Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the career development of Generation Z. In addition, another objective of this study is to explore the application of career development to Generation Z employees. Using a qualitative approach, this study employed phenomenological methods to conduct in-depth interviews with six respondents working in companies in Indonesia. The results of this study suggest that the characteristics of Generation Z encompass both its advantages and disadvantages, as well as the challenges it faces. There are limitations in terms of time, energy, and the researcher's ability in this research. For further research, it is recommended to explore career development in Generation Z in various aspects. In addition, quantitative research can be used to measure the career development of Generation Z in detail.

Keywords

career development generation Z

Article Details

How to Cite
Nugrohojati, I. S., & Linando, J. A. (2025). Understanding Generation Z in the Workplace: Characteristics, Challenges, and Implications. Selekta Manajemen: Jurnal Mahasiswa Bisnis & Manajemen, 3(3), 98–111. Retrieved from https://journal.uii.ac.id/selma/article/view/42940

References

  1. Amrullah, M., Perkasa, D.H. and Edward, R. (2025) “Gen Z and the Future of Work: Adapting HRM Strategies for A Digital Workforce,” Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 6(3), pp. 1835–1843. Available at: https://doi.org/10.38035/jemsi.v6i3.4053.
  2. Carstensen, L.L. (1992) “Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: support for socioemotional selectivity theory,” Psychology and aging, 7(3), pp. 331–338. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.7.3.331.
  3. Christensen, C.M. (1997) The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firm to. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  4. Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (2000) “The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior,” Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), pp. 227–268. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
  5. Dimock, M. (2019) Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins, Pew Research Centre. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/ (Accessed: August 1, 2025).
  6. Goleman, D. (2000) Kecerdasan Emosional: Mengapa EI Lebih Penting Daripada IQ. Edited by T. Hermaya. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  7. Hidayat, R.M.D. and Linando, J.A. (2024) “The Influence of Work-life Balance & Healthy Lifestyle on Mental Health through Focus on Work in Gen Z Employees,” Selekta Manajemen: Jurnal Mahasiswa Bisnis & Manajemen, 3(1), pp. 174–188. Available at: https://journal.uii.ac.id/selma/article/view/36638.
  8. Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Available at: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=671519.
  9. IDN Research Institute (2024) INDONESIA GEN Z REPORT 2024: Understanding and Uncovering the Behavior, Challenges, and Opportunities. Available at: https://cdn.idntimes.com/content-documents/indonesia-gen-z-report-2024.pdf.
  10. Lerner, Richard M et al. (2005) “Positive Youth Development A View of the Issues,” The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(1), pp. 10–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431604273211.
  11. Leroy, S. (2009) “Why is it so hard to do my work? The challenge of attention residue when switching between work tasks,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), pp. 168–181. Available at: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.04.002.
  12. Linando, J.A. (2021) Manajemen Kinerja: Konsep Praktis & Perspektif Islam. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
  13. Mannheim, K. (1952) “The Sociological Problem of Generations,” in Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 163–195. Available at: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1450362.
  14. Mitchell, T.R. et al. (2001) “Why People Stay: Using Job Embeddedness to Predict Voluntary Turnover,” Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), pp. 1102–1121. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/3069391.
  15. Nindyati, A.D. and Ramadhani, A. (2022) “GAMBARAN MAKNA KERJA BAGI GENERASI Z DI JAKARTA (How Z Gen in Jakarta have their Meaning of their Work?),” INQUIRY: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 13(1), pp. 41–60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.51353/inquiry.v13i01.596.
  16. Prensky, M. (2001) “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1,” On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 9(5), pp. 1–6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816.
  17. Schroth, Holly (2019) “Are You Ready for Gen Z in the Workplace?,” California Management Review, 61(3), pp. 5–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619841006.
  18. Seemiller, C. and Grace, M. (2016) Generation Z Goes to College. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass-John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  19. Singh, A.P. and Dangmei, J. (2016) “Understanding the Generation Z: the Future Workforce,” South -Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(3), pp. 1–5. Available at: https://bk.unipasby.ac.id/morevej/2018/05/UNDERSTANDING-THE-GENERATION-Z-THE-FUTURE-WORKFORCE.pdf.
  20. Turner, A. (2015) “Generation Z: Technology and Social Interest,” The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(2), pp. 103–113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2015.0021.
  21. Twenge, J.M. (2017) iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood. New York: Atria.
  22. White, A. (2008) From Comfort Zone to Performance Management: Understanding Development & Performance. Baisy-Thy: White & MacLean Publishing.