Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 3, 2024
Accepted
August 17, 2024
Published
August 29, 2024
Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 46 Download : 61

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The development of digital technology has succeeded in providing alternative financial services with the FinTech lending industry. This industry allows direct connection between lenders and borrowers through a digital platform. FinTech lending has unique characteristics that provide advantages over traditional financial institution services, such as utilizing soft information for credit risk assessment, providing unsecured loans, and using third-party platforms to secure transactions. Indonesian government continues to update the regulatory framework for the FinTech industry including the implementation of regulatory sandbox. This effort aims to ensure that the development of digital financial innovation is beneficial and safe for society. Various jurisdictions have also implemented similar initiatives to address issues in FinTech lending, allowing companies to test their operations under regulatory supervision. This research conducted a systematic review using the PRISMA 2020 methodology to understand issues related to FinTech lending and the initiatives provided by regulatory sandboxes to address the issues. The study identified 10 issues in the FinTech lending sector using the Technology, Organization, and Environment (TOE) framework and 11 initiatives from implementing regulatory sandboxes using the Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) framework. Finally, this study highlights the potential for further research regarding the issues of algorithmic bias and monopolistic practices, as well as the exploration of how regulatory sandboxes can mitigate these issues.

Keywords

FinTech regulatory sandbox systematic review TOE DOI

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Rahardito Dio Prastowo, Dana Indra Sensuse, Sofian Lusa, Prasetyo Adi Wibowo Putro

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Prastowo, R. D., Sensuse, D. I., Lusa, S., & Putro, P. A. W. (2024). Navigating regulatory sandbox initiatives for innovation diffusion in fintech lending: A systematic review. Asian Management and Business Review, 4(2), 324–339. https://doi.org/10.20885/AMBR.vol4.iss2.art10
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Alkhalil, A., Sahandi, R., & John, D. (2017). An exploration of the determinants for decision to migrate existing resources to cloud computing using an integrated TOE-DOI model. Journal of Cloud Computing, 6(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-016-0072-x
  2. Allayarov, Sh., Mirzamakhmudov, M., & Mirzamakhmudova, M. (2020). Analysis of regulatory sandbox in the Netherlands that promote development of innovative fintech start-ups. International Finance and Accounting, 2020(3), 1-13. https://uzjournals.edu.uz/interfinance/vol2020/iss3/34
  3. Aloulou, M., Grati, R., Al-Qudah, A. A., & Al-Okaily, M. (2024). Does fintech adoption increase the diffusion rate of digital financial inclusion? A study of the banking industry sector. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 22(2), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-05-2023-0224
  4. Arslan, A., Buchanan, B. G., Kamara, S., & Al Nabulsi, N. (2022). Fintech, base of the pyramid entrepreneurs and social value creation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 29(3), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-10-2020-0370
  5. Basha, S. A., Elgammal, M. M., & Abuzayed, B. M. (2021). Online peer-to-peer lending: A review of the literature. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 48, 101069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101069
  6. Basloom, R. S., Sani Mohamad, M. H., & Auzair, S. M. (2022). Applicability of public sector reform initiatives of the Yemeni government from the integrated TOE-DOI framework. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 6(4), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2022.08.005
  7. Bastani, K., Asgari, E., & Namavari, H. (2019). Wide and deep learning for peer-to-peer lending. Expert Systems with Applications, 134, 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.05.042
  8. Bayram, O., Talay, I., & Feridun, M. (2022). Can fintech promote sustainable finance? Policy lessons from the case of Turkey. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(19), 12414. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912414
  9. Bejar, P., Ishi, K., Komatsuzaki, T., Shibata, I., Sin, J., & Tambunlertchai, S. (2022). Can fintech foster competition in the banking system in Latin America and the Caribbean? Latin American Journal of Central Banking, 3(2), 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.latcb.2022.100061
  10. Butor-Keler, A., & Polasik, M. (2020). The role of regulatory sandboxes in the development of innovations on the financial services market: The case of the United Kingdom. Ekonomia i Prawo, 19(4), 621. https://doi.org/10.12775/eip.2020.041
  11. Chang, H. H., Lu, M. T., Huang, L. H., Ling, H. F., & Yen, Y. C. (2024). Assessing the diffusion of fintech innovation in financial industry: Using the rough MCDM model. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 30(1), 261–286. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2024.20260
  12. Chemmanur, T. J., Imerman, M. B., Rajaiya, H., & Yu, Q. (2020). Recent developments in the fintech industry. Journal of Financial Management, Markets and Institutions, 8(01), 20400022. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2282717X20400022
  13. Chen, D., Deakin, S., Johnston, A., & Wang, B. (2021). Too much technology and too little regulation? The spectacular demise of P2P lending in China. Accounting, Economics and Law: A Convivium, 1-48 https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2021-0056
  14. Chen, X., Huang, B., & Ye, D. (2020). Gender gap in peer-to-peer lending: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking and Finance, 112, 105633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.105633
  15. Crema, E. R., Bloxam, A., Stevens, C. J., & Vander Linden, M. (2024). Modelling diffusion of innovation curves using radiocarbon data. Journal of Archaeological Science, 165, 105962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2024.105962
  16. Cumming, D., Johan, S., & Reardon, R. (2023). Global fintech trends and their impact on international business: A review. Multinational Business Review, 31(3), 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-05-2023-0077
  17. Fáykiss, P., Papp, D., Sajtos, P., & Tőrös, Á. (2018). Regulatory tools to encourage fintech innovations: The innovation hub and regulatory sandbox in international practice. Financial and Economic Review, 2017(2), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.25201/fer.17.2.4367
  18. Gerlach, J. M., Rugilo, D., & Sc, M. (2019). The predicament of fintechs in the environment of traditional banking sector regulation – An analysis of regulatory sandboxes as a possible solution. Credit and Capital Markets, 52(3), 323–373. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-05-2023-0077
  19. Ghahroud, M. L., Ebrahimiyan, N., Bastani, S., Abadi, A., Jafari, F., & Tajdini, S. (2021). The sandbox approach. Journal of FinTech and Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 3-3. https://doi.org/10.47277/JFAI/1(1)022
  20. Goo, J. J., & Heo, J. Y. (2020). The impact of the regulatory sandbox on the fintech industry, with a discussion on the relation between regulatory sandboxes and open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC6020043
  21. Hellmann, T., Montag, A., & Vulkan, N. (2024). The impact of the regulatory sandbox on the fintech industry. SSRN 4187295, 1-52. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4187295
  22. Hemphill, T. A. (2023). Technology entrepreneurship and innovation hubs: Perspectives on the universal regulatory sandbox. Science and Public Policy, 50(2), 350–353. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac072
  23. Hesekova Bojmirova, S. (2022). Fintech and regulatory sandbox – New challenges for the financial market: The case of the Slovak Republic. Juridical Tribune, 12(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2022/12/3.06
  24. Hiebl, M. R. W. (2023). Sample selection in systematic literature reviews of management research. Organizational Research Methods, 26(2), 229–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120986851
  25. Hiran, K. K., & Henten, A. (2020). An integrated TOE–DOI framework for cloud computing adoption in the higher education sector: Case study of Sub-Saharan Africa, Ethiopia. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 11(2), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00872-z
  26. Huang, R. H., & Wang, C. M. (2023). Fintech-bank partnership in China’s credit market: Models, risks and regulatory responses. European Business Organization Law Review, 24(4), 721–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-023-00269-3
  27. Iqbal, M., & Zahidie, A. (2022). Diffusion of innovations: A guiding framework for public health. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 50(5), 533–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948211014104
  28. Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
  29. Jinasena, D. N., Spanaki, K., Papadopoulos, T., & Balta, M. E. (2023). Success and failure retrospectives of fintech projects: A case study approach. Information Systems Frontiers, 25, 259-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10079-4
  30. Just, S. N., Sivertsen, M. F., & Lewin, S. (2024). Open for business: The discursive diffusion of regulatory sandboxes for fintech innovation. Journal of Cultural Economy, 17(3), 360–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2023.2282131
  31. Kaur, M., Ahmad, W., Hari, K. S., & Kattumuri, R. (2024). Fintech entrepreneurial ecosystem in India: Role of incubators and accelerators. Global Finance Journal, 60, 100933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100933
  32. Kemal Tosun, O., Eshraghi, A., & Muradoglu, G. (2023). Learning financial survival from disasters. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 85, 101778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2023.101778
  33. Nguyen, Q. K., & Dang, V. C. (2022). The effect of fintech development on financial stability in an emerging market: The role of market discipline. Research in Globalization, 5, 100105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2022.100105
  34. Klein, G., Shtudiner, Z., & Zwilling, M. (2023). Why do peer-to-peer (P2P) lending platforms fail? The gap between P2P lenders’ preferences and the platforms’ intentions. Electronic Commerce Research, 23(2), 709–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09489-6
  35. Koloseni, D., & Mandari, H. (2024). Expediting financial inclusion in Tanzania using fintech: The perspective of diffusion of innovation theory. Technological Sustainability, 3(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/TECHS-11-2023-0048
  36. Lee, S., & Seo, Y. (2022). Exploring how interest groups affect regulation and innovation based on the two-level games: The case of regulatory sandboxes in Korea. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, 121880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121880
  37. Liu, Z., Shang, J., Wu, S. yi, & Chen, P. yu. (2020). Social collateral, soft information and online peer-to-peer lending: A theoretical model. European Journal of Operational Research, 281(2), 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.08.038
  38. Masood, T., & Egger, J. (2019). Augmented reality in support of Industry 4.0—Implementation challenges and success factors. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 58, 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.02.003
  39. McCarthy, J. (2023). The regulation of regtech and suptech in finance: Ensuring consistency in principle and in practice. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 31(2), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-01-2022-0004
  40. Mohd Haridan, N., Sheikh Hassan, A. F., Mohammed Shah, S., & Mustafa, H. (2023). Financial innovation in Islamic banks: Evidence on the interaction between Shariah board and fintech. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(6), 911–930. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-11-2022-0305
  41. Molla, A., & Biru, A. (2023). The evolution of the Fintech entrepreneurial ecosystem in Africa: An exploratory study and model for future development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 186, 122123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122123
  42. Najaf, K., Subramaniam, R. K., & Atayah, O. F. (2022). Understanding the implications of fintech peer-to-peer (P2P) lending during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 12(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1917225
  43. Peón, D., Antelo, M., & Sun, Y. (2024). Market competition and strategic interaction in the Spanish fintech industry. Research in International Business and Finance, 70, 102365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102365
  44. Rupeika-Apoga, R., & Wendt, S. (2022). Fintech development and regulatory scrutiny: a contradiction? The case of Latvia. Risks, 10(9), 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10090167
  45. Saklain, M. S. (2024). Fintech, systemic risk and bank market power – Australian perspective. International Review of Financial Analysis, 95, 103351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103351
  46. Sampat, B., Mogaji, E., & Nguyen, N. P. (2024). The dark side of fintech in financial services: A qualitative enquiry into fintech developers’ perspective. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 42(1), 38–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-07-2022-0328
  47. Sarabdeen, J. (2023). Laws on regulatory technology (RegTech) in Saudi Arabia: Are they adequate? International Journal of Law and Management, 65(6), 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2023-0042
  48. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  49. Sunio, V., Mendejar, J., Nery, J. R., & Carlos, J. P. (2023). Generalization of digital innovation for financial inclusion by means of market creation through regulation and governance. Global Transitions, 5, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2023.04.001
  50. Suryono, R. R., Budi, I., & Purwandari, B. (2021). Detection of fintech P2P lending issues in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(4), e06782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06782
  51. Truby, J. (2020). Fintech and the city: Sandbox 2.0 policy and regulatory reform proposals. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 34(3), 277–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2018.1546542
  52. Tsang, C. Y., & Chen, P. K. (2022). Understanding policy diffusion mechanism of financial regulatory innovation: The experience of Taiwan. Asia Pacific Law Review, 30(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2022.2045705
  53. Vijayakumar Bharathi, S., Perdana, A., & Kulkarni, M. S. (2023). Exploring the synergy between financial technologies and financial inclusion: What we know and where we should be heading? Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(1), 87–126. https://doi.org/10.17705/1pais.15104
  54. Washington, P. B., Rehman, S. U., & Lee, E. (2022). Nexus between regulatory sandbox and performance of digital banks—A study on UK digital banks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(12), 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15120610