Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 22, 2020
Accepted
July 21, 2021
Published
August 25, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 782 Download : 4486

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper aims firstly, to identify the background of how the Vrijwillige Onderwepping and Toepasselijk Verklaring policies are made. Second, to explore the influence of the policies of Vrijwillige Onderwepping and Toepasselijk Verklaring in realizing legal unification in the Dutch East Indies. The method used is normative juridical with statutory and historical approaches. At the end this paper concludes that, First, the vrijwillige onderwepping and toepasselijk verklaring policies were made to bridge two different perspectives even though the ultimate goal is unification. Second, this policy greatly influenced the submission of the natives to European law although complete unification was never achieved due to the arrival of the Japan in 1942.

Keywords

Dualism of the law toepasselijk verklaring unification vrijwillige onderwepping

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Muttaqin, E. Z., & Zaini, A. (2021). Kebijakan Hukum Vrijwillige Orderwepping Dan Toepasselijk Verklaring Sebagai Unifikasi Pemerintah Hindia Belanda. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 28(3), 657–676. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss3.art10
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Ali, Moh. Daud, Hukum Islam, (Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Islam di Indonesia), Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2004.
  3. Ball, John, The Struggle for National Law in Indonesia, Sydney, Faculty of Law University of Sydney, 1986.
  4. Ball, John, Indonesian Law Commentary and Teaching Materials, Jilid I, Sydney, Faculty of Law Sydney University press, 1985.
  5. Bushar, Muhammad, Pengantar Hukum Adat, Pradnya Paramitah, Jakarta, 1983
  6. _______, Asas-asas Hukum Adat, Pradnya Paramitha, Jakarta, 1978.
  7. Cribb, Robert, “Legal Pluralism and Criminal Law in The Dutch Colonial Order”, Indonesia, Cornell University Press, New York, 2010.
  8. Fuad, Mahsun, Hukum Islam Indonesia dari Nalar Parsitipatoris Hingga Emansipatoris, Yogyakarta, Lkis, 2005.
  9. Furnivall, J.S, Studies in The Social and Economic Development of The Netherlands East Indies IIb, An Introduction to The History of the Netherlands India, 1602-1836, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.
  10. Hartono, Sunaryati, Penelitian Hukum di Indonesia Pada Akhir Abad Ke-20, Alumni, Bandung, 1994.
  11. Hensen, Emile, Gerretson en Indie, Groningen, Wolters, Noordhoff-Bouwman, 1983.
  12. Hisyam, Muhammad, Caught Between Three fires, The Javanese Pangulu Under The Netherlands Colonial Administration 1882-1942, INIS, Jakarta, 2001.
  13. Hurgronje, Snouck, C.1931. Mecca In the Latter Part of 19th Century (translated by J.H. Monahan). Revised edition, Leiden, E.J. Brill, 2021.
  14. Soekanto, Soerjono, Meninjau Hukum Adat Indonesia, Rajawali, Jakarta, 1981.
  15. _______, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, UI-Press, Jakarta, 1986.
  16. Soemitro, Roni Hanitijo, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1990.
  17. Soekanto, Soerjono, Meninjau Hukum Adat Indonesia, CV Rajawali, Jakarta, 1981.
  18. Soepomo, R., Sistem Hukum di Indonesia Sebelum Perang Dunia II, Jakarta, Pradnya Paramitha, 1997.
  19. Suparman, Eman, Hukum Perselisihan (conflictenrecht) Pertautan Sistem Hukum dan Konflik Kompetensi dalam Pluralisme Hukum Bangsa Pribumi, Kencana, Jakarta, 2018.
  20. Vollenhoven, C.Van, Miskeningen van Het Adatrecht Leiden, Brill, 1909.
  21. _______, Indlandsch Grondbezit, Nieuw Rotterdamsche Courant, 3 Desember 1919.
  22. _______, De Indonesier en zijn Grond, Leiden, Brill, 1932.
  23. Wiegnjosoebroto, Soetandyo, Dari Hukum Kolonial ke Hukum Nasional, Raja Grafindo, Jakarta, 1995.
  24. Jurnal
  25. Dietrich Jung,” Islam As a Problem: Dutch Religious Politics in East Indies”, Review of Religious Research, Vol. 51. No. 3, Maret 2010.
  26. G. Bartholomew, “Indonesian Legal History 1602–1848. By John Ball. Sydney: Oughtershaw Press, 1982. Pp. viii, 300. Notes, Bibliography, Index. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 17. No. 1, Agustus 2009.
  27. Ikhda Fitria, “Recognizing Adat Law: Problems and Challenges in Modern Law System in Indonesia”, The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education, Vol. 2. No. 4, Desember 2020.
  28. Keebet von Benda-Beckman, “Anachronism, Agency, and The Contextualization of Adat: Van Vollenhoven Analysis in Light of Struggles over Resources, The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, Vol. 20 No. 5, Oktober 2019.
  29. Munir Salim, “Adatrecht Sebagai Bukti Sejarah Perkembangan Hukum Positif di Indonesia”, Jurnal al-Daulah, Vol. 4. No. 1, Juni 2015.
  30. Wulan Sondarika, “Dampak Cultuurstelsel (Tanam Paksa) Bagi Masyarakat Indonesia dari Tahun 1830-1870”, Jurnal Artefak, Vol.3 No. 1, Maret 2015.