvania Law Revie, Vol. 119 : 439, 1971.
  22. Peraturan Perundang-undangan
  23. The Federal of Criminal Procedure
  24. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
  25. Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban
  26. Undang-Undang No. 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
  27. Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia
  28. Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.
  29. Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana
  30. Internet
  31. Chakim, Luthfi, 2015. Plea Bargaining. http://www.lutfichakim.com.
  32. Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, 2015. http:// kepaniteraan. mahkamahagung.go.id.
  33. Misha, 2005. Issues of Overcrowded Prisons and the Trade-Off “Plea Bargaining in the Criminal Justice”. http://www .associatedcontent.com.
  34. Wildya. Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Amerika Serikat. https://www.slideshare.net.