Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 17, 2025
Accepted
August 26, 2025
Published
August 31, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 235 Download : 50

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Existing research on social cohesion in Malaysia often examines it at the national level, with a strong emphasis on inter-ethnic relations. However, there is a significant gap in studies th at focus solely on intra-ethnic cohesion within the Malay-Muslims community. This study addresses that gap by developing and validating, through expert consensus, a new instrument to measure intra-ethnic cohesion. The study employs a quantitative design using the Fuzzy Delphi Method with a 7-point Likert scale, involving 10 carefully selected experts. Data were analysed using triangular fuzzy numbers and defuzzification ranking. Findings show that all elements of the proposed construct such as self-belonging, inclusivity, organizational/ political participation, recognition, legitimacy and equality has reached expert consensus. The agreement level exceeded 75%, the threshold value was below 0.2 (d<0.2) and the fuzzy score (A) was greater than the α-cut value of 0.5. These results provide a foundation for developing a structured framework for measuring social cohesion within the Malay-Muslim community in Malaysia. This article reports Phase 1 of instrument development, highlighting its limitations and future directions for full psychometric validation.

Keywords

Fuzzy Delphi Method Social Cohesion Malay-Muslims Community Intra-ethnic Relation

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Nur Anis Amalina Amir Hamzah, Mohd Sobhi Ishak, Azlina Abdullah, Shamsul Amri Baharuddin, Azizah Sarkowi, Ahmad Zul Hakimi Hassim

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-SA) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Amir Hamzah, N. A. A. ., Ishak, M. S. ., Abdullah, A. ., Baharuddin, S. A. ., Sarkowi, A., & Hassim, A. Z. H. . (2025). A Fuzzy Delphi Approach to Social Cohesion Among Malay Muslims in Malaysia. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 24(2), 869–906. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol24.iss2.ar10
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Funding data

References

  1. Abu Bakar, M. (2015). Malay, English and religion: Language maintenance in multilingual Singapore. Issues in Language Studies, 4(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.33736/ils.1645.2015

  2. Ahmad, H. (2006). Ke arah kelahiran Melayu glokal [Towards the birth of a glocal Malay]. Alaf 21.

  3. Altabaa, H., & Idid, S. A. (2019). Trusting the institutions in Malaysia: An Islamic sociological perspective [Conference]. International Conference On Religion, Governance And Sustainable Development (ICRGD2019), Kuala Lumpur. http://irep.iium.edu.my/75461/

  4. Altabaa, H., & Idid, S. A. (2020). Trust, society and governance: An Islamic perspective on Malaysian institutions (Keyakinan, masyarakat dan tadbir urus: Perspektif Islam terhadap institusi di Malaysia). Journal of Islam in Asia, 17(4), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.31436/jia.v17i4.1003

  5. Ashtiani, B., Haghighirad, F., Makui, A., & Montazer, G. ali. (2009). Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Applied Soft Computing, 9(2), 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2008.05.005

  6. Awang, A. A., Syed Sheikh, S. S., Mohd Lokman, A., & Saifuddin, A. H. (2016). A theoretical analysis of racial integration through New Economic Policy and 1Malaysia concept. Advanced Science Letters, 22(5), 1363–1367. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.6614

  7. Aziz, S. F. A., Siraj, S., Hussin, Z., Norman, N. A., & Norman, N. I. (2017). Development of a garden-based curriculum content model for indigenous primary school students. Science Journal of Business and Management, 5(5), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20170505.11

  8. Baharuddin, S. A. (2008). Many ethnicities, many cultures, one nation: The Malaysian experience. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Press.

  9. Baharuddin, S. A. (2010). Unity in diversity: The Malaysian experience. Institut Kajian Etnik, (KITA).

  10. Baharuddin, S. A. (2012). Kesepaduan dalam kepelbagaian: Perpaduan di Malaysia sebagai work-in-progress [Integration in diversity: Unity in Malaysia as a work in progress]. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

  11. Baharuddin, S. A. (2021). Sekali air bah, sekali pantai berubah. Akademika, 91(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.17576/AKAD-2021-9103-16

  12. Beauvais, C., & Jenson, J. (2002). Social cohesion. Updating the state of the research (CPRN Discussion Paper Nos. F, 22). Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc. https://www.socialcohesion.info/fileadmin/user_upload/Beauvais___Jenson_02.pdf

  13. Berger-Schmitt, R. (2002). Considering social cohesion in quality of life assessments: Concept and measurement. Social Indicators Research, 58(1), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015752320935

  14. Bernard, P. (1999). Social cohesion: A critique (CPRN Discussion Paper Nos. F, 09). Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc. https://oaresource.library.carleton.ca/cprn/15743_en.pdf

  15. Bétrisey, F., Bastiaensen, J., & Mager, C. (2018). Payments for ecosystem services and social justice: Using recognition theories to assess the Bolivian Acuerdos Recíprocos por el Agua. Geoforum, 92, 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.04.001

  16. Brown, G. K. (2010). Legible pluralism: The politics of ethnic and religious identification in Malaysia. Ethnopolitics, 9(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449050903557401

  17. Çakın, B., Glas, S., & Spierings, N. (2024). Polarization, religiosity, and support for gender equality: A comparative study across four Muslim-majority countries. Women’s Studies International Forum, 103, 102880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102880

  18. Chan, J., To, H.-P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-2118-1

  19. Chang, P.-T., Huang, L.-C., & Lin, H.-J. (2000). The fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy statistics and membership function fitting and an application to the human resources. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 112(3), 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00067-0

  20. Chen, H.-M., Wu, H.-Y., & Chen, P.-S. (2022). Innovative service model of information services based on the sustainability balanced scorecard: Applied integration of the fuzzy Delphi method, Kano model, and TRIZ. Expert Systems with Applications, 205, 117601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117601

  21. Cheng, C.-H., & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(1), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00280-6

  22. Chu, H., & Hwang, G. (2008). A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 2826–2840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.034

  23. Durkheim, E. (1997). The division of labor in society. Simon and Schuster.

  24. Embong, A. R. (2002). State-led modernization and the new middle class in Malaysia. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403914286

  25. Fonseca, X., Lukosch, S., & Brazier, F. (2019). Social cohesion revisited: A new definition and how to characterize it. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(2), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1497480

  26. Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “Postsocialist” condition. Psychology Press.

  27. Hanesworth, P., Bracken, S., & Elkington, S. (2019). A typology for a social justice approach to assessment: Learning from universal design and culturally sustaining pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1465405

  28. Ishikawa, A., Amagasa, M., Shiga, T., Tomizawa, G., Tatsuta, R., & Mieno, H. (1993). The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 55(3), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(93)90251-C

  29. Jenson, J. (1998). Mapping social cohesion. The state of Canadian research (CPRN Study Nos. F, 03). Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc. http://www.cccg.umontreal.ca/pdf/cprn/cprn_f03.pdf

  30. Jomo, K. S. (2011). The New Economic Policy and interethnic relations in Malaysia. In J. Castellino (Ed.), Global minority rights (pp. 239–266). Routledge.

  31. Jones, H., & Twiss, B. C. (1978). Forecasting technology for planning decisions. Macmillan.

  32. Khaile, F. T., Roman, N. V., & Davids, G. J. (2021). The role of local government in promoting a sense of belonging as an aspect of social cohesion: A document analysis. African Journal of Governance and Development, 10(1), 8–33. https://doi.org/10.10520/ejc-ajgd_v10_n1_a2

  33. Lee, H.-A. (2022). Malaysia’s New Economic Policy: Fifty years of polarization and impasse (No. 2). Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University. https://doi.org/10.20495/seas.11.2_299

  34. Lee, H.-A. (2023). Social justice and affirmative action in malaysia: The new Economic Policy after 50 years. Asian Economic Policy Review, 18(1), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12404

  35. Lee, H.-A. (2024). Group‐based redistribution in Malaysia: Polarization, incoherence, stasis. Social Inclusion, 12, 7594. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.7594

  36. Linssen, R., Schmeets, H., Scheepers, P., & te Grotenhuis, M. (2015). Trends in conventional and unconventional political: Participation in Europe, 1981–2008. In C. Eder, I. C. Mochmann, & M. Quandt (Eds.), Political trust and disenchantment with politics: International perspectives (pp. 31–58). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004276062_004

  37. Linstone, H. A. (1985). The Delphi technique. In V. T. Covello, J. L. Mumpower, P. J. M. Stallen, & V. R. R. Uppuluri (Eds.), Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis (pp. 621–649). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70634-9_22

  38. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Advanced Book Program.

  39. Lussier, D. N., & Fish, M. S. (2016). Men, Muslims, and attitudes toward gender inequality. Politics and Religion, 9(1), 29–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048315000826

  40. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Oxford University Press.

  41. Miri, M. A. (2024). An integrated conceptual model for enhancing refugee education. British Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 1857–1877. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.4005

  42. Mohd Jamil, M. R., & Mat Noh, N. (2020). Kepelbagaian metodologi dalam penyelidikan reka bentuk dan pembangunan [Methodological diversity in design and development research]. Qaisar Prestige Resources.

  43. Murry, J. W., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1995.0008

  44. Mustapha, R., & Darusalam, G. (2018). Aplikasi kaedah fuzzy Delphi dalam penyelidikan sains sosial [Application of the fuzzy Delphi method in social science research]. UM Press.

  45. Nik Mat, N. H., Zabidi, Z. N., Che Sulaiman, N. F., Abdul Rashid, R., & Satoshi, M. (2023). Religiosity and gender role perceptions: Insights from Malaysia. Contemporary Islam, 17(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-022-00502-9

  46. Noor, N. M., & Leong, C.-H. (2013). Multiculturalism in Malaysia and Singapore: Contesting models. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(6), 714–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.09.009

  47. Orazani, S. N., Reynolds, K. J., & Osborne, H. (2023). What works and why in interventions to strengthen social cohesion: A systematic review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53(10), 938–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12990

  48. Pama, V. I., Jamilah, I. I., & Yasnel, Y. (2024). Jati diri dan sistem kepemimpinan Melayu [Malay identity and leadership system]. Al-Amin: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(2), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.53398/alamin.v1i2.277

  49. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.

  50. Roknifard, J. (2023). New Economic Policy: Impact of social and economic engineering on Malaysia’s development. In C. Zhang & B. T. A. Trinh (Eds.), Governance in transitional societies in East and Southeast Asia (pp. 91–120). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5306-6_5

  51. Schiefer, D., & van der Noll, J. (2017). The essentials of social cohesion: A literature review. Social Indicators Research, 132(2), 579–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1314-5

  52. Schleimer, S. M. (2020). Educationally successful female Muslim students in present-day Malaysia: Challenges, chances and change. Kajian Malaysia, 38(Supp.1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.21315/km2020.38.s1.4

  53. Schmeets, H., & te Riele, S. (2014). Declining social cohesion in the Netherlands? Social Indicators Research, 115(2), 791–812. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24720380

  54. Shukri, S. (2023). Islamist civilizationism in Malaysia. Religions, 14(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020209

  55. Stanley, D. (2003). What do we know about social cohesion: The research perspective of the Federal Government’s Social Cohesion Research Network. The Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 28(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/3341872

  56. Thillainathan, R., & Cheong, K.-C. (2020). Malaysia’s new economic policy, growth and distribution: Revisiting the debate. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 53(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.158583662604137

  57. Wang Chen, H. M., Chou, S.-Y., Luu, Q. D., & Yu, T. H.-K. (2016). A Fuzzy MCDM approach for green supplier selection from the economic and environmental aspects. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016(1), 8097386. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8097386

No Related Submission Found