Main Article Content

Abstract

ATCk restricts its jurisdiction by imposing some doctrines such as minimum contact, forum non-convenience, political question, international commuty and act of state doc trine. Besides that, it also ignores the international criminal law principles such as pre
sumption of innocence, expeditious trial, equity ofarms and the atendance ofthe suspect in the court. The existence of par im parem in habet Imperium principle recognized in
international law causes the decision of American Courtis meaningless.

Keywords

jurisdiction criminal innocence

Article Details

How to Cite
sefriani, sefriani. (2006). Perierapan Yurisdiksi Alien Tort Claim Act Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 13(2), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol13.iss2.art4

References

  1. Akehurst, Michael, AModem Introduction toIn
  2. ternational Law, George Allen and
  3. Unwin (Publisher) Ltd, Fourth edition, 1982.
  4. Antonio Cassese, Intemational Criminal Law,
  5. Oxford University Press, 2003
  6. Alina Kaczorowska, Textbook :Public Intema
  7. tional Law, Old Bailey Press, London.
  8. Dixcn, Martin, Textbook on Intemational Law,
  9. fourt edition, Blackctone Press Limited,
  10. London, United Kingdom, 2000