Main Article Content

Abstract

In 2005, Indonesia officially approved the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights through Law Number 11 of 2005. Through this ratification, the state committed to not taking land arbitrarily which could deprive its citizens of their land ownership rights. Articles 36 and 37 paragraph (1) of Law Number 39 of 1999 also state that no one can be deprived of their property rights arbitrarily and against the law and revocation of property rights is only permitted by compensating for reasoneable and immediate losses. Even though the state's commitment to protecting land ownership rights has been acknowledged, in reality there are still difficulties in providing this protection to the community. An example can be seen in the case of the Urutsewu Community in Kebumen, which experienced land confiscation by the Indonesian Army. This research focuses on the state's restoration of land ownership rights to land arbitrarily confiscated by the Indonesian Army in the Urutsewu community. In its analysis, this research uses empirical legal research methods with a sociological approach. The sociological approach emphasizes the relationship between legal principles and norms and their implementation in empirical reality in the field and the legislative approach examines all laws and regulations related the legal issue being studied. This analysis is also applied to the reality of society which is the subject of discussion, taking into account social aspects in understanding the problem. The results of this research indicate that there has been no government effort to grant the Urutsewu community the right to recover land confiscated by the Indonesian Army.

Keywords

restoration land ownership rights human rights

Article Details

References

  1. An-Na’im, A. “Human rights under African constitutions”. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013. muse.jhu.edu/book/26953.
  2. Ari Yurino, Pelanggaran HAM, Korban, dan Pemulihan, https://referensi.elsam.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Pelanggaran-HAM-Korban-dan-Pemulihan, diakses pada 1 Juli 2023
  3. Devy Dhian Cahyati, “Konflik Agraria Di Urutsewu Pendekatan Ekologi Politik”, STPN Press, Yogyakarta, 2014, hlm. 31
  4. General Comment 7, ‘The right to adequate housing (Art. 11.1 of the Covenant): forced evictions,’ United Nations Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights, 1997.
  5. Laporan Konflik Pertanahan Kabupaten Kebumen Provinsi Jawa Tengah antara TNI AD dengan Petani Pesisir Selatan (Forum Paguyuban Petani Kebumen Selatan - FPPKS
  6. Perry, M. J, The idea of human rights: Four inquiries. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998, https://archive.org/details/ideaofhumanright0000perr/page/n7/mode/2up.
  7. Rudal Afgani Dirgantara, “Menyoal Prosedur Sertifikasi Tanah di Urut Sewu Kebumen”, dikutip dari Laporan Investigasi Kasus Konflik Agraria Menyerobot Tanah Rakyat Atas Nama Monarki, Investasi & Negara, Aji Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, 2022, hlm. 72
  8. Van Banning, T. R. G. (2002). “The human right to property”. Antwerpen: Intersentia/Hart, 2002, https://ebook-full.com/get-ebook/read.php?id=X1EobCBveNUC&t=the-human-right-to-property&a=theo-r-g-van-banning&h=469&w=www.skillexperto.com
  9. Wisborg, P. ‘It is our land’: Human rights and land tenure reform in Namaqualand, South Africa (Vol. 4). PhD thesis. Aas: Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 2006, http://www.umb.no/statisk/noragric/publications/phdtheses/wisborg_fulltext_phd_thesis_2006.pdf