Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 14, 2017
Published
August 14, 2018
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 506 Download : 802

Main Article Content

Abstract

The ability of judges to make decisions is acquired from their experiences during the career that they have undergone. The problems formulated in this study were, first why is it necessary to improve the competence of judges through trainings of judges? Second, how is the model of judge competence improvement program aimed to create professional and authoritative judges with high integrity? This was a socio-legal or non-doctrinal research. The results of this study indicated that: first, judge training programs are highly necessary in order to create professional and authoritative judges with high integrity. Besides, these trainings also serve as a means to improve the quality of judge decisions and judge competencies, including professional competence, personal competence, social competence, and leadership competence. Second, the model of judge competence improvement program to create professional and authoritative judges with high integrity is through integrated and continuous trainings.

Keywords

Competence training judge

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Author Biography

Indriati Amarini, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

FAKULTAS HUKUM
How to Cite
Amarini, I. (2018). Evaluasi Program Peningkatan Kompetensi Hakim Melalui Pelatihan yang Terintegrasi dan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 25(1), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss1.art9
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Amarini, Indriati, Keaktifan Hakim Dan Peradilan Administrasi, UMPurwokerto Press, Purwokerto, 2017.
  3. A. Posner, Richard, How Judges Think, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts, England, 2010.
  4. E. Bond, James, 2009, The Art Of Judging, New Brunswick, USA
  5. Marwan, Awaludin, Satjipto Rahardjo Sebuah Biografi Intelektual & Pertarungan Tafsir Terhadap Filsafat Hukum Progresif, Thafa Media, Yogyakarta, 2013.
  6. Cetak Biru Pembaharuan Mahkamah Agung, 2010
  7. Panduan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Calon Hakim (PPC Hakim Terpadu), 2010
  8. Jurnal
  9. Assegaf, Rifqi Sjarief, “Hanya Hakim Yang Bersih Dan Kompeten Yang Layak Adili Koruptor”, Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Indonesia, Vol. 2 No. 1 Januari 2002,
  10. Hendrawati, Heni, dkk, “Aspek Penegakan Kode Etik Hakim Dalam Mewujudkan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Yang Bermartabat”, Varia Justica, Vol. 12 No. 1, Maret, 2016.
  11. Mitrofan, Florina, “The Independence of Judge-a guarantee of the rule of law state”, dalam Spesial Issue JL & Admin Sci. 93, 2015.
  12. Purwadi, Hari, et. all, “Konsekuensi Transplatasi Hukum Terhadap Pancasila Sebagai Norma Dasar Dan Hukum Lokal”, Jurnal Hukum Yustisia Edisi 9, Januari – Apil 2015, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta
  13. Riedel, Johanes. “Training ang Recruitment Of Judges in Germany”, International Journal For Court Administration, Volume 5 No. 2, October 2013.
  14. Syamsudin, M, “Rekontruksi Perilaku Etik Hakim Dalam Menangani Perkara Berbasis Hukum Progresif”, Jurnal Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta, Edisi Khusus Vol. 18 Oktober 2011.
  15. Sutatiek, Sri, “Akuntabilitas Moral Hakim Dalam Memerika, Mengadili Dan Memutus Perkara Agar Putusannya Berkualitas”, dalam Jurnal Hukum Arena Hukum 2014, Tersedia di http://arenahukum.ub.ac.id. diakses hari Minggu, 3 Desember 2017.
  16. Wantu, Fence, “Kendala Hakim Dalam Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Di Peradilan Perdata”, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, Volume 25 Nomor 2, 2013.
  17. Majalah Hukum
  18. Arto, A. Mukti, Putusan Yang Berkualitas Mahkota Bagi Hakim Mutiara Bagi Pencari Keadilan, dalam Majalah Hukum Varia Peradilan No. 296 Juli 2010
  19. Arifin, Busthanul, “Sepanjang Jalan Kenangan Bersama Bismar Siregar, Sang Hakim”, Varia Peradilan No. 282 Mei 2009
  20. Indrawati, Nani. “Selayang Pandang Tentang Judicial System Di Korea Selatan”, Majalah Hukum Varia Peradilan No. 269 April 2008
  21. Maruli, Jimly, “Dicari : Putusan Yang Progresif”, Varia Peradilan No. 293 April 2010, IKAHI, Jakarta
  22. Manan, Bagir, “Memulihkan Peradilan Yang Berwibawa Dan Dihormati”, IKAHI, Jakarta, 2008
  23. Perundang-undangan
  24. Undang-undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5076)
  25. Website
  26. Abdullah, Mustafa, Laporan Penelitian Putusan Hakim Tahun 2007, Tersedia di http://komisiyudisial.go.id. diakses tanggal 15 Oktober 2017
  27. Andi Andojo Soetjipto. “Hakim Tunggal yang Gagap Hukum”, Tersedia di http://nasional.kompas.com diakses tanggal 1 Desember 2017
  28. Pejabat MA Ditangkap KPK Dan Hasil Survey Kepuasan Masyarakat ke Pengadilan”, Tersedia di http://news.detik.com/berita/3143235 diakses tanggal 16 Februari 2016
  29. Belum Semua Hakim Mendapatkan Pelatihan Umum dan Sertifikasi, http://nasional.kompas.com, diakses tanggal 28 Januari 2018