Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 6, 2021
Accepted
December 31, 2021
Published
December 31, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 560 Download : 3954

Main Article Content

Abstract

Since Covid-19, schools implement the online learning system which gives extra
tasks and responsibilities to all teachers. In online learning, the implementation
of formative and summative evaluations has several problems, one of which is
the limitations of media and learning evaluation tools. The purpose of this study
is to explain and analyze (1) the implementation of summative and formative
tests before the pandemic (2) the implementation of summative and formative
tests during the new normal (3) The obstacles and supporting factors of the
evaluation process at SDN 04 Kalisari. The research uses a qualitative approach.
The data collection technique was carried out by indirect observation through
the website, interviews via Zoom, and the study of documentation obtained in
the form of data on school facilities and infrastructure. The technique of
determining the informants used purposive sampling, namely the Principal and Teachers. The data analysis technique uses the Miles and Huberman model by means of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The conclusion of this study is that the implementation of formative and summative learning evaluations provides new achievements or new challenges for principals and teachers (1) The use of various learning methods to increasestudent interest (2) Smartphone and unstable network constraints (3) decreasedstudent scores.

Keywords: Management; Evaluation; Learning; Pandemic.

Keywords

Management; Evaluation; Learning; Pandemic.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Nada Nurfadhilah, Ahmad Alkindi Siregar, Vira Muthia Rabi'ah, Burhan Nudin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright
Authors who publish with EL-TARBAWI agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0)that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Licensing for Data Publication

EL-TARBAWI use a variety of waivers and licenses, that are specifically designed for and appropriate for the treatment of data:

Other data publishing licenses may be allowed as exceptions (subject to approval by the editor on a case-by-case basis) and should be justified with a written statement from the author, which will be published with the article.

References

  1. Asep Ediana Latip. (2018). Evaluasi Pembelajaran di SD dan MI
  2. (Perencanaan dan Pelaksanaan Penilaian Hasil Belajar
  3. Autentik).
  4. Hafidah, lilih, wilanika, dkk. (2020). Penurunan Motivasi dan
  5. Keaktifan Belajar Siswa Selama Pembelajaran Daring di
  6. Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Vol. 2
  7. Idi, Abdullah. (2014). Pengembangan Kurikulum: Teori & Praktik.
  8. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  9. Oosterhof, Albert. (1999). Developing and Using Classroom
  10. Assessment. New Jersey: Upper Saddle River.
  11. Proborini, Ellen. (2021). “EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN
  12. MATEMATIKA SECARA DARING PADA SISWA
  13. KELAS VI SD KARANGTURI”. Intelligentes: Jurnal
  14. Pendidikan Fisika dan Sains”. Vol. 2, No. 2.
  15. Magdalena ina, Annisa Rachmadan dan Mita Aulia. 2020.
  16. PENERAPAN PEMBELAJARAN DAN PENILAIAN
  17. SECARA ONLINE DI MASA PANDEMI . Universitas
  18. Muhammadiyah Tangerang : Jurnal Edukasi dan Sains, Vol.
  19. , No. 2.
  20. Magdalena Ina, Hani Melly Mayanti, dan Rizka Surya Putri.
  21. (2020). “Evaluasi Belajar Peserta Didik di Sekolah
  22. Dasar”. Bintang: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sains, Vol. 2, No. 3.
  23. Mukminah, Hadi Wijaya, Hirlian. (2020). Problematika
  24. Pembelajaran Saat Pandemi Covid-19 di Madrasah
  25. Ibtidaiyah Nurul Ulum Mertak Tombok. Jurnal Ilmu
  26. Sosial dan Pendidikan. Vol. 5, No. 1.
  27. Rukajat, Ajat. (2018). Teknik Evaluasi Pembelajaran.
  28. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
  29. Magdalena, I., Rachmadani, A., & Aulia, M. (2020). Penerapan Pembelajaran Dan Penilaian Secara Online Di Masa Pandemi Sdn Karang Tengah 06 Tangerang. Jurnal Edukasi dan Sains, 2(2), 393–409.
  30. Proborini, E. (2021). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika Secara Daring Pada Siswa Kelas Vi Sd Karangturi. Intelligentes Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Sains, 2(2).
  31. Rukajat, A. (n.d.). Teknik Evaluasi Pembelajaran (Pertama). Deepublish.
  32. Sadikin, A., & Hamidah, A. (2020). Pembelajaran Daring di Tengah Wabah Covid-19. Biodik, 6(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v6i2.9759
  33. Suparlan, H. (2016). Filsafat Pendidikan Ki Hadjar Dewantara Dan Sumbangannya Bagi Pendidikan Indonesia. Jurnal Filsafat, 25(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.12614
  34. Wasitohadi, W. (2014). HAKEKAT PENDIDIKAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF JOHN DEWEY Tinjauan Teoritis. Satya Widya, 30(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.2014.v30.i1.p49-61
  35. Widiyanto, J. (2018). Evaluasi Pembelajaran (Sesuai dengan Kurikulum 2013) Konsep, Prinsip & Prosedur. In A. M. W (Ed.), UNIPMA PRESS (Pertama). UNIPMA PRESS.
  36. Wijaya, H., Mukminah, & Hirlan. (2021). Problematika Pembelajaran Saat Pandemi Covid-19 Di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Nurul Ulum Mertak Tombok. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 5(1), 320–326. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.36312/jisip.v5i1.1700
  37. Yayan Alpian, Sri Wulan Anggraeni, Unika Wiharti, & Nizmah Maratos Soleha. (2019). PENTINGNYA PENDIDIKAN BAGI MANUSIA. JURNAL BUANA PENGABDIAN, 1(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.36805/jurnalbuanapengabdian.v1i1.581
  38. Van Loon; Yu Ting, Stefan Clermonts; Zimmerman, David.
  39. (2021). New Normal Manajemen Program Penguatan
  40. Pendidikan Karakter Melalui Pembelajaran Dalam
  41. Jaringan dan Luar Jaringan di Masa Pandemi Covid-19
  42. Widiyanto, Joko. 2018. EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN (Sesuai
  43. dengan Kurikulum 2013) Konsep, Prinsip Prosedur.
  44. Madiun: Unipma Press.
  45. Nurhastuti. (2019). Pentingnya Pendidikan Bagi Manusia.Jurnal
  46. Buana Pengabdian. Vol. 1, No. 1.