Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 1, 2025
Accepted
August 21, 2025
Published
October 25, 2025
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 86 Download : 70

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine students' science literacy abilities, to know students' science literacy abilities based on learning styles, and to determine differences in students' science literacy based on learning styles in acid-base materials. This research is a non-experimental causal-comparative quantitative study with a sample of 62 students from 11th grade Science (MIPA) at MAN 1 Jombang, specifically classes XI-H and XI-I. The sample was selected using a purposive sampling techniques. The research instruments used were interviews for the preliminary study, a test consisting of 19 questions covering all literacy indicators with a test reliability score of 0.697, which is considered high, and a questionnaire to determine students' learning styles using the AkuPintar website. The interview results indicate that the school has implemented the independent curriculum, but the application of science literacy in learning is still limited to providing introductory readings before explaining the material and during practice exercises, and has not fully integrated the aspects of science literacy. The research results show that students' science literacy skills on acid-base materials fall into the medium category. Based on science literacy indicators, the high category is found in the indicators of researching, evaluating, and using scientific information for decision-making and action; the medium category is found in the indicator of explaining phenomena scientifically; and the high category is found in the indicators of designing and evaluating designs for scientific investigations and critically interpreting scientific data and evidence. Based on learning styles, students with a visual learning style have higher science literacy skills, followed by students with an auditory learning style and students with a kinesthetic learning style. Although there are differences in mean scores between learning styles, statistically no significant difference was found in students' science literacy abilities based on learning style. This indicates that efforts to improve science literacy should focus on enhancing the quality of teaching, student engagement, and strengthening scientific thinking skills, rather than solely on adapting teaching methods to specific learning styles.

Keywords

science literacy learning styles acids and bases

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Nurul Ulya Septiani, Ivan Ashif Ardhana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the simultaneously licenced under A Creative Commons Attribution (CC-By-SA) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the worsk's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

How to Cite
Septiani, N. U. ., & Ardhana, I. A. . (2025). Analysis of Students’ Scientific Literacy Ability in Terms of Learning Styles on Acid-Base Material. IJCER (International Journal of Chemistry Education Research), 9(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.20885/ijcer.vol9.iss2.art8
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. OECD, “PISA 2018 Results (Volume I),” OECD Publishing. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-i_5f07c754-en
  2. OECD, “Pisa 2022,” OECD Publishing. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en.html
  3. H. Fuadi, A. Z. Robbia, J. Jamaluddin, and A. W. Jufri, “Analisis Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik,” J. Ilm. Profesi Pendidik., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 108–116, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://jipp.unram.ac.id/index.php/jipp/article/view/122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v5i2.122
  4. C. A. Dewi and S. Rahayu, “Pentingnya Mengoptimalkan Literasi Kimia Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Isu-isu Sosiosaintifik di Abad Ke-21,” Proceeding Semin. Nas. IPA, pp. 348–359, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snipa/article/view/1371%0Ahttps://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snipa/article/download/1371/882
  5. OECD, “PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework,” OECD Publishing. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2018-assessment-and-analytical-framework_b25efab8-en.html
  6. M. Andriani, M. Muhali and C. A. Dewi, “Pengembangan Modul Kimia Berbasis Kontekstual Untuk Membangun Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Pada Materi Asam Basa,” HJKK., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://e-journal3.undikma.ac.id/index.php/hydrogen/article/view/1653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v7i1.1653
  7. R. Rahmadhani and Guspatni, “Deskrepsi Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SMAN 3 Padang Panjang pada Materi Asam Basa Kelas XI SMA/MA,” Arjuna, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 56–69, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.61132/arjuna.v1i4.77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61132/arjuna.v1i4.77
  8. E. N. Saputri, I. Wigati, and P. J. Laksono, “Kemampuan Literasi Kimia pada Aspek Kompetensi Sains pada Materi Asam Basa,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Pendidik. Kim., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 223–231, 2022.
  9. A. Caniago, “Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam memahami materi asam basa,” Skripsi, Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, UIN Ar-Raniry, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/13648/.
  10. T. Nofiarti, “Analisis Keterampilan Abad 21 Menggunakan Instrumen Tes Literasi Sains Pada Materi Asam Basa,” Bedelau J. Educ. Learn., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 8–12, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.55748/bjel.v2i1.51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55748/bjel.v2i1.51
  11. W. Sari, M. Suendarti, and S. Sumaryati, “Gaya belajar dan kebiasaan membaca berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan literasi sains siswa SMA Negeri di Kota Tangerang Selatan,” Alfarisi J. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 161–172, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/alfarisi/article/view/9574/5942
  12. N. B. Sumanik, E. Nurvitasari, and L. F. Siregar, “Analisis Profil Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Calon Guru Pendidikan Kimia,” Quantum J. Inov. Pendidik. Sains, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 22, 2021, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v12i1.10215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/quantum.v12i1.10215
  13. Nasution, Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2017.
  14. L. Rahmawati and S. Gumiandari, “Identifikasi Gaya Belajar (Visual, Auditorial Dan Kinestetik) Mahasiswa Tadris Bahasa Inggris Kelas 3F IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon,” Pedagog. J. Pendidik., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://journal.umpr.ac.id/index.php/pedagogik/article/view/1876. . DOI: https://doi.org/10.33084/pedagogik.v16i1.1876
  15. Y. Wahyuni, “Identifikasi Gaya Belajar (Visual, Auditorial, Kinestetik) Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Bung Hatta,” J. Penelit. dan Pembelajaran Mat., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 128–132, 2017, doi: 10.30870/jppm.v10i2.2037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i2.2037
  16. W. Waluyo, “Pengaruh Pendekatan Konstruktivistik dan Gaya Belajar Siswa terhadap Prestasi Belajar Kimia Siswa Kelas I Semester 2 SMA Negeri 1 Ngaglik Sleman Tahun Pelajaran 2003/2004,” Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, vol. 8, no. 1, Jun. 2006. doi: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v8i1.2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v8i1.2016
  17. M. A. S. Pangestu, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Di Smp Negeri 22 Surabaya,” Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://digilib.uinsa.ac.id/63891/
  18. H. Durasa, A.A.I.R. Sudiatmika, and I.W. Subagia, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Smp Pada Materi Pemanasan Global,” J. Penelit. dan Eval. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 51–36, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpepi.v12i1.930. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpepi.v12i1.930
  19. A. J. Khumairoh and I. A. Ardhana, “Scientific Literacy Skills Profiles Of Eleven Grade Students On Reaction Rates Topic,” J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kim)., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 74–81, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/j-pek/article/view/54406
  20. T. Mayasari and P. Paidi, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas Xi Sma Negeri Di Kota Yogyakarta Mata Pelajaran Biologi Ditinjau Dari Kefavoritan Sekolah,” J. Edukasi Biol., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 86–97, 2022, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/edubio.v8i2.18212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/edubio.v8i2.18212
  21. R. Yanti, T. Prihatin, and K. Khumaedi, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Ditinjau Dari Kebiasaan Membaca, Motivasi Belajar Dan Prestasi Belajar,” INKUIRI J. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 156, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v9i2.27422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v9i2.27422
  22. I. A. Ardhana, “Dampak Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL) terhadap Pengetahuan Metakognitif Siswa pada Topik Asam-Basa,” Hydrog. J. Kependidikan Kim., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://e-journal3.undikma.ac.id/index.php/hydrogen/article/view/2545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v8i1.2545
  23. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2019.
  24. Sugiyono, Statitsika Untuk Penelitian. 12th ed. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2007.
  25. Sardiyo, D. Rimbano, A. Famalika, N. Nadziro, and H. satria Diana, Metodologi Penelitian. Jawa Barat: Perkumpulan Rumah Cemerlang Indonesia, 2022.
  26. M. Amelia, M. Tawil, and A. A. Arsyad, “Deskripsi Kemampuan Literasi Sains Aspek Kompetensi Peserta Didik,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 80–84, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.62388/jpdp.v3i2.328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62388/jpdp.v3i2.328
  27. N. Wulandari and H. Sholihin, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Pada Aspek Pengetahuan Dan Kompetensi Sains Siswa Smp Pada Materi Kalor,” EDUSAINS, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 66–73, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i1.1762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i1.1762
  28. W. J. Musa, F. Zainudin, I. Isa, J. La Kilo, and A. K. Kilo, “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Ditinjau dari Aspek Kompetensi Sains Siswa pada Materi Global Warming,” Jambura J. Educ. Chem., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 142–149, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v5i2.12705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v5i2.12705
  29. OECD, “Pisa 2025 Science Framework,” OECD Publishing. [Online]. Available: https://pisa-framework.oecd.org/science-2025/
  30. L. N. Hanifah and E. R. Mulyaningrum, “Analisis Gaya Belajar Siswa Kelas X Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pada Materi Protista Di Sma Negeri 1 Godong,” J. Ilm. Edukasia, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 112–128, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.26877/jie.v1i1.7970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/jie.v1i1.7970
  31. B. De Porter and M. Hernacki, Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Bandung, Indonesia: Kaifa, 2013.
  32. S. R. Yunus, M. Tawil, and N. H. Muhiddin, “Laporan akhir penelitian,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://eprints.unm.ac.id/32976/
  33. N. Pitch, S. Shell, and F. Point, “Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning,” 2012. [Online]. Available: http://software-carpentry.org/2011/12/organizing-instruction-and-study-to-improve-student-learning/
  34. R. Djatmiko and K. Mahbubah, “Identifikasi Keterampilan Literasi Sains Siswa Pada Materi Asam Basa,” SCIENING : Sci. Learn. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 59–63, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.53682/slj.v3i1.4190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53682/slj.v3i1.4190