Article Sidebar

Submitted
January 17, 2017
Published
January 17, 2017
Download
PDF Untitled
Statistic
Read Counter : 1242 Download : 1903

Main Article Content

Abstract

The main problem in this study is to examine the developments of the contingency plans that have not or have been made and whether it is activated or not. If it is activated, how is the evaluation of its implementation and if not activated, how is its monitoring and how is the supervision of its budget? The method used in this research is normative-juridical. The study concluded that not all contingency plans have been made in the types of disaster. Some contingency plans have been made. in Yogyakarta there are 4, 3 are in Sleman Regency, 3 in Kulonprogo and in Gunung Kidul. Overall, there are 8 contingency plans already implemented. For the places that have not been activated, the state is returned to the original condition. To follow-up and evaluation of post-contingency plan, the activation or inactivity should be uniform. It is necessary to put in the draft of Raperda on the changes in the draft of Regional Regulation About Disaster Management.

Keywords

Discretion management disaster

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Koenti, I. J. (2017). Diskresi dalam Penanggulangan Bencana di DIY dengan Paradigma Kontinjensi. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 23(3), 461–485. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss3.art6
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Daftar Pustaka
  2. Buku
  3. Sulistiyono, Bambang, Prediksi Genangan Kali Code di Kota Yogyakarta Pasca Erupsi Merapi 2010, DPPM UII, Yogyakarta, 2010.
  4. Blaang, C. Djemabut, Permukiman dan Perumahan Sebagai Kebutuhan Pokok, Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta, 1998.
  5. Dwiyanto, Agus, dkk, Reformasi Tata Pemerintahan dan Otonomi Daerah, Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan Kebijakan UGM, Yogyakarta, 2003.
  6. Galligan, D. J , Discretionary Power, Oxford Press University, New York, 1990.
  7. Hutabarat, Martin H. dkk. (penyunting), Hukum dan Politik Indonesia Tinjauan Analitis Dekrit Presiden dan Otonomi Daerah, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta, 1996.
  8. Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar, Fungsi dan Perkembangan Hukum Dalam Pembangunan Nasional, Alumni, Bandung, 1994.
  9. Liesnoor Dewi, Erosi dan Mitigasi Bencana, (Buku Ajar) Jurusan Geografi, UNNES, CV. Sanggar Krida Aditama, Semarang, 2010.
  10. Muchsan, Sistem Pengawasan Terhadap Perbuatan Aparat Pemerintah dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 1992.
  11. Hajon, Philipus M., Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia, Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta, 1993.
  12. Nonet, Philippe, dan Philip Zelnick, Hukum Responsif, (terj: Raisul Muttaqien), Nusamedia, Bandung, 2007.
  13. Admosudirdjo, Prajudi, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1981.
  14. HR, Ridwan, Hukum Administrasi Negara, UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2002.
  15. Marbun, SF., et (Penyunting), Dimensi-Dimensi Pemikiran Hukum Administrasi Negara, UII Press, Yogyakarta, 20
  16. Wignyosoebroto, Soetandyo, Hukum, Paradigma, Metode dan Dinamika Masalahnya, ELSAM dan HUma, Jakarta, 2002.
  17. Tatang M. Amirin, Menyusun Rencana Peneritian, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 1990.
  18. Utrecht, A., Pengantar Hukum Administrasi, Pustaka Tinta Mas, Surabaya, 1988.
  19. Warsito Utomo, Administrasi Publik Bam Indonesia, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2006.
  20. Jurnal
  21. Sulastriyono, dkk., Pola Penguasaan dan Upaya Penataan Tanah Wedi Kengser di Tepi Sungai Code dalam Rangka Otonomi daerah di Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Mimbar Hukum Fakultas Hukum UGM Yogyakarta, 2002.
  22. Yang Yang, “Fundamental Research on the Administrative Discretion Standard†Beijing Law Review, 2012, 3, 128-132 2014
  23. Internet
  24. Jawahir Thontowi, Legal System to related Sediment and Natural Disater in Indonesia, Conducted by Joining to Collaboration Between JICA Japan and IMPRESS Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2004.
  25. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/blr.2012.33017 Published Online September 2012, (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/blr)
  26. http://www.tribunnews.com/2011/04/30/aliran-lahar-dingin-merapi-bisa-berlangsung-4-tahun.
  27. Hasil Penelitian Terdahulu
  28. Eko Suharto, Bambang, Responsivitas dan Akuntabilitas Pemerintah Lokal dalam Menuju Good Governance (Disertasi) Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Brawijaya. Malang, 2010