Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 109 Download : 86

Main Article Content

Abstract

Economic activity is shifting towards electronic transactions over time. This development has resulted in lending and borrowing activities, as well as social gatherings that were previously carried out in person but are now more convenient to do online. Technological advancements enable quick and easy access to cash funds online, and they are simple to manage. However, this convenience has significant social and economic consequences, including the emergence of new security and regulatory challenges. Online lending and social gatherings have significant social and economic implications, but they also present security and regulatory challenges. Further research is required to understand the legal relationship and resolution of legal consequences that arise during the implementation of online lending and online social gathering activities, because many debtors are unable to pay, and many social gathering participants are trapped in fictional social gatherings. This study considered the prevalence of crime in online economic activities such as online loan transactions and online social gathering transactions. Because there is no binding legal protection for organisers of online economic transaction activities, many people have fallen victim to these crimes. Consequently, concerns were raised about how online loan transactions and online social gathering transactions are community economic activities, as well as the existence of regulations and state protection for their practice in society. The answer will be investigated through normative legal research, which will employ both a statutory and a case approach based on engagement and legal protection theories. Finally, debtors and social gathering participants require guarantees, which can take the form of protection institutions or insurance.

Keywords

Electronic Transactions Legal Protection Online Lending Online Social Gatherings

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Yunita Dian Ashari, Nayla Sarachenita Arssya

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Anggraeny, Isdian. “Urgensi Pelaksanaan Tahapan Persiapan Penyusunan Kontrak Oleh Pelaku Bisnis Dalam Mengkonstruksi Hubungan Bisnis.” Yurispruden Vol. 3, No. 1. (2020): 6.
  2. Aris, Mohammad Syaiful. dan Sukardi. Ilmu Negara: Pendekaan Problem Based Learning. Malang: Setara Press, 2023.
  3. CNN Indonesia. "Warga RI Juara Satu Kecanduan Hp di Dunia, Habiskan 6 Jam Sehari," Terakhir diakses pada 5 Maret, 2024. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20240112200540-185-1048875/warga-ri-juara-satu-kecanduan-hp-di-dunia-habiskan-6-jam-sehari
  4. Djuarn, Wenny dan Rita Ratnasari. “Implementasi Prinsip 5C dalam Menentukan Kelayakan Pemberian Kredit pada Nasabah Ar-Rihlah: Keuangan dan Perbankan Syariah, Vol. 02, No. 02 (2022): 99-113.
  5. Dyas, Dwi Pratama Potabuga, “Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Perjanjian Baku”, Jurnal Lex Privatum, Vol. I, No. 2, 2013, hal. 37.
  6. Eprianti, Nanik. “Penerapan Prinsip 5C Terhadap Tingkat Non Performing Financing (NPF).” Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah Vol. 3 No.2 (2019): 252-266
  7. Guntara, I Made Adi Guntara. dan Ni Made Ari Yuliartini Griadhi. “Penerapan Prinsip 5C Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Terhadap Bank Didalam Menyalurkan Kredit.” Skripsi S1, Universitas Udayana, 2023.
  8. Hadjon, Philipus M. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2015.
  9. Hadjon, Philipus M. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1987.
  10. Indonesia, UU Administrasi Pemerintahan, UU 30/2014, LN. 2014/292, TLN. 5601,
  11. Indonesia, UU ITE, UU No. 19/2016, LN. 2016/251, TLN. 5952 Jo. Indonesia, UU Perubahan UU ITE UU No. 1/2024, LN. 2024/1, TLN 6905.
  12. Indonesia, UU ITE, UU No. 19/2016, LN 2016/251, TLN 5952, Pasal 1 angka 2.
  13. Kansil, CST. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1989.
  14. Kasmir. Pengantar Manajemen Keuangan. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2017.
  15. Kompas. “7 Kasus Arisan Online dengan Kerugian Miliaran Rupiah, Ada yang Pelakunya Polisi hingga Istri Brimob”. Terakhir diakses pada 5 Maret, 2024. https://regional.kompas.com/read/2022/03/06/060600678/7-kasus-arisan-online-dengan-kerugian-miliaran-rupiah-ada-yang-pelakunya?page=all#page2
  16. Lubis, M. Faisal Rahendra. “Penerapan Hukum Terhadap Asas Kepercayaan Didalam Transaksi Jual Beli Online.” Ilmiah Metadata, Vol. 1, No. 3. (2019): 192.
  17. Otoritas Jasa Keuagan. “Penting! Simak Bedanya, Ini Ciri-Ciri Pinjol Legal dan Ilegal”. Terakhir diakses pada 5 Maret, 2024. https://pasarmodal.ojk.go.id/News/Detail/20463
  18. Pengadilan Negeri Banjarmasin, Putusan No. 788/Pid.B/2022, 15 November 2022.
  19. Pengadilan Negeri Banjarmasin, Putusan No. 941/Pid.B/2022, 2 Februari 2023.
  20. Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara, Nomor 438/Pid.Sus/2020, 9 Juni 2020.
  21. Negeri Jayapura, Putusan Nomor 85/Pdt.G/2023, 4 Desember 2023.
  22. Potabu, Dyan Dwi Pratama. “Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Perjanjian Baku.” Lex Privatum, Vol. I, No. 2, 2013: 37.
  23. Raharjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.
  24. RBTVCAMKOHA.COM. “Cara Pinjam Uang di BRImo, Pinjaman Rp 10 Juta Angsuran hanya Rp 200 Ribuan.” Terakhir diakses pada 5 Maret, 2024. https://rbtv.disway.id/read/40779/cara-pinjam-uang-di-brimo-pinjaman-rp-10-juta-angsuran-hanya-rp-200-ribuan
  25. SAPLAW. “Pendeketan Perundang-Undangan (Statue Approach) Dalam Penelitian Hukum”. Terakhir diakses pada 5 Maret, 2024. https://www.saplaw.top/pendekatan-perundang-undangan-statute-approach-dalam-penelitian-hukum/
  26. Setiono, “Rule of Law”, Disertasi S3, Surakarta: Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2004
  27. Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 1984.
  28. Subekti. dan Tjitrosudibio, “Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata [Burgerlijk Wetbook]. Cetakan 43, (Jakarta: PT Balai Pustaka, 2017), Pasal 1320.
  29. Syarifah, Nur. “Hukum Perjanjian.” Universitas Terbuka, Tangerang Selatan, 2015.
  30. Twitter. “Download Easycash, Bunga rendah, peninjauan cepat, cicilan fleksibel, pembayaran mudah”. Terakhir diakses pada 5 Maret, 2024. https://twitter.com/easycashid/status/1730837672040787989?t=YYI_2BJyGPf6oa6WGAzuRw&s=08
  31. Utama, Yos Johan. Pengertian Administrasi Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara. Modul: Univesitas Terbuka, 2014.
  32. Yuanitasari, Deviana dan Kusmayanti, Hazar. “Pengembangan Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Pelaksanaan Asas Itikad Baik Pada Tahap Pra Kontraktual.” Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, Vol. 3, No. 3 (2020): 297.
  33. Yunanto. “Hakikat Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda Dalam Sengketa Yang Dilandasi Perjanjian.” Law, Development & Justice Review, Vol. 2, No.?? (2019): 38