About Journal

Focus and Scope

Eksakta: Journal of Sciences and Data Analysis covers some topics in mathematics, statistics and natural science including

Mathematics theory and applications
Statistics in industry, statistical modelling and other applications
Physic
Chemistry: organic, inorganic, physical chemistry, analytical chemistry, biochemistry, environmental chemistry
Pharmacy: analysis, synthesis and analysis of drug, biomolecules, active compouns isolation, purification, modification and their applications
Analytical method fabrication, development and validation
other collaboration and related topics in mathematics and natural sciences

Peer Review Process

Submitted articles will be first review by the editor for the topic and writing style according to the guidelines. The articles will then blind-review by editor selected reviewers according to the topic specialist.

Open Access Policy

EKSAKTA provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. It means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. Non-commercial use and distribution in any medium are permitted.

Benefits of open access for authors are :

Free access for all users worldwide
Authors retain copyright to their work
Increased visibility and readership
No spatial constraints

There is no submission fee.

Journal History

The journal was first published in 2010 as Eksakta: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu MIPA (e-ISSN 2503-2364 and p-ISSN 1411-1047),

which then changed to EKSKATA: Journal of Science and Data Analysis since February 2020 (e-ISSN 2720-9326 and p-ISSN 2716-0459)

Journal Publication

The journal publishes 2 issues in one volume each year. Starting publication in 2024, the journal will be published in April and October.

Peer Review Process

The reviewers are chosen considering their expertise in the subject to be reviewed.

- The peer review is a double-blind type and all steps are done through the OJS online system.
- Compliance with the standards and the scope of the journal is reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief and the Staff. Failure to comply with the scope results in the rejection of the article and non-compliance with the standards leads to the request for its compliance by the authors;
- The manuscript is subjected to the analysis of plagiarism using the TURNITIN software and the report is evaluated by the Editor-in-Chief who can reject or request the authors to change parts of the manuscript;
- Attended the scope and requirement of non-plagiarism, one editor is appointed, and 2 reviewers are invited.
- The article is rejected when 2 reviewers reject it. If the reports are divergent regarding rejection, 2 more reviewers are invited, and they are given time to analyze the manuscript;
- The Editor may request information and corrections from the authors in conjunction with or separately from peer reviews reports;
- There is one (1) round, but in certain cases, it is possible to review in a second round if the manuscript has many revisions;
- The time accepted by the authors to return the revised version depends on the complexity of the correction and the round. In the case of non-return in time, the article can be rejected, and resubmitting as a new submission is permitted;
- The editor or editorial board considers the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and arrives at a decision. The following are the most common decisions:

Accept Submission: The submission will be accepted without revisions.
Revisions Required: The submission will be accepted after minor changes have been made.
Resubmit for Review: The submission needs to be reworked, but with significant changes, may be accepted. It will require a second round of review, however.
Decline Submission: The submission will not be published in the journal.

Further information regarding the peer review process for this journal is shown in the following flowchart:

Editorial Team