Article Sidebar

Submitted
December 13, 2025
Accepted
June 17, 2026
Published
June 17, 2026
Download
Article Report Review
Statistic
Read Counter : 194 Download : 72

Main Article Content

Abstract

The digital era has intensified discursive contestations surrounding the kiai–santri relationship in pesantren (Islamic boarding schools). This study aims to map the dialectic between Western paradigms of feudalism and the Islamic tradition of ta'dhim (traditional reverence and obedience) within the digital public sphere. Employing a descriptive qualitative method and Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis, this study examines a limited empirical scope consisting of four viral social media contents and in-depth interviews with two key participants. The findings suggest that participants and pesantren-based narratives tend to frame ta'dhim not as a form of structural oppression, but rather as a mechanism of respect, identity formation, and a means of sustaining traditional values amid contemporary social change. Ultimately, this discursive interplay highlights how pesantren communities navigate traditional authority while adapting to modern decentralized digital spaces, suggesting a need for broader empirical exploration to fully capture these evolving dynamics.

Keywords

Western Feudalism Digital Discourse. Islamic Dialectics Pesantren Ta'dhim Modernization

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Umar Ibnu Malik, Tubagus Naufal Ramadhan; Alwi Akhmad Syibromalisi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY-SA) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Malik, M. U. I., Ramadhan, T. N. ., & Syibromalisi, A. A. . (2026). Pesantren Feudalism or Ta’dzim? Contesting Western and Islamic Epistemologies in Digital Discourse. El-Tarbawi, 19(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.20885/tarbawi.vol19.iss1.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)

References

  1. Abdullah, Y. (2023). Critical Review Marxisme-Buku Western Political Theory Lee Cameron McDonald. Yumiriyah Abdullah.
  2. Alwi, M. S. (2025). The Socio-Political Role of Village Kiai in Nahdlatul Ulama Rural Communities: Patron–Client Relations, Symbolic Capital, and the Dynamics of Local Political Fields. Journal of Nahdlatul Ulama Studies, 6(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.35672/jnus.v6i1.54-67 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35672/jnus.v6i1.54-67
  3. Aryanti, Y., Mutathahirin, M., Rahman, I., & Mulyani, R. (2022). Teacher Analysis Study According to Imam Al Ghazali in the Book of Al Adab Fi Al-Din. Ahlussunnah: Journal of Islamic Education, 1(2), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.58485/jie.v1i2.177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58485/jie.v1i2.177
  4. Borges, S. V. M., Marta, R. F., Panggabean, H. R. G., Briandana, R., & Chinmi, M. (2024). Stereotip Dan Prasangka Komunikasi Antar Pemeran Film Kos-Kosan Dengan Pespektif Wacana Kritis Mills. Ekspresi Dan Persepsi : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(2), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.33822/jep.v7i2.7236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33822/jep.v7i2.7236
  5. Chien, C.-L., Hsu, S.-C., & Lin, T.-H. (2024). Is respect for teachers beneficial or harmful to students? The predictive effects of dual dimensions of respect-for-teachers on teacher-student relationships and academic engagement in a Confucian cultural context. Social Psychology of Education, 27(5), 2343–2366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09905-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09905-3
  6. Engels, F. (1884). The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State (J. D. Eleanor Burke Leacock, Ed.). Verso.
  7. Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical Discourse Analysis. Int. Adv. Eng. Technol., 7, 452–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350933927.ch-003
  8. Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368
  9. Fauzi, W. K., Takar, A. H., Kanz, S., & Fauzi, R. A. C. N. (2025). Social Representation and Ethical Communication in Contemporary Islamic Preaching (A Content Analysis of Gus Miftah’s Viral Video on The Sweet Iced Tea Seller Incident). Communicative : Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 6(2), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.47453/communicative.v6i2.3413
  10. Feng, T. (2023). The Truth About Marx’s Theory of Feudalism. In T. Feng (Ed.), The Cultural History of the Chinese Concepts Fengjian (Feudalism) and Jingji (Economy) (pp. 65–69). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2617-6_10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2617-6_10
  11. Fikri, L. H. (2023). Islamic Education and Social Media Literacy in Facing the Information Era for Indonesia’s Young Generation. Journal of Education and Religious Studies, 3(03), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.57060/jers.v3i03.123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57060/jers.v3i03.123
  12. Firdausiyah, Y. A., Fauziyah, U., & Azizah, I. F. (2025). Local Wisdom Of Pesantren And The Resilience Of Islamic Education In The Digital Disruption Era. International Seminar On Islamic Education & Peace, 5, 777–788. https://ejournal.uniramalang.ac.id/isiep/article/view/8764
  13. Fiveable. (2024). Critical Discourse Analysis – Ethnic Studies.
  14. Fowler, S., Gabriel, F., & Leonard, S. N. (2025). Exploring the Effect of Teacher Ontological and Epistemic Cognition on Engagement with Professional Development. Professional Development in Education, 51(2), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2022.2131600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2022.2131600
  15. Hafidh, M. I. (2023). Representasi Santri Milenial dalam Wacana Literasi Digital di Instagram (Analisis Wacana Kritis Norman Fairclough pada Instagram: @elmahrusy). Kediri Journal of Journalism and Digital Media (KJOURDIA), 1(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.30762/kjourdia.v1i1.1382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30762/kjourdia.v1i1.1382
  16. Harracá, M., Castelló, I., & Gawer, A. (2023). How Digital Platforms Organize Immaturity: A Sociosymbolic Framework of Platform Power. Business Ethics Quarterly, 33(3), 440–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2022.40 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2022.40
  17. Historical Materialism: Marx’s Framework for Social Change • PolSci Institute. (2025, December 30). https://polsci.institute/political-theory/historical-materialism-marx-social-change/
  18. Ilahi, M. T. (2014). Kiai: Figur Elite Pesantren. IBDA’: Jurnal Kebudayaan Islam, 12(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v12i2.442 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v12i2.442
  19. Jailani, M. S., & Jambi, D. (2013). Kepemimpinan Kyai Dalam Merevitalisasi Pesantren. Artikel, Tarbiyah, IAIN STS Jambi, 5.
  20. Khofifah, A. L. (2019). Ta’Dzim: Studi Model Karakter Menghadapi Era Society 5.0. Academia.
  21. Khoirunnisa, T., & Effendi, Y. (2025). Rearticulating Islamic Signifiers: Counter-Narratives from Pesantren for Peace. Dialog, 48, 164–187. https://doi.org/10.47655/dialog.v48i2.1091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47655/dialog.v48i2.1091
  22. Layalia, S. A. (2025). Al-Ghazālī’s Perspective on Human Spiritual Components: Heart, Spirit, Soul, and Intellect. Al-Falasifah: Journal of Philosophy and Islamic Studies, 1(1), 40–51. https://ejournal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/alfalasifah/article/view/1415
  23. Li, Y., Cheng, Z., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2025). TikTok’s political landscape: Examining echo chambers and political expression dynamics. New Media & Society, 14614448251339755. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251339755 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448251339755
  24. Lutfi, D., M. & Anwar, K., (2026). Peran Ta’dzim dan Khidmah dalam Implementasi Karakter Sosial Siswa Santri Mts. Kaganga:Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Dan Riset Sosial Humaniora, 9(2), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.31539/8tc43k12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31539/8tc43k12
  25. Mardiah, M. (2024). Etika Menuntut Ilmu Dalam Kitab Ta’lim Muta’allim Dan Aktualisasinya Pada Santri Pondok Pesantren Darul Muta’allimin Tanah Merah. Abdurrauf Science and Society, 1(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.70742/asoc.v1i1.98
  26. McCartan, J., Brimblecombe, J., & Adams, K. (2022). Methodological tensions for non-Indigenous people in Indigenous research: A critique of critical discourse analysis in the Australian context. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), 100282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100282
  27. Morchid, M. (2025). A Methodological Framework for Applying Critical Discourse Analysis to Textual Data. International Journal of Research in Education Humanities and Commerce, 06, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.37602/IJREHC.2025.6606 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37602/IJREHC.2025.6606
  28. Mushthofa, Z., & Aminah, S. (2023). Menggugah Kesadaran Berdemokrasi Dalam Dunia Pesantren. Ummul Qura Jurnal Institut Pesantren Sunan Drajat (INSUD) Lamongan, 18(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.55352/uq.v18i1.118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55352/uq.v18i1.118
  29. Mustofa, M. Y., Mas’ud, A., & Elizabeth, M. Z. (2023). Hybrid Pesantren in Indonesia; Analyzing the Transformation of Islamic Religious Education in the Digital Age. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 14(1), 79–104. https://doi.org/10.24042/atjpi.v14i1.16928
  30. Nabila, F. I., Aimah, S., & Tazkia, S. (2026). Branding Spiritual Pesantren: Analisis Strategi Komunikasi MPI Berbasis Konversi Modal Budaya Ta’dzim, Khidmah, dan Barakah di Ruang Digital. Az-Zaida: Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 2(1), 227–236. https://albaayaninstitute.org/index.php/azzaida/article/view/475
  31. Nisa, K., 2025. Nyantri Kilat as a Digital Pesantren: The New Normal in Indonesian Islam » Asia Research Institute, NUS. (2025, May 22). https://ari.nus.edu.sg/20331-128/
  32. Olsen, W. (2022). From Content Analysis to Discourse Analysis: Using Systematic Analysis of Meanings and Discourses. In W. Olsen (Ed.), Systematic Mixed-Methods Research for Social Scientists (pp. 175–199). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93148-3_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93148-3_8
  33. Parlan, H. P., & Bahar, H. (2024). Filsafat Materialisme Karl Marx (Epistimologi Dialectical And Historical Materiali). Tarbiatuna : Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 4(2), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.47467/tarbiatuna.v4i2.1664 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47467/tarbiatuna.v4i2.6325
  34. Perwitasari, E. (2009). Analisis Wacana Kritis Feodalisme Dan Diskriminasi Perempuan Jawa Dalam Novel Gadis Pantai Karya Pramoedya Ananta Toer. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(3), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.31315/jik.v7i3.25
  35. Pešić, M. (2023). Critical Discourse Analysis as a Critical Social Study: Norman Fairclough’s Approach. Politička Revija, 74, 89–113. https://doi.org/10.22182/pr.7442022.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22182/pr.7442022.4
  36. Pitkin, H. F. (2023). The Concept of Representation. Univ of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2711645
  37. Putri, D. (2023). Tarbiatuna: Journal of Islamic Education Studies. Tarbiatuna: Journal of Islamic Education Studies, 4(1), 52–63.
  38. Rahman, A., Simbolon, P., & Friedrich, W. (2025). Sejarah Dunia sebagai Dialektika Progresif dalam Perspektif Filsafat Sejarah Hegel. 11(01), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.54154/dekonstruksi.v11i01.296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54154/dekonstruksi.v11i01.296
  39. Rohanita, L., Husen, K. Romadhon, M. R., Nisak, A., Mufarrohah, L., & Abrori, A. M. (2025). Representasi Feodalisme Pesantren dalam Media Televisi: Analisis Pemberitaan Trans7 dan Realitas Sosial di Pesantren An-Nur 2 Bululawang Malang. YASIN, 5(6), 6455–6478. https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v5i6.8151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v5i6.8151
  40. Sabariah, H., Anggriani, D., Zuhra, D. M., Syafrida, & Azhar. (2024). Konsep Adab Dalam Pemikiran Imam Al-Ghazali Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pembentukan Karakter Siswa Di Era Kontemporer. AL-ADABIYAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 5(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.35719/adabiyah.v5i1.1183
  41. Safitri, H. H., Albab, U., Khobir, A., Solehuddin, M. S., Azid, M. A. A. A. A. A., & Khimmataliev, D. O. (2026). The Transformation of Religious Authority: A Critical Review of Fanaticism and Intellectual Freedom in Indonesian Islamic Boarding Schools. Hayula: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies, 10(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.21009/hayula.010.01.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/hayula.010.01.03
  42. Sari, R. T., Madani, C., Afradini, A. R., Uyun, Q., & Chanigia, G. A. (2025). Otoritas dan Feodalisme dalam Tradisi Pesantren Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Interdisipliner tentang Kekuasaan, Pengetahuan, dan Modal Keagamaan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 3(4), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.58540/isihumor.v3i4.1064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58540/isihumor.v3i4.1064
  43. Sen, S. (2020). The Surplus Approach of Engels and Marx and Its Contemporary Relevance. Social Scientist, 48(11/12 (570-571)), 59–70.
  44. Silaswati, D. (2019). Analisis Wacana Kritis Dalam Pengkajian Wacana. METAMORFOSIS | Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia Dan Pengajarannya, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.55222/metamorfosis.v12i1.124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55222/metamorfosis.v12i1.124
  45. Suryanto, E. (2022). Implementasi Pendidikikan Sikap Ta’dzim Dan Khidmah Santri Di Pondok Pesantren Pancasila Dusun Klumpit Kecamatan Sidorejo Kota Salatiga Tahun 2021 [PeerReviewed, IAIN SALATIGA]. http://e-repository.perpus.iainsalatiga.ac.id/13902/
  46. Syihabuddin, M., Manggala, K., Wafi, H. A., & Maulana, A. H. (2023). Interpreting the Concept of Ngalap Berkah as Pesantren Tradition in the Perspective of Santri. Santri: Journal of Pesantren and Fiqh Sosial, 4(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.35878/santri.v4i2.957 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35878/santri.v4i2.957
  47. Tamjidnor, Suriagiri, Surawardi, Samdani, Amal, F., & Khuzaini. (2025). Transformation of Hadith Teaching as an Effort to Revitalize Islamic Science in Pesantren. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v8i1.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v8i1.9
  48. Toguslu, E. (2007, October 26). Gülen’s Theory of “Adab” and Ethical Values of the Gülen Movement. https://fgulen.com/en/conference-papers-en/contributions-of-the-gulen-movement/gulens-theory-of-adab-and-ethical-values-of-the-gulen-movement DOI: https://doi.org/10.55207/RZXZ8734
  49. Ujiyanto, E. (2025). The Lived Experience of Barakah in Business: A Study of Muslim Entrepreneurs in Pesantren Communities. Journal of Business, Management, and Accounting, 1(7), 291–298.
  50. Ulum, B. (2020). Kiprah Pendidikan Pesantren Sebagai Pendidikan Tradisional dalam Menjawab Keterasingan Masyarakat Modern. Jurnal Studi Pesantren, 1(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.35897/studipesantren.v1i1.623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35897/studipesantren.v1i1.623
  51. Wardi, M., & Ismail, I. (2018). Following the Prophet Muhammad Character Through Ngabuleh Tradition in Pondok Pesantren Darul Ulum Banyuanyar Pamekasan. El Harakah Jurnal Budaya Islam, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.18860/el.v20i1.4473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/el.v20i1.4473
  52. Warsah, I., Morganna, R., Warsah, B. A. A., & Warsah, B. H. H. (2025). Teacher’s Ridha In The Ethics Of Santri Khidmah: A Hermeneutic Phenomenological Study On Pesantren’s Cultural Resistance To “Santri Slavery” Narratives In Digital Public Spaces. AJIS: Academic Journal of Islamic Studies, 295–324. https://doi.org/10.29240/ajis.v10i2.15012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29240/ajis.v10i2.15012
  53. Wibowo, H. (2021). Etika Santri kepada Kiai Menurut Kitab Ta’lim Muta’allim di PP. Kotagede Hidayatul Mubtadi-ien Yogyakarta. Panangkaran: Jurnal Penelitian Agama Dan Masyarakat, 4(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14421/panangkaran.2020.0402-01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/panangkaran.2020.0402-01
  54. Widodo, H., Wardhana, D. E. C., & Mislikhah, St. (2025). The representation of Islamic values in Indonesian language textbooks: A critical discourse analysis. Qualitative Research Journal, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-07-2025-0228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-07-2025-0228
  55. Widura, S. W., Mubarok, A., Yusuf, A., & Mohtarom, A. (2021). Telaah Relevansi Konsep Menuntut Ilmu dalam Kitab Ta ’ lim Muta ’ allim dengan Kepribadian Santri. Tabyin: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 03(2), 49–60.
  56. Wisnu, A. W. P., Nadhyfa, D., Hernanta, J. R., & Abiyyu, M. D. A. (2024). Violence in Pesantren and the Culture of Silence Behind Religious Walls. Civic Engagement and Social Education Journal, 1(1), 315–322.
  57. Yasin, N. A., Yaqin, M. N., & Pramuja, A. (2025). Revitalisasi Kultur Pesantren dan Sosial di Masyarakat melalui Kegiatan Alumni: Studi Kasus Organisasi CENDANA (Cendekiawan Muda Nurul Amin). Jurnal Masyarakat Madani Indonesia, 4(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.59025/07e11w95 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59025/07e11w95
  58. Zahroh, A. (2025). Aktualisasi Sikap Ta’dzim Santri Terhadap Ustadz Dalam Pembelajaran Kitab Ta’lim Muta’allim. Jurnal At-Ta’dib, 5(02).