Main Article Content
Abstract
The science learning process is anticipated to be able to offer an independent learning experience by utilizing previously acquired skills, namely science process skills. Based on the needs analysis, students get bored easily, are lazy, and find it difficult to accept science learning. In addition, worksheets and printed books that are used as learning resources have not implemented current technological developments, as a result students are bored and less interested. Teachers as science learning practitioners still find it difficult to provide learning media that have the capacity to pique students' interest. So, this research was conducted to develop an e-module centered on scientific process skills in the area of substance stress and its practical application, as well as evaluating its efficacy. The methodology employed in the research was the ADDIE R&D model which was carried out in class IX at SMP Nasional Malang. Data collection was done through student analysis questionnaires, media validity questionnaires, material validity questionnaires, student readability test questionnaires, and practicality test questionnaires by science teachers. Overall, the validity of the material is 92%, the validity of the media is 97.2%, the readability of students is 86.61%, and the practicality of science teachers is 99%. Therefore, this e-module is very feasible and effective to be applied to the science learning process in junior high schools on substance stress and its application in daily life.
Keywords
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2025 Isnanik Juni Fitriyah, Andik Wahyun Muqoyyidin Andik, Septi Aprilia Septi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the simultaneously licenced under A Creative Commons Attribution (CC-By-SA) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the worsk's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
References
- A. Kirkwood and L. Price, “Technology-enhanced Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A Critical Literature Review,” Learn. Media Technol., vol. 39, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1080/17439884.2013.770404.
- R. Pea, “The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 13, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6.
- B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, and M. Bakia, “The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature,” Teach. Coll. Rec., vol. 115, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1177/016146811311500307.
- M. Prince, “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, pp. 223–231, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.
- S. Kocdar, “Designing Teaching and Learning for a Digital Age,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 18, May 2017, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.3107.
- R. Clark, R. Mayer, and W. Thalheimer, “E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning,” Perform. Improv., vol. 42, May 2003, doi: 10.1002/pfi.4930420510.
- I. J. Fitriyah, S. Saputro, and Sajidan, “Research Trends in Design Thinking Education: A Systematic Literature Review from 2014 to 2024,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 381–391, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.14.2.381.
- M. Paulsen, “Theory and Practice of Online Learning,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 5, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v5i3.200.
- S. Alessi and S. Trollip, Multimedia for Learning: Methods and Development. USA: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.
- N. Sahu and P. S. Khare, Emerging Trends and Research in Education Technology. Delhi, India: ABS Book, 2022.
- J. Cowan, “John Biggs 1999. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does,” High. Educ., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 374–376, 2000, doi: 10.1023/A:1004049006757.
- M. Knowles, E. III, R. Swanson, and P. Robinson, The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. 2020. doi: 10.4324/9780429299612.
- J. Keller, Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach. 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3.
- R. Reiser, “Eight Trends Affecting the Field of Instructional Design and Technology: Opportunities and Challenges,” 2017, pp. 139–147. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-38956-1_11.
- G. W. Jones and D. Pratomo, “Education in Indonesia: Trends, Differentials, and Implications for Development BT - Contemporary Demographic Transformations in China, India and Indonesia,” 2016, pp. 195–214. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24783-0_12.
- I. J. Fitriyah and I. Fardhani, “Increase Students’ Motivation in Learning Science by Developing Instructional Media in The Form of Powtoon,” J. IPA Pembelajaran IPA, vol. 6, pp. 111–118, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.24815/jipi.v6i2.24639.
- F. Putri, Z. Zainuddin, and S. Miriam, “Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing pada Materi Cahaya,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 3, p. 24, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.20527/jipf.v3i1.1027.
- Y. Affriyenni, G. Swalaganata, V. R. Mustikasari, and I. J. Fitriyah, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Fisika pada Materi Optik Geometri Berbasis Augmented Reality dengan Unity dan Vuforia,” JIPVA (Jurnal Pendidik. IPA Veteran), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 160–174, 2020. doi: 10.31331/jipva.v4i2.1301.
- G. Ackerman, “Brief Review of Fadel, C., & Trilling, B. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.,” Mar. 2010.
- L. Larson and T. Miller, “21st Century Skills: Prepare Students for the Future,” Kappa Delta Pi Rec., vol. 47, pp. 121–123, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1080/00228958.2011.10516575.
- F. Wati, Y. Turnip, and D. Priyandoko, “Science Literacy: How do High School Students Solve PISA Test Items?,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 895, p. 12166, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012166.
- A. Rohmatulloh, Z. Prasetyo, and H. Aji, “Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum for Science Learning,” Mimb. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 6, p. 105, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i1.15912.
- Toto, “STEM-based Science Learning Design in the 2013 Curriculum,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1233, p. 12094, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012094.
- P. Siahaan, A. Suryani, I. Kaniawati, E. Suhendi, and A. Samsudin, “Improving Students’ Science Process Skills through Simple Computer Simulations on Linear Motion Conceptions,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 812, p. 12017, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012017.
- E. F. S. Rini and F. Aldila, “Practicum Activity: Analysis of Science Process Skills and Students’ Critical Thinking Skills,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, pp. 54–61, May 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i2.322.
- I. Damopolii, V. Botutihe, and J. Hendriek Nunaki, “The contribution of science process skill towards students cognitive achievement through guided inquiry-based learning,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1317, p. 12184, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012184.
- I. J. Fitriyah and A. W. Muqoyyidin, Transformasi Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) sebagai Creative Thinking Skills dalam Pendidikan Abad 21. Eureka Media Aksara, 2024.
- I. J. Fitriyah, M. Munzil, Y. Affriyenni, and E. Hamimi, “Improving the competence of junior high school teachers in using PhET virtual lab media to support online learning,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2023. doi: 10.1063/5.0125247.
- A. Afandi, M. Sajidan, M. Akhyar, and N. Suryani, “Development Frameworks of the Indonesian Partnership 21st-Century Skills Standards for Prospective Science Teachers: A Delphi Study,” vol. 8, pp. 91–102, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v8i1.11647.
- A. W. Muqoyyidin, I. J. Fitriyah, and F. R. Mardasari, Integrasi Filsafat Pendidikan Islam dan Ilmu Sains : Menggali Sinergi dalam Pembentukan Karakter dan Pemahaman Alam. Eureka Media Aksara, 2024.
- N. D. Anggraini, A. Purwanto, and I. Sakti, “Pengaruh Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Pada Materi Usaha Dan Energi Kelas X IPA SMAN 3 Bengkulu Tengah,” J. Kumparan Fis., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 20–27, 2018, doi: 10.33369/jkf.1.3.20-27.
- A. Shtepura, “The Impact of Digital Technology on Digital Natives’ Learning: American Outlook,” Comp. Prof. Pedagog., vol. 8, pp. 128–133, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.2478/rpp-2018-0029.
- D. Sugiyono, “Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D,” 2013.
- A. T. Jebb, V. Ng, and L. Tay, “A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995-2019.,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, p. 637547, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637547.
- G. Guest and S. Wealth, “Using Guttman Scaling to Rank Wealth: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Data,” Field methods, vol. 12, pp. 346–357, 2000, doi: 10.1177/1525822X0001200406.
- R. DeVellis, “Scale development: theory and applications, applied social research methods. Sage Publications,” Thousand Oaks, pp. 1–216, Jan. 2003.
- M. Naeem, W. Ozuem, K. Howell, and S. Ranfagni, “A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 22, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1177/16094069231205789.
- R. Hake, “Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses,” Am. J. Phys. - AMER J PHYS, vol. 66, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1119/1.18809.
References
A. Kirkwood and L. Price, “Technology-enhanced Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A Critical Literature Review,” Learn. Media Technol., vol. 39, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1080/17439884.2013.770404.
R. Pea, “The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity,” J. Learn. Sci., vol. 13, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1303_6.
B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, and M. Bakia, “The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature,” Teach. Coll. Rec., vol. 115, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1177/016146811311500307.
M. Prince, “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, pp. 223–231, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.
S. Kocdar, “Designing Teaching and Learning for a Digital Age,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 18, May 2017, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.3107.
R. Clark, R. Mayer, and W. Thalheimer, “E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning,” Perform. Improv., vol. 42, May 2003, doi: 10.1002/pfi.4930420510.
I. J. Fitriyah, S. Saputro, and Sajidan, “Research Trends in Design Thinking Education: A Systematic Literature Review from 2014 to 2024,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 381–391, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.14.2.381.
M. Paulsen, “Theory and Practice of Online Learning,” Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 5, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v5i3.200.
S. Alessi and S. Trollip, Multimedia for Learning: Methods and Development. USA: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.
N. Sahu and P. S. Khare, Emerging Trends and Research in Education Technology. Delhi, India: ABS Book, 2022.
J. Cowan, “John Biggs 1999. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does,” High. Educ., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 374–376, 2000, doi: 10.1023/A:1004049006757.
M. Knowles, E. III, R. Swanson, and P. Robinson, The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. 2020. doi: 10.4324/9780429299612.
J. Keller, Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS Model Approach. 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1250-3.
R. Reiser, “Eight Trends Affecting the Field of Instructional Design and Technology: Opportunities and Challenges,” 2017, pp. 139–147. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-38956-1_11.
G. W. Jones and D. Pratomo, “Education in Indonesia: Trends, Differentials, and Implications for Development BT - Contemporary Demographic Transformations in China, India and Indonesia,” 2016, pp. 195–214. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24783-0_12.
I. J. Fitriyah and I. Fardhani, “Increase Students’ Motivation in Learning Science by Developing Instructional Media in The Form of Powtoon,” J. IPA Pembelajaran IPA, vol. 6, pp. 111–118, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.24815/jipi.v6i2.24639.
F. Putri, Z. Zainuddin, and S. Miriam, “Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing pada Materi Cahaya,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Fis., vol. 3, p. 24, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.20527/jipf.v3i1.1027.
Y. Affriyenni, G. Swalaganata, V. R. Mustikasari, and I. J. Fitriyah, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Fisika pada Materi Optik Geometri Berbasis Augmented Reality dengan Unity dan Vuforia,” JIPVA (Jurnal Pendidik. IPA Veteran), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 160–174, 2020. doi: 10.31331/jipva.v4i2.1301.
G. Ackerman, “Brief Review of Fadel, C., & Trilling, B. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.,” Mar. 2010.
L. Larson and T. Miller, “21st Century Skills: Prepare Students for the Future,” Kappa Delta Pi Rec., vol. 47, pp. 121–123, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1080/00228958.2011.10516575.
F. Wati, Y. Turnip, and D. Priyandoko, “Science Literacy: How do High School Students Solve PISA Test Items?,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 895, p. 12166, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012166.
A. Rohmatulloh, Z. Prasetyo, and H. Aji, “Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum for Science Learning,” Mimb. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 6, p. 105, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i1.15912.
Toto, “STEM-based Science Learning Design in the 2013 Curriculum,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1233, p. 12094, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012094.
P. Siahaan, A. Suryani, I. Kaniawati, E. Suhendi, and A. Samsudin, “Improving Students’ Science Process Skills through Simple Computer Simulations on Linear Motion Conceptions,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 812, p. 12017, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012017.
E. F. S. Rini and F. Aldila, “Practicum Activity: Analysis of Science Process Skills and Students’ Critical Thinking Skills,” Integr. Sci. Educ. J., vol. 4, pp. 54–61, May 2023, doi: 10.37251/isej.v4i2.322.
I. Damopolii, V. Botutihe, and J. Hendriek Nunaki, “The contribution of science process skill towards students cognitive achievement through guided inquiry-based learning,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1317, p. 12184, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012184.
I. J. Fitriyah and A. W. Muqoyyidin, Transformasi Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) sebagai Creative Thinking Skills dalam Pendidikan Abad 21. Eureka Media Aksara, 2024.
I. J. Fitriyah, M. Munzil, Y. Affriyenni, and E. Hamimi, “Improving the competence of junior high school teachers in using PhET virtual lab media to support online learning,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2023. doi: 10.1063/5.0125247.
A. Afandi, M. Sajidan, M. Akhyar, and N. Suryani, “Development Frameworks of the Indonesian Partnership 21st-Century Skills Standards for Prospective Science Teachers: A Delphi Study,” vol. 8, pp. 91–102, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v8i1.11647.
A. W. Muqoyyidin, I. J. Fitriyah, and F. R. Mardasari, Integrasi Filsafat Pendidikan Islam dan Ilmu Sains : Menggali Sinergi dalam Pembentukan Karakter dan Pemahaman Alam. Eureka Media Aksara, 2024.
N. D. Anggraini, A. Purwanto, and I. Sakti, “Pengaruh Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Pada Materi Usaha Dan Energi Kelas X IPA SMAN 3 Bengkulu Tengah,” J. Kumparan Fis., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 20–27, 2018, doi: 10.33369/jkf.1.3.20-27.
A. Shtepura, “The Impact of Digital Technology on Digital Natives’ Learning: American Outlook,” Comp. Prof. Pedagog., vol. 8, pp. 128–133, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.2478/rpp-2018-0029.
D. Sugiyono, “Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D,” 2013.
A. T. Jebb, V. Ng, and L. Tay, “A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995-2019.,” Front. Psychol., vol. 12, p. 637547, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637547.
G. Guest and S. Wealth, “Using Guttman Scaling to Rank Wealth: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Data,” Field methods, vol. 12, pp. 346–357, 2000, doi: 10.1177/1525822X0001200406.
R. DeVellis, “Scale development: theory and applications, applied social research methods. Sage Publications,” Thousand Oaks, pp. 1–216, Jan. 2003.
M. Naeem, W. Ozuem, K. Howell, and S. Ranfagni, “A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research,” Int. J. Qual. Methods, vol. 22, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1177/16094069231205789.
R. Hake, “Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses,” Am. J. Phys. - AMER J PHYS, vol. 66, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1119/1.18809.