Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 43 Download : 94

Main Article Content

Abstract

The dynamics of the relationship between people's representatives and constituents today cannot only be interpreted in the stages before and when general elections are held, but needs to be understood as a whole, especially regarding how guaranteeing the implementation of the goals of post-election representative democracy ends in fostering relations between people's representatives and constituents. The discussion in this study focuses on fundamental questions about the influence of the responsibilities of representatives of the people to constituents after the election on public trust which is then elaborated with the application of the concept of deliberative democracy. This research method is carried out using a doctrinal approach. The results of the study describe that in the implementation of representative democracy in Indonesia, there is a democratic deficit which causes distrust of representative institutions due to policy configurations that are considered elitist and unresponsive. With the approach of applying the concept of deliberative democracy, it can be an alternative in solving problems between people's representatives and constituents through mutual agreement in determining policy directions.

Keywords

Deliberative Democracy People's Representatives Constituents

Article Details

References

  1. Feri, Amsari. Konstitusionalitas Dan Kerangka Hukum Penyelenggaraan Pemilu Dan Pemilihan Serentak Tahun 2024. Padang: Komisi Pemilihan Umum, 2022.
  2. Hardiman, F. Budi. Demokrasi Delibratif (Menimbang Negara Hukum Dan Ruang Publik Dalam Teori Diskursus Jurgen Habermas). Edited by Priotomo. Yogyakarta: PT. Kanisius, 2009.
  3. Joko, Riskiyono. Pengaruh Partisipasi Publik Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Telaah Atas Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pemilu. Jakarta: Nadi Pustaka, n.d.
  4. Muhammad, Nawai Adlan. Politik Wakil Rakyat Sebuah Perspektif Deontologi Uranik. Jakarta: PTIQ Press, 2020.
  5. Nur, Subano Iman. Demokrasi Tanpa Representasi, Masalah Dan Pilihan Demokrasi Di Empat Daerah. Jakarta: Lembaga Kajian Demokrasi dan Hak Asasi, DEMOS, 2012.
  6. Parkinson John, Mansbridge Jane. Deliberative Systems (Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale). Edited by Mansbridge Jane Parkinson John. First. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
  7. Patrick, Hayden. The Philosohpy of Human Rights. United State: Paragon House, 2001.
  8. Syamsuddin, Radjab. Konfigurasi Politik Dan Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Nagamedia, 2013.
  9. Achmad, Badawi. “Problematika Yuridis Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 Tentang Ibu Kota Negara Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal Demokrasi dan Ketahanan Nasiona 2, no. 1 (2023).
  10. Carole J. Uhlaner, “Potentiality and Representation: The Link between Descriptive Representation and Participation in the United States,” Politics & Gender 8, no. 04
  11. Cornelia, Cabui Evelin. “Refleksi Kinerja Pemerintahan Presiden Jokowi Selama Tiga Tahun Pada Periode Kedua Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Adhikari 1, no. 4 (2022).
  12. Dwi, B. Setyowati Andayani. “Sistem Pemilu Dan Keterwakilan Politik Rakyat.” Era Hukum 5, no. 2 (1995).
  13. Efriza. “Analisis Kemunduran Demokrasi Pada Pengelolaan Satu Setengah Tahun Pemerintahan Jokowi Widodo-Ma’ruf Amin.” Journal Of Government and Social Issues 2, no. 11 (2022).
  14. Gultom, Ferdi, and Agus Machfud Fauzi. “Demo Penolakan RUU Cipta Kerja Dalam Kacamata Teori Konflik Sosiologi.” Doktrina : Journal of Law 4, no. 1 (April 30, 2021): 53–67.
  15. Gusti, Santika Nugraha I. “Menelisik Akar Kegaduhan Bangsa Indonesia Pasca Disetujuinya Hasil Revisi UU KPK Dalam Perspektif Pancasila.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial 6, no. 1 (2020).
  16. Helmalia, Cahyani. “Kebijakan Pasal-Pasal Kontroversial Dalam RUU KUHP Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Dinamika Sosial Kultur Masyarakat Indonesia.” Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Scienc 2, no. 2 (2022).
  17. Heru, Nugroho. “Demokrasi Dan Demokratisasi: Sebuah Kerangka Konseptual Untuk Memahami Dinamika Sosial-Politik Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi Volume 1, no. 1 (2012)
  18. Ilan, Kapoor. “Deliberative Democracy or Agnostic Pluralisme? The Relevance of the Habermas-Mouffe Debate for Third World Politics.” Alternatives 27, no. 4 (2022).
  19. Jovanoski, Aleksandar, and Kire Sharlamanov. “Jurgen Habermas and His Contribution To the Theory of Deliberative Democracy.” American International Journal of Social Science Research, no. August (2021): 36–47.
  20. Luthfi, Chakim M. “Desain Institusional Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) Sebagai Peradilan Etik.” Jurnal Konstitusi 11, no. 2 (2014).
  21. Minta, Michael D. “Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and Political Representation in the United States.” Politics & Gender 8, no. 04 (December 12, 2012): 541–547.
  22. Rasyid, M Nur, Sri Maulina, and Sharif Kuala. “The Decrease of Legislative Function of The People’s Representative Council of The Republic of Indonesia in The Reform Era” 2, no. 2 (2019): 219–228.
  23. UI, Tim Peneliti KANOPI FEB UI dan Tim Peneliti KSM Eka Prasetya. “Di Balik Aksi Demonstrasi Mahasiswa: Pengaruh Media Sosial Terhadap Perilaku Politik.” Jurnal KSM Eka Prasetya UI 1, no. 1 (2019).
  24. United States.” Politics & Gender 8, no. 04 (December 12, 2012): 535–541.
  25. Wimmy Haliim. “Demokrasi Deliberatif Indonesia: Konsep Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Membentuk Demokrasi Dan Hukum Yang Responsif.” Jurnal Masyarakat Indonesia 42, no. 1 (2016): 19–30.
  26. Democratic Audit UK “Political parties do represent their voters, but the degree of representation varies across issues and parties”, https://www.democraticaudit.com, Diakses pada 30 Juni 2023
  27. Djani, Luky. “Representasi Politik : Relasi Imaginer Konstituen Dan Politikus ?” Institute for Strategic Initiatives (2017): 25. www.insistive.org. Diakses pada yanggal 29 Juni 2023
  28. Maria, Flora. “Demo Anarkistis, Ini Deretan Fasilitas Umum Di Jakarta Yang Dirusak Massa Perusuh.” Liputan 6. Jakarta, 2020. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/4377582/demo-anarkistis-ini-deretan-fasilitas-umum-di-jakarta-yang-dirusak-massa-perusuh.
  29. Putusa Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 tentang Uji Formil UU Cipta