Main Article Content

Abstract

Conventional face-to-face or offline learning is considered outdated for students in today's digital era. However, online learning, which is considered new and meets nowadays learning, still lacks practice. This research is aimed to provide a solution for combining online and offline teaching; at the same time, to offer an approach to develop students’ piety. The proposed innovation is to apply blended learning. This method emphasizes students’ active roles in their learning. Digital devices used include YouTube, Google Classroom, and Interactive Mentimeter. The methods used in this research were classroom action research and literature studies. The learning model used was flipped Classroom; offline meetings used textbooks, and online lectures used online videos. The main objective is to link blended learning media with the development of piety among the Chemical Analysis department students. The results indicate that collaborative and contextual learning meet students’ needs in developing piety. In conclusion, blended learning also helps students to formulate their contributions to Islamic civilization in the future.

Keywords

Blended Learning Offline Online Piety

Article Details

How to Cite
Haningsih, S., Harimurti, S. M. ., & Budiwati, A. . (2022). Blended Learning in Islam Ulil Albab Course and Its Contribution To Enhance Students’ Piety. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 21(2), 491–522. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol21.iss2.art7

References

  1. Andrioni, Felicia. “Cross-European Perspective in Social Work Education: A Good Blended Learning Model of Practice.” Sustainability 10, no. 5 (2018): 1–15.
  2. Attard, Angele, Emma Di Iorio, Koen Geven, and Robert Santa. Student-Centred Learning - Toolkit for Students, Staff and Higher Education Institutions. Brussels: The European Students’ Union, 2010.
  3. Bazluki, M, and N B Milman. “Transforming Traditional, Face-to-Face Courses to Online or Blended Learning Environments: Advice for Faculty and Instructional Designers.” Distance Learning 16, no. 1 (2019).
  4. Bernard, P., P. Broś, and A. Migdał-Mikuli. “Influence of Blended Learning on Outcomes of Students Attending a General Chemistry Course: Summary of a Five-Year-Long Study.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 18, no. 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00040e.
  5. Boelens, Ruth, and Et.al. “Thematic Review Four Key Challenges to the Design of Blended Learning a Systematic Literature Review,” 2017, 4–18.
  6. Castro, Robin. “Blended Learning in Higher Education: Trends and Capabilities.” Education and Information Technologies 24, no. 4 (July 2019): 2523–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3.
  7. Dau, S. “Blended Learning - an Epistemic Conceptualization of ‘Learning as Wayfinding’ in Blended Environments.” EDULEARN16 Proceedings, 2016, 8521–32. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2016.0860.
  8. Davies, J. P., and N. Pachler. Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Perspectives from UCL. Edited by J. P. Davies and N. Pachler. UCL IOE Press: London, UK. (2018). London, UK: UCL IOE Press, 2018. https://www.ucl-ioe-press.com/books/higher-education-and-lifelong-learning/teaching-and-learning-in-higher-education/.
  9. Dziuban, Charles, Charles R. Graham, Patsy D. Moskal, Anders Norberg, and Nicole Sicilia. “Blended Learning: The New Normal and Emerging Technologies.” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 15, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5.
  10. Garrison, D.Randy, and Heather Kanuka. “Blended Learning: Uncovering Its Transformative Potential in Higher Education.” The Internet and Higher Education 7, no. 2 (2004): 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001.
  11. Glasby, Patricia. “Future Trends in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,” no. November (2015).
  12. Gosling, David. Supporting Student Learning. Edited by Heather Fry, Steve Ketteridge, and Stephanie Marshall. A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Third Edit. New York and London: Routledge, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891414-30.
  13. Hartini, Nanik. “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning (Ctl) Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Ipa Siswa Kelas Ii Sdn O2 Gambirmanis Pracimantoro Wonogiri Tahun Ajaran 2009/2010.” Other, Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2010. https://eprints.uns.ac.id/7974/.
  14. Junaidi, Aris, Dewi Wulandari, Syamsul Arifin, Hendrawan Soetanto, Sri Suning Kusumawardani, Sri Peni Wastutiningsih, Made Supartha Utama, and Edy Cahyono. Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi. IV. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2020.
  15. Latorre-Cosculluela, Cecilia, Cristina Suárez, Sonia Quiroga, Natalia Sobradiel-Sierra, Raquel Lozano-Blasco, and Ana Rodríguez-Martínez. “Flipped Classroom Model before and during COVID-19: Using Technology to Develop 21st Century Skills.” Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0137.
  16. Universitas Islam Indonesia. “Menghujamkan Akar, Menjulangkan Cabang, dan Melebatkan Buah,” May 31, 2018. https://www.uii.ac.id/menghujamkan-akar-menjulangkan-cabang-melebatkan-buah/.
  17. Morze, N, and T Noskova. “Information Environment of Blended Learning: Aspects of Teaching and Quality.” E-Learning and …, 2014, 74–94.
  18. Okaz, Abeer Ali. “Integrating Blended Learning in Higher Education.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 186 (2015): 600–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.086.
  19. Purg, Peter, Klemen Širok, and Daniela Brasil. “The Transformative Impact of Blended Mobility Courses.” International Journal of Art and Design Education 37, no. 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12101.
  20. Putra, H. D., and R. Purwasih. “Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Dan Keaktifan Mahasiswa Melalui Project Based Learning.” P2M STKIP Siliwangi 2(2) (2016): 128–36.
  21. Ramakrisnan, Prasanna, Yuraidza Bt Yahya, Mohd Nor Hajar Hasrol, and Azlan Abdul Aziz. “Blended Learning: A Suitable Framework For E-Learning In Higher Education.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 67 (2012): 513–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.356.
  22. Rovai, Alfred P., and Hope Jordan. “Blended Learning and Sense of Community: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional and Fully Online Graduate Courses.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 5, no. 2 (August 1, 2004). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192.