Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 110 Download : 149

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research entitled "The execution of additional sanctions in the form of repair due to criminal acts as an effort to restore the environment due to environmental crimes by corporations" contains 2 (two) problem formulations, namely (1) What considerations does the public prosecutor make when filing additional sanctions in the form of repair due to criminal acts in a demand letter? (2) How is the implementation of the execution of additional sanctions in the form of repair due to criminal acts ? This research uses empirical legal research methods with normative juridical aspects. The data used is primary data using direct interviews and secondary data through literature studies which are then analyzed descriptively qualitatively with research subjects, namely a Prosecutor at the Prosecutors Office of the Republic of Indonesia. The results of the research show that prosecutors consider additional sanction in the form of repair due to criminal acts important to overcome environmental crimes and support sustainable development, because it directly addresses environmental damage. In contrast, corporate fines are not effective for environmental restoration. The execution of additional punishment in the form of repair due to criminal acts is often not optimal due to the lack of guideline regulation, the absence of time limits and coercive nature as well as the conversion of additional sanctions in the form of repair due to criminal acts into a sum of money.

Keywords

Additional Sanction Environmental Crime Corporate Repair Due to Criminal Act.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Alika Asmir, Mahrus Ali

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Baharuddin M. Syukri AKUB, Wawasan Due Process of Law Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education, 2012). p.23.
  2. B. Marbun. Konsep Pemulihan Dalam Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup (Studi Pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Nomor 735/PDT.GLH/2018/PN.Jkt.), Jurnal LITRA: Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, Tata Ruang, dan Agraria, Volume 1 Nomor 1, 2021, p. 92.
  3. Daniel Mulia Djati, et al, Penafsiran Asas Kepastian Hukum Dan Kekosongan Hukum Dalam Keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tentang Cipta Kerja (Kajian Keputusan Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020), JURNAL IKAMAKUM, Volume 2, No. 1, 2022. p. 587-600.
  4. Deni Daniel, Azam Hawari, & Marsya Mutmainah Handayani, “Reorientasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Lingkungan Hidup Melalui Perjanjian Penangguhan Penuntutan,” Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia 6, no. 1 (2019): 72–96, https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v6i1.148
  5. Farikhin, Kejari Pelalawan Eksekusi Uang Perbaikan Karhutla PT Adei Plantation Rp15 Miliar Lebih, GoRiau.Com, 13 Agustus 2020, diakses pada 10 Juni 2024. https://m.goriau.com/berita/baca/kejari-pelalawan-eksekusi-uang-perbaikan-karhutla-pt-a dei-plantation-rp15-miliar-lebih.html.
  6. Gatot Supramono. Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia. (Jakarta : Rineka Cipta : 2013) p. 132
  7. Hamrat Hamid & Harum Husein. Pembahasan Permasalahan KUHAP Bidang Penuntutan dan Eksekusi (Dalam Bentuk Tanya Jawab), (Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 1992), p. 312.
  8. I.H. Rahman, Agna Susila, & J.Krisnan. Pelaksanaan Pembayaran Uang Pengganti dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Varia Justicia, Vol.12 No.1, 2016. p. 87-99.
  9. J. Rawung. Ganti Kerugian Dan Pemulihan Lingkungan Akibat Pencemaran Dan Perusakan Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Lex Crimen Volume 2 Nomor 5, 2013, p. 83
  10. Khalatbari, Yalda, & Poorhashemi Abbas, Environmental Damage : Challenges and opportunities in International Environmental Law, CIFILE Journal of International Law (CJIL), Vol. 1, No. 1, 2019, p.21-28.
  11. Mahrus Ali. Hukum Pidana Lingkungan. 1st ed. (Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2020)
  12. Muhammad Akib. Hukum Lingkungan. (Jakarta : Rajagrafindo Persada : 2014)
  13. M. Rizal, Kejari Purwakarta Lakukan Eksekusi Pidana Tambahan PT Indo Bharat Rayon, SinarJabar.com, 7 Februari 2022, diakses pada 10 Juni 2024. https://www.sinarjabar.com/daerah/amp/pr-2912617781/kejari-purwakarta-lakukan-eksek usi-pidana-tambahan-pt-indo-bharat-rayon.
  14. Rob White. Environmental Crime and Social Conflict : Contemporary and Emerging Issues. 1st Edition. (London : Routledge : 2016) p. 45
  15. R. Soesilo. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP): Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. (Bogor : Politeia : 1995)
  16. Rob White. Green victimology and non-human victims. International Review of Victimology, vol. 24 no.2 (2018): p.239 - 255. https://doi.org/10.1177/026975801774561
  17. Shane Evelina & Diah Ayu Ma’rifatul, Rekonstruksi Sanksi Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup Berparadigma Green Victimology, Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 2, no. 12 (2021): 1276–1296.
  18. S. Suryati. Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Di Wilayah Provinsi Jawa Barat Dihubungkan Dengan Upaya Pemulihan Lingkungan Hidup. Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(2), 2018, p. 207–232. https://doi.org/10.29313/sh.v16i2.5355
  19. Valenzuela, The Damage to the Environment: A View from Law, Athens Journal of Law, Volume 1, Issue 2, 2015, p. 127-140, https://doi.org/10.30958/ajl.1-2-3.
  20. Walter V. Reid, et al. Ecosystems and Human Well-being, (Kuala Lumpur: Millenium Ecosystem Assessment : 2005) p. 26.