Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 8, 2017
Published
August 14, 2018
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 410 Download : 373

Main Article Content

Abstract

Consumers and business actors as seekers for justice for peace consider the decision of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) as a peace agreement letter containing the values of justice for peace. The problem analyzed in this research was the achievement of justice for peace in the decision of BPSK in Jakarta in decision No. Reg. 004/REG/BPSK-DKI/I/2016 dated January 22, 2016 between Andhie Saad as a consumer and Turkish Airlines as a business actor based on the principles of justice, benefit, and legal certainty. This research used qualitative method with statute approach and conceptual approach based on theories of Jeremy Bentham, John Rawls and Hans Kelsen as elements of justice for peace. The primary legal materials used were Law no. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection and Decree of the Minister of Industry and Trade of the Republic of Indonesia No. 350/MPP/Kep/12/2001 on the Implementation of Duties and Authority of Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK). The analysis was carried out using philosophical-normative approach. The result of the research showed that, the resolution of Consumer Dispute through Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) in decision of BPSK No. Reg.004/REG/BPSK-DKI/I/2016 has met the values of justice for peace.

Keywords

Justice for Peace mediation consumer protection the verdict of Consumer Dispute Settlement Board (BPSK)

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Author Biographies

Mia Hadiati, Tarumanagara University

Proceeding Law

Mariske Myeke Tampi, Tarumanagara University

Business Law
How to Cite
Hadiati, M., & Tampi, M. M. (2018). Menakar Justice for Peace dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Melalui Mediasi (Studi Keputusan BPSK No. Reg. 004/REG/BPSK-DKI/I/2016). Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 25(1), 92–114. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss1.art5
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Bentham, Jeremy, An Introduction to the Principles of Moral and Legislation Kitchener, Ontario, 2000.
  3. Fuady, Munir, Teori-teori Besar (Grand Theory) dalam Hukum, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2013.
  4. Harahap, Yahya M., Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Keputusan Pengadilan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2007.
  5. Kelsen, Hans, Introduction to The Problem of Legal Theory, Oxford University Press, New York, 2002.
  6. Margono, Suyud, ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) dan Arbitrase Proses Pelembagaan dan Aspek Hukum, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor, 2004.
  7. Marzuki, Mahmud Peter, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta, 2006.
  8. Nasution, Az, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Suatu Pengantar, Penerbit Diadi, Jakarta, 2006.
  9. Nugroho, A. Susanti, Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Cetakan ke-2, Telaga Ilmu Indonesia, Tangerang, 2011.
  10. ______, Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase dan Penerapan Hukumnya, Prenada, Jakarta, 2015.
  11. ______, Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Ditinjau dari Hukum Acara serta Kendala dan Implementasinya, Prenada, Jakarta, 2011.
  12. Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
  13. Satjipto Raharjo, Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1980.
  14. ______, Ilmu Hukum, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2006.
  15. Sembiring, Jimmy Joses, Cara Menyelesaikan Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan; Negosiasi, Mediasi, Konsiliasi, & Arbitrase, Visimedia, Jakarta, 2011.
  16. Sumardjono, Maria S. W., et al., Mediasi Sengketa Tanah: Potensi Penerapan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (ADR) di Bidang Pertanahan, Gramedia, Jakarta, 2008.
  17. Soejono Soekanto, Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 1983.
  18. Umam, Khotibul, Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan, Pustaka Yustisia, Yogyakarta, 2010.
  19. Usman, Rachmadi, Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2003.
  20. Kamus
  21. Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, 4th Edition, edited by Colin Mc. Intosh, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2013.
  22. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
  23. Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen
  24. Keputusan Menteri Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Republik Indonesia Indonesia, Nomor: 350/MPP/Kep/12/2001
  25. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan.
  26. Jurnal
  27. Armstrong, Kimberley, “Justice without Peace? International Justice and Conflict Resolution in Northern Uganda”, Development & Change, May2014, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p589-607, 19p. DOI: 10.1111/dech.12090.
  28. Bossert, Walter, dan Suzumura, Kotaro, “The Greatest Unhappiness of the Least Number Social Choice & Welfare”, Jun2016, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p187-205, 19p. DOI: 10.1007/s00355-016-0951-6.
  29. Cordelli, Chiara, “Justice as Fairness and Relational Resources”, Journal of Political Philosophy, Mar2015, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p86-110, 25p. DOI: 10.1111/jopp.12036.
  30. Gérard, Philippe, “On Some Presuppositions of Judgments of Legal Validity”, Ratio Juris, Jun2016, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p280-287, 8p. DOI: 10.1111/raju.12128.
  31. Hadiati, Mia dan Mariske Myeke Tampi, “Efektivitas Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen oleh Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) di D.K.I. Jakarta”, Jurnal Hukum Prioris, Volume 6 No. 1 Tahun 2017, 64-80.
  32. Klijnsma, Josse, “Contract Law as Fairness”, Ratio Juris, Mar2015, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p68-88. 21p.
  33. Kramer, Matthew H, “Moral Principles and Legal Validity”, Ratio Juris, Mar2009, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p44-61, 18p. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2008.00411.x.
  34. Lawrence, Michael Anthony, “Justice-as-Fairness as Judicial Guiding Principle”, Brooklyn Law Review, Winter2016, Vol. 81 Issue 2, p673-731, 59p.
  35. Martinás, Katalin, dan Kerényi, Ádám, “On The Teory of Human Decisions in the Age of Beneficial Globalization”, Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, Dec2010, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p70-80, 11p.
  36. Pino, Giorgio, “Positivism, Legal Validity, and Separation of Law and Morals”, Ratio Juris, Jun2014, Vol. 27 Issue 2, p190-217, 28p. DOI: 10.1111/raju.12044.
  37. Robinson, Jeffrey M, “An Incongruent Amalgamation: John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism on Naturalism”, Eleutheria, Fall2015, Vol. 4 Issue 2, preceding p30-52. 25p.
  38. Teerawattananon, Yot, dan Russell, Steve, “The Greatest Happiness of the Greatest Number? Policy Actors’ Perspectives on the Limits of Economic Evaluation As A Tool for Informing Health Care Coverage Decisions in Thailand”, BMC Health Services Research, 2008, Vol. 8, Special section p1-9. 9p. 1 Chart, 1 Graph. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-197.
  39. Weinberger, Ota, “Legal Validity, Acceptance of Law, Legitimacy: Some Critical Comments and Constructive Proposals”, Ratio Juris, Dec1999, Vol. 12 Issue 4, p336, 18p.
  40. Keputusan
  41. Keputusan BPSK No. Reg. 004/REG/BPSK-DKI/I/2016 tertanggal 22 Januari 2016
  42. Wawancara
  43. Wawancara dengan Dr. Djainal A. Simanjuntak, Hakim Mediator BPSK DKI Jakarta, 17 Oktober 2016, BPSK DKI Jakarta, Jl. Perintis Kemerdekaan/BGR I No. 2, Jakarta Utara - 14240
  44. Wawancara dengan Bpk. Jerry Ephraim Caraen, Kepala Seksi Konsultasi Hukum Sub Direktorat Pemberdayaan dan Perlindungan Konsumen, 19 Oktober 2016, Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia, Jl. M Ridwan Rais No. 5, Jakarta Pusat – 10110