Main Article Content

Abstract

The issues raised in this study are: The form and legal considerations, the methods and the role of ijtihad as well as the contribution of the judge ijtihad decision of religions courts in the field of inheritance law in Islamic Law Compilation (KHI)aganise the national law from the influence of muslim community life of Indonesia. The research method using a normative approach and the paradigm of constructivism, with the object research of jurisprudence of the high supreme court of Republic Indonesia and the verdict as the primary source of qualitative data analysis.  It is verdicted that: A daughter (as the inheritor) who acts hijab toward the inheritance provider’s biological brother gets all of the inheritance from the inheritance provider. This verdict seemingly confronts article 176 of Islamic Law Compilation which says:”on anly daughter alone gets a half of the inheritence …”. The verdict is the result of Ijtihad in attempt of catching the ruh (soul) or maqashid al-syari’ah in order to promote justice with a legal justification that the provider’s brother is not in responsibility for providing his niece money and other needs. It is also because of the change in social structure in farm of “family structure” which is widely known in modern Indonesian family as “nuclear family” consisting of father, mother, and children excluding relatives. This type of family structure has become more standard and socially accepted. In other words, nuclear family is a more modern model in Indonesian modern society

Keywords

Ijtihad judge inheritance law national law.

Article Details

Author Biography

Akhmad Khisni, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Fakultas Hukum
How to Cite
Khisni, A. (2017). Ijtihad Hakim Peradilan Agama Bidang Hukum Kewarisan dan Kontribusinya Terhadap Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 18, 146–163. Retrieved from https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/7238

References

  1. Daftar Pustaka
  2. Asshiddiqie, Jimly, “Hukum Islam di Antara Agenda Hukum Nasional,†Mimbar Hukum FH UGM Yogyakarta No. 51 Thn. XII 2001.
  3. Ali, Achmad, “Eksistensi Hakim dalam Menegakkan Hukum di Indonesia,†dalam Mimbar Hukum FH UGM Yogyakarta No. 52 Thn. XII 2001.
  4. Azizy, A. Qodri, “Hukum Islam sebagai Sumber Hukum Positif dalam Reformasi Hukum Nasional,†dalam Mimbar Hukum FH UGM Yogyakarta No. 54 thn. XII 2001.
  5. Effendi M. Zein, Satria, “Analisis Fiqh,†dalam Mimbar Hukum FH UGM Yogyakarta No. 30 Thn. VIII 1997.
  6. _____, “Munawir Sjadzali dan Reaktulisasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia,†ed. Muhammad Wahyuni Nafis dalam Kontekstualisasi Ajaran Islam, 70 Tahun Munawir Sadzali, Cet. 1, PT. Temprint, Jakartta, 1995.
  7. Hanityo, Ronny, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Cet. 1, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1982.
  8. Jaya Bakti, Asfari, Konsep Maqashid al-Syari’ah menurut Al-Syatibi dan Relevansinya dengan Ijtihad Hukum Dewasa Ini, Program Pascasarjana IAIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta, 1994.
  9. Manan, Bagir, “Peranan Peradilan Agama dalam Pembinaan Hukum Nasional,†di dalam Yuhaya S. Praja, Hukum Islam Indonesia: Pemikiran dan Praktek, Cet. 1, Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung, 1991.
  10. Mualim, Amir, dan Yusdani, Konfigurasi Pemikiran Hukum Islam, Cet. 2, UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2001.
  11. Saleh, Ismail, “Wawasan Pembangunan Hukum Nasional,â€Makalah dalam Dialog tentang Pembangunan Hukum Nasional, Memperingati 8 Windu Pondok Modern Gontor Indonesia, 17 Juni 1991
  12. GBHN Tahun 1999
  13. Hasil Wawancara dengan Rozikhan, Ulama Muhammadiyah, Wakil Ketua PW Jawa Tengan, pada tanggal 2 Januari 2010.
  14. Putusan Pengadilan Agama Mataram: No. 85/Pdt.G/92/V/PA.MTR, tanggal 5 Nopember 1992 M, bertepatan tanggal 10 Jumadil Awal 1413 H., Jo. Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Mataram: No. 19/Pdt.G/1993/PTA. MTR, tanggal 15 September 1993 M, bertepatan tanggal 28 Rabiul Awal 1414 H., Jo. Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI: No. 86 K/AG/194, tanggal 28 April 1995.