Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The process of amending UUD 1945 has created different kinds of views regarding its form of amendment. One side demands “amendment system” as the one applied in United State of America. The other side demands a total change by creating a new constitution such as in France, Netherlands, and Germany. The main problem that would be investigated and answered in this research is how the amendment of constitution in theory and constitutions in several countries. This research is a case study about the method used in the amendment of constitution. The approach used in this research is not only normative jurisdiction, but also comparative approach, because it has normative comparison on the constitutions in several countries. This research has concluded; first, the way UUD 1945 amended theoretically does not divert from the general principles of constitution changing and democracy country. Second, the amendment of UUD 1945 follows the form of the amendment or constitutional adandum of United States of America.
Key words : Constitution, amendment, UUD 1945
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
