Main Article Content
Abstract
The legal process from the detention to the court session for the activist of KOMJI (Jihad Commando) seems to be unprofessional, not transparent and mostly engineered by the lawgivers. The topic being examined includes how to accommodate the Human Rights aspect during the process of investigation and verdict in the case of Jihad Commando. The research using doctrinal and non-doctrinal approach is focused on the primary and secondary data. This research shows that there has been a human rights abuse in the case of Jihad Commando in all stages of the case either in the process of detention and preparing the documents bearing the case (BAP) by Kopkamtib/ Laksusda (Command for the Restoration of security and public order), Police Department, Attorney, or in the examining process in court.
Keywords
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.