Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research discusses: First, the juridical ratio of the position of People’s Consultative Assembly’s adjudication which re-enters the regulations of law hierarchy. Second, the position and legal status of the People’s Consultative Assembly’s adjudication based on Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Formulation of Regulations of Law compared with the position and legal status of the previous People’s Consultative Assembly’s adjudications. The research method used in this research was normative-juridical method. The approach used was historical and statute approaches. The research finding shows that: First, the position of People’s Consultative Assembly’s adjudication in the regulations of law hierarchy is condition sine quanon. Second, the legal status of the People’s Consultative Assembly’s adjudication based on Law Number 12 of 2011 is different from the People’s Consultative Assembly’s adjudications prior to the amendment of Constitution 1945 of the Republic of Indonesia. This is in regards with the fact that the People’s Consultative Assembly after the amendment of Constitution 1945 has the position as state high institution.
Keywords
Article Details
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
