Article Sidebar
Submitted
February 20, 2009
Published
February 24, 2009
Download
Statistic
Read Counter :
362
Download : 780
Main Article Content
Abstract
The changes of UUD 1945 has an implication on the establishment of Constitution Justice. One of the authorities of the institution whose authority is in the same line with Supreme Court is the dispute settlement of General Election results. The role played by Constitution Justice, once it solved the dispute of the result of general election in 2004, proved that the principals of court justice have been implemented in order to keep the democracy and to establish the constitution.
Article Details
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
How to Cite
Puspitasari, S. H. (2009). Refleksi Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilihan Umum 2004. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 15(3), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol15.iss3.art7
